Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

Using web conferencing to engage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people in research: a feasibility study

Authors: Kate Anderson, Alana Gall, Tamara Butler, Brian Arley, Kirsten Howard, Alan Cass, Gail Garvey

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

While web conferencing technologies are being widely used in communication and collaboration, their uptake in conducting research field work has been relatively slow. The benefits that these technologies offer researchers for engaging with hard-to-reach populations are beginning to be recognised, however, the acceptability and feasibility of using web conferencing technology to engage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people in research is unknown.

Objective

This study aims to evaluate whether the use of web conferencing to engage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people in research is an acceptable and feasible alternative to conventional face-to-face methods.

Methods

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people aged between 18 and 24 years were recruited via emails, flyers and snowballing to participate in an Online Yarning Circle (OYC) about wellbeing conducted via web conferencing. Five young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians were trained as peer facilitators and each conducted one or more OYCs with support from an experienced Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander researcher. The OYCs were recorded and the researchers conducted post-OYC interviews with the facilitators. OYC recordings, facilitator interviews and researchers’ reflections about the method were analysed to assess acceptability and feasibility for use with this population.

Results

11 OYCs were conducted with 21 participants. The evaluation focused on (a) acceptability of the method for participants and facilitators and (b) feasibility of data collection method and procedures for use in research. Our evaluation revealed good acceptability and feasibility of the method, with only minor challenges experienced, which were predominantly logistical in nature and related to scheduling, obtaining documentation of consent, and technical issues. These challenges were offset by the greater control over the level of engagement that was comfortable for individual participants and the greater ease with which they felt they could withdraw from participating. This shift in the traditional researcher-participant power dynamic was recognised by both participants and peer facilitators and was regarded as a support for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people’s participation in research.

Conclusions

The use of web conferencing to engage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people in research offers an acceptable and feasible alternative to face-to-face research methods. The benefits conferred by these technologies associated with yielding greater control and power to the research participant has broad relevance to research with marginalised populations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lobe B, Morgan D, Hoffman KA. Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. Int J Qual Methods. 2020;19:1609406920937875.CrossRef Lobe B, Morgan D, Hoffman KA. Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. Int J Qual Methods. 2020;19:1609406920937875.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kite J, Phongsavan P. Insights for conducting real-time focus groups online using a web conferencing service. F1000Res. 2017;6:122.CrossRef Kite J, Phongsavan P. Insights for conducting real-time focus groups online using a web conferencing service. F1000Res. 2017;6:122.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dodds S, Hess AC. "Adapting research methodology during COVID-19: lessons for transformative service research". Journal of Service Management. 2021;32(2):203-17. Dodds S, Hess AC. "Adapting research methodology during COVID-19: lessons for transformative service research". Journal of Service Management. 2021;32(2):203-17.
4.
go back to reference Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS, et al. Our future: a lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet. 2016;387(10036):2423–78.CrossRef Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS, et al. Our future: a lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet. 2016;387(10036):2423–78.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adolescent and youth health and wellbeing. Canberra: AIHW; 2018. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adolescent and youth health and wellbeing. Canberra: AIHW; 2018.
6.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics. Data Cube - Estimated resident Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous populations, Remoteness Areas, single year of age - 30 June 2016. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2018. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Data Cube - Estimated resident Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous populations, Remoteness Areas, single year of age - 30 June 2016. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2018.
7.
go back to reference Ralph S, Ryan K. Addressing the mental health gap in working with indigenous youth: some considerations for non-indigenous psychologists working with indigenous youth. Aust Psychol. 2017;52(4):288–98.CrossRef Ralph S, Ryan K. Addressing the mental health gap in working with indigenous youth: some considerations for non-indigenous psychologists working with indigenous youth. Aust Psychol. 2017;52(4):288–98.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Usher K, Marriott R, Smallwood R, et al. COVID-19 and social restrictions: the potential mental health impact of social distancing and isolation for young indigenous Australians. Australasian Psychiatry. 2020;28(5):599–600.CrossRef Usher K, Marriott R, Smallwood R, et al. COVID-19 and social restrictions: the potential mental health impact of social distancing and isolation for young indigenous Australians. Australasian Psychiatry. 2020;28(5):599–600.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Laycock A, Walker D, Harrison N, Brands J. Researching indigenous health: a practical guide for researchers. Melbourne: The Lowitja Institute; 2011. Laycock A, Walker D, Harrison N, Brands J. Researching indigenous health: a practical guide for researchers. Melbourne: The Lowitja Institute; 2011.
10.
go back to reference Bonevski B, Randell M, Paul C, et al. Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:42.CrossRef Bonevski B, Randell M, Paul C, et al. Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:42.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Harfield S, Pearson O, Morey K, et al. Assessing the quality of health research from an indigenous perspective: the Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander quality appraisal tool. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):79.CrossRef Harfield S, Pearson O, Morey K, et al. Assessing the quality of health research from an indigenous perspective: the Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander quality appraisal tool. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):79.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Alvesson M, Skoldburg K. Reflexive methodology. London: Sage; 2000. Alvesson M, Skoldburg K. Reflexive methodology. London: Sage; 2000.
13.
go back to reference Nilson C. A journey toward cultural competence: the role of researcher reflexivity in indigenous research. J Transcult Nurs. 2017;28(2):119–27.CrossRef Nilson C. A journey toward cultural competence: the role of researcher reflexivity in indigenous research. J Transcult Nurs. 2017;28(2):119–27.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Devotta K, Woodhall-Melnik J, Pedersen C, et al. Enriching qualitative research by engaging peer interviewers: a case study. Qual Res. 2016;16(6):661–80.CrossRef Devotta K, Woodhall-Melnik J, Pedersen C, et al. Enriching qualitative research by engaging peer interviewers: a case study. Qual Res. 2016;16(6):661–80.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bessarab D, Ng'andu B. Yarning about yarning as a legitimate method in indigenous research. Int J Critical Indigenous Stud. 2010;3(1):37–50.CrossRef Bessarab D, Ng'andu B. Yarning about yarning as a legitimate method in indigenous research. Int J Critical Indigenous Stud. 2010;3(1):37–50.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Faulkhead S, Russell L. What is Australian Indigenous Oral History? International Oral History Association Conference. Sydney; 2006. Faulkhead S, Russell L. What is Australian Indigenous Oral History? International Oral History Association Conference. Sydney; 2006.
17.
go back to reference Orsmond GI, Cohn ES. The distinctive features of a feasibility study: objectives and guiding questions. OTJR. 2015;35(3):169–77.PubMed Orsmond GI, Cohn ES. The distinctive features of a feasibility study: objectives and guiding questions. OTJR. 2015;35(3):169–77.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Deakin H, Wakefield K. Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers. Qual Res. 2013;14(5):603–16.CrossRef Deakin H, Wakefield K. Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers. Qual Res. 2013;14(5):603–16.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hanna P. Using internet technologies (such as skype) as a research medium: a research note. Qual Res. 2012;12(2):239–42.CrossRef Hanna P. Using internet technologies (such as skype) as a research medium: a research note. Qual Res. 2012;12(2):239–42.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Seitz S. Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via skype: a research note. Qual Res. 2015;16(2):229–35.CrossRef Seitz S. Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via skype: a research note. Qual Res. 2015;16(2):229–35.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Krouwel M, Jolly K, Greenfield S. Comparing skype (video calling) and in-person qualitative interview modes in a study of people with irritable bowel syndrome – an exploratory comparative analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):219.CrossRef Krouwel M, Jolly K, Greenfield S. Comparing skype (video calling) and in-person qualitative interview modes in a study of people with irritable bowel syndrome – an exploratory comparative analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):219.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Han J, Torok M, Gale N, et al. Use of web conferencing Technology for Conducting Online Focus Groups among Young People with Lived Experience of suicidal thoughts: mixed methods research. JMIR Ment Health. 2019;6(10):e14191.CrossRef Han J, Torok M, Gale N, et al. Use of web conferencing Technology for Conducting Online Focus Groups among Young People with Lived Experience of suicidal thoughts: mixed methods research. JMIR Ment Health. 2019;6(10):e14191.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Using web conferencing to engage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people in research: a feasibility study
Authors
Kate Anderson
Alana Gall
Tamara Butler
Brian Arley
Kirsten Howard
Alan Cass
Gail Garvey
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01366-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2021 Go to the issue