Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Emergency Medicine 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Pneumothorax | Research

Towards enhanced telephone triage for chest pain: a Delphi study to define life-threatening conditions that must be identified

Authors: Ahmed Alotaibi, Richard Body, Simon Carley, Elspeth Pennington

Published in: BMC Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Improving telephone triage for patients with chest pain has been identified as a national research priority. However, there is a lack of strong evidence to define the life-threatening conditions (LTCs) that telephone triage ought to identify. Therefore, we aimed to build consensus for the LTCs associated with chest pain that ought to be identified during telephone triage for emergency calls.

Methods

We conducted a Delphi study in three rounds. Twenty experts in pre-hospital care and emergency medicine experience from the UK were invited to participate. In round I, experts were asked to list all LTCs that would require priority 1, 2, and 4 ambulance responses. Round II was a ranking evaluation, and round III was a consensus round. Consensus level was predefined at > = 70%.

Results

A total of 15 participants responded to round one and 10 to rounds two and three. Of 185 conditions initially identified by the experts, 26 reached consensus in the final round. Ten conditions met consensus for requiring priority 1 response: oesophageal perforation/rupture; ST elevation myocardial infarction; non-ST elevation myocardial infarction with clinical compromise (defined, also by consensus, as oxygen saturation < 90%, heart rate < 40/min or systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg); acute heart failure; cardiac tamponade; life-threatening asthma; cardiac arrest; tension pneumothorax and massive pulmonary embolism. An additional six conditions met consensus for priority 2 response, and three for priority 4 response.

Conclusion

Using expert consensus, we have defined the LTCs that may present with chest pain, which ought to receive a high-priority ambulance response. This list of conditions can now form a composite primary outcome for future studies to derive and validate clinical prediction models that will optimise telephone triage for patients with a primary complaint of chest pain.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pedersen CK, et al. Chest pain in the ambulance; prevalence, causes and outcome - a retrospective cohort study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019;27(1):84.CrossRef Pedersen CK, et al. Chest pain in the ambulance; prevalence, causes and outcome - a retrospective cohort study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019;27(1):84.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference George S. Using a structured clinical assessment to identify the cause of chest pain. p. 59–66. 2019 George S. Using a structured clinical assessment to identify the cause of chest pain. p. 59–66. 2019
5.
go back to reference Ashley Brown M, Slovis CM, McKinney J, Brywczynski J, Dingle HE. The Five Deadly Causes of Chest Pain Other than Myocardial Infarction. JEMS. 2017;42(1). Ashley Brown M, Slovis CM, McKinney J, Brywczynski J, Dingle HE. The Five Deadly Causes of Chest Pain Other than Myocardial Infarction. JEMS. 2017;42(1).
7.
go back to reference Deakin CD, et al. Does telephone triage of emergency (999) calls using advanced medical priority dispatch (AMPDS) with Department of Health (DH) call prioritisation effectively identify patients with an acute coronary syndrome? An audit of 42,657 emergency calls to Hampshire ambulance service NHS trust. Emergency Med J. 2006;23(3):232–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2004.022962.CrossRef Deakin CD, et al. Does telephone triage of emergency (999) calls using advanced medical priority dispatch (AMPDS) with Department of Health (DH) call prioritisation effectively identify patients with an acute coronary syndrome? An audit of 42,657 emergency calls to Hampshire ambulance service NHS trust. Emergency Med J. 2006;23(3):232–5. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​emj.​2004.​022962.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lidal IB, Holte HH, Vist GE. Triage systems for pre-hospital emergency medical services - a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21(1):28.CrossRef Lidal IB, Holte HH, Vist GE. Triage systems for pre-hospital emergency medical services - a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21(1):28.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hoikka M, et al. Medical priority dispatch codes—comparison with National Early Warning Score. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24(1):142.CrossRef Hoikka M, et al. Medical priority dispatch codes—comparison with National Early Warning Score. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24(1):142.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Torlén K, et al. A comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017;25(1):122.CrossRef Torlén K, et al. A comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017;25(1):122.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Turner J, J C, Chambers D, Cantrell A, Phung V-H, Knowles E, et al. What evidence is there on the effectiveness of different models of delivering urgent care? A rapid review. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2015. Turner J, J C, Chambers D, Cantrell A, Phung V-H, Knowles E, et al. What evidence is there on the effectiveness of different models of delivering urgent care? A rapid review. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2015.
16.
go back to reference Lindström V, et al. 51 evaluation of ambulance dispatch when two triage scales are used in the pre-hospital system. BMJ Open. 2018;8(Suppl 1):A19. Lindström V, et al. 51 evaluation of ambulance dispatch when two triage scales are used in the pre-hospital system. BMJ Open. 2018;8(Suppl 1):A19.
17.
go back to reference Schmidt TA, Cone DC, Mann NC. Criteria currently used to evaluate dispatch triage systems: where do they leave us? Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004;8(2):126–9.PubMed Schmidt TA, Cone DC, Mann NC. Criteria currently used to evaluate dispatch triage systems: where do they leave us? Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004;8(2):126–9.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Janette Turner RJ, Crum A, Coster J, Stone T, Nicholl J. Ambulance Response Programme; 2017. Janette Turner RJ, Crum A, Coster J, Stone T, Nicholl J. Ambulance Response Programme; 2017.
23.
go back to reference Van De Glind I, et al. A national research agenda for pre-hospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi-study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24(1):2.CrossRef Van De Glind I, et al. A national research agenda for pre-hospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi-study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24(1):2.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Towards enhanced telephone triage for chest pain: a Delphi study to define life-threatening conditions that must be identified
Authors
Ahmed Alotaibi
Richard Body
Simon Carley
Elspeth Pennington
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-227X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00553-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Emergency Medicine 1/2021 Go to the issue