Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 2/2011

Open Access 01-04-2011 | Review

Stereotactically guided breast biopsy: a review

Authors: Victoria Ames, Peter D. Britton

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The aims of this review are to compare and contrast the available stereotactic equipment, and to describe the variety of needle types used and their affect on pathological results and subsequent patient management. Initial stereotactic devices were “added-on” to analogue mammography units and have been replaced by prone or ducubitus equipment using digital image acquisition. Biopsies use either 14-G core biopsy (CB) needles or vacuum-assisted biopsies (VAB). Vacuum-assisted biopsy systems consistently out-perform 14-G CB with reduced need for diagnostic or multi-treatment surgery. The false-negative rate is 8% for 14-G CB compared with 0.7% for VAB. There is a risk of underestimating the disease present for lesions of uncertain malignant potential (Cat B3) and suspicious of malignancy (Cat B4) results with 25% of patients with a B3 biopsy found to have cancer at subsequent surgery and 66% of those with a B4 biopsy. A CB diagnosis of in situ malignancy is upgraded to invasive disease at surgery in 15-36% of patients undergoing CB and of the order of 10% with VAB. A high degree of diagnostic accuracy and hence safe patient care can only be achieved by meticulous attention to technique and multi-disciplinary cooperation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wallis M et al (2007) Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures. Eur Radiol 17:581–588PubMedCrossRef Wallis M et al (2007) Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures. Eur Radiol 17:581–588PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kirshenbaum KJ et al (2003) Stereotactic core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions using a conventional mammography unit with an add-on device. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:527–531PubMedCrossRef Kirshenbaum KJ et al (2003) Stereotactic core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions using a conventional mammography unit with an add-on device. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:527–531PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Whitlock JP et al (2000) Digital imaging improves upright stereotactic core biopsy of mammographic microcalcifications. Clin Radiol 55:374–377PubMedCrossRef Whitlock JP et al (2000) Digital imaging improves upright stereotactic core biopsy of mammographic microcalcifications. Clin Radiol 55:374–377PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jackman RJ et al (2006) Breast microcalcifications: retrieval failure at prone stereotactic core and vacuum breast biopsy--frequency, causes, and outcome. Radiology 239:61–70PubMedCrossRef Jackman RJ et al (2006) Breast microcalcifications: retrieval failure at prone stereotactic core and vacuum breast biopsy--frequency, causes, and outcome. Radiology 239:61–70PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference James J et al (2005) The use of a short-acting benzodiazepine to reduce the risk of syncopal episodes during upright stereotactic breast biopsy. Clin Radiol 60:394–396PubMedCrossRef James J et al (2005) The use of a short-acting benzodiazepine to reduce the risk of syncopal episodes during upright stereotactic breast biopsy. Clin Radiol 60:394–396PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Doyle AJ et al (1999) Decubitus stereotactic core biopsy of the breast: technique and experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:688–690PubMedCrossRef Doyle AJ et al (1999) Decubitus stereotactic core biopsy of the breast: technique and experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:688–690PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Britton PD et al (1999) Needle biopsy in the NHS breast screening programme 96/97: how much and how accurate? Breast 8:5-11CrossRef Britton PD et al (1999) Needle biopsy in the NHS breast screening programme 96/97: how much and how accurate? Breast 8:5-11CrossRef
13.
14.
16.
go back to reference Parker SH et al (1994) Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 193:359–364PubMedCrossRef Parker SH et al (1994) Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 193:359–364PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Bagnall MJ et al (2000) When have mammographic calcifications been adequately sampled at needle core biopsy? Clin Radiol 55:548–553PubMedCrossRef Bagnall MJ et al (2000) When have mammographic calcifications been adequately sampled at needle core biopsy? Clin Radiol 55:548–553PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Burbank F et al (1996) Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome. Am Surg 62:738–744PubMed Burbank F et al (1996) Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome. Am Surg 62:738–744PubMed
20.
go back to reference Kettritz U (2004) Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study. Cancer 100:245–251PubMedCrossRef Kettritz U (2004) Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study. Cancer 100:245–251PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Laurenco AP et al (2007) Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of histologic underestimation rates with 11- and 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W275–W279CrossRef Laurenco AP et al (2007) Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of histologic underestimation rates with 11- and 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W275–W279CrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Parker S et al (1997) Performing a breast biopsy with a directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy instrument. Radiographics 17:1233–1252PubMedCrossRef Parker S et al (1997) Performing a breast biopsy with a directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy instrument. Radiographics 17:1233–1252PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jackman RJ et al (2009) False-negative diagnoses at stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle breast biopsy: long-term follow-up of 1,280 lesions and review of the literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:341–351PubMedCrossRef Jackman RJ et al (2009) False-negative diagnoses at stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle breast biopsy: long-term follow-up of 1,280 lesions and review of the literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:341–351PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Darling ML et al (2000) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1341–1346PubMedCrossRef Darling ML et al (2000) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1341–1346PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Meyer JE et al (1998) Large-needle core biopsy: nonmalignant breast abnormalities evaluated with surgical excision or repeat core biopsy. Radiology 206:717–720PubMedCrossRef Meyer JE et al (1998) Large-needle core biopsy: nonmalignant breast abnormalities evaluated with surgical excision or repeat core biopsy. Radiology 206:717–720PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Philpotts LE et al (1999) Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:683–687PubMedCrossRef Philpotts LE et al (1999) Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:683–687PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Houssami N et al (2007) Borderline breast core needle histology: predictive values for malignancy in lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3). Br J Cancer 96:1253–1257PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Houssami N et al (2007) Borderline breast core needle histology: predictive values for malignancy in lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3). Br J Cancer 96:1253–1257PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Penco S et al (2010) Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy is not a therapeutic procedure even when all mammographically found microcalcifications are removed: analysis of 4,086 procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:1255–1260PubMedCrossRef Penco S et al (2010) Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy is not a therapeutic procedure even when all mammographically found microcalcifications are removed: analysis of 4,086 procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:1255–1260PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Jackman RJ et al (2001) Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 218:497–502PubMedCrossRef Jackman RJ et al (2001) Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 218:497–502PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Bagnall MJ (2001) Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification. Clin Radiol 56:828–832PubMedCrossRef Bagnall MJ (2001) Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification. Clin Radiol 56:828–832PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference O’Flynn EA et al (2009) Prediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsy. Clin Radiol 2009(64):178–183CrossRef O’Flynn EA et al (2009) Prediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsy. Clin Radiol 2009(64):178–183CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Wallis MG et al (2009) Non-operative diagnosis—effect on repeat-operation rates in the UK breast screening programme. Eur Radiol 19:318–323PubMedCrossRef Wallis MG et al (2009) Non-operative diagnosis—effect on repeat-operation rates in the UK breast screening programme. Eur Radiol 19:318–323PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Liberman L et al (1999) Epithelial displacement after stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:677–681PubMedCrossRef Liberman L et al (1999) Epithelial displacement after stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:677–681PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Stereotactically guided breast biopsy: a review
Authors
Victoria Ames
Peter D. Britton
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 2/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0064-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Insights into Imaging 2/2011 Go to the issue