Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | COVID-19 | Research

Crossroads of well-being and compliance: a qualitative cohort study of visitor restriction policy during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Netherlands, May 2020-December 2021

Authors: Fatima Arrahmani, Annerike Gorter, Janneke Elberse, Anne H. Buitenhuis, Gerjo Kok, Pita Spruijt

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In this qualitative study we observed in-depth the impact of the visiting restriction policy (VRP, i.e. number of visitors allowed at home) on well-being and compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic to regulate infection rates.

Methods

A cohort of 15 interviewees was followed throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands in 12 interview rounds (May 2020-December 2021). Every round semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted by a team of 8 researchers. In total 176 interviews were conducted.

Results

This study showed that four categories can be identified when observing the impact of the VRP on well-being and compliance. For Resilient-Followers reasons for compliance were risk perception, following government rules, and for some having a small social circle. Because they accepted the situation, well-being was hardly affected. Resilient-Rulebreakers made their own risk assessment of people they met. Their well-being was hardly affected, because they experienced social rest and interpreted the measure in their own way. Suffering-Followers complied, because of risk perception, following government rules, and working in healthcare. However, the VRP had substantial impact on well-being, because social structures were disrupted. Suffering-Rulebreakers gave their own interpretation to the VRP, trying to find a balance between compliance and well-being. We observed that the categories were quite stable over time.

Conclusions

The VRP appeared to be a measure with substantial impact on well-being for some, mostly because social structures were disrupted. The measure showed fluctuating compliance, in which feasibility and frequent changes in the VRP played a role. Well-being seemed related to the number of visitors that was allowed; a restriction of four visitors was feasible, while one visitor resulted in a negative breaking-point in resilience, which had an impact on compliance, even among the most compliant. Taken together, this study provides valuable insights into the implications of and compliance to a VRP during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, which may contribute to policymaking during future pandemics.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Du Long K, Verhoeven L. Brabantse monitor maatschappelijke effecten coronavirus. Resultaten meting 8 - mei 2021 12 t/m 17 mei. Het PON & Telos, 2021. Du Long K, Verhoeven L. Brabantse monitor maatschappelijke effecten coronavirus. Resultaten meting 8 - mei 2021 12 t/m 17 mei. Het PON & Telos, 2021.
3.
4.
go back to reference Du Long K, Verhoeven L. Brabantse monitor maatschappelijke effecten coronavirus. Resultaten meting 5. Tilburg: Het PON, 14 October 2020. Du Long K, Verhoeven L. Brabantse monitor maatschappelijke effecten coronavirus. Resultaten meting 5. Tilburg: Het PON, 14 October 2020.
5.
go back to reference Engbersen G, Van Bochove M, De Boom J, Etienne T, Krouwel A, Van Lindert J, et al. De ongeduldige samenleving. De maatschappelijke impact van covid-19 in Amsterdam, Den Haag, Rotterdam & Nederland. Rotterdam: Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences & Kenniswerkplaats Leefbare Wijken; 2021. Engbersen G, Van Bochove M, De Boom J, Etienne T, Krouwel A, Van Lindert J, et al. De ongeduldige samenleving. De maatschappelijke impact van covid-19 in Amsterdam, Den Haag, Rotterdam & Nederland. Rotterdam: Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences & Kenniswerkplaats Leefbare Wijken; 2021.
6.
go back to reference Harbers MM, Hulshof T, Schaink, R, Schrijvers C.T.M. Inventarisatie Nederlandse COVID-19 onderzoeken: preventie en zorg & brede maatschappelijke vraagstukken: rapportage nr. 10: leefstijl en lichamelijke gezondheid. Bilthoven: RIVM; 2021. Harbers MM, Hulshof T, Schaink, R, Schrijvers C.T.M. Inventarisatie Nederlandse COVID-19 onderzoeken: preventie en zorg & brede maatschappelijke vraagstukken: rapportage nr. 10: leefstijl en lichamelijke gezondheid. Bilthoven: RIVM; 2021.
8.
go back to reference Van Lindert J, Van Heck L, Etienne T, Kutiyski Y, Krouwel A. Impact van het coronavirus (covid-19) op het sociale welzijn van Gelderlanders - achtste wave. Kieskompas; 2020. Van Lindert J, Van Heck L, Etienne T, Kutiyski Y, Krouwel A. Impact van het coronavirus (covid-19) op het sociale welzijn van Gelderlanders - achtste wave. Kieskompas; 2020.
9.
go back to reference Petherick A, Goldszmidt R, Andrade EB, Furst R, Hale T, Pott A, Wood A. A worldwide assessment of changes in adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviours and hypothesized pandemic fatigue. Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5(9):1145–60.CrossRefPubMed Petherick A, Goldszmidt R, Andrade EB, Furst R, Hale T, Pott A, Wood A. A worldwide assessment of changes in adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviours and hypothesized pandemic fatigue. Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5(9):1145–60.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wright L, Steptoe A, Fancourt D. Patterns of compliance with COVID-19 preventive behaviours: a latent class analysis of 20 000 UK adults. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022;76(3):247–53.CrossRefPubMed Wright L, Steptoe A, Fancourt D. Patterns of compliance with COVID-19 preventive behaviours: a latent class analysis of 20 000 UK adults. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022;76(3):247–53.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Van den Boom W, Van Dijk M, Snijders B, Luijben G, Van der Laan J, Euser S, Sanders JG, Buitenhuis AH, Spruijt P, Kroese F, Lambooij M, Muhren Y, Tak N, Van der Swaluw K, Van Rossum C, Nielen T, Elberse J, Renes RJ, Leurs M, de Bruin M. Cohort profile: The Corona Behavioral Unit cohort, a longitudinal mixed-methods study on COVID-19-related behavior, well-being and policy support in the Netherlands. Plos One. 2023; 18(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289294. PMID: 37523360; PMCID: PMC10389736. Van den Boom W, Van Dijk M, Snijders B, Luijben G, Van der Laan J, Euser S, Sanders JG, Buitenhuis AH, Spruijt P, Kroese F, Lambooij M, Muhren Y, Tak N, Van der Swaluw K, Van Rossum C, Nielen T, Elberse J, Renes RJ, Leurs M, de Bruin M. Cohort profile: The Corona Behavioral Unit cohort, a longitudinal mixed-methods study on COVID-19-related behavior, well-being and policy support in the Netherlands. Plos One. 2023; 18(7). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0289294. PMID: 37523360; PMCID: PMC10389736.
18.
go back to reference Champion VL, Skinner CS. The health belief model. In Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (Eds.). San Francisco: Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice; 2015. p. 75–94 John Wiley & Sons. Champion VL, Skinner CS. The health belief model. In Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (Eds.). San Francisco: Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice; 2015. p. 75–94 John Wiley & Sons.
Metadata
Title
Crossroads of well-being and compliance: a qualitative cohort study of visitor restriction policy during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Netherlands, May 2020-December 2021
Authors
Fatima Arrahmani
Annerike Gorter
Janneke Elberse
Anne H. Buitenhuis
Gerjo Kok
Pita Spruijt
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
COVID-19
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17665-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue