Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research article

The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives

Authors: Arthur G Money, Julie Barnett, Jasna Kuljis, Michael P Craven, Jennifer L Martin, Terry Young

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Academic literature and international standards bodies suggest that user involvement, via the incorporation of human factors engineering methods within the medical device design and development (MDDD) process, offer many benefits that enable the development of safer and more usable medical devices that are better suited to users' needs. However, little research has been carried out to explore medical device manufacturers' beliefs and attitudes towards user involvement within this process, or indeed what value they believe can be added by doing so.

Methods

In-depth interviews with representatives from 11 medical device manufacturers are carried out. We ask them to specify who they believe the intended users of the device to be, who they consult to inform the MDDD process, what role they believe the user plays within this process, and what value (if any) they believe users add. Thematic analysis is used to analyse the fully transcribed interview data, to gain insight into medical device manufacturers' beliefs and attitudes towards user involvement within the MDDD process.

Results

A number of high-level themes emerged, relating who the user is perceived to be, the methods used, the perceived value and barriers to user involvement, and the nature of user contributions. The findings reveal that despite standards agencies and academic literature offering strong support for the employment formal methods, manufacturers are still hesitant due to a range of factors including: perceived barriers to obtaining ethical approval; the speed at which such activity may be carried out; the belief that there is no need given the 'all-knowing' nature of senior health care staff and clinical champions; a belief that effective results are achievable by consulting a minimal number of champions. Furthermore, less senior health care practitioners and patients were rarely seen as being able to provide valuable input into the process.

Conclusions

Medical device manufacturers often do not see the benefit of employing formal human factors engineering methods within the MDDD process. Research is required to better understand the day-to-day requirements of manufacturers within this sector. The development of new or adapted methods may be required if user involvement is to be fully realised.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Shah SGS, Robinson I: Medical device technologies: who is the user?. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management. 2008, 9: 181-197. 10.1504/IJHTM.2008.017372.CrossRef Shah SGS, Robinson I: Medical device technologies: who is the user?. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management. 2008, 9: 181-197. 10.1504/IJHTM.2008.017372.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Shah SGS, Robinson I, Alshawi S: Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: A theoretical framework for involving users in the development process. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2009, 25: 514-521. 10.1017/S0266462309990328.CrossRefPubMed Shah SGS, Robinson I, Alshawi S: Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: A theoretical framework for involving users in the development process. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2009, 25: 514-521. 10.1017/S0266462309990328.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wilson T, Sheikh A: Enhancing public safety in primary care. British Medical Journal. 324: 584-587. 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.584. Wilson T, Sheikh A: Enhancing public safety in primary care. British Medical Journal. 324: 584-587. 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.584.
5.
go back to reference Martin JL: Design for patient safety: User testing in the development of medical devices. 2010, National Patient Safety Agency, London, UK Martin JL: Design for patient safety: User testing in the development of medical devices. 2010, National Patient Safety Agency, London, UK
6.
go back to reference Sax H, Allegranzi B, Uckay I, Larson E, Boyce J, Pittet D: 'My five moments for hand hygiene':a user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2007, 67: 9-21. 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.06.004.CrossRefPubMed Sax H, Allegranzi B, Uckay I, Larson E, Boyce J, Pittet D: 'My five moments for hand hygiene':a user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2007, 67: 9-21. 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.06.004.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wressle E, Samuelsson K: User Satisfaction with Mobility Assistive Devices. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2004, 11: 143-150. 10.1080/11038120410020728.CrossRef Wressle E, Samuelsson K: User Satisfaction with Mobility Assistive Devices. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2004, 11: 143-150. 10.1080/11038120410020728.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference De Vito Dabbs A, Myers B, McCurry K, Dunbar-Jacob J, Hawkins R, Begey A, Dew M: User-Centered Design and Interactive Health Technologies for Patients. Computers Informatics Nursing. 2009, 27: 1-16. 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181920769.CrossRef De Vito Dabbs A, Myers B, McCurry K, Dunbar-Jacob J, Hawkins R, Begey A, Dew M: User-Centered Design and Interactive Health Technologies for Patients. Computers Informatics Nursing. 2009, 27: 1-16. 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181920769.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bias RG, Mayhew DJ: Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for the Internet Age. 2005, San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann PublishersCrossRef Bias RG, Mayhew DJ: Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for the Internet Age. 2005, San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann PublishersCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices. Official Journal of the European Communities. 1993, L169: Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices. Official Journal of the European Communities. 1993, L169:
11.
go back to reference Martin JL, Norris JN, Murphy E, Crowe JA: Medical device development: The challenge for ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics. 2008, 39: 271-283. 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.10.002.CrossRefPubMed Martin JL, Norris JN, Murphy E, Crowe JA: Medical device development: The challenge for ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics. 2008, 39: 271-283. 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.10.002.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sawyer D: Do it by design: an introduction to human factors in medical devices. US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drud Administration. 1996 Sawyer D: Do it by design: an introduction to human factors in medical devices. US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drud Administration. 1996
13.
go back to reference IEC 2004: General Requirements for Safety of Electrical Medical Equipment Collateral Standard: Usability. 60601-1-6 IEC 2004: General Requirements for Safety of Electrical Medical Equipment Collateral Standard: Usability. 60601-1-6
14.
go back to reference ISO/IEC 2008: Medical Devices - Application of Usability Engineering to Medical Devices. International Organisation for Standardisation. Geneva, 62366 ISO/IEC 2008: Medical Devices - Application of Usability Engineering to Medical Devices. International Organisation for Standardisation. Geneva, 62366
15.
go back to reference Martin JL, Murphy E, Crowe J, Norris B: Capturing user requirements in medical device development: the role of ergonomics. Physioogical Measurement. 2006, 27: 49-62. 10.1088/0967-3334/27/8/R01.CrossRef Martin JL, Murphy E, Crowe J, Norris B: Capturing user requirements in medical device development: the role of ergonomics. Physioogical Measurement. 2006, 27: 49-62. 10.1088/0967-3334/27/8/R01.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shah SGS, Robinson I: Benefits of, and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2007, 23: 131-137. 10.1017/S0266462307051677.CrossRefPubMed Shah SGS, Robinson I: Benefits of, and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2007, 23: 131-137. 10.1017/S0266462307051677.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cooper RG: The invisible success factors in product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 1999, 16: 115-133. 10.1016/S0737-6782(98)00061-7.CrossRef Cooper RG: The invisible success factors in product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 1999, 16: 115-133. 10.1016/S0737-6782(98)00061-7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kujala S: User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behaviou and Information Technology. 2003, 22: 1-16. 10.1080/01449290301782.CrossRef Kujala S: User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behaviou and Information Technology. 2003, 22: 1-16. 10.1080/01449290301782.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Brown DS: The challenges of user-based design in a medical equipment market. Field methods casebook for software design. 1996, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 157-176. Brown DS: The challenges of user-based design in a medical equipment market. Field methods casebook for software design. 1996, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 157-176.
20.
go back to reference Butler MB: Getting to know your users: Usability roundtables at Lotus development. Interactions. 1996, 3: 23-30. 10.1145/223500.223507.CrossRef Butler MB: Getting to know your users: Usability roundtables at Lotus development. Interactions. 1996, 3: 23-30. 10.1145/223500.223507.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Van der Panne G, Van Beers C, Kleinknecht A: Success and failure of innovation: a literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management. 2003, 7: 309-10.1142/S1363919603000830.CrossRef Van der Panne G, Van Beers C, Kleinknecht A: Success and failure of innovation: a literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management. 2003, 7: 309-10.1142/S1363919603000830.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Stewart J, Williams R: The Wrong Trousers? Beyond the Design Fallacy: Social Learning and the User. User involvement in innovation processes Strategies and limitations from a socio-technical perspective. Edited by: Rohracher H. 2005, Munich: Profil-Verlag Stewart J, Williams R: The Wrong Trousers? Beyond the Design Fallacy: Social Learning and the User. User involvement in innovation processes Strategies and limitations from a socio-technical perspective. Edited by: Rohracher H. 2005, Munich: Profil-Verlag
23.
go back to reference Wixon D: Evaluating usability methods: why the current literature fails the practitioner. Interactions. 2003, 10: 28-34. 10.1145/838830.838870.CrossRef Wixon D: Evaluating usability methods: why the current literature fails the practitioner. Interactions. 2003, 10: 28-34. 10.1145/838830.838870.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Steen M, Kuijt-Evers L, Klok J: Early user involvement in research and design projects - A review of methods and practices. 2007 Steen M, Kuijt-Evers L, Klok J: Early user involvement in research and design projects - A review of methods and practices. 2007
25.
go back to reference Steen M, de Koning N, Takahashi I: Innovating together with users - Taking the organizational context into account. 2009 Steen M, de Koning N, Takahashi I: Innovating together with users - Taking the organizational context into account. 2009
26.
go back to reference Grocott P, Weir H, Ram MB: A model of user engagement in medical device development. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2007, 20: 484-493. 10.1108/09526860710819422.CrossRefPubMed Grocott P, Weir H, Ram MB: A model of user engagement in medical device development. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2007, 20: 484-493. 10.1108/09526860710819422.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Gulliksen J, Boivie I, Goransson B: Usability professionals - current practices and future development. Interacting with Computers. 2006, 18: 568-600. 10.1016/j.intcom.2005.10.005.CrossRef Gulliksen J, Boivie I, Goransson B: Usability professionals - current practices and future development. Interacting with Computers. 2006, 18: 568-600. 10.1016/j.intcom.2005.10.005.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Boivie I, Gulliksen J, Goransson G: The lonesome cowboy: A study of the usability designer role in systems development. Interacting with Computers. 2006, 18: 601-634. 10.1016/j.intcom.2005.10.003.CrossRef Boivie I, Gulliksen J, Goransson G: The lonesome cowboy: A study of the usability designer role in systems development. Interacting with Computers. 2006, 18: 601-634. 10.1016/j.intcom.2005.10.003.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Boyatzis RE: Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. 1998, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications Boyatzis RE: Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. 1998, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications
30.
go back to reference Taylor SJ, Bogdan R: Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meanings. 1984, New York, NY: Wiley Taylor SJ, Bogdan R: Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meanings. 1984, New York, NY: Wiley
31.
go back to reference Silverman D: Doing Qualitative Research. 2005, London: Sage Publications Silverman D: Doing Qualitative Research. 2005, London: Sage Publications
32.
go back to reference Joffe H, Yardley L: Content and thematic analysis. Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. Edited by: Marks DF, Yardley L. 2004, London, UK: Sage Publications, 56-66. Joffe H, Yardley L: Content and thematic analysis. Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. Edited by: Marks DF, Yardley L. 2004, London, UK: Sage Publications, 56-66.
33.
go back to reference Dey I: Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. 1993, London: RoutledgeCrossRef Dey I: Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. 1993, London: RoutledgeCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Garmer K, Liljegren E, Osvalder AL, Dahlman S: Application of usability testing to the development of medical equipment. Usability testing of a frequently used infusion pump and a new user interface for an infusion pump developed with a Human Factors approach. International Journall of Industrial Ergonomics. 2002, 29: 145-159. 10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00060-9.CrossRef Garmer K, Liljegren E, Osvalder AL, Dahlman S: Application of usability testing to the development of medical equipment. Usability testing of a frequently used infusion pump and a new user interface for an infusion pump developed with a Human Factors approach. International Journall of Industrial Ergonomics. 2002, 29: 145-159. 10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00060-9.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Carayon P: Human factors of complex sociotechnical systems. Applied Ergonomics. 2006, 37: 525-535. 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.011.CrossRefPubMed Carayon P: Human factors of complex sociotechnical systems. Applied Ergonomics. 2006, 37: 525-535. 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.011.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference ginsburg: Human factors engineering: A tool for medical device evaluation in hospital procurement decision-making. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2005, 38: 213-219. 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.008.CrossRefPubMed ginsburg: Human factors engineering: A tool for medical device evaluation in hospital procurement decision-making. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2005, 38: 213-219. 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.008.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Stewart J, Williams R: The Wrong Trousers? Beyond the Design Fallacy: Social Learning and the User. User involvement in innovation processes Strategies and limitations from a socio-technical perspective. Edited by: Rohracher H. 2005, Munich, Germany: Profil-Verlag Stewart J, Williams R: The Wrong Trousers? Beyond the Design Fallacy: Social Learning and the User. User involvement in innovation processes Strategies and limitations from a socio-technical perspective. Edited by: Rohracher H. 2005, Munich, Germany: Profil-Verlag
39.
go back to reference Martin JL, Craven MP, Norris BJ: MATCH: A new industry-focused approach to medical device development. Healthcare systems Ergonomics and Patient Safety: Human Factor, a bridge between care and cure. Edited by: Tartaglia R, Venneri F, Parlangeli O, Tomassini CR, Bagnara S. 2005, London, UK: Taylor & Francis, 294-297. Martin JL, Craven MP, Norris BJ: MATCH: A new industry-focused approach to medical device development. Healthcare systems Ergonomics and Patient Safety: Human Factor, a bridge between care and cure. Edited by: Tartaglia R, Venneri F, Parlangeli O, Tomassini CR, Bagnara S. 2005, London, UK: Taylor & Francis, 294-297.
40.
go back to reference Craven MP, Martin JL: How does the Healthcare Industry involve Users in Medical Device Development? - Pointers for UbiHealth, Nottingham, England, 7-10 September 2004. 2004 Craven MP, Martin JL: How does the Healthcare Industry involve Users in Medical Device Development? - Pointers for UbiHealth, Nottingham, England, 7-10 September 2004. 2004
41.
go back to reference Warlow C: Over-regulation of clinical research: a threat to public health. Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians. 2005, 5: 33-38. Warlow C: Over-regulation of clinical research: a threat to public health. Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians. 2005, 5: 33-38.
42.
go back to reference Stewart PM, Stears A, Tomlinson JW, Brown MJ: Regulation - the real threat to clinical research. British Medical Journal. 2008, 337: Stewart PM, Stears A, Tomlinson JW, Brown MJ: Regulation - the real threat to clinical research. British Medical Journal. 2008, 337:
Metadata
Title
The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives
Authors
Arthur G Money
Julie Barnett
Jasna Kuljis
Michael P Craven
Jennifer L Martin
Terry Young
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-15

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2011 Go to the issue