Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Updates in Surgery
Published in: Updates in Surgery 4/2020

01-12-2020 | Ileostomy | Original Article

Rate of urinary retention after ileostomy takedown in men and role of routine placement of urinary catheter

Authors: Jose Cataneo, Carlos Córdova-Cassia, Thomas Curran, Daniel Alvarez, Vitaliy Y. Poylin

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Ileostomy takedown has been proposed as one of the procedures where the placement of the catheters can be avoided, however, the rate of UR after ileostomy takedown is unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the rate of UR after ileostomy takedown and the potential benefit of perioperative Tamsulosin. Retrospective cohort study of men undergoing ileostomy takedown after pelvic colorectal surgery between January 2009 and December 2016. A total of 100 patients were identified. The rate of UR after ileostomy takedown was high at 26%. There were no instances of urinary tract infection, however, most instances of UR were in patients who did not have catheter in surgery (96% vs. 4%, p = 0.044). Perioperative use of tamsulosin did not result in significant decrease in urinary retention. Rates of urinary retention after ileostomy takedown are high. Although not placing the catheter may be protective against urinary tract infections, patients should be counseled about the possibility of UR after ileostomy takedown.
Literature
1.
Saint S (2000) Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter-related bacteriuria. Am J Infect Control 28:68–75CrossRef
2.
Kang C, Chaudhry O, Halabi W et al (2012) Risk factors for postoperative urinary tract infection and urinary retention in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Am Surg 78(10):1100–1104CrossRef
3.
Kowalik U, Plante MK (2016) Urinary retention in surgical patients. Surg Clin N Am 96(3):453–467CrossRef
4.
Wald H, Ma A, Bratzler D et al (2008) Indwelling urinary catheter use in postoperative period: analysis of the national surgical infection prevention project data. Arch Surg 143(6):551–557CrossRef
5.
Patel DN, Felder SI, Luu M, Daskivich TJ, Zaghiyan KN, Fleshner P (2018) Early urinary catheter removal following pelvic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, noninferiority trial. Dis Colon Rectum 61(10):1180–1186CrossRef
6.
Benoist S, Panis Y, Denet C et al (1999) Optimal duration of urinary drainage after rectal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 125(2):135–141CrossRef
7.
Kaplan JA, Carter JT (2018) Near-perfect compliance with SCIP Inf-9 had no effect on catheter utilization or urinary tract infections at an academic medical center. Am J Surg 215(1):23–27CrossRef
8.
Changchien C, Yeh C, Huang S et al (2007) Postoperative urinary retention after primary colorectal cancer resection via laparotomy: a prospective study of 2355 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50(10):1688–1696CrossRef
9.
Kin C, Rhoads K, Jalali M et al (2013) Predictors of postoperative urinary retention after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 56(6):738–746CrossRef
10.
Mason SE, Scott AJ, Mayer E, Purkayastha S (2016) Patient-related risk factors for urinary retention following ambulatory general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 211(6):1126–1134CrossRef
11.
Toritani K, Watanabe J, Suwa Y, Suzuki S, Nakagawa K, Suwa H, Ishibe A, Ota M, Kunisaki C, Endo I (2019) The risk factors for urinary dysfunction after autonomic nerve-preserving rectal cancer surgery: a multicenter retrospective study at Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group. Int J Colorectal Dis. 34(10):1697–1703CrossRef
12.
Wu A, Auerbach A, Aaronson D (2012) National incidence and outcomes of postoperative urinary retention in the Surgical Care Improvement Project. Am J Surg 204(2):167–171CrossRef
13.
Shadle B, Barbaro C, Waxman K et al (2009) Predictors of postoperative urinary retention. Am Surg 75(10):922–924CrossRef
14.
Poylin V, Cataldo T, Nagle D (2015) Perioperative use of tamsulosin significantly decreases rates of urinary retention in men undergoing pelvic surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(9):1223–1228CrossRef
15.
Cheung F, Sandhu JS (2018) Voiding dysfunction after non-urologic pelvic surgery. Curr Urol Rep 19(9):75CrossRef
16.
Nickel J (2003) The use of alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists in lower urinary tract symptoms: beyond benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 62(3 Suppl 1):34–41CrossRef
17.
Masumori N, Tsukamoto T, Horita H et al (2013) Nα1-blocker tamsulosin as initial treatment for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: 5-year outcome analysis of a prospective multicenter study. Int J Urol 20(4):421–428CrossRef
18.
Jeong I, You D, Yoon J et al (2014) Impact of tamsulosin on urinary retention following early catheter removal after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Urol 21(2):164–168CrossRef
19.
Fitzpatrick JM, Desgrandchamps F, Adjali K, Gomez Guerra L, Hong SJ, El Khalid S, Ratana-Olarn K, Reten-World Study Group (2012) Management of acute urinary retention: a worldwide survey of 6074 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. 109(1):88–95CrossRef
20.
Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Vella-Baldacchino M, Thavayogan R, Orgill DP, for the STROCCS Group (2017) The STROCCS statement: strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int J Surg 46:198–202CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rate of urinary retention after ileostomy takedown in men and role of routine placement of urinary catheter
Authors
Jose Cataneo
Carlos Córdova-Cassia
Thomas Curran
Daniel Alvarez
Vitaliy Y. Poylin
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00763-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Updates in Surgery 4/2020 Go to the issue

Original Article

Predicting primary postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer

Correction

Correction to: Predictors of bowel necrosis in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia: systematic review and meta-analysis

Original Article

Role of preoperative gut microbiota on colorectal anastomotic leakage: preliminary results

Letter to the Editor

Prevention of the “slippage” effect in right hemicolectomy

Letter to the Editor

Current Italian surgical resident trends regarding elective rotations abroad

Original Article

Deadlock of proctologic practice in Italy during COVID-19 pandemic: a national report from ProctoLock2020