Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 4/2020

01-08-2020 | Angiography | Original Article

Does fractional flow reserve overestimate severity of LAD lesions?

Authors: Shu Yokota, MD, Nanette M. Borren, MD, Jan Paul Ottervanger, MD, PhD, Mohamed Mouden, MD, PhD, Jorik R. Timmer, MD, PhD, Siert Knollema, MD, PhD, Pieter L. Jager, MD, PhD

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract:

Background

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is increasingly used to estimate the severity of coronary stenoses, prior to coronary revascularization. However, it has been suggested that FFR overestimates the severity of Left Anterior Descending (LAD) lesions. Our aim was to verify whether in patients without ischemia on Myocardial Perfusion Imaging, FFR of the LAD is more often abnormal in comparison to FFR of other coronary arteries.

Methods

Prospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent FFR measurement because of persistent or worsening of angina complaints, within 6 months after normal Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. FFR measurements of a graft or diagonal branch were excluded. A FFR ≤ 0.80 denoted a functionally relevant stenosis.

Results

In 133 patients, 167 FFR measurements were performed, of which 85 in the LAD. Mean age of the patients was 64.8 ± 10.5 years, 40% were women. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between patients undergoing LAD and non-LAD measurements. An abnormal FFR was observed in 35.3% of the LAD measurements, compared to 9.8% in the non-LAD measurements (P = 0.001). Also after adjusting for age and gender, the FFR remained more frequently abnormal in the LAD with OR 5.2 (95% CI 2.2 to 12.3). Of the abnormal FFR LAD measurements, 70% were visually considered non-obstructive on invasive angiography.

Conclusions

In selected patients without ischemia on MPI, FFR measurement of the LAD is significantly more often abnormal. The majority of these patients has no obstructive lesions on invasive angiography. Possibly, FFR overestimates severity of LAD lesions, with risk of unnecessary revascularization.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nakamura M, Yamagishi M, Ueno T, Hara K, Ishiwata S, Itoh T, et al Prevalence of visual-functional mismatch regarding coronary artery stenosis in the CVIT-DEFER registry. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2014;29:300-8.CrossRef Nakamura M, Yamagishi M, Ueno T, Hara K, Ishiwata S, Itoh T, et al Prevalence of visual-functional mismatch regarding coronary artery stenosis in the CVIT-DEFER registry. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2014;29:300-8.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Arashi H, Yamaguchi J, Nakazawa M, Otsuki H, Haruki S, Nakao M, et al Lesion characteristics of coronary arteries associated with a mismatch between angiographic severity of stenosis and fractional flow reserve. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017;32:120-6.CrossRef Arashi H, Yamaguchi J, Nakazawa M, Otsuki H, Haruki S, Nakao M, et al Lesion characteristics of coronary arteries associated with a mismatch between angiographic severity of stenosis and fractional flow reserve. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017;32:120-6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Safi M, Eslami V, Namazi MH, Vakili H, Saadat H, Alipourparsa S, et al Visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography, fractional flow reserve, and quantitative coronary angiography. Int J Angiol. 2016;25:229-34.CrossRef Safi M, Eslami V, Namazi MH, Vakili H, Saadat H, Alipourparsa S, et al Visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography, fractional flow reserve, and quantitative coronary angiography. Int J Angiol. 2016;25:229-34.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Borren NM, Ottervanger JP, Engbers EM, Hof AWJ. Angiographic underestimation of disease severity in the left anterior descending artery: A fractional flow reserve analysis. Coron Artery Dis. 2016;27:556-60.CrossRef Borren NM, Ottervanger JP, Engbers EM, Hof AWJ. Angiographic underestimation of disease severity in the left anterior descending artery: A fractional flow reserve analysis. Coron Artery Dis. 2016;27:556-60.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Taguchi E, Fukunaga T, Miyamoto S, Sakamoto T. Accuracy and usefulness of noninvasive fractional flow reserve from computed tomographic coronary angiography: Comparison with myocardial perfusion imaging, echocardiographic coronary flow reserve, and invasive fractional flow reserve. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017;32:66-71.CrossRef Taguchi E, Fukunaga T, Miyamoto S, Sakamoto T. Accuracy and usefulness of noninvasive fractional flow reserve from computed tomographic coronary angiography: Comparison with myocardial perfusion imaging, echocardiographic coronary flow reserve, and invasive fractional flow reserve. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017;32:66-71.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Engbers EM, Timmer JR, Ottervanger JP, Mouden M, Knollema S, Jager PL. Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium scoring in addition to single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging in symptomatic patients. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:e003966.CrossRef Engbers EM, Timmer JR, Ottervanger JP, Mouden M, Knollema S, Jager PL. Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium scoring in addition to single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging in symptomatic patients. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:e003966.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines, et al ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013;2013:2949-3003. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines, et al ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013;2013:2949-3003.
8.
go back to reference Toth G, Hamilos M, Pyxaras S, Mangiacapra F, Nelis O, De Vroey F, et al Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2831-8.CrossRef Toth G, Hamilos M, Pyxaras S, Mangiacapra F, Nelis O, De Vroey F, et al Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2831-8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, et al Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816-21.CrossRef Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, et al Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816-21.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, de Muinck ED, Hoorntje JCA, Escaned J, et al Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: A randomized trial. Circulation. 2001;103:2928-34.CrossRef Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, de Muinck ED, Hoorntje JCA, Escaned J, et al Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: A randomized trial. Circulation. 2001;103:2928-34.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, et al Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-Year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:177-84.CrossRef Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, et al Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-Year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:177-84.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jeremias A, Kirtane AJ, Stone GW. A test in context: Fractional flow reserve: accuracy, prognostic implications, and limitations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2748-58.CrossRef Jeremias A, Kirtane AJ, Stone GW. A test in context: Fractional flow reserve: accuracy, prognostic implications, and limitations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2748-58.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wilson WM, Shah ASV, Birse D, Harley E, Northridge DB, Uren NG. The relationship between the basal coronary translesional pressure ratio and fractional flow reserve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;90:745-53.CrossRef Wilson WM, Shah ASV, Birse D, Harley E, Northridge DB, Uren NG. The relationship between the basal coronary translesional pressure ratio and fractional flow reserve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;90:745-53.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Seto AH, Tehrani D, Kern MJ. Limitations and pitfalls of fractional flow reserve measurements and adenosine-induced hyperemia. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2015;4:419-34.PubMed Seto AH, Tehrani D, Kern MJ. Limitations and pitfalls of fractional flow reserve measurements and adenosine-induced hyperemia. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2015;4:419-34.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Götberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, Sandhall L, Danielewicz M, Jakobsen L, et al Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1813-23.CrossRef Götberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, Sandhall L, Danielewicz M, Jakobsen L, et al Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1813-23.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Meuwissen M, Siebes M, Chamuleau SA, van Eck-Smit BL, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, et al Hyperemic stenosis resistance index for evaluation of functional coronary lesion severity. Circulation. 2002;106:441-6.CrossRef Meuwissen M, Siebes M, Chamuleau SA, van Eck-Smit BL, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, et al Hyperemic stenosis resistance index for evaluation of functional coronary lesion severity. Circulation. 2002;106:441-6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Johnson NP, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Is discordance of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve due to methodology or clinically relevant coronary pathophysiology? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:193-202.CrossRef Johnson NP, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Is discordance of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve due to methodology or clinically relevant coronary pathophysiology? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:193-202.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Siebes M, Verhoeff BJ, Meuwissen M, Winter RJ, Spaan JA, Piek JJ. Single-wire pressure and flow velocity measurement to quantify coronary stenosis hemodynamics and effects of percutaneous interventions. Circulation. 2004;109:756-62.CrossRef Siebes M, Verhoeff BJ, Meuwissen M, Winter RJ, Spaan JA, Piek JJ. Single-wire pressure and flow velocity measurement to quantify coronary stenosis hemodynamics and effects of percutaneous interventions. Circulation. 2004;109:756-62.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sinha Roy A, Back MR, Khoury SF, Schneeberger EW, Back LH, Velury VV, et al Functional and anatomical diagnosis of coronary artery stenoses. J Surg Res. 2008;150:24-33.CrossRef Sinha Roy A, Back MR, Khoury SF, Schneeberger EW, Back LH, Velury VV, et al Functional and anatomical diagnosis of coronary artery stenoses. J Surg Res. 2008;150:24-33.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Takx RA, Blomberg BA, El Aidi H, Habets J, de Jong PA, Nagel E, et al Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e002666.CrossRef Takx RA, Blomberg BA, El Aidi H, Habets J, de Jong PA, Nagel E, et al Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e002666.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sahiner I, Akdemir UO, Kocaman SA, Sahinarslan A, Timurkaynak T, Unlu M. Quantitative evaluation improves specificity of myocardial perfusion SPECT in the assessment of functionally significant intermediate coronary artery stenoses: A comparative study with fractional flow reserve measurements. Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27:132-9.CrossRef Sahiner I, Akdemir UO, Kocaman SA, Sahinarslan A, Timurkaynak T, Unlu M. Quantitative evaluation improves specificity of myocardial perfusion SPECT in the assessment of functionally significant intermediate coronary artery stenoses: A comparative study with fractional flow reserve measurements. Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27:132-9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zoghbi GJ, Dorfman TA, Iskandrian AE. The effects of medications on myocardial perfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:401-16.CrossRef Zoghbi GJ, Dorfman TA, Iskandrian AE. The effects of medications on myocardial perfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:401-16.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Huang JY, Huang CK, Yen RF, Wu HY, Tu YK, Cheng MF, et al Diagnostic performance of attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1893-8.CrossRef Huang JY, Huang CK, Yen RF, Wu HY, Tu YK, Cheng MF, et al Diagnostic performance of attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1893-8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Yokota S, Mouden M, Ottervanger JP, Engbers E, Knollema S, Timmer JR, et al Prognostic value of normal stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging: a comparison between conventional and CZT-based SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:296-301.CrossRef Yokota S, Mouden M, Ottervanger JP, Engbers E, Knollema S, Timmer JR, et al Prognostic value of normal stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging: a comparison between conventional and CZT-based SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:296-301.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Botman CJ, Schonberger J, Koolen S, Penn O, Botman H, Dib N, et al Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve—guided study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:2093-7.CrossRef Botman CJ, Schonberger J, Koolen S, Penn O, Botman H, Dib N, et al Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve—guided study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:2093-7.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Biasco L, Pedersen F, Lønborg J, Holmvang L, Helqvist S, Saunamäki K, et al Angiographic characteristics of intermediate stenosis of the left anterior descending artery for determination of lesion significance as identified by fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:1475-80.CrossRef Biasco L, Pedersen F, Lønborg J, Holmvang L, Helqvist S, Saunamäki K, et al Angiographic characteristics of intermediate stenosis of the left anterior descending artery for determination of lesion significance as identified by fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:1475-80.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Aminian A, Dolatabadi D, Lefebvre P, Khalil G, Zimmerman R, Michalakis G, et al Importance of guiding catheter disengagement during measurement of fractional flow reserve in patients with an isolated proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;85:595-601.CrossRef Aminian A, Dolatabadi D, Lefebvre P, Khalil G, Zimmerman R, Michalakis G, et al Importance of guiding catheter disengagement during measurement of fractional flow reserve in patients with an isolated proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;85:595-601.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does fractional flow reserve overestimate severity of LAD lesions?
Authors
Shu Yokota, MD
Nanette M. Borren, MD
Jan Paul Ottervanger, MD, PhD
Mohamed Mouden, MD, PhD
Jorik R. Timmer, MD, PhD
Siert Knollema, MD, PhD
Pieter L. Jager, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01712-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 4/2020 Go to the issue