Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Validity and reliability of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index for stroke patients

Authors: Tomoko Ohura, Kimitaka Hase, Yoshie Nakajima, Takeo Nakayama

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Barthel Index (BI) is a measure of independence in activities of daily living (ADL). In the modified Barthel Index (MBI), a five-point system replaced the original two or three or four point rating system. Based on this modified measure, the performance evaluation tool MBI (PET-MBI) was developed in Japan. Although the reliability and validity of PET-MBI have been verified for older people, the use of this tool in stroke patients has not been evaluated. This study investigated the validity and reliability of PET-MBI for stroke patients.

Methods

Ten raters independently determined the BI and PET-MBI scores of stroke patients by direct observation. These patients’ ADL were videotaped, and 10 other raters then evaluated the videos privately and assigned PET-MBI scores twice, one month apart. The criterion-related validity of the PET-MBI against the BI was evaluated using the correlation coefficients for their total scores. Furthermore, to assess inter- and intra-rater reliabilities from the results of the first and second sessions, Fleiss’ intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for the total scores, with the lower limits of the 95% confidence interval (95%CI), along with weighted kappa (κw) coefficients for agreement in individual tasks of this evaluation tool. ICC and κw coefficients of 0.81–1.00 were considered to be “almost perfect” agreement.

Results

The mean age of the 30 patients (23 men, 7 women) was 71.9 (standard deviation 10.5) years. One patient had diplegia, 14 had right hemiplegia, and 15 had left hemiplegia. For the total scores obtained by direct evaluation, Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients of the BI versus the PET-MBI were both 0.95 (lower limit of the 95%CI, 0.90). The ICC representing inter-rater reliability for the first session was 0.99 (lower limit of the 95%CI, 0.98]. For intra-rater reliability, the mean value of the ICCs was 0.99 (range, 0.99–1.00). For individual tasks of the PET-MBI, inter-rater κw coefficients for the first session ranged from 0.77 to 0.94, with intra-rater κw coefficients from 0.85 to 0.96.

Conclusions

PET-MBI showed strong criterion-related validity against the BI, with high reliabilities. This scoring system may become a convenient tool allowing anyone to assess ADL.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Barnes MP, Ward AB. Oxford Handbook of Rehabilitation Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. Barnes MP, Ward AB. Oxford Handbook of Rehabilitation Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
3.
go back to reference The Japan Stroke Society, The Joint Committee on Guidelines for the Management of Stroke. Japanese Guidelines for the Management of Stroke 2015. Tokyo: Kyowa Kikaku Ltd.; 2015. The Japan Stroke Society, The Joint Committee on Guidelines for the Management of Stroke. Japanese Guidelines for the Management of Stroke 2015. Tokyo: Kyowa Kikaku Ltd.; 2015.
4.
go back to reference Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5.PubMed Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:703–9.CrossRefPubMed Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:703–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10:61–3.CrossRefPubMed Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10:61–3.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Granger CV, Albrecht GL, Hamilton BB. Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: measurement by PULSES profile and the Barthel Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979;60:145–54.PubMed Granger CV, Albrecht GL, Hamilton BB. Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: measurement by PULSES profile and the Barthel Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979;60:145–54.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Fortinsky RH, Granger CV, Seltzer GB. The use of functional assessment in understanding home care needs. Med Care. 1981;19:489–97.CrossRefPubMed Fortinsky RH, Granger CV, Seltzer GB. The use of functional assessment in understanding home care needs. Med Care. 1981;19:489–97.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, Zielezny M, Sherwin FS. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 1986;1:59–74.CrossRef Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, Zielezny M, Sherwin FS. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 1986;1:59–74.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC, Hens MM. Functional assessment scales: a study of persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:870–5.PubMed Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC, Hens MM. Functional assessment scales: a study of persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:870–5.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Chino N, Sonoda S, Domen K, Saitoh E, Kimura A. Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS): A new evaluation instrument for stroke patients. Japn J Rehabil Med. 1994;31:119–25.CrossRef Chino N, Sonoda S, Domen K, Saitoh E, Kimura A. Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS): A new evaluation instrument for stroke patients. Japn J Rehabil Med. 1994;31:119–25.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604–7.CrossRefPubMed van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ohura T, Ishizaki T, Higashi T, Konishi K, Ishiguro R, Nakanishi K, et al. Reliability and validity tests of an evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2011;18:422–8.CrossRef Ohura T, Ishizaki T, Higashi T, Konishi K, Ishiguro R, Nakanishi K, et al. Reliability and validity tests of an evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2011;18:422–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ohura T, Higashi T, Ishizaki T, Nakayama T. Assessment of the validity and internal consistency of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index Japanese version for elderly people living at home. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:1971–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ohura T, Higashi T, Ishizaki T, Nakayama T. Assessment of the validity and internal consistency of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index Japanese version for elderly people living at home. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:1971–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Ad Hoc Committee (Whisnant JP, Basford JR, Bernstein EF, et al.). Classification of cerebrovascular diseases III. Stroke 1990;21:637–676.CrossRef National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Ad Hoc Committee (Whisnant JP, Basford JR, Bernstein EF, et al.). Classification of cerebrovascular diseases III. Stroke 1990;21:637–676.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ohta T, Waga S, Handa H, et al. New grading of level of disordered consciousness. No Shinkei Geka. 1974;2:623–7. (in Japanese)PubMed Ohta T, Waga S, Handa H, et al. New grading of level of disordered consciousness. No Shinkei Geka. 1974;2:623–7. (in Japanese)PubMed
17.
go back to reference Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98.CrossRefPubMed Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Folstein MF, et al. (translated by M. Sugishita) Mini mental state examination – Japanese. Tokyo: Nihon Bunka Kagakusha Co., Ltd; 2012. Folstein MF, et al. (translated by M. Sugishita) Mini mental state examination – Japanese. Tokyo: Nihon Bunka Kagakusha Co., Ltd; 2012.
19.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Goldstein LB, Samsa GP. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. Stroke. 1997;28:307–10.CrossRefPubMed Goldstein LB, Samsa GP. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. Stroke. 1997;28:307–10.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Shinohara Y, Minematsu K, Amano T, Ohashi Y. Modified Rankin scale with expanded guidance scheme and interview questionnaire: interrater agreement and reproducibility of assessment. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;21:271–8.CrossRefPubMed Shinohara Y, Minematsu K, Amano T, Ohashi Y. Modified Rankin scale with expanded guidance scheme and interview questionnaire: interrater agreement and reproducibility of assessment. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;21:271–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Fricke J, Unsworth CA. Inter-rater reliability of the original and modified Barthel Index, and a comparison with the Functional Independence Measure. Aust Occup Ther J. 1996;43:22–9. Fricke J, Unsworth CA. Inter-rater reliability of the original and modified Barthel Index, and a comparison with the Functional Independence Measure. Aust Occup Ther J. 1996;43:22–9.
23.
go back to reference Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke. 2000;31:1429–38.CrossRefPubMed Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke. 2000;31:1429–38.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Validity and reliability of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index for stroke patients
Authors
Tomoko Ohura
Kimitaka Hase
Yoshie Nakajima
Takeo Nakayama
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0409-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2017 Go to the issue