Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal 2/2017

Open Access 01-02-2017 | Original Article

Introducing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a new generation prosthesis: Institutional learning curve and effects on acute outcomes

Authors: G. D’Ancona, H. U. Agma, S. Kische, G. El-Achkar, M. Dißmann, J. Ortak, H. Ince, U. Ketterer, A. Bärisch, A. Öner

Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

We present our single-centre experience with the direct flow medical (DFM) trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) prosthesis addressing the impact of learning curve upon outcomes.

Background

The DFM has been recently introduced for TAVI. The prosthesis presents original design and implantation features.

Methods

Patients were divided into three groups according to the chronological implantation sequence that reflected technical skills acquisition of the entire team.

Results

Group I included the first 20 patients (early learning phase), group II the second 20 patients (proctoring to other members of the team), and group III the following 93 patients (technique consolidation). Differences in baseline and procedural variables were analysed. Nonparametric correlation and linear regression were used to identify changes according to institutional cumulative experience. There was a significant correlation between catheterisation time and institutional experience (rho = −0.4; p < 0.0001) confirmed at linear regression (beta = −0.2; p = 0.001; CI: −0.3 – −0.08). Moreover, there was lower rate of valve retrieval in group III (15% vs. 20% vs. 10%; p = 0.5). No intra-procedural mortality was reported and improved early safety (at 30 days) was observed (80% vs. 85% vs. 87.1; p = 0.7). At hospital discharge, valve haemodynamic performance was satisfactory with only mild regurgitation in 10% (I), 20% (II), and 9.7% (III) (p = 0.8).

Conclusions

DFM adequate sizing and implantation can be achieved after the early learning phases. A significant reduction in catheterisation time is reported after the first 20 patients. Results remain satisfactory during the proctoring and technical consolidation phase.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:6–23.CrossRefPubMed Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:6–23.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference De Marco F, Latib A. Tools and Techniques – Clinical: The inner curve technique for implantation of the Direct Flow Medical® transcatheter aortic valve. EuroIntervention. 2014;10:400–2.CrossRefPubMed De Marco F, Latib A. Tools and Techniques – Clinical: The inner curve technique for implantation of the Direct Flow Medical® transcatheter aortic valve. EuroIntervention. 2014;10:400–2.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Schofer J, Colombo A, Klugmann S, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the direct flow medical transcatheter aortic valve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:763–8.CrossRefPubMed Schofer J, Colombo A, Klugmann S, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the direct flow medical transcatheter aortic valve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:763–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kische S, D’Ancona G, Agma HU, et al. Transcatheter, inflatable, and fully repositionable aortic valve: Preliminary results using a modified implantation technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;87:500–7.CrossRefPubMed Kische S, D’Ancona G, Agma HU, et al. Transcatheter, inflatable, and fully repositionable aortic valve: Preliminary results using a modified implantation technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;87:500–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Panoulas VF, Latib A, Agricola E, et al. Echocardiographic vs invasive measurement of the direct flow transcatheter aortic heart valve mean gradient: contradictory or complementary? Can J Cardiol. 2015;31:1303.e1–1303.e4.CrossRef Panoulas VF, Latib A, Agricola E, et al. Echocardiographic vs invasive measurement of the direct flow transcatheter aortic heart valve mean gradient: contradictory or complementary? Can J Cardiol. 2015;31:1303.e1–1303.e4.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Pyxaras SA, Wolf A, Schmitz T, Naber CK. Propensity-matched comparison between Direct Flow Medical, Medtronic Corevalve, and Edwards Sapien XT prostheses: Device success, thirty-day safety, and mortality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;85:1217–25.CrossRefPubMed Zhang Y, Pyxaras SA, Wolf A, Schmitz T, Naber CK. Propensity-matched comparison between Direct Flow Medical, Medtronic Corevalve, and Edwards Sapien XT prostheses: Device success, thirty-day safety, and mortality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;85:1217–25.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Introducing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a new generation prosthesis: Institutional learning curve and effects on acute outcomes
Authors
G. D’Ancona
H. U. Agma
S. Kische
G. El-Achkar
M. Dißmann
J. Ortak
H. Ince
U. Ketterer
A. Bärisch
A. Öner
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Electronic ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0925-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Netherlands Heart Journal 2/2017 Go to the issue