Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 1/2021

01-02-2021 | Endocrine Surgery | Original Article

SimLife model: introducing a new teaching device in endocrine surgery simulation

Authors: G. Donatini, S. Bakkar, F. M. Leclere, W. Dib, S. Suaud, D. Oriot, C. Breque, J. P. Richer, J. P. Faure, J. Danion

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

To evaluate the validity and reliability of an innovative training model for endocrine surgical procedures. A simulator training model for endocrine procedures (SimLife) was developed at an academic center. The model consisted of a realistic operating environment with a coherent simulated patient dynamized by pulsatile vascularization with simulated blood warmed to 37 °C, and ventilation. Training sessions were designed for adrenal and thyroid surgery, as well as neck dissection. The primary outcome of interest was to evaluate learners’ performance and satisfaction. Learners’ performance was evaluated based on a scoring scale that followed the Downing method for the assessment of competency. While learners’ satisfaction was evaluated using a Likert scale of 1 to 10 on four items (ease of learning, anatomic correspondence of landmarks, realism, and overall satisfaction). Participants were engaged in 32 training sessions. These included 24 adrenalectomies (conventional and laparoscopic both transabdominal and posterior), and 4 thyroid lobectomies with concomitant functional lateral compartment neck dissection. competency scores were procedure-specific addressing specific core components of a given procedure. Learners’ performance scored above average in all procedures evaluated. Satisfaction scores for the specified four items ranged between 8.43 (SD 0.87) and 8.89 (SD 0.96). No major events were reported for the adrenalectomies, while only one jugular vein injury occurred during neck dissection. SimLife is a hyper-realistic training model that allows for satisfactory acquisition of skills and the evaluation of performance progression. It has the potential to become a cornerstone in specialized surgical training.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bakkar S, Materazzi G, Biricotti M, De Napoli L, Conte M, Galleri D, Aghababyan A, Miccoli P (2016) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) from A to Z. Surg Today 46:255–259CrossRef Bakkar S, Materazzi G, Biricotti M, De Napoli L, Conte M, Galleri D, Aghababyan A, Miccoli P (2016) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) from A to Z. Surg Today 46:255–259CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sosa JA, Wang TS, Yeo HL et al (2007) The maturation of a specialty: workforce projections for endocrine surgery. Surgery 142:876–883CrossRef Sosa JA, Wang TS, Yeo HL et al (2007) The maturation of a specialty: workforce projections for endocrine surgery. Surgery 142:876–883CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Solorzano CC, Sosa JA, Lechner SC et al (2010) Endocrine surgery: where are we today? A national survey of young endocrine surgeons. Surgery 147:536–541CrossRef Solorzano CC, Sosa JA, Lechner SC et al (2010) Endocrine surgery: where are we today? A national survey of young endocrine surgeons. Surgery 147:536–541CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Palazzo F, Dickinson A, Phillips B et al (2016) Adrenal surgery in England: better outcomes in high-volume practices. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 85:17–20CrossRef Palazzo F, Dickinson A, Phillips B et al (2016) Adrenal surgery in England: better outcomes in high-volume practices. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 85:17–20CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Phitayakorn R, Kelz RR, Petrusa E et al (2017) Expert consensus of general surgery residents’ proficiency with common endocrine operations. Surgery 161:280–288CrossRef Phitayakorn R, Kelz RR, Petrusa E et al (2017) Expert consensus of general surgery residents’ proficiency with common endocrine operations. Surgery 161:280–288CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fronza JS, Prystowsky JP, DaRosa D et al (2012) Surgical residents’ perception of competence and relevance of the clinical curriculum to future practice. J Surg Educ 69:792–797CrossRef Fronza JS, Prystowsky JP, DaRosa D et al (2012) Surgical residents’ perception of competence and relevance of the clinical curriculum to future practice. J Surg Educ 69:792–797CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Scott DJ, Cendan JC, Pugh CM, Minter RM, Dunnington GL, Kozar RA (2008) The changing face of surgical education: simulation as the new paradigm. J Surg Res 147:189–193CrossRef Scott DJ, Cendan JC, Pugh CM, Minter RM, Dunnington GL, Kozar RA (2008) The changing face of surgical education: simulation as the new paradigm. J Surg Res 147:189–193CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ziv A, Small SD, Wolpe PR (2000) Patient safety and simulation-based medical education. Med Teacher 22:489–495CrossRef Ziv A, Small SD, Wolpe PR (2000) Patient safety and simulation-based medical education. Med Teacher 22:489–495CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD (2006) Evaluating training programs: the four levels. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, p 379 Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD (2006) Evaluating training programs: the four levels. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, p 379
16.
go back to reference Faure JP, Breque C, Danion J, Delpech PO, Oriot D, Richer JP (2017) SIM Life: a new surgical simulation device using a human perfused cadaver. Surg Radiol Anat 39:211–217CrossRef Faure JP, Breque C, Danion J, Delpech PO, Oriot D, Richer JP (2017) SIM Life: a new surgical simulation device using a human perfused cadaver. Surg Radiol Anat 39:211–217CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Downing SM (2003) Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 37:830–837CrossRef Downing SM (2003) Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 37:830–837CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sarker SK, Patel B (2007) Simulation and surgical training. Int J Clin Pract 61:2120–2125CrossRef Sarker SK, Patel B (2007) Simulation and surgical training. Int J Clin Pract 61:2120–2125CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Aydin A, Ahmed K, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, McCabe J (2015) The role of human cadaveric procedural simulation in urology training. J Urol 193:e273CrossRef Aydin A, Ahmed K, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, McCabe J (2015) The role of human cadaveric procedural simulation in urology training. J Urol 193:e273CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Weber EL, Leland HA, Azadgoli B, Minneti M, Carey JN (2017) Preoperative surgical rehearsal using cadaveric fresh tissue surgical simulation increases resident operative confidence. Ann Transl Med 5:302CrossRef Weber EL, Leland HA, Azadgoli B, Minneti M, Carey JN (2017) Preoperative surgical rehearsal using cadaveric fresh tissue surgical simulation increases resident operative confidence. Ann Transl Med 5:302CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Reed AB, Crafton C, Giglia JS, Hutto JD (2009) Back to basics: use of fresh cadavers in vascular surgery training. Surgery 146:757–763CrossRef Reed AB, Crafton C, Giglia JS, Hutto JD (2009) Back to basics: use of fresh cadavers in vascular surgery training. Surgery 146:757–763CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Chouari TAM, Lindsay K, Bradshaw E, Parson S, Watson L, Ahmed J et al (2018) An enhanced fresh cadaveric model for reconstructive microsurgery training. Eur J Plast Surg 41:439–446CrossRef Chouari TAM, Lindsay K, Bradshaw E, Parson S, Watson L, Ahmed J et al (2018) An enhanced fresh cadaveric model for reconstructive microsurgery training. Eur J Plast Surg 41:439–446CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sharma M, Macafee D, Horgan AF (2013) Basic laparoscopic skills training using fresh frozen cadaver: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 206:23–31CrossRef Sharma M, Macafee D, Horgan AF (2013) Basic laparoscopic skills training using fresh frozen cadaver: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 206:23–31CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Pham M, Kale A, Marquez Y, Winer J, Lee B, Harris B et al (2014) A perfusion-based human cadaveric model for management of carotid artery injury during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 75:309–313CrossRef Pham M, Kale A, Marquez Y, Winer J, Lee B, Harris B et al (2014) A perfusion-based human cadaveric model for management of carotid artery injury during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 75:309–313CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Pacca P, Jhawar SS, Seclen DV, Wang E, Snyderman C, Gardner PA et al (2017) ‘Live cadaver’ model for internal carotid artery injury simulation in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 13:732–738CrossRef Pacca P, Jhawar SS, Seclen DV, Wang E, Snyderman C, Gardner PA et al (2017) ‘Live cadaver’ model for internal carotid artery injury simulation in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 13:732–738CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ciporen JN, Lucke-Wold B, Mendez G, Cameron WE, McCartney S (2017) Endoscopic management of cavernous carotid surgical complications: evaluation of a simulated perfusion model. World Neurosurg 98:388–396CrossRef Ciporen JN, Lucke-Wold B, Mendez G, Cameron WE, McCartney S (2017) Endoscopic management of cavernous carotid surgical complications: evaluation of a simulated perfusion model. World Neurosurg 98:388–396CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Strickland BA, Ravina K, Kammen A, Chang S, Rutkowski M, Donoho DA, Minneti M, Jackanich A, Bakhsheshian J, Zada G (2020) The use of a novel perfusion based human cadaveric model for simulation of dural enous injury and repair. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz424CrossRef Strickland BA, Ravina K, Kammen A, Chang S, Rutkowski M, Donoho DA, Minneti M, Jackanich A, Bakhsheshian J, Zada G (2020) The use of a novel perfusion based human cadaveric model for simulation of dural enous injury and repair. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​ons/​opz424CrossRef
Metadata
Title
SimLife model: introducing a new teaching device in endocrine surgery simulation
Authors
G. Donatini
S. Bakkar
F. M. Leclere
W. Dib
S. Suaud
D. Oriot
C. Breque
J. P. Richer
J. P. Faure
J. Danion
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00871-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Updates in Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue