Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetes Therapy 3/2017

Open Access 01-06-2017 | Original Research

Use of Flash Glucose-Sensing Technology for 12 months as a Replacement for Blood Glucose Monitoring in Insulin-treated Type 2 Diabetes

Authors: Thomas Haak, Hélène Hanaire, Ramzi Ajjan, Norbert Hermanns, Jean-Pierre Riveline, Gerry Rayman

Published in: Diabetes Therapy | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Published evaluations of sensor glucose monitoring use in insulin treated type 2 diabetes are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of flash glucose-sensing technology as a replacement for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) over a 12-month period in participants with type 2 diabetes who were on intensive insulin therapy.

Methods

An open-label, randomized, controlled study in adults with type 2 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy from 26 European diabetes centers aimed at assessing flash glucose sensing technology was conducted. Participants (N = 224) were randomized (1:2 respectively) to a control group (n = 75) that used SMBG (FreeStyle Lite™) or to an intervention group (n = 149) which used sensor glucose data (FreeStyle Libre™ Flash Glucose Monitoring System) for self-management over 6 months. All intervention group participants who completed the 6-month treatment phase continued into an additional 6-month open-access phase.

Results

A total of 139 intervention participants completed the 6-month treatment phase and continued into the open-access phase. At 12 months (end of open-access period), time in hypoglycemia [sensor glucose <3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL)] was reduced by 50% compared to baseline [−0.70 ± 1.85/24 h (mean ± standard deviation); p = 0.0002]. Nocturnal hypoglycemia [2300 to 0600 hours, <3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL)] was reduced by 52%; p = 0.0002. There was no change in time in range [sensor glucose 3.9–10.0 mmol/L (70–180 mg/dL)]. SMBG testing fell from a mean of 3.9 (median 3.9) times/day at baseline to 0.2 (0.0), with an average frequency of sensor scanning of 7.1 (5.7) times/day at 12 months, and mean sensor utilization was 83.6 ± 13.8% (median 88.3%) during the open-access phase. During this 6-month extension period no device-related serious adverse events were reported. Nine participants reported 16 instances of device-related adverse events (e.g. infection, allergy) and 28 participants (20.1%) experienced 134 occurrences of anticipated skin symptoms/sensor-insertion events expected with device use (e.g. erythema, itching and rash).

Conclusion

The use of flash glucose-sensing technology for glycemic management in individuals with type 2 diabetes treated by intensive insulin therapy over 12 months was associated with a sustained reduction in hypoglycemia and safely and effectively replaced SMBG.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02082184.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes 2017. Diabetes Care. 2017;40[Suppl 1]:S52. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes 2017. Diabetes Care. 2017;40[Suppl 1]:S52.
2.
go back to reference Workgroup on hypoglycemia, American Diabetes Association. Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1245–9.CrossRef Workgroup on hypoglycemia, American Diabetes Association. Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1245–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Khunti K, Alsifri S, Aronson R, Cigrovski Berkovic M, Enters-Weijnen C, Forsen T, Galstyan G, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Goldfracht M, Gydesen H, Kapur R, Lalic N, Ludvik B, Moberg E, Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Ramchandran A (the HAT Investigator Group). Rates and predictors of hypoglycemia in 27,585 people from 24 countries with insulin-treated type 1 and type 2 diabetes: the global HAT study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18:907–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khunti K, Alsifri S, Aronson R, Cigrovski Berkovic M, Enters-Weijnen C, Forsen T, Galstyan G, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Goldfracht M, Gydesen H, Kapur R, Lalic N, Ludvik B, Moberg E, Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Ramchandran A (the HAT Investigator Group). Rates and predictors of hypoglycemia in 27,585 people from 24 countries with insulin-treated type 1 and type 2 diabetes: the global HAT study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18:907–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Holman RR, (4-T Study Group), et al. Three-year efficacy of complex insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(18):1736–47.CrossRefPubMed Holman RR, (4-T Study Group), et al. Three-year efficacy of complex insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(18):1736–47.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference McCoy RG, Lipska KJ, Yao X, Ross JS, Montori VM, Shah ND. Intensive treatment and severe hypoglycemia among adults with type 2 diabetes. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(7):969–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McCoy RG, Lipska KJ, Yao X, Ross JS, Montori VM, Shah ND. Intensive treatment and severe hypoglycemia among adults with type 2 diabetes. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(7):969–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Toschi E, Wolpert H. Utility of continuous glucose monitoring in type and type 2 diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin. 2016;45(4):895–904.CrossRef Toschi E, Wolpert H. Utility of continuous glucose monitoring in type and type 2 diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin. 2016;45(4):895–904.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Peters AL, Ahmann AJ, Battelino T, Evert A, Hirsch IB, Hassan Murad M, Winter WE, Wolpert H. Diabetes technology—continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring in adults: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(11):3922–37.CrossRefPubMed Peters AL, Ahmann AJ, Battelino T, Evert A, Hirsch IB, Hassan Murad M, Winter WE, Wolpert H. Diabetes technology—continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring in adults: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(11):3922–37.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Zick R, Petersen B, Richter M, Haug C, (The SAFIR Study Group). Comparison of continuous blood glucose measurement with conventional documentation of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes on multiple daily insulin injection therapy. Diabetes Technol Therap. 2007;9(6):483–92.CrossRef Zick R, Petersen B, Richter M, Haug C, (The SAFIR Study Group). Comparison of continuous blood glucose measurement with conventional documentation of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes on multiple daily insulin injection therapy. Diabetes Technol Therap. 2007;9(6):483–92.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Haak T, Hanaire H, Ajjan RA, Hermanns N, Riveline J-P, Rayman G. Flash glucose-sensing technology as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring for the management of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Therapy. 2017;8:55–73. Haak T, Hanaire H, Ajjan RA, Hermanns N, Riveline J-P, Rayman G. Flash glucose-sensing technology as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring for the management of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Therapy. 2017;8:55–73.
11.
go back to reference Bolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn, Kröger J, Weitgasser R. Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2254–63.CrossRefPubMed Bolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn, Kröger J, Weitgasser R. Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2254–63.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Seaquist ER, Anderson J, Childs B, Cryer P, Dagogo-Jack S, Fish L, Heller SR, Rodriguez H, Rosenzweig J, Vigersky R. Hypoglycemia and diabetes: a report of a workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and the Endocrine Society. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(5):1384–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Seaquist ER, Anderson J, Childs B, Cryer P, Dagogo-Jack S, Fish L, Heller SR, Rodriguez H, Rosenzweig J, Vigersky R. Hypoglycemia and diabetes: a report of a workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and the Endocrine Society. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(5):1384–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Glucose concentrations of less than 3.0 mmol/l (54 mg/dl) should be reported in clinical trials: a joint position statement. Diabetalogia. 2017;60:3–6.CrossRef American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Glucose concentrations of less than 3.0 mmol/l (54 mg/dl) should be reported in clinical trials: a joint position statement. Diabetalogia. 2017;60:3–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chow E, Bernjak A, Williams S, Elaine, Fawdry RA, Hibbert S, Freeman J, Sheridan PJ, Heller SR. Risk of cardiac arrhythmias during hypoglycemia in patients with type2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk. Diabetes. 2014;63:1738–47.CrossRefPubMed Chow E, Bernjak A, Williams S, Elaine, Fawdry RA, Hibbert S, Freeman J, Sheridan PJ, Heller SR. Risk of cardiac arrhythmias during hypoglycemia in patients with type2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk. Diabetes. 2014;63:1738–47.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pistrosch F, Ganfacz X, Bornstein SR, Birkenfeld AL, Henkel E, Hanefeld M. Risk of and risk factors for hypoglycemia and associated arrhythmias in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease; a cohort study under real world conditions. Acta Diabetol. 2015;52:889–95.CrossRefPubMed Pistrosch F, Ganfacz X, Bornstein SR, Birkenfeld AL, Henkel E, Hanefeld M. Risk of and risk factors for hypoglycemia and associated arrhythmias in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease; a cohort study under real world conditions. Acta Diabetol. 2015;52:889–95.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Bonds DE, Miller ME, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Byington RP, Cutler JA, Dudl RJ, Ismail-Beigi F, Kimel AR, Hoogwerf B, Horowitz KR, Savage PJ, Seaquist ER, Simmons DL, Sivitz WI, Speril-Hillen JM, Sweeney ME. The association between symptomatic, severe hypoglycemia and mortality in type 2 diabetes: retrospective epidemiological analysis of the ACCORD study. BMJ. 2010;340:b4909.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bonds DE, Miller ME, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Byington RP, Cutler JA, Dudl RJ, Ismail-Beigi F, Kimel AR, Hoogwerf B, Horowitz KR, Savage PJ, Seaquist ER, Simmons DL, Sivitz WI, Speril-Hillen JM, Sweeney ME. The association between symptomatic, severe hypoglycemia and mortality in type 2 diabetes: retrospective epidemiological analysis of the ACCORD study. BMJ. 2010;340:b4909.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Outcomes Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) Investigators. Does hypoglycemia increase the risk of cardiovascular events? A report from the ORIGIN trial. Euro Heart J. 2013;34:3137–44.CrossRef Outcomes Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) Investigators. Does hypoglycemia increase the risk of cardiovascular events? A report from the ORIGIN trial. Euro Heart J. 2013;34:3137–44.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ehrhardt NM, Chellappa M, Walker SM, Fonda SJ, Vigersky RA. The effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(3):668–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ehrhardt NM, Chellappa M, Walker SM, Fonda SJ, Vigersky RA. The effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(3):668–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Vigersky RA, Fonda SJ, Chellappa M, Walker SM, Ehrhardt NM. Short- and long-term effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:32–8.CrossRefPubMed Vigersky RA, Fonda SJ, Chellappa M, Walker SM, Ehrhardt NM. Short- and long-term effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:32–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ramchandani N, Arya S, Ten S, Bhandari S. Real-life utilization of real-time continuous glucose monitoring: the complete picture. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5:860–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ramchandani N, Arya S, Ten S, Bhandari S. Real-life utilization of real-time continuous glucose monitoring: the complete picture. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5:860–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Wong JC, Foster NC, Maahs DM, et al. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring among participants in the T1D exchange registry. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:2702–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wong JC, Foster NC, Maahs DM, et al. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring among participants in the T1D exchange registry. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:2702–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Heinemann L, Kamann S. Adhesives used for diabetes medical devices: a neglected risk with serious consequences? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016;10:1211–5.CrossRefPubMed Heinemann L, Kamann S. Adhesives used for diabetes medical devices: a neglected risk with serious consequences? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016;10:1211–5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Use of Flash Glucose-Sensing Technology for 12 months as a Replacement for Blood Glucose Monitoring in Insulin-treated Type 2 Diabetes
Authors
Thomas Haak
Hélène Hanaire
Ramzi Ajjan
Norbert Hermanns
Jean-Pierre Riveline
Gerry Rayman
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Diabetes Therapy / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1869-6953
Electronic ISSN: 1869-6961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0255-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Diabetes Therapy 3/2017 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.