Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 8/2019

Open Access 01-08-2019 | Pharmacokinetics | Original Research Article

Population Pharmacokinetics of Upadacitinib Using the Immediate-Release and Extended-Release Formulations in Healthy Subjects and Subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Analyses of Phase I–III Clinical Trials

Authors: Ben Klünder, Rajendar K. Mittapalli, Mohamed-Eslam F. Mohamed, Anna Friedel, Peter Noertersheuser, Ahmed A. Othman

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Upadacitinib is a selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor being developed as an orally administered treatment for patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other autoimmune disorders. These analyses characterized the population pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib across phase I–III clinical trials using data for immediate-release (IR) and extended-release (ER) formulations.

Methods

Pharmacokinetic data from 4170 subjects taking IR doses of 1–48 mg and ER doses of 7.5–30 mg across 12 studies spanning phase I–III clinical trials, with a total of 29,372 upadacitinib plasma concentrations, were analyzed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling. The model was evaluated using bootstrap analyses and visual predictive checks.

Results

A two-compartment model with first-order absorption with lag time for the IR formulation, mixed zero- and first-order absorption with lag time for the ER formulation, and linear elimination, adequately described upadacitinib plasma concentration–time profiles. Population estimates of upadacitinib apparent oral clearance and steady-state volume of distribution in healthy volunteers for the ER formulation were 53.7 L/h and 294 L, respectively. The relative bioavailability of the ER formulation compared with the IR formulation was estimated to be 76.2%. Statistically significant covariates were patient population (RA subjects vs. healthy subjects), creatinine clearance, and baseline bodyweight on apparent clearance (CL/F) and bodyweight on volume of distribution of the central compartment (Vc/F). The intersubject variability for upadacitinib CL/F and Vc/F were estimated to be 21% and 24%, respectively, in the phase I studies, and 37% and 53%, respectively, in the phase II/III studies. Upadacitinib area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) was estimated to be only 5% higher or lower for RA patients who were < 60 or > 100 kg, respectively, relative to subjects with a bodyweight of 60–100 kg. RA subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment had 13% and 26% higher AUC, respectively, compared with RA subjects with normal renal function. Sex, race, concomitant use of pH-modifying drugs, moderate cytochrome P450 3A inhibitors, or methotrexate use had no effect on upadacitinib exposure.

Conclusions

A robust population pharmacokinetic model was developed for upadacitinib using a large dataset from phase I–III clinical trials in healthy volunteers and subjects with RA. None of the identified covariates had a clinically meaningful effect on upadacitinib exposures. The model is appropriate to use for simulations and to evaluate the exposure–response relationship of upadacitinib.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TWJ. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2010;376:1094–108.CrossRef Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TWJ. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2010;376:1094–108.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Leonard WJ. Role of Jak kinases and STATs in cytokine signal transduction. Int J Hematol. 2001;73:271–7.CrossRefPubMed Leonard WJ. Role of Jak kinases and STATs in cytokine signal transduction. Int J Hematol. 2001;73:271–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Voss J, Graff C, Schwartz A, Hyland D, Argiriadi M, Camp H, et al. Pharmacodynamics of a novel Jak1 selective inhibitor in rat arthritis and anemia models and in healthy human subjects. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:1. Voss J, Graff C, Schwartz A, Hyland D, Argiriadi M, Camp H, et al. Pharmacodynamics of a novel Jak1 selective inhibitor in rat arthritis and anemia models and in healthy human subjects. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:1.
6.
go back to reference Winthrop KL. The emerging safety profile of JAK inhibitors in rheumatic disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13:234–43.CrossRefPubMed Winthrop KL. The emerging safety profile of JAK inhibitors in rheumatic disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13:234–43.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kontzias A, Kotlyar A, Laurence A, Changelian P, O’Shea JJ. Jakinibs: a new class of kinase inhibitors in cancer and autoimmune disease. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2012;12:464–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kontzias A, Kotlyar A, Laurence A, Changelian P, O’Shea JJ. Jakinibs: a new class of kinase inhibitors in cancer and autoimmune disease. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2012;12:464–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Neubauer H, Cumano A, Müller M, Wu H, Huffstadt U, Pfeffer K. Jak2 deficiency defines an essential developmental checkpoint in definitive hematopoiesis. Cell. 1998;93:397–409.CrossRefPubMed Neubauer H, Cumano A, Müller M, Wu H, Huffstadt U, Pfeffer K. Jak2 deficiency defines an essential developmental checkpoint in definitive hematopoiesis. Cell. 1998;93:397–409.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Norman P. Selective JAK inhibitors in development for rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2014;23:1067–77.CrossRefPubMed Norman P. Selective JAK inhibitors in development for rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2014;23:1067–77.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mohamed M-EF, Camp HS, Jiang P, Padley RJ, Asatryan A, Othman AA. Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of ABT-494, a novel selective JAK 1 inhibitor, in healthy volunteers and subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55:1547–58. Mohamed M-EF, Camp HS, Jiang P, Padley RJ, Asatryan A, Othman AA. Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of ABT-494, a novel selective JAK 1 inhibitor, in healthy volunteers and subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55:1547–58.
11.
go back to reference Genovese MC, Smolen JS, Weinblatt ME, Burmester GR, Meerwein S, Camp HS, et al. Efficacy and safety of ABT-494, a selective JAK-1 inhibitor, in a phase IIb study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:2857–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Genovese MC, Smolen JS, Weinblatt ME, Burmester GR, Meerwein S, Camp HS, et al. Efficacy and safety of ABT-494, a selective JAK-1 inhibitor, in a phase IIb study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:2857–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Combe B, Hall S, Rubbert-Roth A, Zhang Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-BEYOND): a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;391:2513–24.CrossRefPubMed Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Combe B, Hall S, Rubbert-Roth A, Zhang Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-BEYOND): a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;391:2513–24.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Klünder B, Mohamed M-EF, Othman AA. Population pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib in healthy subjects and subjects with rheumatoid arthritis: analyses of phase I and II clinical trials. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018;57:977–88. Klünder B, Mohamed M-EF, Othman AA. Population pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib in healthy subjects and subjects with rheumatoid arthritis: analyses of phase I and II clinical trials. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018;57:977–88.
15.
go back to reference Kremer JM, Emery P, Camp HS, Friedman A, Wang L, Othman AA, et al. A phase IIb study of ABT-494, a selective JAK-1 inhibitor, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:2867–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kremer JM, Emery P, Camp HS, Friedman A, Wang L, Othman AA, et al. A phase IIb study of ABT-494, a selective JAK-1 inhibitor, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:2867–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Burmester GR, Kremer JM, Van den Bosch F, Kivitz A, Bessette L, Li Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-NEXT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;391:2503–12.CrossRefPubMed Burmester GR, Kremer JM, Van den Bosch F, Kivitz A, Bessette L, Li Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-NEXT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;391:2503–12.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Roy F. A phase 3, randomized, double-blind study comparing upadacitinib to placebo and to adalimumab, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate [abstract no. 72780]. American College of Rheumatology Meeting Abstracts; 2018. Roy F. A phase 3, randomized, double-blind study comparing upadacitinib to placebo and to adalimumab, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate [abstract no. 72780]. American College of Rheumatology Meeting Abstracts; 2018.
18.
go back to reference van Vollenhoven R. A phase 3, randomized, controlled trial comparing upadacitinib monotherapy to MTX monotherapy in MTX-naïve patients with active rheumatoid arthritis [abstract no. 75147]. American College of Rheumatology Meeting Abstracts; 2018. van Vollenhoven R. A phase 3, randomized, controlled trial comparing upadacitinib monotherapy to MTX monotherapy in MTX-naïve patients with active rheumatoid arthritis [abstract no. 75147]. American College of Rheumatology Meeting Abstracts; 2018.
19.
go back to reference Smolen JS. Upadacitinib As Monotherapy: A phase 3 randomized controlled double- blind study in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate. American College of Rheumatology Meeting Abstracts; 2018. Smolen JS. Upadacitinib As Monotherapy: A phase 3 randomized controlled double- blind study in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate. American College of Rheumatology Meeting Abstracts; 2018.
20.
go back to reference Tanaka Y. A Phase2b/3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of upadacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic dmards. EULAR18-4302. European League Against Rheumatism; 2018. Tanaka Y. A Phase2b/3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of upadacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic dmards. EULAR18-4302. European League Against Rheumatism; 2018.
21.
go back to reference Beal SL. Ways to fit a PK model with some data below the quantification limit. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2001;28:481–504.CrossRefPubMed Beal SL. Ways to fit a PK model with some data below the quantification limit. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2001;28:481–504.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sheiner LB, Ludden TM. Population pharmacokinetics/dynamics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1992;32:185–209.CrossRefPubMed Sheiner LB, Ludden TM. Population pharmacokinetics/dynamics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1992;32:185–209.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Bergstrand M, Hooker AC, Wallin JE, Karlsson MO. Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects models. AAPS J. 2011;13:143–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bergstrand M, Hooker AC, Wallin JE, Karlsson MO. Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects models. AAPS J. 2011;13:143–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Namour F, Diderichsen PM, Cox E, Vayssière B, Van der Aa A, Tasset C, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of filgotinib (GLPG0634), a selective JAK1 inhibitor, in support of phase IIB dose selection. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;54:859–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Namour F, Diderichsen PM, Cox E, Vayssière B, Van der Aa A, Tasset C, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of filgotinib (GLPG0634), a selective JAK1 inhibitor, in support of phase IIB dose selection. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;54:859–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Us FDA. Clinical pharmacology and biopharmaceutics review(s)—tofacitinib. Silver Spring: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US FDA; 2011. Us FDA. Clinical pharmacology and biopharmaceutics review(s)—tofacitinib. Silver Spring: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US FDA; 2011.
26.
go back to reference Jover R, Bort R, Gómez-Lechón MJ, Castell JV. Down-regulation of human CYP3A4 by the inflammatory signal interleukin-6: molecular mechanism and transcription factors involved. FASEB J. 2002;16:1799–801.CrossRefPubMed Jover R, Bort R, Gómez-Lechón MJ, Castell JV. Down-regulation of human CYP3A4 by the inflammatory signal interleukin-6: molecular mechanism and transcription factors involved. FASEB J. 2002;16:1799–801.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Mohamed M-EF, Jungerwirth S, Asatryan A, Jiang P, Othman AA. Assessment of effect of CYP3A inhibition, CYP induction, OATP1B inhibition, and high-fat meal on pharmacokinetics of the JAK1 inhibitor upadacitinib. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83:2242–8.CrossRef Mohamed M-EF, Jungerwirth S, Asatryan A, Jiang P, Othman AA. Assessment of effect of CYP3A inhibition, CYP induction, OATP1B inhibition, and high-fat meal on pharmacokinetics of the JAK1 inhibitor upadacitinib. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83:2242–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Population Pharmacokinetics of Upadacitinib Using the Immediate-Release and Extended-Release Formulations in Healthy Subjects and Subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Analyses of Phase I–III Clinical Trials
Authors
Ben Klünder
Rajendar K. Mittapalli
Mohamed-Eslam F. Mohamed
Anna Friedel
Peter Noertersheuser
Ahmed A. Othman
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-019-00739-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 8/2019 Go to the issue