Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2015

01-10-2015 | SAGES HERNIA TASK FORCE

“See one, do one, teach one”: inadequacies of current methods to train surgeons in hernia repair

Authors: H. Reza Zahiri, Adrian E. Park, Carla M. Pugh, Melina Vassiliou, Guy Voeller

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Residency/fellowship training in hernia repair is still too widely characterized by the “see one, do one, teach one” model. The goal of this study was to perform a needs assessment focused on surgical training to guide the creation of a curriculum by SAGES intended to improve the care of hernia patients.

Methods

Using mixed methods (interviews and online survey), the SAGES hernia task force (HTF) conducted a study asking subjects about their perceived deficits in resident training to care for hernia patients, preferred training topics about hernias, ideal learning modalities, and education development.

Results

Participants included 18 of 24 HTF members, 27 chief residents and fellows, and 31 surgical residents. HTF members agreed that residency exposes trainees to a wide spectrum of hernia repairs by a variety of surgeons. They cited outdated materials, techniques, and paucity of feedback. Additionally, they identified the “see one, do one, teach one” method of training as prevalent and clearly inadequate. The topics least addressed were system-based approach to hernia care (46 %) and patient outcomes (62 %). Training topics residents considered well covered during residency were: preoperative and intraoperative decision-making (90 %), complications (94 %), and technical approach for repairs (98 %). Instructional methods used in residency include assisted/supervised surgery (96 %), Web-based learning (24 %), and simulation (30 %). Residents’ preferred learning methods included simulation (82 %), Web-based training (61 %), hands-on laboratory (54 %), and videos (47 %), in addition to supervised surgery. Trainees reported their most desired training topics as basic techniques for inguinal and ventral hernia repairs (41 %) versus advanced technical training (68 %), which mirrored those reported by attending surgeons, 36 % and 71 %, respectively.

Conclusions

There was a consensus among HTF members and surgical trainees that a comprehensive, dynamic, and flexible educational program employing various media to address contemporary key deficits in the care of hernia patients would be welcomed by surgeons.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cogbill TH (2015) Surgical education and training: how are they likely to change? J Am Coll Surg 220(6):1032–1035CrossRefPubMed Cogbill TH (2015) Surgical education and training: how are they likely to change? J Am Coll Surg 220(6):1032–1035CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1993) Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States. Surg Clin North Am 73(3):413–426PubMed Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1993) Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States. Surg Clin North Am 73(3):413–426PubMed
3.
go back to reference Masukawa K, Wilson SE (2010) Is postoperative chronic pain syndrome higher with mesh repair of inguinal hernia? Am Surg 76:1115–1118PubMed Masukawa K, Wilson SE (2010) Is postoperative chronic pain syndrome higher with mesh repair of inguinal hernia? Am Surg 76:1115–1118PubMed
4.
go back to reference Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am 83:1045–1051 (v–vi) CrossRefPubMed Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am 83:1045–1051 (v–vi) CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Netto FS, Quereshy F, Camilotti BG et al (2014) Hospital costs associated with laparoscopic and open inguinal herniorrhaphy. JSLS 18(4):1–6 Netto FS, Quereshy F, Camilotti BG et al (2014) Hospital costs associated with laparoscopic and open inguinal herniorrhaphy. JSLS 18(4):1–6
6.
go back to reference Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S et al (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16:179–183CrossRefPubMed Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S et al (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16:179–183CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Funk LM, Perry KA, Narula VK et al (2013) Current national practice patterns for inpatient management of ventral abdominal wall hernia in the United States. Surg Endosc 27:4104–4112CrossRefPubMed Funk LM, Perry KA, Narula VK et al (2013) Current national practice patterns for inpatient management of ventral abdominal wall hernia in the United States. Surg Endosc 27:4104–4112CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lewis FR, Klingensmith ME (2012) Issues in general surgery residency training-2012. Ann Surg 256:553–559CrossRefPubMed Lewis FR, Klingensmith ME (2012) Issues in general surgery residency training-2012. Ann Surg 256:553–559CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Malangoni MA, Biester TW, Jones AT et al (2013) Operative experience of surgery residents: trends and challenges. J Surg Educ 70:783–788CrossRefPubMed Malangoni MA, Biester TW, Jones AT et al (2013) Operative experience of surgery residents: trends and challenges. J Surg Educ 70:783–788CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sonnadara RR, Mui C, McQueen S et al (2014) Reflections on competency-based education and training for surgical residents. J Surg Educ 71:151–158CrossRefPubMed Sonnadara RR, Mui C, McQueen S et al (2014) Reflections on competency-based education and training for surgical residents. J Surg Educ 71:151–158CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kavic SM (2013) Laparoscopic versus open repair: a superior approach to inguinal herniorrhaphy? OA Min Inv Surg 1(1):1 Kavic SM (2013) Laparoscopic versus open repair: a superior approach to inguinal herniorrhaphy? OA Min Inv Surg 1(1):1
12.
go back to reference Wauschkuhn CA, Schwarz J, Boekeler U et al (2010) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: gold standard in bilateral hernia repair? Results of more than 2800 patients in comparison to literature. Surg Endosc 24(12):3026–3030CrossRefPubMed Wauschkuhn CA, Schwarz J, Boekeler U et al (2010) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: gold standard in bilateral hernia repair? Results of more than 2800 patients in comparison to literature. Surg Endosc 24(12):3026–3030CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–398CrossRefPubMed Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–398CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Schwab R, Willms A, Kroger A et al (2006) Less chronic pain following mesh fixation using a fibrin sealant in TEP inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 10:272–277CrossRefPubMed Schwab R, Willms A, Kroger A et al (2006) Less chronic pain following mesh fixation using a fibrin sealant in TEP inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 10:272–277CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gong K, Zhang N, Lu Y et al (2011) Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 25:234–239CrossRefPubMed Gong K, Zhang N, Lu Y et al (2011) Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 25:234–239CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Langeveld HR, van’t Riet M, Weidema WF et al (2010) Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 251:819–824CrossRefPubMed Langeveld HR, van’t Riet M, Weidema WF et al (2010) Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 251:819–824CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Myers E, Browne KM, Kavanagh DO et al (2010) Laparoscopic (TEP) versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of quality-of-life outcomes. World J Surg 34:3059–3064CrossRefPubMed Myers E, Browne KM, Kavanagh DO et al (2010) Laparoscopic (TEP) versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of quality-of-life outcomes. World J Surg 34:3059–3064CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Pokorny H, Klingler A, Schmid T et al (2008) Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Hernia 12:385–389CrossRefPubMed Pokorny H, Klingler A, Schmid T et al (2008) Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Hernia 12:385–389CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Atkinson H, Nicol S, Purkayastha S et al Surgical management of inguinal hernia: retrospective cohort study in southeastern Scotland, 1985–2001. BMJ 329(7478):1315–1316 Atkinson H, Nicol S, Purkayastha S et al Surgical management of inguinal hernia: retrospective cohort study in southeastern Scotland, 1985–2001. BMJ 329(7478):1315–1316
20.
go back to reference EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: meta-analysis of randomized trials based on individual patient data. Hernia 6(1):2–10 EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: meta-analysis of randomized trials based on individual patient data. Hernia 6(1):2–10
21.
go back to reference Colavita PD, Tsirline VB, Walters AL et al (2012) Laparoscopic versus open hernia repair: outcomes and sociodemogrpahic utilization results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Surg Endosc 27:109–117CrossRefPubMed Colavita PD, Tsirline VB, Walters AL et al (2012) Laparoscopic versus open hernia repair: outcomes and sociodemogrpahic utilization results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Surg Endosc 27:109–117CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA et al (2006) Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg 202(5):746–752CrossRefPubMed Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA et al (2006) Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg 202(5):746–752CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Carney BT, West P, Neily J et al (2010) Differences in nurse and surgeon perceptions of teamwork: implications for use of a briefing checklist in the OR. AORN J 91(6):722–729CrossRefPubMed Carney BT, West P, Neily J et al (2010) Differences in nurse and surgeon perceptions of teamwork: implications for use of a briefing checklist in the OR. AORN J 91(6):722–729CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Chen XP, Williams RG, Smink DS (2014) Do residents receive the same OR guidance as surgeons report? Difference between residents’ and surgeons’ perceptions of OR guidance. J Surg Educ 71(6):e79–e82CrossRefPubMed Chen XP, Williams RG, Smink DS (2014) Do residents receive the same OR guidance as surgeons report? Difference between residents’ and surgeons’ perceptions of OR guidance. J Surg Educ 71(6):e79–e82CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Boerebach BC, Arath OA, Busch OR et al (2012) Reliable and valid tools for measuring surgeons’ teaching performance: residents’ versus self evaluation. J Surg Educ 69(4):511–520CrossRefPubMed Boerebach BC, Arath OA, Busch OR et al (2012) Reliable and valid tools for measuring surgeons’ teaching performance: residents’ versus self evaluation. J Surg Educ 69(4):511–520CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
“See one, do one, teach one”: inadequacies of current methods to train surgeons in hernia repair
Authors
H. Reza Zahiri
Adrian E. Park
Carla M. Pugh
Melina Vassiliou
Guy Voeller
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4411-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2015 Go to the issue