Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2003

Open Access 01-12-2003 | Research article

Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio

Authors: Aluísio JD Barros, Vânia N Hirakata

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cross-sectional studies with binary outcomes analyzed by logistic regression are frequent in the epidemiological literature. However, the odds ratio can importantly overestimate the prevalence ratio, the measure of choice in these studies. Also, controlling for confounding is not equivalent for the two measures. In this paper we explore alternatives for modeling data of such studies with techniques that directly estimate the prevalence ratio.

Methods

We compared Cox regression with constant time at risk, Poisson regression and log-binomial regression against the standard Mantel-Haenszel estimators. Models with robust variance estimators in Cox and Poisson regressions and variance corrected by the scale parameter in Poisson regression were also evaluated.

Results

Three outcomes, from a cross-sectional study carried out in Pelotas, Brazil, with different levels of prevalence were explored: weight-for-age deficit (4%), asthma (31%) and mother in a paid job (52%). Unadjusted Cox/Poisson regression and Poisson regression with scale parameter adjusted by deviance performed worst in terms of interval estimates. Poisson regression with scale parameter adjusted by χ2 showed variable performance depending on the outcome prevalence. Cox/Poisson regression with robust variance, and log-binomial regression performed equally well when the model was correctly specified.

Conclusions

Cox or Poisson regression with robust variance and log-binomial regression provide correct estimates and are a better alternative for the analysis of cross-sectional studies with binary outcomes than logistic regression, since the prevalence ratio is more interpretable and easier to communicate to non-specialists than the odds ratio. However, precautions are needed to avoid estimation problems in specific situations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Greenland S: Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1987, 125: 761-768.PubMed Greenland S: Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1987, 125: 761-768.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Savitz DA: Measurements, estimates, and inferences in reporting epidemiologic study results [editorial]. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1992, 135: 223-224.PubMed Savitz DA: Measurements, estimates, and inferences in reporting epidemiologic study results [editorial]. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1992, 135: 223-224.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Nurminen M: To use or not to use the odds ratio in epidemiologic analyses. European Journal of Epidemiology. 1995, 11: 365-371.CrossRefPubMed Nurminen M: To use or not to use the odds ratio in epidemiologic analyses. European Journal of Epidemiology. 1995, 11: 365-371.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Thompson ML, Myers JE, Kriebel D: Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done?. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 1998, 55: 272-277.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thompson ML, Myers JE, Kriebel D: Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done?. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 1998, 55: 272-277.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Miettinen OS, Cook EF: Confounding: essence and detection. Am J Epidemiol. 1981, 114: 593-603.PubMed Miettinen OS, Cook EF: Confounding: essence and detection. Am J Epidemiol. 1981, 114: 593-603.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Axelson O, Fredriksson M, Ekberg K: Use of the prevalence ratio v the prevalence odds ratio as a measure of risk in cross sectional studies [letter; comment]. Occup Environ Med. 1994, 51: 574-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Axelson O, Fredriksson M, Ekberg K: Use of the prevalence ratio v the prevalence odds ratio as a measure of risk in cross sectional studies [letter; comment]. Occup Environ Med. 1994, 51: 574-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Zocchetti C, Consonni D, Bertazzi PA: Estimation of prevalence rate ratios from cross-sectional data [letter; comment]. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1995, 24: 1064-1067.CrossRefPubMed Zocchetti C, Consonni D, Bertazzi PA: Estimation of prevalence rate ratios from cross-sectional data [letter; comment]. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1995, 24: 1064-1067.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Osborn J, Cattaruzza MS: Odds ratio and relative risk for cross-sectional data [letter; comment]. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1995, 24: 464-465.CrossRefPubMed Osborn J, Cattaruzza MS: Odds ratio and relative risk for cross-sectional data [letter; comment]. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1995, 24: 464-465.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hirakata Vânia Naomi: Alternativas de análise para um desfecho binário em estudos transversais e longitudinais [MSc dissertation]. Depto. Medicina Social. 1999, Pelotas, Brasil, Universidade Federal de Pelotas; Hirakata Vânia Naomi: Alternativas de análise para um desfecho binário em estudos transversais e longitudinais [MSc dissertation]. Depto. Medicina Social. 1999, Pelotas, Brasil, Universidade Federal de Pelotas;
10.
go back to reference Lee J, Chia KS: Estimation of prevalence rate ratios for cross sectional data: an example in occupational epidemiology [letter]. British Journal of Industrial Medicine. 1993, 50: 861-862.PubMedPubMedCentral Lee J, Chia KS: Estimation of prevalence rate ratios for cross sectional data: an example in occupational epidemiology [letter]. British Journal of Industrial Medicine. 1993, 50: 861-862.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Victora Cesar Gomes, Vaughan JP, Kirkwood Betty R., Martines JC, Barcelos LB: Risk factors for malnutrition in Brazilian children. The role of social and environmental variables. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1986, 64: 299-309.PubMedPubMedCentral Victora Cesar Gomes, Vaughan JP, Kirkwood Betty R., Martines JC, Barcelos LB: Risk factors for malnutrition in Brazilian children. The role of social and environmental variables. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1986, 64: 299-309.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Wacholder S: Binomial regression in GLIM: estimating risk ratios and risk differences [see comments]. Am J Epidemiol. 1986, 123: 174-184.PubMed Wacholder S: Binomial regression in GLIM: estimating risk ratios and risk differences [see comments]. Am J Epidemiol. 1986, 123: 174-184.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Traissac P, Martin-Prevel Y, Delpeuch F, Maire B: Régression logistique vs autres modèles linéaires généralisés pour l'estimation de rapports de prévalences. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1999, 47: 593-604.PubMed Traissac P, Martin-Prevel Y, Delpeuch F, Maire B: Régression logistique vs autres modèles linéaires généralisés pour l'estimation de rapports de prévalences. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1999, 47: 593-604.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Martuzzi M, Elliott P: Estimating the incidence rate ratio in cross-sectional studies using a simple alternative to logistic regression. Annals of Epidemiology. 1998, 8: 52-55. 10.1016/S1047-2797(97)00106-3.CrossRefPubMed Martuzzi M, Elliott P: Estimating the incidence rate ratio in cross-sectional studies using a simple alternative to logistic regression. Annals of Epidemiology. 1998, 8: 52-55. 10.1016/S1047-2797(97)00106-3.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Skov T, Deddens J, Petersen MR, Endahl L: Prevalence proportion ratios: estimation and hypothesis testing. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1998, 27: 91-95. 10.1093/ije/27.1.91.CrossRefPubMed Skov T, Deddens J, Petersen MR, Endahl L: Prevalence proportion ratios: estimation and hypothesis testing. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1998, 27: 91-95. 10.1093/ije/27.1.91.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cox DR: Regression models and life-tables [with discussion]. J R Stat Soc B. 1972, 34: 187-220. Cox DR: Regression models and life-tables [with discussion]. J R Stat Soc B. 1972, 34: 187-220.
17.
18.
go back to reference Lee J: Odds ratio or relative risk for cross-sectional data? [letter]. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1994, 23: 201-203.CrossRefPubMed Lee J: Odds ratio or relative risk for cross-sectional data? [letter]. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1994, 23: 201-203.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lin DY, Wei LJ: The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1989, 84: 1074-1078.CrossRef Lin DY, Wei LJ: The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1989, 84: 1074-1078.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Huber PJ: The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Vol. 1. 1967, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press, 1, 221-233. Huber PJ: The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Vol. 1. 1967, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press, 1, 221-233.
21.
go back to reference Clayton David, Hills Michael: Statistical Models in Epidemiology. 1996, New York, Oxford University Press Inc.;, 367- Clayton David, Hills Michael: Statistical Models in Epidemiology. 1996, New York, Oxford University Press Inc.;, 367-
22.
go back to reference McCullagh P, Nelder JA: Generalized linear models. 1989, New York, Chapman and Hall;, 2ndCrossRef McCullagh P, Nelder JA: Generalized linear models. 1989, New York, Chapman and Hall;, 2ndCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Breslow NE: Generalized linear models: checking assumptions and strengthening conclusions. Statistica Applicata. 1996, 8: 23-41. Breslow NE: Generalized linear models: checking assumptions and strengthening conclusions. Statistica Applicata. 1996, 8: 23-41.
24.
go back to reference Lee J: Estimation of prevalence rate ratios from cross-sectional data: a reply. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1995, 24: 1066-1067.CrossRef Lee J: Estimation of prevalence rate ratios from cross-sectional data: a reply. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1995, 24: 1066-1067.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference StataCorp.: Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.0. 2001, College Station, TX, Stata Corporation StataCorp.: Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.0. 2001, College Station, TX, Stata Corporation
26.
go back to reference Victora CG, Barros FC, Halpern R, Menezes AM, Horta BL, Tomasi E, Weiderpass E, Cesar JA, Olinto MT, Guimaraes PR, Garcia MM, Vaughan JP: Estudo longitudinal da populacao materno-infantil da regiao urbana do Sul do Brasil, 1993: aspectos metodologicos e resultados preliminares. Revista de Saúde Pública. 1996, 30: 34-45.CrossRefPubMed Victora CG, Barros FC, Halpern R, Menezes AM, Horta BL, Tomasi E, Weiderpass E, Cesar JA, Olinto MT, Guimaraes PR, Garcia MM, Vaughan JP: Estudo longitudinal da populacao materno-infantil da regiao urbana do Sul do Brasil, 1993: aspectos metodologicos e resultados preliminares. Revista de Saúde Pública. 1996, 30: 34-45.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Deddens J, Petersen MR, Lei X: Estimation of prevalence ratios when PROC GENMOD does not converge. Proceedings of SAS Users Group International 28 (SUGI28). 2003, Seattle, Washington, Paper 270- Deddens J, Petersen MR, Lei X: Estimation of prevalence ratios when PROC GENMOD does not converge. Proceedings of SAS Users Group International 28 (SUGI28). 2003, Seattle, Washington, Paper 270-
28.
go back to reference Fonseca SS, Victora CG, Halpern R, Barros AJ, Lima RC, Monteiro LA, Barros FC: Fatores de risco para injúrias acidentais em pré-escolares. Jornal de Pediatria. 2002, 78: 97-104.PubMed Fonseca SS, Victora CG, Halpern R, Barros AJ, Lima RC, Monteiro LA, Barros FC: Fatores de risco para injúrias acidentais em pré-escolares. Jornal de Pediatria. 2002, 78: 97-104.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Mendoza-Sassi R, Beria JU, Barros AJ: Outpatient health service utilization and associated factors: a population-based study. Revista de Saúde Pública. 2003, 37: 372-378.CrossRefPubMed Mendoza-Sassi R, Beria JU, Barros AJ: Outpatient health service utilization and associated factors: a population-based study. Revista de Saúde Pública. 2003, 37: 372-378.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Hallal PC, Victora CG, Wells JC, Lima RC: Phisical inactivity: prevalence and associated variables in Brazilian adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2003, in press: Hallal PC, Victora CG, Wells JC, Lima RC: Phisical inactivity: prevalence and associated variables in Brazilian adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2003, in press:
Metadata
Title
Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio
Authors
Aluísio JD Barros
Vânia N Hirakata
Publication date
01-12-2003
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2003
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-21

Other articles of this Issue 1/2003

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2003 Go to the issue