Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research article

Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study

Authors: Jennifer L Martin, Julie Barnett

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

It is well established that considering users is an important aspect of medical device development. However it is also well established that there are numerous barriers to successfully conducting user research and integrating the results into product development. It is not sufficient to simply conduct user research, it must also be effectively integrated into product development.

Methods

A case study of the development of a new medical imaging device was conducted to examine in detail how users were involved in a medical device development project. Two user research studies were conducted: a requirements elicitation interview study and an early prototype evaluation using contextual inquiry. A descriptive in situ approach was taken to investigate how these studies contributed to the product development process and how the results of this work influenced the development of the technology. Data was collected qualitatively through interviews with the development team, participant observation at development meetings and document analysis. The focus was on investigating the barriers that exist to prevent user data from being integrated into product development.

Results

A number of individual, organisational and system barriers were identified that functioned to prevent the results of the user research being fully integrated into development. The user and technological aspects of development were seen as separate work streams during development. The expectations of the developers were that user research would collect requirements for the appearance of the device, rather than challenge its fundamental concept. The manner that the user data was communicated to the development team was not effective in conveying the significance or breadth of the findings.

Conclusion

There are a range of informal and formal organisational processes that can affect the uptake of user data during medical device development. Adopting formal decision making processes may assist manufacturers to take a more integrated and reflective approach to development, which should result in improved business decisions and a higher quality end product.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buckle P, Clarkson PJ, Coleman R, Ward J, Anderson J: Patient safety, systems design and ergonomics. App Ergon. 2006, 37: 491-500. 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.016.CrossRef Buckle P, Clarkson PJ, Coleman R, Ward J, Anderson J: Patient safety, systems design and ergonomics. App Ergon. 2006, 37: 491-500. 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.016.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Martin JL, Norris BJ, Murphy E, Crowe JA: Medical device development: The challenge for ergonomics. App Ergon. 2006, 39: 271-283.CrossRef Martin JL, Norris BJ, Murphy E, Crowe JA: Medical device development: The challenge for ergonomics. App Ergon. 2006, 39: 271-283.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Shah SGS, Robinson I: Benefits of, and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. Int J Technol Assess. 2007, 23: 131-137.CrossRef Shah SGS, Robinson I: Benefits of, and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. Int J Technol Assess. 2007, 23: 131-137.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Grocott P, Weir H, Ram MB: A model of user engagement in medical device development. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2007, 20: 484-493. 10.1108/09526860710819422.CrossRefPubMed Grocott P, Weir H, Ram MB: A model of user engagement in medical device development. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2007, 20: 484-493. 10.1108/09526860710819422.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Harrison S, Dowswell G, Milewa T: Public and user ‘involvement’ in the UK national health service. Health Soc Care Comm. 2002, 10: 63-66. 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2002.00342.x.CrossRef Harrison S, Dowswell G, Milewa T: Public and user ‘involvement’ in the UK national health service. Health Soc Care Comm. 2002, 10: 63-66. 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2002.00342.x.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Martin JL, Murphy E, Crowe JA, Norris BJ: Capturing user requirements in medical device development: the role of ergonomics. Phys Meas. 2006, 27: 49-62. 10.1088/0967-3334/27/8/R01.CrossRef Martin JL, Murphy E, Crowe JA, Norris BJ: Capturing user requirements in medical device development: the role of ergonomics. Phys Meas. 2006, 27: 49-62. 10.1088/0967-3334/27/8/R01.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference International Electrotechnical Commission: IEC 62366: Medical devices - Application of usability engineering to medical devices. 2007, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva International Electrotechnical Commission: IEC 62366: Medical devices - Application of usability engineering to medical devices. 2007, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva
10.
go back to reference American National Standards Institute: ANSI HE75: Human factors Human factors engineering—Design of medical devices. 2009, American National Standards Institute, Washington DC American National Standards Institute: ANSI HE75: Human factors Human factors engineering—Design of medical devices. 2009, American National Standards Institute, Washington DC
11.
go back to reference Sawyer D: Do it by design. An introduction to human factors in medical devices.US department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 1997, Food and Drug Administration, Centre for Device and Radiological Health, USA Sawyer D: Do it by design. An introduction to human factors in medical devices.US department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 1997, Food and Drug Administration, Centre for Device and Radiological Health, USA
12.
go back to reference Lettl C: User involvement competence for radical innovation. J Eng Technol Manage. 2007, 24: 53-75. 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.004.CrossRef Lettl C: User involvement competence for radical innovation. J Eng Technol Manage. 2007, 24: 53-75. 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.004.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Van der Panne G, Van Beers C, Kleinknecht A: Success and failure of innovation: a literature review. Int J Innov Manage. 2003, 7: 309-10.1142/S1363919603000830.CrossRef Van der Panne G, Van Beers C, Kleinknecht A: Success and failure of innovation: a literature review. Int J Innov Manage. 2003, 7: 309-10.1142/S1363919603000830.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Money AG, Barnett J, Kuljis J, Craven MP, Martin JL, Young T: The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers’ perspectives. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011, 11: 15-10.1186/1472-6947-11-15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Money AG, Barnett J, Kuljis J, Craven MP, Martin JL, Young T: The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers’ perspectives. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011, 11: 15-10.1186/1472-6947-11-15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Brown DS: The challenges of user-based design in a medical equipment market. Field methods casebook for software design. 2006, Wiley,157-176. Brown DS: The challenges of user-based design in a medical equipment market. Field methods casebook for software design. 2006, Wiley,157-176.
16.
go back to reference Butler MB: Getting to know your users: Usability roundtables at Lotus development. Interactions. 1996, 3: 23-30. 10.1145/223500.223507.CrossRef Butler MB: Getting to know your users: Usability roundtables at Lotus development. Interactions. 1996, 3: 23-30. 10.1145/223500.223507.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stewart J, Williams R: The Wrong Trousers? Beyond the Design Fallacy: Social Learning and the User. User Involvement in Innovation Processes: Strategies and Limitations from a Socio-Technical Perspective. Edited by: Rohracher H. 2005, Profil Verlag, Munich Stewart J, Williams R: The Wrong Trousers? Beyond the Design Fallacy: Social Learning and the User. User Involvement in Innovation Processes: Strategies and Limitations from a Socio-Technical Perspective. Edited by: Rohracher H. 2005, Profil Verlag, Munich
18.
go back to reference Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ: Winning businesses in product development, the critical success factors. Res Tech Manage. 1996, 39: 18-29. Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ: Winning businesses in product development, the critical success factors. Res Tech Manage. 1996, 39: 18-29.
19.
go back to reference Cooper RG: Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Bus Horiz. 1990,: 44-56. Cooper RG: Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Bus Horiz. 1990,: 44-56.
20.
go back to reference Pietzsch JB, Shluzas LA, Paté-Cornell ME, Yock PG, Linehan JH: Stage-gate processes for the development of medical devices. J Med Device. 2009, 3: 021004-10.1115/1.3148836.CrossRef Pietzsch JB, Shluzas LA, Paté-Cornell ME, Yock PG, Linehan JH: Stage-gate processes for the development of medical devices. J Med Device. 2009, 3: 021004-10.1115/1.3148836.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Yin RK: The case study crisis: some answers. Adm Sci Q. 1981, 26: 58-65. 10.2307/2392599.CrossRef Yin RK: The case study crisis: some answers. Adm Sci Q. 1981, 26: 58-65. 10.2307/2392599.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Martin JL, Clark DJ, Morgan SP, Crowe JA, Murphy E: A user-centred approach to requirements elicitation in medical device development: A case study from an industry perspective. App Ergon. 2012, 43: 184-190. 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.05.002.CrossRef Martin JL, Clark DJ, Morgan SP, Crowe JA, Murphy E: A user-centred approach to requirements elicitation in medical device development: A case study from an industry perspective. App Ergon. 2012, 43: 184-190. 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.05.002.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Martin JL, Crowe JA: Contextual Inquiry for Medical Device Development: A Case Study. Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. Edited by: Duffy VG. 2010, CRC Press, Ch, 62- Martin JL, Crowe JA: Contextual Inquiry for Medical Device Development: A Case Study. Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. Edited by: Duffy VG. 2010, CRC Press, Ch, 62-
24.
go back to reference International Organization for Standardization: ISO 13407: Human-centred design processes for interactive systems. 1999, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva International Organization for Standardization: ISO 13407: Human-centred design processes for interactive systems. 1999, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
25.
go back to reference Garmer K, Ylven J, Karlsson ICM: User participation in requirements elicitation comparing focus group interviews and usability tests for eliciting usability requirements for medical equipment: a case study. Int J Ind Ergonom. 2004, 33: 85-98. 10.1016/j.ergon.2003.07.005.CrossRef Garmer K, Ylven J, Karlsson ICM: User participation in requirements elicitation comparing focus group interviews and usability tests for eliciting usability requirements for medical equipment: a case study. Int J Ind Ergonom. 2004, 33: 85-98. 10.1016/j.ergon.2003.07.005.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Chess C: A model of organizational responsiveness to stakeholders. Risk. 1999, 10: 257-267. Chess C: A model of organizational responsiveness to stakeholders. Risk. 1999, 10: 257-267.
27.
go back to reference Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ: Benchmarking the Firm's Critical Success Factors in New Product Development. J Prod Innovat Manag. 1995, 12: 374-391. 10.1016/0737-6782(95)00059-3.CrossRef Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ: Benchmarking the Firm's Critical Success Factors in New Product Development. J Prod Innovat Manag. 1995, 12: 374-391. 10.1016/0737-6782(95)00059-3.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hayes R, Abernathy WJ: Managing Our Way to Economic Decline. Harvard Bus Rev. 1980,: 67-77. Hayes R, Abernathy WJ: Managing Our Way to Economic Decline. Harvard Bus Rev. 1980,: 67-77.
29.
go back to reference Hamel G: Prahalad CK: Competing for the Future. 1994, Harvard Business School Press, Boston Hamel G: Prahalad CK: Competing for the Future. 1994, Harvard Business School Press, Boston
30.
go back to reference Lettl C, Gemünden HG, Herstatt C: Users’ Contributions to Radical Innovation: Evidence from Four Cases in the Field of Medical Equipment Technology. R&D Manage. 2006, 36: 251-272. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00431.x.CrossRef Lettl C, Gemünden HG, Herstatt C: Users’ Contributions to Radical Innovation: Evidence from Four Cases in the Field of Medical Equipment Technology. R&D Manage. 2006, 36: 251-272. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00431.x.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Shah SG, Robinson I, AlShawi S: Developing medical device technologies from users’ perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development process. Int J Technol Assess. 2009, 25: 514-521. 10.1017/S0266462309990328.CrossRef Shah SG, Robinson I, AlShawi S: Developing medical device technologies from users’ perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development process. Int J Technol Assess. 2009, 25: 514-521. 10.1017/S0266462309990328.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Nickerson RS: Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol. 1998, 2: 175-220.CrossRef Nickerson RS: Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol. 1998, 2: 175-220.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Evans JSBT: Bias in Human Reasoning: Causes and Consequences. 1990, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove and London Evans JSBT: Bias in Human Reasoning: Causes and Consequences. 1990, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove and London
34.
go back to reference Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R: Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. J Risk Uncertainty. 1998, 1: 7-59.CrossRef Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R: Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. J Risk Uncertainty. 1998, 1: 7-59.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Fleming SM, Thomas CL, Dolan RJ: Overcoming status quo bias in the human brain. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 6005-6009. 10.1073/pnas.0910380107.CrossRef Fleming SM, Thomas CL, Dolan RJ: Overcoming status quo bias in the human brain. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 6005-6009. 10.1073/pnas.0910380107.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Keil M, Carmel E: Customer–developer links in software development. Commun ACM. 1995, 37: 33-44.CrossRef Keil M, Carmel E: Customer–developer links in software development. Commun ACM. 1995, 37: 33-44.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Bruseberg A, McDonagh-Philp D: Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: A review based on current literature and designers' feedback. App Ergon. 2002, 33: 27-38. 10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00053-9.CrossRef Bruseberg A, McDonagh-Philp D: Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: A review based on current literature and designers' feedback. App Ergon. 2002, 33: 27-38. 10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00053-9.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Gould JD, Lewis C: Designing for Usability: Key principles and what designers think. Commun ACM. 1985, 28: 300-311. 10.1145/3166.3170.CrossRef Gould JD, Lewis C: Designing for Usability: Key principles and what designers think. Commun ACM. 1985, 28: 300-311. 10.1145/3166.3170.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study
Authors
Jennifer L Martin
Julie Barnett
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-74

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2012 Go to the issue