Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal 2/2017

Open Access 01-02-2017 | Review Article

Patient-specific computer modelling – its role in the planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Authors: N. El Faquir, B. Ren, N. M. Van Mieghem, J. Bosmans, P. P. de Jaegere

Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is increasingly used to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at increased risk for surgical aortic valve replacement and is projected to be the preferred treatment modality. As patient selection and operator experience have improved, it is hypothesised that device-host interactions will play a more dominant role in outcome. This, in combination with the increasing number of valve types and sizes, confronts the physician with the dilemma to choose the valve that best fits the individual patient. This necessitates the availability of pre-procedural computer simulation that is based upon the integration of the patient-specific anatomy, the physical and (bio)mechanical properties of the valve and recipient anatomy derived from in-vitro experiments. The objective of this paper is to present such a model and illustrate its potential clinical utility via a few case studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mack MJ, Leon MB, Smith CR, et al. 5‑year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:2477–84.CrossRefPubMed Mack MJ, Leon MB, Smith CR, et al. 5‑year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:2477–84.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Deeb GM, Reardon MJ, Chetcuti S, et al. 3‑year outcomes in high-risk patients who underwent surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:2565–74.CrossRefPubMed Deeb GM, Reardon MJ, Chetcuti S, et al. 3‑year outcomes in high-risk patients who underwent surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:2565–74.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1609–20.CrossRefPubMed Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1609–20.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Thourani VH, Kodali S, Makkar RR, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:2218–25.CrossRefPubMed Thourani VH, Kodali S, Makkar RR, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:2218–25.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Schultz CJ, Weustink A, Piazza N, et al. Geometry and degree of apposition of the CoreValve ReValving system with multislice computed tomography after implantation in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:911–8.CrossRefPubMed Schultz CJ, Weustink A, Piazza N, et al. Geometry and degree of apposition of the CoreValve ReValving system with multislice computed tomography after implantation in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:911–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Rodriguez-Olivares R, Van Mieghem NM, De Jaegere PP. The role of frame geometry assessment during transcatheter aortic valve replacement by rotational angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:e191–e192.CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez-Olivares R, Van Mieghem NM, De Jaegere PP. The role of frame geometry assessment during transcatheter aortic valve replacement by rotational angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:e191–e192.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rodriguez-Olivares R, El Faquir N, Rahhab Z, et al. Does frame geometry play a role in aortic regurgitation after medtronic CoreValve implantation? EuroIntervention. 2016;12:519–25.CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez-Olivares R, El Faquir N, Rahhab Z, et al. Does frame geometry play a role in aortic regurgitation after medtronic CoreValve implantation? EuroIntervention. 2016;12:519–25.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rodriguez-Olivares R, Rahhab Z, Faquir NE, et al. Differences in frame geometry between balloon-expandable and self-expanding transcatheter heart valves and association with aortic regurgitation. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016;69:392–400.CrossRef Rodriguez-Olivares R, Rahhab Z, Faquir NE, et al. Differences in frame geometry between balloon-expandable and self-expanding transcatheter heart valves and association with aortic regurgitation. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016;69:392–400.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference van der Boon RM, Nuis RJ, Van Mieghem NM, et al. New conduction abnormalities after TAVI-frequency and causes. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012;9:454–63.CrossRefPubMed van der Boon RM, Nuis RJ, Van Mieghem NM, et al. New conduction abnormalities after TAVI-frequency and causes. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012;9:454–63.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1686–95.CrossRefPubMed Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1686–95.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Houthuizen P, van der Boon RM, Urena M, et al. Occurrence, fate and consequences of ventricular conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention. 2014;9:1142–50.CrossRefPubMed Houthuizen P, van der Boon RM, Urena M, et al. Occurrence, fate and consequences of ventricular conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention. 2014;9:1142–50.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Houthuizen P, Van Garsse LA, Poels TT, et al. Left bundle-branch block induced by transcatheter aortic valve implantation increases risk of death. Circulation. 2012;126:720–8.CrossRefPubMed Houthuizen P, Van Garsse LA, Poels TT, et al. Left bundle-branch block induced by transcatheter aortic valve implantation increases risk of death. Circulation. 2012;126:720–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Meredith IT, Walters DL, Dumonteil N, et al. 1‑year outcomes with the fully repositionable and retrievable lotus transcatheter aortic replacement valve in 120 high-risk surgical patients with severe aortic stenosis: results of the REPRISE II study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:376–84.CrossRefPubMed Meredith IT, Walters DL, Dumonteil N, et al. 1‑year outcomes with the fully repositionable and retrievable lotus transcatheter aortic replacement valve in 120 high-risk surgical patients with severe aortic stenosis: results of the REPRISE II study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:376–84.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Binder RK, Stortecky S, Heg D, et al. Procedural results and clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Switzerland: an observational cohort study of sapien 3 versus sapien XT transcatheter heart valves. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:e002653.CrossRefPubMed Binder RK, Stortecky S, Heg D, et al. Procedural results and clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Switzerland: an observational cohort study of sapien 3 versus sapien XT transcatheter heart valves. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:e002653.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Barbanti M, Yang TH, Rodes Cabau J, et al. Anatomical and procedural features associated with aortic root rupture during balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2013;128:244–53.CrossRefPubMed Barbanti M, Yang TH, Rodes Cabau J, et al. Anatomical and procedural features associated with aortic root rupture during balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2013;128:244–53.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Pasic M, Unbehaun A, Buz S, Drews T, Hetzer R. Annular rupture during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: classification, pathophysiology, diagnostics, treatment approaches, and prevention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(1 Pt A):1–9.CrossRefPubMed Pasic M, Unbehaun A, Buz S, Drews T, Hetzer R. Annular rupture during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: classification, pathophysiology, diagnostics, treatment approaches, and prevention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(1 Pt A):1–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ribeiro HB, Nombela-Franco L, Urena M, et al. Coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:452–61.CrossRefPubMed Ribeiro HB, Nombela-Franco L, Urena M, et al. Coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:452–61.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tay EL, Gurvitch R, Wijeysinghe N, et al. Outcome of patients after transcatheter aortic valve embolization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:228–34.CrossRefPubMed Tay EL, Gurvitch R, Wijeysinghe N, et al. Outcome of patients after transcatheter aortic valve embolization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:228–34.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Alli O, Rihal CS, Suri RM, et al. Learning curves for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER-I trial: technical performance. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87:154–62.CrossRefPubMed Alli O, Rihal CS, Suri RM, et al. Learning curves for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER-I trial: technical performance. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87:154–62.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Minha S, Waksman R, Satler LP, et al. Learning curves for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER-I trial: success and safety. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87:165–75.CrossRefPubMed Minha S, Waksman R, Satler LP, et al. Learning curves for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER-I trial: success and safety. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87:165–75.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Vahl TP, Kodali SK, Leon MB. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement 2016: a modern-day ‘through the looking-glass’ adventure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1472–87.CrossRefPubMed Vahl TP, Kodali SK, Leon MB. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement 2016: a modern-day ‘through the looking-glass’ adventure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1472–87.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Votta E, Le TB, Stevanella M, et al. Toward patient-specific simulations of cardiac valves: state-of-the-art and future directions. J Biomech. 2013;46:217–28.CrossRefPubMed Votta E, Le TB, Stevanella M, et al. Toward patient-specific simulations of cardiac valves: state-of-the-art and future directions. J Biomech. 2013;46:217–28.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Smith N, de Vecchi A, McCormick M, et al. euHeart: personalized and integrated cardiac care using patient-specific cardiovascular modelling. Interface Focus. 2011;1:349–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smith N, de Vecchi A, McCormick M, et al. euHeart: personalized and integrated cardiac care using patient-specific cardiovascular modelling. Interface Focus. 2011;1:349–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Kirchhof P, Sipido KR, Cowie MR, et al. The continuum of personalized cardiovascular medicine: a position paper of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:3250–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kirchhof P, Sipido KR, Cowie MR, et al. The continuum of personalized cardiovascular medicine: a position paper of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:3250–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Schultz C, Rodriguez-Olivares R, Bosmans J, et al. Patient-specific image-based computer simulation for theprediction of valve morphology and calcium displacement after TAVI with the medtronic CoreValve and the Edwards SAPIEN valve. EuroIntervention. 2016;11:1044–52.CrossRefPubMed Schultz C, Rodriguez-Olivares R, Bosmans J, et al. Patient-specific image-based computer simulation for theprediction of valve morphology and calcium displacement after TAVI with the medtronic CoreValve and the Edwards SAPIEN valve. EuroIntervention. 2016;11:1044–52.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference de Jaegere P, De Santis G, Rodriguez-Olivares R, et al. Patient-specific computer modeling to predict aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:508–12.CrossRefPubMed de Jaegere P, De Santis G, Rodriguez-Olivares R, et al. Patient-specific computer modeling to predict aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:508–12.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Lee M, Modine T, Piazza N, Mylotte D. TAVI device selection: time for a patient-specific approach. EuroIntervention. 2016;12:Y37–41.CrossRefPubMed Lee M, Modine T, Piazza N, Mylotte D. TAVI device selection: time for a patient-specific approach. EuroIntervention. 2016;12:Y37–41.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Patient-specific computer modelling – its role in the planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Authors
N. El Faquir
B. Ren
N. M. Van Mieghem
J. Bosmans
P. P. de Jaegere
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Electronic ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0923-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Netherlands Heart Journal 2/2017 Go to the issue