Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetes Therapy 1/2020

Open Access 01-01-2020 | Insulins | Original Research

Three European Retrospective Real-World Chart Review Studies to Determine the Effectiveness of Flash Glucose Monitoring on HbA1c in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes

Authors: Jens Kröger, Peter Fasching, Hélène Hanaire

Published in: Diabetes Therapy | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The impact of flash glucose monitoring technology on HbA1c in type 2 diabetes managed by basal bolus insulin is uncertain. Three parallel European retrospective non-interventional chart review studies collected data reported in medical records. Each country’s study aim was to determine the effectiveness of the device on HbA1c when used by their population for 3–6 months as their standard of care for management of glycaemia in a real-world setting.

Methods

Medical records were eligible for adult patients with type 2 diabetes, on a basal bolus insulin regimen for 1 year or more, device use for 3 months or more before the start of the study, an HbA1c concentration up to 3 months prior to starting device use (patients were using blood glucose monitoring for self-management) between 64 and 108 mmol/mol (8.0–12.0%) plus an HbA1c determination 3–6 months after commencing flash glucose monitoring use.

Results

Records were analysed from 18 medical centres in Austria (n = 92), France (n = 88) and Germany (n = 183). Baseline HbA1c results, recorded up to 90 days before the start of device use, were comparable across the three countries and were reduced significantly by 9.6 ± 8.8 mmol/mol mean ± SD (Austria [0.9 ± 0.8%], p < 0.0001), 8.9 ± 12.5 mmol/mol (France [0.8% ± 1.1], p < 0.0001) and 10.1 ± 12.2 mmol/mol (Germany [0.9% ± 1.1], p < 0.0001). No significant differences were detected between age group, sex, BMI or duration of insulin use.

Conclusions

Three European real-world, chart review studies in people with type 2 diabetes managed using basal bolus insulin therapy each concluded that HbA1c was significantly reduced after changing to use of flash glucose monitoring for 3–6 months in a real-world setting.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2018;2018(61):2461.CrossRef Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2018;2018(61):2461.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Haak T, Hanaire H, Ajjan R, Hermanns N, Riveline J-P, Rayman G. Flash glucose-sensing technology as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring for the management of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8(1):55–73.CrossRef Haak T, Hanaire H, Ajjan R, Hermanns N, Riveline J-P, Rayman G. Flash glucose-sensing technology as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring for the management of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8(1):55–73.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Haak T, Hanaire H, Ajjan R, Hermanns N, Riveline J-P, Rayman G. Use of flash glucose-sensing technology for 12 months as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8(3):573–86.CrossRef Haak T, Hanaire H, Ajjan R, Hermanns N, Riveline J-P, Rayman G. Use of flash glucose-sensing technology for 12 months as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8(3):573–86.CrossRef
7.
8.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.CrossRef Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ajjan RA, Abougila K, Bellary S, et al. Sensor and software use for the glycaemic management of insulin-treated type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res. 2016;13(3):211–9.CrossRef Ajjan RA, Abougila K, Bellary S, et al. Sensor and software use for the glycaemic management of insulin-treated type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res. 2016;13(3):211–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837–53.CrossRef UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837–53.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dunn TC, Xu Y, Hayter G, Ajjan RA. Real-world flash glucose monitoring patterns and associations between self-monitoring frequency and glycaemic measures: a European analysis of over 60 million glucose tests. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;137(37–4):6. Dunn TC, Xu Y, Hayter G, Ajjan RA. Real-world flash glucose monitoring patterns and associations between self-monitoring frequency and glycaemic measures: a European analysis of over 60 million glucose tests. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;137(37–4):6.
15.
go back to reference Dal-Ré R, Avendaño-Solà C, Bloechl-Daum B, et al. Low risk pragmatic trials do not always require participants’ informed consent. BMJ. 2019;364:1092.CrossRef Dal-Ré R, Avendaño-Solà C, Bloechl-Daum B, et al. Low risk pragmatic trials do not always require participants’ informed consent. BMJ. 2019;364:1092.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Blak BT, Thompson M, Dattani H, Bourke A. Generalisability of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database: demographics, chronic disease prevalence and mortality rates. Inform Prim Care. 2011;19:251–5.PubMed Blak BT, Thompson M, Dattani H, Bourke A. Generalisability of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database: demographics, chronic disease prevalence and mortality rates. Inform Prim Care. 2011;19:251–5.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Einarson TR, Acs A, Ludwig C, Panton UH. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review of scientific evidence from across the world in 2007–2017. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17:83.CrossRef Einarson TR, Acs A, Ludwig C, Panton UH. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review of scientific evidence from across the world in 2007–2017. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17:83.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lipska KJ, Warton M, Huang ES, et al. HbA1c and risk of severe hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes the diabetes and aging study. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3535–42.CrossRef Lipska KJ, Warton M, Huang ES, et al. HbA1c and risk of severe hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes the diabetes and aging study. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3535–42.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nowakowska M, Zghebi SS, Ashcroft DM, et al. The comorbidity burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus: patterns, clusters and predictions from a large English primary care cohort. BMC Med. 2019;17:145.CrossRef Nowakowska M, Zghebi SS, Ashcroft DM, et al. The comorbidity burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus: patterns, clusters and predictions from a large English primary care cohort. BMC Med. 2019;17:145.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mørkrid K, Ali L, Hussain A. Risk factors and prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a study of type 2 diabetic outpatients in Bangladesh. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2010;30(1):11–7.CrossRef Mørkrid K, Ali L, Hussain A. Risk factors and prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a study of type 2 diabetic outpatients in Bangladesh. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2010;30(1):11–7.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Machado S, Marques R, Nascimento E, Matos A, Henriques C. Relationship between HbA1c and capillary blood glucose self-monitoring in type 2 diabetes. Romanian J Intern Med. 2019;57(2):125–32.CrossRef Machado S, Marques R, Nascimento E, Matos A, Henriques C. Relationship between HbA1c and capillary blood glucose self-monitoring in type 2 diabetes. Romanian J Intern Med. 2019;57(2):125–32.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Reznik Y, Joubert M. The OPT2MISE study—a review of the major findings and clinical implications. Eur Endocrinol. 2015;11(2):70–4.CrossRef Reznik Y, Joubert M. The OPT2MISE study—a review of the major findings and clinical implications. Eur Endocrinol. 2015;11(2):70–4.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Three European Retrospective Real-World Chart Review Studies to Determine the Effectiveness of Flash Glucose Monitoring on HbA1c in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes
Authors
Jens Kröger
Peter Fasching
Hélène Hanaire
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Diabetes Therapy / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1869-6953
Electronic ISSN: 1869-6961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-00741-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Diabetes Therapy 1/2020 Go to the issue