Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

User needs elicitation via analytic hierarchy process (AHP). A case study on a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner

Authors: Leandro Pecchia, Jennifer L Martin, Angela Ragozzino, Carmela Vanzanella, Arturo Scognamiglio, Luciano Mirarchi, Stephen P Morgan

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The rigorous elicitation of user needs is a crucial step for both medical device design and purchasing. However, user needs elicitation is often based on qualitative methods whose findings can be difficult to integrate into medical decision-making. This paper describes the application of AHP to elicit user needs for a new CT scanner for use in a public hospital.

Methods

AHP was used to design a hierarchy of 12 needs for a new CT scanner, grouped into 4 homogenous categories, and to prepare a paper questionnaire to investigate the relative priorities of these. The questionnaire was completed by 5 senior clinicians working in a variety of clinical specialisations and departments in the same Italian public hospital.

Results

Although safety and performance were considered the most important issues, user needs changed according to clinical scenario. For elective surgery, the five most important needs were: spatial resolution, processing software, radiation dose, patient monitoring, and contrast medium. For emergency, the top five most important needs were: patient monitoring, radiation dose, contrast medium control, speed run, spatial resolution.

Conclusions

AHP effectively supported user need elicitation, helping to develop an analytic and intelligible framework of decision-making. User needs varied according to working scenario (elective versus emergency medicine) more than clinical specialization. This method should be considered by practitioners involved in decisions about new medical technology, whether that be during device design or before deciding whether to allocate budgets for new medical devices according to clinical functions or according to hospital department.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Martin JL, Murphy E, Crowe JA, Norris BJ: Capturing user requirements in medical device development: the role of ergonomics. Physiol Meas. 2006, 27 (8): R49-R62. 10.1088/0967-3334/27/8/R01.CrossRefPubMed Martin JL, Murphy E, Crowe JA, Norris BJ: Capturing user requirements in medical device development: the role of ergonomics. Physiol Meas. 2006, 27 (8): R49-R62. 10.1088/0967-3334/27/8/R01.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Shah SGS, Robinson I: Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007, 23 (1): 131-137.CrossRefPubMed Shah SGS, Robinson I: Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007, 23 (1): 131-137.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Money AG, Barnett J, Kuljis J, Craven MP, Martin JL, Young T: The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers’ perspectives. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011, 11: 15-10.1186/1472-6947-11-15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Money AG, Barnett J, Kuljis J, Craven MP, Martin JL, Young T: The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers’ perspectives. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011, 11: 15-10.1186/1472-6947-11-15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Martin JL, Barnett J: Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012, 12: 74-10.1186/1472-6947-12-74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Martin JL, Barnett J: Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012, 12: 74-10.1186/1472-6947-12-74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Bracale U, Rovani M, Picardo A, Merola G, Pignata G, Sodo M, Di Salvo E, Ratto EL, Noceti A, Melillo P: Beneficial effects of fibrin glue (Quixil) versus Lichtenstein conventional technique in inguinal hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. Hernia. 2012, Epub ahead of print Bracale U, Rovani M, Picardo A, Merola G, Pignata G, Sodo M, Di Salvo E, Ratto EL, Noceti A, Melillo P: Beneficial effects of fibrin glue (Quixil) versus Lichtenstein conventional technique in inguinal hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. Hernia. 2012, Epub ahead of print
7.
go back to reference Bracale U, Rovani M, Bracale M, Pignata G, Corcione F, Pecchia L: Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2011, 21 (3): 150-160.CrossRefPubMed Bracale U, Rovani M, Bracale M, Pignata G, Corcione F, Pecchia L: Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2011, 21 (3): 150-160.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bracale U, Rovani M, Melillo P, Merola G, Pecchia L: Which is the best laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernia repair: TEP or TAPP? A network meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012, Epub ahead of print Bracale U, Rovani M, Melillo P, Merola G, Pecchia L: Which is the best laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernia repair: TEP or TAPP? A network meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012, Epub ahead of print
9.
go back to reference Leys M: Health care policy: qualitative evidence and health technology assessment. Health Policy. 2003, 65 (3): 217-226. 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00209-9.CrossRefPubMed Leys M: Health care policy: qualitative evidence and health technology assessment. Health Policy. 2003, 65 (3): 217-226. 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00209-9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Martin JL, Norris BJ, Murphy E, Crowe JA: Medical device development: The challenge for ergonomics. Appl Ergon. 2008, 39 (3): 271-283. 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.10.002.CrossRefPubMed Martin JL, Norris BJ, Murphy E, Crowe JA: Medical device development: The challenge for ergonomics. Appl Ergon. 2008, 39 (3): 271-283. 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.10.002.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N: Qualitative research in health care - Analysing qualitative data (Reprinted from Qualitative Research in Health Care). Br Med J. 2000, 320 (7227): 114-116. 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.CrossRef Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N: Qualitative research in health care - Analysing qualitative data (Reprinted from Qualitative Research in Health Care). Br Med J. 2000, 320 (7227): 114-116. 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Upshur REG, VanDenKerkhof EG, Goel V: Meaning and measurement: an inclusive model of evidence in health care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2001, 7 (2): 91-96. 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00279.x.CrossRefPubMed Upshur REG, VanDenKerkhof EG, Goel V: Meaning and measurement: an inclusive model of evidence in health care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2001, 7 (2): 91-96. 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00279.x.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kaplan B, Shaw NT: Future directions in evaluation research: People, organizational, and social issues. Methods Inf Med. 2004, 43 (3): 215-231.PubMed Kaplan B, Shaw NT: Future directions in evaluation research: People, organizational, and social issues. Methods Inf Med. 2004, 43 (3): 215-231.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Sackett DL, Haynes RB: Evidence base of clinical diagnosis - The architecture of diagnostic research. Br Med J. 2002, 324 (7336): 539-541. 10.1136/bmj.324.7336.539.CrossRef Sackett DL, Haynes RB: Evidence base of clinical diagnosis - The architecture of diagnostic research. Br Med J. 2002, 324 (7336): 539-541. 10.1136/bmj.324.7336.539.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001, 358 (9280): 483-488. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6.CrossRefPubMed Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001, 358 (9280): 483-488. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Chapple A, Rogers A: Explicit guidelines for qualitative research: a step in the right direction, a defence of the ‘soft’ option, or a form of sociological imperialism?. Fam Pract. 1998, 15 (6): 556-561. 10.1093/fampra/15.6.556.CrossRefPubMed Chapple A, Rogers A: Explicit guidelines for qualitative research: a step in the right direction, a defence of the ‘soft’ option, or a form of sociological imperialism?. Fam Pract. 1998, 15 (6): 556-561. 10.1093/fampra/15.6.556.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hostgaard AM, Bertelsen P, Nohr C: Methods to identify, study and understand End-user participation in HIT development. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011, 11: 57-10.1186/1472-6947-11-57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hostgaard AM, Bertelsen P, Nohr C: Methods to identify, study and understand End-user participation in HIT development. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011, 11: 57-10.1186/1472-6947-11-57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
19.
go back to reference Melillo P, Fusco R, Sansone M, Bracale M, Pecchia L: Discrimination power of long-term heart rate variability measures for chronic heart failure detection. Med Bio Eng Comput. 2011, 49 (1): 67-74. 10.1007/s11517-010-0728-5.CrossRef Melillo P, Fusco R, Sansone M, Bracale M, Pecchia L: Discrimination power of long-term heart rate variability measures for chronic heart failure detection. Med Bio Eng Comput. 2011, 49 (1): 67-74. 10.1007/s11517-010-0728-5.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Melillo P, Izzo R, Luca N, Pecchia L: Heart rate variability and target organ damage in hypertensive patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012, 12 (1): 105-10.1186/1471-2261-12-105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Melillo P, Izzo R, Luca N, Pecchia L: Heart rate variability and target organ damage in hypertensive patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012, 12 (1): 105-10.1186/1471-2261-12-105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Pecchia L, Mirarchi L, Doniacovo R, Marsico V, Bracale M: Health Technology Assessment for a Service Contract: a new method for decisional tools. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering. 2009, 25 (12): 105-108. Pecchia L, Mirarchi L, Doniacovo R, Marsico V, Bracale M: Health Technology Assessment for a Service Contract: a new method for decisional tools. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering. 2009, 25 (12): 105-108.
22.
go back to reference Benario HW: Caesar’s Gallic war: a commentary. 2012, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press Benario HW: Caesar’s Gallic war: a commentary. 2012, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press
23.
go back to reference Raible F, Brand M: Divide et Impera–the midbrain-hindbrain boundary and its organizer. Trends Neurosci. 2004, 27 (12): 727-734. 10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.003.CrossRefPubMed Raible F, Brand M: Divide et Impera–the midbrain-hindbrain boundary and its organizer. Trends Neurosci. 2004, 27 (12): 727-734. 10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.003.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Scorrano L: Divide et impera: Ca2+ signals, mitochondrial fission and sensitization to apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2003, 10 (12): 1287-1289. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401310.CrossRefPubMed Scorrano L: Divide et impera: Ca2+ signals, mitochondrial fission and sensitization to apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2003, 10 (12): 1287-1289. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401310.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Reinhardt U: Divide et impera: protecting the growth of health care incomes (COSTS). Health Econ. 2012, 21 (1): 41-54. 10.1002/hec.1813.CrossRefPubMed Reinhardt U: Divide et impera: protecting the growth of health care incomes (COSTS). Health Econ. 2012, 21 (1): 41-54. 10.1002/hec.1813.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Pecchia LB, P A, Pendleton N, Jackson S, Clarke C, Briggs P, Mcinnes L, Angelova M, Bracale M: proceedings of the 11th. International Symposium on Analytic Hierarchy Process (ISAHP). The use of analytic hierarchy process for the prioritization of factors affecting wellbeing in elderly. 2011, Sorrento, Naples, Italy, 1-4. Pecchia LB, P A, Pendleton N, Jackson S, Clarke C, Briggs P, Mcinnes L, Angelova M, Bracale M: proceedings of the 11th. International Symposium on Analytic Hierarchy Process (ISAHP). The use of analytic hierarchy process for the prioritization of factors affecting wellbeing in elderly. 2011, Sorrento, Naples, Italy, 1-4.
27.
go back to reference Saaty TL: An essay on how judgment and measurement are different in science and in decision making. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2009, 1 (1): 61-62. Saaty TL: An essay on how judgment and measurement are different in science and in decision making. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2009, 1 (1): 61-62.
28.
go back to reference Pecchia L, Bath PA, Pendleton N, Bracale M: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for examining healthcare professionals’ assessments of risk factorsThe relative importance of risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older people. Methods Inf Med. 2011, 50 (5): 435-444.CrossRefPubMed Pecchia L, Bath PA, Pendleton N, Bracale M: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for examining healthcare professionals’ assessments of risk factorsThe relative importance of risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older people. Methods Inf Med. 2011, 50 (5): 435-444.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Hummel JM, IJzerman MJ: A Systematic Review of the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Health Care Decision Making. Value Health. 2009, 12 (7): A227-A227.CrossRef Hummel JM, IJzerman MJ: A Systematic Review of the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Health Care Decision Making. Value Health. 2009, 12 (7): A227-A227.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Uzoka FM, Obot O, Barker K, Osuji J: An experimental comparison of fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process for medical decision support systems. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011, 103 (1): 10-27. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.06.003.CrossRefPubMed Uzoka FM, Obot O, Barker K, Osuji J: An experimental comparison of fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process for medical decision support systems. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011, 103 (1): 10-27. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.06.003.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Danner M, Hummel JM, Volz F, van Manen JG, Wiegard B, Dintsios C-M, Bastian H, Gerber A, Ijzerman MJ: Integrating patients’ views into health technology assessment: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011, 27 (4): 369-375. 10.1017/S0266462311000523.CrossRefPubMed Danner M, Hummel JM, Volz F, van Manen JG, Wiegard B, Dintsios C-M, Bastian H, Gerber A, Ijzerman MJ: Integrating patients’ views into health technology assessment: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011, 27 (4): 369-375. 10.1017/S0266462311000523.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Bridges JF: Future challenges for the economic evaluation of healthcare: patient preferences, risk attitudes and beyond. PharmacoEconomics. 2005, 23 (4): 317-321. 10.2165/00019053-200523040-00002.CrossRefPubMed Bridges JF: Future challenges for the economic evaluation of healthcare: patient preferences, risk attitudes and beyond. PharmacoEconomics. 2005, 23 (4): 317-321. 10.2165/00019053-200523040-00002.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Dolan JG: Are patients capable of using the analytic hierarchy process and willing to use it to help make clinical decisions?. Med Decis Making. 1995, 15 (1): 76-80. 10.1177/0272989X9501500111.CrossRefPubMed Dolan JG: Are patients capable of using the analytic hierarchy process and willing to use it to help make clinical decisions?. Med Decis Making. 1995, 15 (1): 76-80. 10.1177/0272989X9501500111.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Dolan JG: Multi-criteria clinical decision support: A primer on the use of multiple criteria decision making methods to promote evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare. Patient. 2010, 3 (4): 229-248. 10.2165/11539470-000000000-00000.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dolan JG: Multi-criteria clinical decision support: A primer on the use of multiple criteria decision making methods to promote evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare. Patient. 2010, 3 (4): 229-248. 10.2165/11539470-000000000-00000.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Bridges JF, Carswell CI: Andrew lloyd: a driving force in patient-centered outcomes research. Patient. 2008, 1 (4): 259-263. 10.2165/1312067-200801040-00007.CrossRefPubMed Bridges JF, Carswell CI: Andrew lloyd: a driving force in patient-centered outcomes research. Patient. 2008, 1 (4): 259-263. 10.2165/1312067-200801040-00007.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Bridges JF, Mohamed AF, Finnern HW, Woehl A, Hauber AB: Patients’ preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A conjoint analysis. Lung Cancer. 2012, 77 (1): 224-231. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.01.016.CrossRefPubMed Bridges JF, Mohamed AF, Finnern HW, Woehl A, Hauber AB: Patients’ preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A conjoint analysis. Lung Cancer. 2012, 77 (1): 224-231. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.01.016.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K: Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012, 21 (2): 145-172. 10.1002/hec.1697.CrossRefPubMed de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K: Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012, 21 (2): 145-172. 10.1002/hec.1697.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Gallego G, Bridges JF, Flynn T, Blauvelt BM: Predicting the Future Impact of Emerging Technologies on Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Hcc): Measuring Stakeholders Preferences with Best-Worst Scaling. Value Health. 2011, 14 (3): A176-A176.CrossRef Gallego G, Bridges JF, Flynn T, Blauvelt BM: Predicting the Future Impact of Emerging Technologies on Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Hcc): Measuring Stakeholders Preferences with Best-Worst Scaling. Value Health. 2011, 14 (3): A176-A176.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Scholl A, Manthey L, Helm R, Steiner M: Solving multiattribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison. Eur J Oper Res. 2005, 164 (3): 760-777. 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.026.CrossRef Scholl A, Manthey L, Helm R, Steiner M: Solving multiattribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison. Eur J Oper Res. 2005, 164 (3): 760-777. 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.026.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Mulye R: An empirical comparison of three variants of the AHP and two variants of conjoint analysis. J Behav Decis Mak. 1998, 11 (4): 263-280. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(1998120)11:4<263::AID-BDM301>3.0.CO;2-T.CrossRef Mulye R: An empirical comparison of three variants of the AHP and two variants of conjoint analysis. J Behav Decis Mak. 1998, 11 (4): 263-280. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(1998120)11:4<263::AID-BDM301>3.0.CO;2-T.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Ijzerman MJ, van Til JA, Snoek GJ: Comparison of two multi-criteria decision techniques for eliciting treatment preferences in people with neurological disorders. Patient. 2008, 1 (4): 265-272. 10.2165/1312067-200801040-00008.CrossRefPubMed Ijzerman MJ, van Til JA, Snoek GJ: Comparison of two multi-criteria decision techniques for eliciting treatment preferences in people with neurological disorders. Patient. 2008, 1 (4): 265-272. 10.2165/1312067-200801040-00008.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Ijzerman MJ, van Til JA, Bridges JF: A comparison of analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis methods in assessing treatment alternatives for stroke rehabilitation. Patient. 2012, 5 (1): 45-56. 10.2165/11587140-000000000-00000.CrossRefPubMed Ijzerman MJ, van Til JA, Bridges JF: A comparison of analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis methods in assessing treatment alternatives for stroke rehabilitation. Patient. 2012, 5 (1): 45-56. 10.2165/11587140-000000000-00000.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Liberatore MJ, Nydick RL: The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review. Eur J Oper Res. 2008, 189 (1): 194-207. 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.001.CrossRef Liberatore MJ, Nydick RL: The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review. Eur J Oper Res. 2008, 189 (1): 194-207. 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.001.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Tarimcilar MM, Khaksari SZ: Capital-budgeting in Hospital Management using the analytic hierarchy process. Socioecon Plann Sci. 1991, 25 (1): 27-34. 10.1016/0038-0121(91)90026-N.CrossRefPubMed Tarimcilar MM, Khaksari SZ: Capital-budgeting in Hospital Management using the analytic hierarchy process. Socioecon Plann Sci. 1991, 25 (1): 27-34. 10.1016/0038-0121(91)90026-N.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference van Til JA, Renzenbrink GJ, Dolan JG, Ijzerman MJ: The use of the analytic hierarchy process to aid decision making in acquired equinovarus deformity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008, 89 (3): 457-462. 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.030.CrossRefPubMed van Til JA, Renzenbrink GJ, Dolan JG, Ijzerman MJ: The use of the analytic hierarchy process to aid decision making in acquired equinovarus deformity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008, 89 (3): 457-462. 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.030.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Hu H: Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction. Med Phys. 1999, 26 (1): 5-18. 10.1118/1.598470.CrossRefPubMed Hu H: Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction. Med Phys. 1999, 26 (1): 5-18. 10.1118/1.598470.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Kroft J, Klostermann NR, Moody JRK, Taerk E, Wolfman W: A novel regimen of combination transdermal estrogen and intermittent vaginally administered progesterone for relief of menopausal symptoms. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010, 26 (12): 902-908. 10.3109/09513590.2010.487602.CrossRefPubMed Kroft J, Klostermann NR, Moody JRK, Taerk E, Wolfman W: A novel regimen of combination transdermal estrogen and intermittent vaginally administered progesterone for relief of menopausal symptoms. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010, 26 (12): 902-908. 10.3109/09513590.2010.487602.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Pecchia L, Bracale U, Bracale M: Health Technology Assessment of Home Monitoring for the Continuity of Care of patient suffering from congestive heart failure. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering. 2009, 25 (12): 184-187. Pecchia L, Bracale U, Bracale M: Health Technology Assessment of Home Monitoring for the Continuity of Care of patient suffering from congestive heart failure. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering. 2009, 25 (12): 184-187.
49.
go back to reference Saaty TL, Vargas LG: Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. 2001, Boston: Kluwer Academic PublishersCrossRef Saaty TL, Vargas LG: Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. 2001, Boston: Kluwer Academic PublishersCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Saaty TL: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol. 1977, 15: 8-CrossRef Saaty TL: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol. 1977, 15: 8-CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Ji P, Jiang R: Scale transitivity in the AHP. J Oper Res Soc. 2003, 54 (8): 896-905. 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601557.CrossRef Ji P, Jiang R: Scale transitivity in the AHP. J Oper Res Soc. 2003, 54 (8): 896-905. 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601557.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Finan JS, Hurley WJ: Transitive calibration of the AHP verbal scale. Eur J Oper Res. 1999, 112 (2): 367-372. 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00411-6.CrossRef Finan JS, Hurley WJ: Transitive calibration of the AHP verbal scale. Eur J Oper Res. 1999, 112 (2): 367-372. 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00411-6.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Salo AA, Hamalainen RP: The measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal. 1997, 6: 11-10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199701)6:1<11::AID-MCDA113>3.0.CO;2-K.CrossRef Salo AA, Hamalainen RP: The measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal. 1997, 6: 11-10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199701)6:1<11::AID-MCDA113>3.0.CO;2-K.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Pecchia L, Bath PA, Pendleton N, Bracale M: Web-based system for assessing risk factors for falls in community-dwelling elderly people using the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2010, 2 (2): 135-157.CrossRef Pecchia L, Bath PA, Pendleton N, Bracale M: Web-based system for assessing risk factors for falls in community-dwelling elderly people using the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2010, 2 (2): 135-157.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Pecchia L, Bath P, Pendleton N, Bracale M: AHP and risk management: a case study for assessing risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older patients. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on AHP (ISAHP2009): July 29–August 1. Edited by: Tammy T. 2009, Pennsylvania, USA: University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 1-15. ISSN 1556-8296 Pecchia L, Bath P, Pendleton N, Bracale M: AHP and risk management: a case study for assessing risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older patients. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on AHP (ISAHP2009): July 29–August 1. Edited by: Tammy T. 2009, Pennsylvania, USA: University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 1-15. ISSN 1556-8296
56.
go back to reference Pecchia L, Bracale U, Melillo P, Sansone M, Bracale M: AHP for Health Technology Assessment. A case study: prioritizing care approaches for patients suffering from chronic heart failure. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on AHP (ISAHP2009): July 29–August 1. Edited by: Tammy T. 2009, Pennsylvania, USA: University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 1-9. ISSN 1556-8296 Pecchia L, Bracale U, Melillo P, Sansone M, Bracale M: AHP for Health Technology Assessment. A case study: prioritizing care approaches for patients suffering from chronic heart failure. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on AHP (ISAHP2009): July 29–August 1. Edited by: Tammy T. 2009, Pennsylvania, USA: University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 1-9. ISSN 1556-8296
57.
go back to reference Saaty T: How to Structure and Make Choices in Complex Problems. Hum Syst Manag. 1982, 3 (4): 255-261. Saaty T: How to Structure and Make Choices in Complex Problems. Hum Syst Manag. 1982, 3 (4): 255-261.
58.
go back to reference Uzoka FME: A fuzzy-enhanced multicriteria decision analysis model for evaluating university Academics’ research output. Information Knowledge Systems Management. 2008, 7: Uzoka FME: A fuzzy-enhanced multicriteria decision analysis model for evaluating university Academics’ research output. Information Knowledge Systems Management. 2008, 7:
59.
go back to reference Carmone FJ, Kara A, Zanakis SH: A Monte Carlo investigation of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices in AHP. Eur J Oper Res. 1997, 102 (3): 538-553. 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00250-0.CrossRef Carmone FJ, Kara A, Zanakis SH: A Monte Carlo investigation of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices in AHP. Eur J Oper Res. 1997, 102 (3): 538-553. 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00250-0.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
User needs elicitation via analytic hierarchy process (AHP). A case study on a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner
Authors
Leandro Pecchia
Jennifer L Martin
Angela Ragozzino
Carmela Vanzanella
Arturo Scognamiglio
Luciano Mirarchi
Stephen P Morgan
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2013 Go to the issue