Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal 11/2015

Open Access 01-11-2015 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE-E-LEARNING

Novel X-ray image noise reduction technology reduces patient radiation dose while maintaining image quality in coronary angiography

Authors: T. ten Cate, M. van Wely, H. Gehlmann, M. Mauti, C. Camaro, N. Reifart, H. Suryapranata, M.J. de Boer

Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims

The consequences of high radiation dose for patient and staff demand constant improvements in X-ray dose reduction technology. This study assessed non-inferiority of image quality and quantified patient dose reduction in interventional cardiology for an anatomy-specific optimised cine acquisition chain combined with advanced real-time image noise reduction algorithms referred to as ‘study cine’, compared with conventional angiography.

Methods

Fifty patients underwent two coronary angiographic acquisitions: one with advanced image processing and optimised exposure system settings to enable dose reduction (study cine) and one with standard image processing and exposure settings (reference cine). The image sets of 39 patients (18 females, 21 males) were rated by six experienced independent reviewers, blinded to the patient and image characteristics. The image pairs were randomly presented. Overall 85 % of the study cine images were rated as better or equal quality compared with the reference cine (95 % CI 0.81–0.90). The median dose area product per frame decreased from 55 to 26 mGy.cm2/frame (53 % reduction, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the novel X-ray imaging technology provides non-inferior image quality compared with conventional angiographic systems for interventional cardiology with a 53 % patient dose reduction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2078–86.CrossRefPubMed Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2078–86.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Aoki J, Hoye A, Staferov AV, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for chronic total occlusion of the left main coronary artery. J Interv Cardiol. 2005;18:65–9. (discussion 69).CrossRefPubMed Aoki J, Hoye A, Staferov AV, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for chronic total occlusion of the left main coronary artery. J Interv Cardiol. 2005;18:65–9. (discussion 69).CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2501–55.CrossRefPubMed Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2501–55.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Suzuki S, Furui S, Kohtake H, et al. Radiation exposure to patient’s skin during percutaneous coronary intervention for various lesions, including chronic total occlusion. Circ J. 2006;70:44–8.CrossRefPubMed Suzuki S, Furui S, Kohtake H, et al. Radiation exposure to patient’s skin during percutaneous coronary intervention for various lesions, including chronic total occlusion. Circ J. 2006;70:44–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Miller DL, Hilohi CM, Spelic DC. Patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology in the U.S.: advisory data sets and possible initial values for U.S. reference levels. Med Phys. 2012;39:6276–86.CrossRefPubMed Miller DL, Hilohi CM, Spelic DC. Patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology in the U.S.: advisory data sets and possible initial values for U.S. reference levels. Med Phys. 2012;39:6276–86.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mercuri M, Moran GR, Gauthier L, et al. Radiation dose in interventional cardiology procedures: urgent need for monitoring dose and establishing diagnostic reference levels. Healthc Q. 2008;11:76–83.CrossRefPubMed Mercuri M, Moran GR, Gauthier L, et al. Radiation dose in interventional cardiology procedures: urgent need for monitoring dose and establishing diagnostic reference levels. Healthc Q. 2008;11:76–83.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fetterly KA, Magnuson DJ, Tannahill GM, et al. Effective use of radiation shields to minimize operator dose during invasive cardiology procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:1133–9.CrossRefPubMed Fetterly KA, Magnuson DJ, Tannahill GM, et al. Effective use of radiation shields to minimize operator dose during invasive cardiology procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:1133–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Fetterly Ka, Lennon RJ, Bell MR, et al. Clinical determinants of radiation dose in percutaneous coronary interventional procedures: influence of patient size, procedure complexity, and performing physician. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:336–43.CrossRefPubMed Fetterly Ka, Lennon RJ, Bell MR, et al. Clinical determinants of radiation dose in percutaneous coronary interventional procedures: influence of patient size, procedure complexity, and performing physician. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:336–43.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Justino H. The ALARA concept in pediatric cardiac catheterization: techniques and tactics for managing radiation dose. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36(Suppl 2):146–53.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Justino H. The ALARA concept in pediatric cardiac catheterization: techniques and tactics for managing radiation dose. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36(Suppl 2):146–53.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Söderman M, Holmin S, Andersson T, et al. Image noise reduction algorithm for digital subtraction angiography: clinical results. Radiology. 2013;269:553–60.CrossRefPubMed Söderman M, Holmin S, Andersson T, et al. Image noise reduction algorithm for digital subtraction angiography: clinical results. Radiology. 2013;269:553–60.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Soderman M, Mauti M, Boon S, et al. Radiation dose in neuroangiography using image noise reduction technology: a population study based on 614 patients. Neuroradiology. 2013;55:1365–72.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Soderman M, Mauti M, Boon S, et al. Radiation dose in neuroangiography using image noise reduction technology: a population study based on 614 patients. Neuroradiology. 2013;55:1365–72.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dekker LR, van der Voort PH, Simmers TA, et al. New image processing and noise reduction technology allows reduction of radiation exposure in complex electrophysiologic interventions while maintaining optimal image quality: a randomised clinical trial. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:1678–82.CrossRefPubMed Dekker LR, van der Voort PH, Simmers TA, et al. New image processing and noise reduction technology allows reduction of radiation exposure in complex electrophysiologic interventions while maintaining optimal image quality: a randomised clinical trial. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:1678–82.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Struelens L, Vanhavere F, Bosmans H, et al. Data analysis from a multi-centre, comparative study of angiographic examinations leading to practical guidelines for the optimisation of patient doses. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1–3):87–92.PubMed Struelens L, Vanhavere F, Bosmans H, et al. Data analysis from a multi-centre, comparative study of angiographic examinations leading to practical guidelines for the optimisation of patient doses. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1–3):87–92.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Dragusin O, Desmet W, Heidbuchel H, et al. Radiation dose levels during interventional cardiology procedures in a tertiary care hospital. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1–3):231–5.PubMed Dragusin O, Desmet W, Heidbuchel H, et al. Radiation dose levels during interventional cardiology procedures in a tertiary care hospital. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1–3):231–5.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Padovani R, Vano E, Trianni A, et al. Reference levels at European level for cardiac interventional procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;129(1–3):104–7.CrossRefPubMed Padovani R, Vano E, Trianni A, et al. Reference levels at European level for cardiac interventional procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;129(1–3):104–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Journy N, Sinno-Tellier S, Maccia C, et al. Main clinical, therapeutic and technical factors related to patient’s maximum skin dose in interventional cardiology procedures. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:433–42.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Journy N, Sinno-Tellier S, Maccia C, et al. Main clinical, therapeutic and technical factors related to patient’s maximum skin dose in interventional cardiology procedures. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:433–42.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Komócsi A, Kónyi A, Kovács E, et al. Radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization: implications for the transradial approach. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2010;2(3):105–9.CrossRef Komócsi A, Kónyi A, Kovács E, et al. Radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization: implications for the transradial approach. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2010;2(3):105–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Roguin A, Goldstein J, Bar O. Brain tumours among interventional cardiologists: a cause for alarm? Report of four new cases from two cities and a review of the literature. EuroIntervention. 2012;7(9):1081–6.CrossRefPubMed Roguin A, Goldstein J, Bar O. Brain tumours among interventional cardiologists: a cause for alarm? Report of four new cases from two cities and a review of the literature. EuroIntervention. 2012;7(9):1081–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Roguin A, Goldstein J, Bar O. Brain malignancies and ionising radiation: more cases reported. EuroIntervention. 2012;8:169–70. doi:10.4244/EIJV8I1A26.CrossRefPubMed Roguin A, Goldstein J, Bar O. Brain malignancies and ionising radiation: more cases reported. EuroIntervention. 2012;8:169–70. doi:10.4244/EIJV8I1A26.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Roguin A, Goldstein J, Bar O, et al. Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:1368–72.CrossRefPubMed Roguin A, Goldstein J, Bar O, et al. Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:1368–72.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Duran A, Hian SK, Miller DL, et al. Recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:29–42.CrossRefPubMed Duran A, Hian SK, Miller DL, et al. Recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:29–42.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Dobbins J III. Observer assessment. In: Beutel J, Kundel HL, Van Metter RL, editors. Handbook of medical imaging: physics and psychophysics. Bellingham: SPIE Press; 2000. S 161–222. (Guidance for industry: developing medical imaging drug and biological products. Design, analysis, and interpretation of clinical studies. US Department of Health and Human Services; 2004).CrossRef Dobbins J III. Observer assessment. In: Beutel J, Kundel HL, Van Metter RL, editors. Handbook of medical imaging: physics and psychophysics. Bellingham: SPIE Press; 2000. S 161–222. (Guidance for industry: developing medical imaging drug and biological products. Design, analysis, and interpretation of clinical studies. US Department of Health and Human Services; 2004).CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Novel X-ray image noise reduction technology reduces patient radiation dose while maintaining image quality in coronary angiography
Authors
T. ten Cate
M. van Wely
H. Gehlmann
M. Mauti
C. Camaro
N. Reifart
H. Suryapranata
M.J. de Boer
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Electronic ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0742-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Netherlands Heart Journal 11/2015 Go to the issue