Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original research

A national research agenda for pre-hospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi-study

Authors: Irene van de Glind, Sivera Berben, Fon Zeegers, Henk Poppen, Margreet Hoogeveen, Ina Bolt, Pierre van Grunsven, Lilian Vloet

Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In pre-hospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) more research is needed to direct and underpin care delivery and inform policy. To target future research efforts, this study aimed to determine future research priorities with representatives of the EMS field.

Methods

A four-round online Delphi survey was used to discuss different viewpoints and reach consensus on research priorities. A multidisciplinary panel of experts was recruited in the field of pre-hospital EMS and adjoining (scientific) professional organisations (n = 62). 48 research topics were presented in Delphi I, and the panel was asked to rate their importance on a 5-point scale. In Delphi II and III the panel selected their priority research topics, and arguments why and suggestions for research questions were collected and reported back. In Delphi IV appropriateness of the remaining topics and agreement within the expert panel was taken into account to make up the final list of research priorities.

Results

The response on the Delphi-survey was high: 95 % (n = 59; Delphi I); 97 % (n = 60, Delphi II); 94 % (n = 58, Delphi III); 97 % (n = 60, Delphi IV). The panel reduced the number of research topics from 48 topics in Delphi I to 12 topics in Delphi III. A variety of arguments and suggestions for research questions were collected, giving insight in reasons why research on these topics in the near future is needed.
Delphi IV showed an adequate level of agreement with respect to the 12 presented research topics. The following 9 topics were rated as appropriate for the national pre-hospital EMS research agenda: Non-conveyance to the hospital (ranked highest); Performance measures for quality of care; Hand over/registration/exchange of patient data; Care and task substitution; Triage; Assessment of acute neurologic signs & symptoms; Protocols and protocol adherence; Immobilisation; and Open/secure airway.

Discussions

The research priorities identified in our study resemble those in other studies. However, the topic 'non-conveyance to the hospital' was determined as a priority in this study but not in other studies.

Conclusions

The national pre-hospital EMS research agenda can focus future research efforts to improve the evidence base and clinical practice of pre-hospital emergency medical services. Dissemination and implementation of the research agenda deserves careful attention.
Literature
1.
2.
McLean SA, Maio RF, Spaite DW, Garrison HG. Emergency medical services outcomes research: evaluating the effectiveness of prehospital care. Prehosp Emerg Care 2002;6:S52–56.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Cone DC. Knowledge translation in the emergency medical services: a research agenda for advancing prehospital care. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:1052–1057.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Mason, S. and A.N. Siriwardena, Chapter 38. Research and development in prehospital emergency medicine, in: ABC of prehospital emergency medicine, T. Nutbeam and M. Boylan, Editors. 2013, E-book via: www.abcbookseries.com: BMJ Books and Wiley-Blackwell p. 206.
5.
Siriwardena AN, Donohoe R, Stephenson J, Phillips P. Supporting research and development in ambulance services: research for better health care in prehospital settings. Emergency Medicine Journal 2010;27:324–326.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Brazier H, Murphy AW, Lynch C, Bury G: Searching for the evidence in pre-hospital care: a review of randomised controlled trials. On behalf of the Ambulance Response Time Sub-Group of the National Ambulance Advisory Committee. J Accid Emerg Med 1999;16:18–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
Callaham M. Quantifying the scanty science of prehospital emergency care. Ann Emerg Med 1997;30:785–790.PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
MacFarlane C, Benn CA: Evaluation of emergency medical services systems: a classification to assist in determination of indicators. Emerg Med J. 2003;20:188–191.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Bigham BL, Buick JE, Brooks SC, Morrison M, Shojania KG, Morrison LJ. Patient safety in emergency medical services: a systematic review of the literature. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012;16:20–35.PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
Dutch National Ambulance EMS Organization (AZN). Patient safety programme ambulance EMS (in Dutch). Dutch National Sector Organisation for Ambulance Care (in Dutch: Ambulancezorg Nederland); Zwolle, The Netherlands. 2014 Last accessed: July 15, 2015].
13.
Ebben RH, Vloet LC, van Grunsven PM, Breeman W, Goosselink B, Lichtveld RA, et al. Factors influencing ambulance nurses' adherence to a national protocol ambulance care: an implementation study in the Netherlands. Eur J Emerg Med. 2015;22:199–205.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Ebben RH, Vloet LC, Verhofstad MH, Meijer S, Mintjes-de Groot JA, van Achterberg T. Adherence to guidelines and protocols in the prehospital and emergency care setting: a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21:9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
van de Glind I, Berben S, van Grunsven P, Poppen H, Bolt W, Zeegers A, Hoogeveen W, Vloet L: Knowledge makes all the difference. Taking the research elevator. Development of a national EMS research agenda 2014-2018. [In Dutch: Kennis maakt het verschil. Onderzoek in de lift. Ontwikkeling van de Landelijke Onderzoeksagenda Ambulancezorg 2014-2018]. Nijmegen: HAN University of Applied Sciences, Department of Emergency and Critical Care 2014.
16.
Simpson E, Goyal NK, Dhepyasuwan N, Flaherman VJ, Chung EK, Von Kohorn I, et al. Prioritizing a Research Agenda: A Delphi Study of the Better Outcomes Through Research for Newborns (BORN) Network. Hosp Pediatr 2014;4:195–202.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Brenner M, Hilliard C, Regan G, Coughlan B, Hayden S, Drennan J, et al. Research priorities for children's nursing in Ireland: a Delphi study. J Pediatr Nurs 2014;29:301–308.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Jordan K, Slavin V, Fenwick J. Research priorities of midwives: a Delphi study. Pract Midwife 2013;16:26–28.PubMed
19.
Cowman S, Gethin G, Clarke E, Moore Z, Craig G, Jordan-O'Brien J, et al. An international eDelphi study identifying the research and education priorities in wound management and tissue repair. J Clin Nurs 2012;21:344–353.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Blackwood B, Albarran JW, Latour JM. Research priorities of adult intensive care nurses in 20 European countries: a Delphi study. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67:550–562.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Jensen JL, Bigham BL, Blanchard IE, Dainty KN, Socha D, Carter A, et al. The Canadian National EMS Research Agenda: a mixed methods consensus study. CJEM. 2013;15:73–82.PubMed
22.
Sayre MR, White LJ, Brown LH, McHenry SD, Implementation Symposium Participants. National EMS research agenda: proceedings of the implementation symposium. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10:1100–1108.PubMed
23.
Sayre MR, White LJ, Brown LH, McHenry SD, National EMS Agenda Writing Team. National EMS Research Agenda. Prehosp Emerg Care 2002;6:S1–43.
24.
Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:1008–1015.PubMed
25.
Fitch K, Bernstein S, Aguilar M: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User’s Manual. Santa Monica, California: RAND; 2001.
26.
Fevang E, Lockey D, Thompson J, Lossius HM, Torpo Research C. The top five research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care: a consensus report from a European research collaboration. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011;19:57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
O’Donnell C, O’Reilly S. A national prehospital research strategy. September 2008. Castletroy Ireland: Centre for Prehospital Research, University of Limerick & National Institute of Health Sciences; 2008.
28.
Snooks H, Evans A, Wells B, Peconi J, Thomas M, Woollard M, et al. What are the highest priorities for research in emergency prehospital care? Emergency Medicine Journal. 2009;26:549–550.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Tippett V, Clark M, Woods S, FitzGerald G. Towards a national research agenda for the ambulance and pre-hospital sector in Australia. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 2003;1.
30.
Huibers L, Giesen P, Wensing M, Grol R: Out-of-hours care in western countries: assessment of different organizational models. BMC health services research. 2009;9:105.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Maio RF, Garrison HG, Spaite DW, Desmond JS, Gregor MA, Cayten CG, et al: Emergency medical services outcomes project I (EMSOP I): prioritizing conditions for outcomes research. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:423–432.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Jensen JL, Dobson T, Canadian EMS Quality Improvement Committee. Towards National Evidence-Informed Practice Guidelines for Canadian EMS: Future Directions. Healthc Policy 2011;7:22–31.
Metadata
Title
A national research agenda for pre-hospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi-study
Authors
Irene van de Glind
Sivera Berben
Fon Zeegers
Henk Poppen
Margreet Hoogeveen
Ina Bolt
Pierre van Grunsven
Lilian Vloet
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0195-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2016 Go to the issue

Original research

Routine whole body CT of high energy trauma patients leads to excessive radiation exposure

Study protocol

The ReCaPTa study - a prospective out of hospital cardiac arrest registry including multiple sources of surveillance for the study of sudden cardiac death in the Mediterranean area

Study protocol

Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial

Original research

Epidemiology, prehospital care and outcomes of patients arriving by ambulance with dyspnoea: an observational study

Study protocol

The Copenhagen Triage Algorithm: a randomized controlled trial

Original research

Analysis of thromboelastography, PT, APTT and fibrinogen in intraosseous and venous samples—an experimental study