Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2012

Open Access 01-02-2012 | Original Article

Gonad shielding in paediatric pelvic radiography: disadvantages prevail over benefit

Authors: Marij J. Frantzen, Simon Robben, Alida A. Postma, Johannes Zoetelief, Joachim E. Wildberger, Gerrit J. Kemerink

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To re-evaluate gonad shielding in paediatric pelvic radiography in terms of attainable radiation risk reduction and associated loss of diagnostic information.

Methods

A study on patient dose and the quality of gonad shielding was performed retrospectively using 500 pelvic radiographs of children from 0 to 15 years old. In a subsequent study, 195 radiographs without gonad shielding were included. Patient doses and detriment adjusted risks for heritable disease and cancer were calculated with and without gonad shielding.

Results

For girls, gonad shields were placed incorrectly in 91% of the radiographs; for boys, in 66%. Without gonad shielding, the hereditary detriment adjusted risk for girls ranged between 0.1 × 10−6 and 1.3 × 10−6 and for boys between 0.3 × 10−6 and 3.9 × 10−6, dependent on age. With shielding, the reduction in hereditary risk for girls was on average 6 ± 3% of the total risk of the radiograph, for boys 24 ± 6%. Without gonad shielding, the effective dose ranged from 0.008 to 0.098 mSv.

Conclusions

With modern optimised X-ray systems, the reduction of the detriment adjusted risk by gonad shielding is negligibly small. Given the potential consequences of loss of diagnostic information, of retakes, and of shielding of automatic exposure-control chambers, gonad shielding might better be discontinued.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abram E, Wilkinson DM, Hodson CJ (1958) Gonadal protection from X radiation for the female. Br J Radiol 31:335–336PubMedCrossRef Abram E, Wilkinson DM, Hodson CJ (1958) Gonadal protection from X radiation for the female. Br J Radiol 31:335–336PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ardran GM, Kemp FH (1957) Protection of the male gonads in diagnostic procedures. Br J Radiol 30:280CrossRef Ardran GM, Kemp FH (1957) Protection of the male gonads in diagnostic procedures. Br J Radiol 30:280CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Whitehead G, Griffiths JT (1961) The Leicester gonad protector: a device to afford localised protection from diagnostic x-irradiation. Br J Radiol 34:135–136PubMedCrossRef Whitehead G, Griffiths JT (1961) The Leicester gonad protector: a device to afford localised protection from diagnostic x-irradiation. Br J Radiol 34:135–136PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lorenz W (1958) Physical and technical problems of radiation protection in medical installations. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed 88:251–276PubMedCrossRef Lorenz W (1958) Physical and technical problems of radiation protection in medical installations. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed 88:251–276PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Meggitt G (2008) Taming the rays—a history of radiation and protection. Raleigh, Lulu.com Meggitt G (2008) Taming the rays—a history of radiation and protection. Raleigh, Lulu.com
6.
go back to reference Miller RW (1953) Some potential hazards of the use of roentgen rays in pediatrics. Pediatrics 11:294–303PubMed Miller RW (1953) Some potential hazards of the use of roentgen rays in pediatrics. Pediatrics 11:294–303PubMed
7.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (1982) Protection of the patient in diagnostic radiology (ICRP publication 34). Ann. ICRP 1982;9 (2–3), Pergamon, Oxford International Commission on Radiological Protection (1982) Protection of the patient in diagnostic radiology (ICRP publication 34). Ann. ICRP 1982;9 (2–3), Pergamon, Oxford
9.
go back to reference Bardo DM, Black M, Schenk K, Zaritzky MF (2009) Location of the ovaries in girls from newborn to 18 years of age: reconsidering ovarian shielding. Pediatr Radiol 39:253–259PubMedCrossRef Bardo DM, Black M, Schenk K, Zaritzky MF (2009) Location of the ovaries in girls from newborn to 18 years of age: reconsidering ovarian shielding. Pediatr Radiol 39:253–259PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stanford RW, Vance J (1955) The quantity of radiation received by the reproductive organs of patients during routine diagnostic x-ray examinations. Br J Radiol 28:266–273PubMedCrossRef Stanford RW, Vance J (1955) The quantity of radiation received by the reproductive organs of patients during routine diagnostic x-ray examinations. Br J Radiol 28:266–273PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Martin JH (1947) Radiation doses received by the skin of a patient during routine diagnostic X-ray examinations. Br J Radiol 20:279–283PubMedCrossRef Martin JH (1947) Radiation doses received by the skin of a patient during routine diagnostic X-ray examinations. Br J Radiol 20:279–283PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Billings MS, Norman A, Greenfield MA (1957) Gonad dose during routine roentgenography. Radiology 69:37–41PubMedCrossRef Billings MS, Norman A, Greenfield MA (1957) Gonad dose during routine roentgenography. Radiology 69:37–41PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ardran GM (1956) The hazards from the increasing use of ionizing radiations II. The dose to the operator and patient in x-ray diagnostic procedures. Br J Radiol 29:266–269PubMedCrossRef Ardran GM (1956) The hazards from the increasing use of ionizing radiations II. The dose to the operator and patient in x-ray diagnostic procedures. Br J Radiol 29:266–269PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wainwright AM (2000) Shielding reproductive organs of orthopaedic patients during pelvic radiography. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82:318–321PubMedPubMedCentral Wainwright AM (2000) Shielding reproductive organs of orthopaedic patients during pelvic radiography. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82:318–321PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference McCarty M, Waugh R, McCallum H, Montgomery RJ, Aszkenasy OM (2001) Pediatric pelvic imaging: improvement in gonad shield placement by multidisciplinary audit. Pediatr Radiol 31:646–649PubMedCrossRef McCarty M, Waugh R, McCallum H, Montgomery RJ, Aszkenasy OM (2001) Pediatric pelvic imaging: improvement in gonad shield placement by multidisciplinary audit. Pediatr Radiol 31:646–649PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sikand M, Stinchcombe S, Livesley PJ (2003) Study on the use of gonadal protection shields during paediatric pelvic X-rays. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:422–425PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sikand M, Stinchcombe S, Livesley PJ (2003) Study on the use of gonadal protection shields during paediatric pelvic X-rays. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:422–425PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gul A, Zafar M, Maffulli N (2005) Gonadal shields in pelvic radiographs in pediatric patients. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 63:13–14PubMed Gul A, Zafar M, Maffulli N (2005) Gonadal shields in pelvic radiographs in pediatric patients. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 63:13–14PubMed
19.
go back to reference Masud S, Mehra A, Clothier JC (2008) Study on the use of gonadal shields in paediatric pelvic x-rays. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90-B (Suppl II):338 Masud S, Mehra A, Clothier JC (2008) Study on the use of gonadal shields in paediatric pelvic x-rays. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90-B (Suppl II):338
20.
go back to reference Fawcett SL, Barter SJ (2009) The use of gonad shielding in paediatric hip and pelvis radiographs. Br J Radiol 82:363–370PubMedCrossRef Fawcett SL, Barter SJ (2009) The use of gonad shielding in paediatric hip and pelvis radiographs. Br J Radiol 82:363–370PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Martin CJ, Farquhar B, Stockdale E, MacDonald S (1994) A study of the relationship between patient dose and size in paediatric radiology. Br J Radiol 67:864–871PubMedCrossRef Martin CJ, Farquhar B, Stockdale E, MacDonald S (1994) A study of the relationship between patient dose and size in paediatric radiology. Br J Radiol 67:864–871PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kyriou JC, Fitzgerald M, Pettett A, Cook JV, Pablot SM (1996) A comparison of doses and techniques between specialist and non-specialist centres in the diagnostic X-ray imaging of children. Br J Radiol 69:437–450PubMedCrossRef Kyriou JC, Fitzgerald M, Pettett A, Cook JV, Pablot SM (1996) A comparison of doses and techniques between specialist and non-specialist centres in the diagnostic X-ray imaging of children. Br J Radiol 69:437–450PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference McDonald S, Martin CJ, Darragh CL, Graham DT (1998) Dose-area product measurements in paediatric radiography. Br J Radiol 69:318–325CrossRef McDonald S, Martin CJ, Darragh CL, Graham DT (1998) Dose-area product measurements in paediatric radiography. Br J Radiol 69:318–325CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mooney R, Thomas PS (1998) Dose reduction in a paediatric X-ray department following optimization of radiographic technique. Br J Radiol 71:852–860PubMedCrossRef Mooney R, Thomas PS (1998) Dose reduction in a paediatric X-ray department following optimization of radiographic technique. Br J Radiol 71:852–860PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hufton AP, Doyle SM, Carty HM (1998) Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction. Br J Radiol 71:186–199PubMedCrossRef Hufton AP, Doyle SM, Carty HM (1998) Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction. Br J Radiol 71:186–199PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Gogos KA, Yakoumakis EN, Tsalafoutas IA, Makri TK (2003) Radiation dose considerations in common paediatric X-ray examinations. Pediatr Radiol 33:236–240PubMedCrossRef Gogos KA, Yakoumakis EN, Tsalafoutas IA, Makri TK (2003) Radiation dose considerations in common paediatric X-ray examinations. Pediatr Radiol 33:236–240PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Yakoumakis EN, Tsalafoutas IA, Aliberti M, Pantos GI, Yakoumakis NE, Karaiskos P, Georgiou EK (2007) Radiation doses in common X-ray examinations carried out in two dedicated paediatric hospitals. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 124:348–352PubMedCrossRef Yakoumakis EN, Tsalafoutas IA, Aliberti M, Pantos GI, Yakoumakis NE, Karaiskos P, Georgiou EK (2007) Radiation doses in common X-ray examinations carried out in two dedicated paediatric hospitals. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 124:348–352PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kiljunen T, Tietäväinen A, Parviainen T, Viitala A, Kortesniemi M (2009) Organ doses and effective doses in pediatric radiography: patient-dose survey in Finland. Acta Radiol 50:114–124PubMedCrossRef Kiljunen T, Tietäväinen A, Parviainen T, Viitala A, Kortesniemi M (2009) Organ doses and effective doses in pediatric radiography: patient-dose survey in Finland. Acta Radiol 50:114–124PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Suliman II, Elshiekh EH (2008) Radiation doses from some common paediatric X-ray examinations in Sudan. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 132:64–72PubMedCrossRef Suliman II, Elshiekh EH (2008) Radiation doses from some common paediatric X-ray examinations in Sudan. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 132:64–72PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Smans K, Vaño E, Sanchez R, Schultz FW, Zoetelief J, Kiljunen T, Maccia C, Järvinen H, Bly R, Kosunen A, Faulkner K, Bosmans H (2008) Results of a European survey on patient doses in paediatric radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129:204–210PubMedCrossRef Smans K, Vaño E, Sanchez R, Schultz FW, Zoetelief J, Kiljunen T, Maccia C, Järvinen H, Bly R, Kosunen A, Faulkner K, Bosmans H (2008) Results of a European survey on patient doses in paediatric radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129:204–210PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP publication 103). Ann ICRP 37(2–4), Pergamon, Oxford International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP publication 103). Ann ICRP 37(2–4), Pergamon, Oxford
33.
go back to reference Ruiz MJ, González L, Vañó E, Martínez A (1991) Measurement of radiation doses in the most frequent simple examinations in paediatric radiology and its dependence on patient age. Br J Radiol 64:929–933PubMedCrossRef Ruiz MJ, González L, Vañó E, Martínez A (1991) Measurement of radiation doses in the most frequent simple examinations in paediatric radiology and its dependence on patient age. Br J Radiol 64:929–933PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Azevedo AC, Osibote OA, Boechat MC (2006) Paediatric x-ray examinations in Rio de Janeiro. Phys Med Biol 51:3723–3732PubMedCrossRef Azevedo AC, Osibote OA, Boechat MC (2006) Paediatric x-ray examinations in Rio de Janeiro. Phys Med Biol 51:3723–3732PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Commission for European Communities (1996) European Guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic images in paediatrics (EUR-16261) Commission for European Communities (1996) European Guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic images in paediatrics (EUR-16261)
36.
go back to reference Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF (1996) Coefficients for estimating effective doses from paediatric x-ray examinations. Chilton, NRPB-R279. HMSO, London Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF (1996) Coefficients for estimating effective doses from paediatric x-ray examinations. Chilton, NRPB-R279. HMSO, London
37.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991) 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP publication 60). Ann ICRP 21(1–3). Pergamon, Oxford International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991) 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP publication 60). Ann ICRP 21(1–3). Pergamon, Oxford
38.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) Radiological protection in medicine (ICRP publication105). Ann ICRP 37(6), Pergamon, Oxford International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) Radiological protection in medicine (ICRP publication105). Ann ICRP 37(6), Pergamon, Oxford
39.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (2006) ICRP supporting guidance 5. Ann. ICRP 35(4), Pergamon, Oxford International Commission on Radiological Protection (2006) ICRP supporting guidance 5. Ann. ICRP 35(4), Pergamon, Oxford
40.
go back to reference National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) (1993) Limitation of Exposure to Ionizing Radiation. Report No. 116, NCRP Publications, Bethesda National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) (1993) Limitation of Exposure to Ionizing Radiation. Report No. 116, NCRP Publications, Bethesda
42.
go back to reference Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000) UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. Vol. I, Annex B, Exposures from natural radiation sources. United Nations, New York Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000) UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. Vol. I, Annex B, Exposures from natural radiation sources. United Nations, New York
45.
go back to reference Lario J, Sánchez-Moral S, Cañaveras JC, Cuezva S, Soler V (2005) Radon continuous monitoring in Altamira Cave (northern Spain) to assess user's annual effective dose. J Environ Radioact 80:161–174PubMedCrossRef Lario J, Sánchez-Moral S, Cañaveras JC, Cuezva S, Soler V (2005) Radon continuous monitoring in Altamira Cave (northern Spain) to assess user's annual effective dose. J Environ Radioact 80:161–174PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Gonad shielding in paediatric pelvic radiography: disadvantages prevail over benefit
Authors
Marij J. Frantzen
Simon Robben
Alida A. Postma
Johannes Zoetelief
Joachim E. Wildberger
Gerrit J. Kemerink
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0130-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Insights into Imaging 1/2012 Go to the issue