Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal 4/2015

Open Access 01-04-2015 | Editorial Comment

There is only one big risk you should avoid at all costs, and that is the risk of doing nothing

Author: J. Daemen

Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Excerpt

This issue of the Netherland Heart Journal presents the meta-analysis of Rasoul et al. [1] in which they question the optimal treatment strategy for patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease, an extremely relevant question to those who are regularly confronted with STEMI patients. The study queues up in line with a large number of studies and meta-analyses on the same topic published in the past 10 years. Unfortunately, their results are conflicting, which is not surprising given the differential study designs and potpourri of confounders in the research question. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rasoul S, van Ommen V, Vainer J, et al. Multivessel revascularisation versus infarct-related artery only revascularisation during the index primary PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease: a meta-analysis. Neth Heart J. 2015;23. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0673-x. Rasoul S, van Ommen V, Vainer J, et al. Multivessel revascularisation versus infarct-related artery only revascularisation during the index primary PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease: a meta-analysis. Neth Heart J. 2015;23. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0673-x.
2.
go back to reference Parodi G, Memisha G, Valenti R, et al. Five year outcome after primary coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from a single centre experience. Heart. 2005;91(12):1541–4.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Parodi G, Memisha G, Valenti R, et al. Five year outcome after primary coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from a single centre experience. Heart. 2005;91(12):1541–4.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rosner GF, Kirtane AJ, Genereux P, et al. Impact of the presence and extent of incomplete angiographic revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial. Circulation. 2012;125(21):2613–20.CrossRefPubMed Rosner GF, Kirtane AJ, Genereux P, et al. Impact of the presence and extent of incomplete angiographic revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial. Circulation. 2012;125(21):2613–20.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, et al. Incomplete revascularization in the era of drug-eluting stents: impact on adverse outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(1):17–25.CrossRefPubMed Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, et al. Incomplete revascularization in the era of drug-eluting stents: impact on adverse outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(1):17–25.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Daemen J, Boersma E, Flather M, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting and coronary artery bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis with 5-year patient-level data from the ARTS, ERACI-II, MASS-II, and SoS trials. Circulation. 2008;118(11):1146–54.CrossRefPubMed Daemen J, Boersma E, Flather M, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting and coronary artery bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis with 5-year patient-level data from the ARTS, ERACI-II, MASS-II, and SoS trials. Circulation. 2008;118(11):1146–54.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):213–24.CrossRefPubMed Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):213–24.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference da Costa BR, Juni P. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(47):3336–45.CrossRefPubMed da Costa BR, Juni P. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(47):3336–45.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wald DS, Morris JK, Wald NJ, et al. Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1115–23.CrossRefPubMed Wald DS, Morris JK, Wald NJ, et al. Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1115–23.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gu YL, van der Horst IC, Douglas YL, Svilaas T, Mariani MA, Zijlstra F. Role of coronary artery bypass grafting during the acute and subacute phase of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Neth Heart J. 2010;18(7–8):348–54.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Gu YL, van der Horst IC, Douglas YL, Svilaas T, Mariani MA, Zijlstra F. Role of coronary artery bypass grafting during the acute and subacute phase of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Neth Heart J. 2010;18(7–8):348–54.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
Metadata
Title
There is only one big risk you should avoid at all costs, and that is the risk of doing nothing
Author
J. Daemen
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Electronic ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0675-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Netherlands Heart Journal 4/2015 Go to the issue