Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 3/2013

Open Access 01-06-2013 | Original Article

A national survey on radiation dose in CT in The Netherlands

Authors: A. J. van der Molen, A. Schilham, P. Stoop, M. Prokop, J. Geleijns

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To assess radiation exposure due to CT in the Netherlands.

Methods

Twenty-one hospitals participated in a dose survey for the 21 most frequently used CT protocols. Hospitals completed a Web survey with detailed parameters for one patient per protocol, including the dose length product (DLP) from the scanner dose report. Only standard-sized patients (1.74 m and 77 kg and BMI 25.4 kg/m2 ± 15 %) for each protocol and available scanner were considered. Effective dose (E) per protocol was estimated using ICRP-103-based E/DLP coefficients. Dose levels were compared to surveys from other countries and to diagnostic reference levels.

Results

Data of 186 patients (247 scan phases) from 14 hospitals and 19 scanners were used for final analysis of DLP and E. Effective doses varied from 0.2 mSv in sinus CT to 19.4 mSv for multiphase liver. The most frequent exams were brain (1.5 mSv), abdomen (8.0 mSv), and thorax-abdomen (11.5 mSv). These results are lower than in Germany and comparable to those in the UK, and are within reference levels. Results between hospitals varied, with per protocol minimum/maximum E ratios ranging from 1.1–5.4.

Conclusions

Compared to surrounding countries, CT in the Netherlands is associated with relatively low radiation doses in standard patients. Important differences remain between hospitals.

Main Messages

A national dose survey providing updated, detailed data for patient dose in the most frequently used CT protocols.
• CT in the Netherlands is associated with relatively low individual radiation doses in standard patients compared to surrounding European countries.
• Considerable differences remain between hospitals for the most frequently used CT protocols, indicating the need for further optimisation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Ibbott GS et al (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources 1950–2007. Radiology 253:520–531PubMedCrossRef Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Ibbott GS et al (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources 1950–2007. Radiology 253:520–531PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler FA Jr et al (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169:2071–2077PubMedCrossRef Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler FA Jr et al (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169:2071–2077PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:2078–2086PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:2078–2086PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Teeuwisse W, Geleijns J, Veldkamp W (2007) An interhospital comparison of patient dose based on clinical indications. Eur Radiol 17:1795–1805PubMedCrossRef Teeuwisse W, Geleijns J, Veldkamp W (2007) An interhospital comparison of patient dose based on clinical indications. Eur Radiol 17:1795–1805PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, Veit R, Lechel U, Griebel J et al (2003) Radiation exposure in multislice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of nationwide survey. Eur Radiol 13:1979–1991PubMedCrossRef Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, Veit R, Lechel U, Griebel J et al (2003) Radiation exposure in multislice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of nationwide survey. Eur Radiol 13:1979–1991PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Rad 79:968–980CrossRef Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Rad 79:968–980CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA (2010) Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 257:158–166PubMedCrossRef Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA (2010) Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 257:158–166PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference van der Molen AJ, Geleijns J (2007) Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose—comparison of four 16-section CT scanners. Radiology 242:208–216PubMedCrossRef van der Molen AJ, Geleijns J (2007) Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose—comparison of four 16-section CT scanners. Radiology 242:208–216PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schilham A, van der Molen AJ, Prokop M, de Jong HW (2010) Overranging at multisection CT: an underestimated source of excess radiation exposure. Radiographics 30:1057–1067PubMedCrossRef Schilham A, van der Molen AJ, Prokop M, de Jong HW (2010) Overranging at multisection CT: an underestimated source of excess radiation exposure. Radiographics 30:1057–1067PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Aldrich JE, Bilawich AM, Mayo JR (2006) Radiation doses to patients receiving computed tomography examinations in British Columbia. Can Assoc Radiol J 57:79–85PubMed Aldrich JE, Bilawich AM, Mayo JR (2006) Radiation doses to patients receiving computed tomography examinations in British Columbia. Can Assoc Radiol J 57:79–85PubMed
Metadata
Title
A national survey on radiation dose in CT in The Netherlands
Authors
A. J. van der Molen
A. Schilham
P. Stoop
M. Prokop
J. Geleijns
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 3/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0253-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Insights into Imaging 3/2013 Go to the issue