Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Irritable Bowel Syndrome | Research article

Comparing Skype (video calling) and in-person qualitative interview modes in a study of people with irritable bowel syndrome – an exploratory comparative analysis

Authors: Matthew Krouwel, Kate Jolly, Sheila Greenfield

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Within qualitative research in-person interviews have the reputation for being the highest standard of interviewer-participant encounter. However, there are other approaches to interviewing such as telephone and e-mail, which may be appropriate for a variety of reasons such as cost, time and privacy. Although there has been much discussion of the relative values of different interview methods, little research has been conducted to assess what differentiates them using quantifiable measures. None of this research has addressed the video call, which is the interview mode most like the in-person interview. This study uses quantifiable measures generated by the interview to explore the relative value of in-person and video call interview modes.

Methods

Interview data gathered by a qualitative research study exploring the views of people with IBS about hypnotherapy for their condition were used. In-person and video call interviews using the same topic guide were compared on measures of length (time and word count), proportion of time the interviewer was dominant, the number of topics generated (codes) and the number of individual statements on which those topics were based.

Results

Both interview methods produced a similar number of words and a similar number of topics (codes) were discussed, however the number of statements upon which the variety of topics was based was notably larger for the in-person interviews.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that in in-person study interviews were marginally superior to video calls in that interviewees said more, although this was on a similar range of topics. However, the difference is sufficiently modest that time and budget constraints may justify the use of some video call interviews within a qualitative research study.
Literature
1.
McCoyd JL, Kerson TS. Conducting intensive interviews using email: a serendipitous comparative opportunity. Qual Soc Work. 2006;5(3):389–406.CrossRef
2.
Opdenakker R, editor. Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research; 2006.
3.
Hamilton RJ, Bowers BJ. Internet recruitment and e-mail interviews in qualitative studies. Qual Health Res. 2006;16(6):821–35.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Flynn N. Instant messaging rules: a business guide to managing policies, security, and legal issues for safe IM communication: AMACOM div American mgmt Assn; 2004.
5.
Hinchcliffe V, Gavin H. Social and virtual networks: evaluating synchronous online interviewing using instant messenger. Qual Rep. 2009;14(2):318.
6.
Bertrand C, Bourdeau L. Research interviews by Skype: A new data collection method; 2010.
7.
8.
9.
Deakin H, Wakefield K. Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers. Qual Res. 2014;14(5):603–16.CrossRef
10.
Saumure K, Given L. Using Skype as a research tool: Lessons learned from qualitative interviews with distance students in a teacher-librarianship program. library research seminar organized and hosted by the iSchool at Maryland College of Information Studies; 2010.
11.
Hanna P. Using internet technologies (such as Skype) as a research medium: a research note. Qual Res. 2012;12(2):239–42.CrossRef
12.
13.
Seitz S. Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via Skype: a research note. Qual Res. 2016;16(2):229–35.CrossRef
14.
Hay-Gibson NV. Interviews via VoIP: benefits and disadvantages within a PhD study of SMEs. Libr Inf Res. 2010;33(105):39–50.
15.
Weller S. The potentials and pitfalls of using Skype for qualitative (longitudinal) interviews; 2015.
16.
Cater JK. Skype a cost-effective method for qualitative research. Rehabil Counselors Educ J. 2011;4(2):3.
17.
18.
Sedgwick M, Spiers J. The use of videoconferencing as a medium for the qualitative interview. Int J Qual Methods. 2009;8(1):1–11.CrossRef
19.
Oates J. Use of Skype in interviews: The impact of the medium in a study of mental health nurses. Nurs Res. 2015;22(4):13.CrossRef
20.
Cook C. Email interviewing: generating data with a vulnerable population. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68(6):1330–9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
22.
Sullivan JR. Skype: an appropriate method of data collection for qualitative interviews? Hilltop Rev. 2012;6(1):10.
23.
Irvine A. Duration, dominance and depth in telephone and face-to-face interviews: a comparative exploration. Int J Qual Methods. 2011;10(3):202–20.CrossRef
24.
Taylor B, Henshall C, Kenyon S, Litchfield I, Greenfield S. Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8(10):e019993.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Weinmann T, Thomas S, Brilmayer S, Heinrich S, Radon K. Testing Skype as an interview method in epidemiologic research: response and feasibility. Int J public health. 2012;57(6):959–61.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Krouwel M, Jolly K, Greenfield S. How do people with refractory irritable bowel syndrome perceive hypnotherapy: qualitative study protocol. European J Int Med. 2019;26:50–5.CrossRef
27.
28.
Reme SE, Darnley S, Kennedy T, Chalder T. The development of the irritable bowel syndrome-behavioral responses questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2010;69(3):319–25.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Dalrymple J, Bullock I. Diagnosis and management of irritable bowel syndrome in adults in primary care: summary of NICE guidance. Bmj. 2008;336(7643):556–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
Bertram S, Kurland M, Lydick E, LOCKE GRI, Yawn BP. The patient's perspective of irritable bowel syndrome. J Fam Pract. 2001;50(6):521.PubMed
31.
Ford AC, Lacy BE, Harris LA, Quigley EM, Moayyedi P. Effect of antidepressants and psychological therapies in irritable bowel syndrome: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;1:21-39.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2016;5(1):1–4.CrossRef
33.
Burnard P. A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Educ Today. 1991;11(6):461–6.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Krouwel M, Jolly K, Greenfield S. How do people with refractory irritable bowel syndrome perceive hypnotherapy?: qualitative study. Complement Ther Med. 2019;45(August 2019):65–70.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Miller JL, Grosjean F, Lomanto C. Articulation rate and its variability in spontaneous speech: a reanalysis and some implications. Phonetica. 1984;41(4):215–25.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Morgan DL. Qualitative content analysis: a guide to paths not taken. Qual Health Res. 1993;3(1):112–21.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Kvale S. Dominance through interviews and dialogues. Qual Inq. 2006;12(3):480–500.CrossRef
38.
Schneider MA, Fletcher PC. ‘I feel as if my IBS is keeping me hostage!‘exploring the negative impact of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) upon university-aged women. Int J Nurs Pract. 2008;14(2):135–48.PubMedCrossRef
39.
K-s K, M-k B, Lee W-h, H-s C, O-y K, C-h Y. Effects of breathing maneuver and sitting posture on muscle activity in inspiratory accessory muscles in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2012;7(1):9.CrossRef
40.
Hoit JD. Influence of body position on breathing and its implications for the evaluation and treatment of speech and voice disorders. J Voice. 1995;9(4):341–7.PubMedCrossRef
41.
42.
O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Drabble SJ, Rudolph A, Goode J, Hewison J. Maximising the value of combining qualitative research and randomised controlled trials in health research: the QUAlitative Research in Trials (QUART) study--a mixed methods study. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18:38.
43.
Chenail RJ. Interviewing the investigator: strategies for addressing instrumentation and researcher bias concerns in qualitative research. Qual Rep. 2011;16(1):255–62.
44.
Mellon J, Prosser C. Twitter and Facebook are not representative of the general population: political attitudes and demographics of British social media users. Res Polit. 2017;4(3):2053168017720008.
45.
Creswell JW. Five qualitative approaches to inquiry. Qual Inq Res Des. 2007;2:53–80.
Metadata
Title
Comparing Skype (video calling) and in-person qualitative interview modes in a study of people with irritable bowel syndrome – an exploratory comparative analysis
Authors
Matthew Krouwel
Kate Jolly
Sheila Greenfield
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0867-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research article

A co-produced method to involve service users in research: the SUCCESS model

Debate

DEBATE-statistical analysis plans for observational studies

Technical advance

A Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression model of multiple informant family health histories

Research article

Chart validation of an algorithm for identifying hereditary progressive muscular dystrophy in healthcare claims

Debate

Pragmatic trials and implementation science: grounds for divorce?

Research article

An application of a pattern-mixture model with multiple imputation for the analysis of longitudinal trials with protocol deviations