Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research article

A simple method for estimating relative risk using logistic regression

Author: Fredi A Diaz-Quijano

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Odds ratios (OR) significantly overestimate associations between risk factors and common outcomes. The estimation of relative risks (RR) or prevalence ratios (PR) has represented a statistical challenge in multivariate analysis and, furthermore, some researchers do not have access to the available methods. Objective: To propose and evaluate a new method for estimating RR and PR by logistic regression.

Methods

A provisional database was designed in which events were duplicated but identified as non-events. After, a logistic regression was performed and effect measures were calculated, which were considered RR estimations. This method was compared with binomial regression, Cox regression with robust variance and ordinary logistic regression in analyses with three outcomes of different frequencies.

Results

ORs estimated by ordinary logistic regression progressively overestimated RRs as the outcome frequency increased. RRs estimated by Cox regression and the method proposed in this article were similar to those estimated by binomial regression for every outcome. However, confidence intervals were wider with the proposed method.

Conclusion

This simple tool could be useful for calculating the effect of risk factors and the impact of health interventions in developing countries when other statistical strategies are not available.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McNutt LA, Wu C, Xue X, Hafner JP: Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2003, 157: 940-3. 10.1093/aje/kwg074.CrossRefPubMed McNutt LA, Wu C, Xue X, Hafner JP: Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2003, 157: 940-3. 10.1093/aje/kwg074.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Zhang J, Yu KF: What's the Relative Risk? A Method of Correcting the Odds Ratio in Cohort Studies of Common Outcomes. JAMA. 1998, 280: 1690-1691. 10.1001/jama.280.19.1690.CrossRefPubMed Zhang J, Yu KF: What's the Relative Risk? A Method of Correcting the Odds Ratio in Cohort Studies of Common Outcomes. JAMA. 1998, 280: 1690-1691. 10.1001/jama.280.19.1690.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wacholder S: Binomial regression in GLIM: estimating risk ratios and risk differences. Am J Epidemiol. 1986, 123: 174-184.PubMed Wacholder S: Binomial regression in GLIM: estimating risk ratios and risk differences. Am J Epidemiol. 1986, 123: 174-184.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Nijem K, Kristensen P, Al-Khatib A, Bjertness E: Application of different statistical methods to estimate risk for self-reported health complaints among shoe factory workers exposed to organic solvents and plastic compounds. Norsk Epidemiologi. 2005, 15: 111-116. Nijem K, Kristensen P, Al-Khatib A, Bjertness E: Application of different statistical methods to estimate risk for self-reported health complaints among shoe factory workers exposed to organic solvents and plastic compounds. Norsk Epidemiologi. 2005, 15: 111-116.
6.
go back to reference Lee J, Chia KS: Estimation of prevalence rate ratios for cross sectional data: an example in occupational epidemiology. Br J Ind Med. 1993, 50: 861-862.PubMedPubMedCentral Lee J, Chia KS: Estimation of prevalence rate ratios for cross sectional data: an example in occupational epidemiology. Br J Ind Med. 1993, 50: 861-862.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Barros AJD, Hirakata VN: Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003, 3: 21-10.1186/1471-2288-3-21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barros AJD, Hirakata VN: Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003, 3: 21-10.1186/1471-2288-3-21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Kulathinal S, Karvanen J, Saarela O, Kuulasmaa K: Case-cohort design in practice - experiences from the MORGAM Project. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2007, 4: 15-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kulathinal S, Karvanen J, Saarela O, Kuulasmaa K: Case-cohort design in practice - experiences from the MORGAM Project. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2007, 4: 15-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Flanders WD: Limitations of the case-exposure study. Epidemiology. 1990, 1: 34-38. 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00008.CrossRefPubMed Flanders WD: Limitations of the case-exposure study. Epidemiology. 1990, 1: 34-38. 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00008.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sato T: Estimation of a common risk ratio in stratified case-cohort studies. Stat Med. 1992, 11: 1599-605. 10.1002/sim.4780111207.CrossRefPubMed Sato T: Estimation of a common risk ratio in stratified case-cohort studies. Stat Med. 1992, 11: 1599-605. 10.1002/sim.4780111207.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lee J, Tan CS, Chia KS: A practical guide for multivariate analysis of dichotomous outcomes. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2009, 38: 714-719.PubMed Lee J, Tan CS, Chia KS: A practical guide for multivariate analysis of dichotomous outcomes. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2009, 38: 714-719.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG: Misunderstandings about the effects of race and sex on physicians' referrals for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1999, 341: 279-83. 10.1056/NEJM199907223410411.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG: Misunderstandings about the effects of race and sex on physicians' referrals for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1999, 341: 279-83. 10.1056/NEJM199907223410411.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Localio AR, Margolis DJ, Berlin JA: Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007, 60: 874-882. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.12.001.CrossRefPubMed Localio AR, Margolis DJ, Berlin JA: Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007, 60: 874-882. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.12.001.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Thompson ML, Myers JE, Kriebel D: Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done?. Occup Environ Med. 1998, 55: 272-277. 10.1136/oem.55.4.272.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thompson ML, Myers JE, Kriebel D: Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done?. Occup Environ Med. 1998, 55: 272-277. 10.1136/oem.55.4.272.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Coutinho LM, Scazufca M, Menezes PR: Methods for estimating prevalence ratios in cross-sectional studies. Rev Saude Publica. 2008, 42: 992-998. 10.1590/S0034-89102008000600003.CrossRefPubMed Coutinho LM, Scazufca M, Menezes PR: Methods for estimating prevalence ratios in cross-sectional studies. Rev Saude Publica. 2008, 42: 992-998. 10.1590/S0034-89102008000600003.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A simple method for estimating relative risk using logistic regression
Author
Fredi A Diaz-Quijano
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-14

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2012 Go to the issue