Top

Published in:

01-02-2019 | Editorial

Striking a balance in the discussion of the benefits of imaging tests and risks of radiation exposure

Authors: Randall C. Thompson, MD, FASNC, Prem Soman, MD, PhD, FASNC

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 1/2019

Excerpt

Diagnostic testing from ionizing radiation is an integral part of the practice of medicine. The therapeutic advances and substantial improvement in the care of patients with cardiovascular diseases would not be possible without the concomitant advances in cardiovascular imaging that have occurred. Indeed, the testing that we perform can be lifesaving, although indirectly. This point is sometimes forgotten in the consideration of risks and benefits. In the case of heart disease, there has been a dramatic improvement in patient outcome.1 It is hard to imagine that this would have occurred without accurate diagnostic testing. …

Mensah GA, Wei GS, Sorlie PD, Fine LJ, Rosenberg Y, Kaufmann PG, Mussolino ME, Hsu LL, Addou E, Engelgau MM, Gordon D. D Decline in cardiovascular mortality: Possible causes and implications. Circ Res. 2017;120:366–80. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hirshfeld JW Jr, Ferrari VA, Bengel FM, Bergersen L, Chambers CE, Einstein AJ, et al. ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT expert consensus document on optimal use of ionizing radiation in cardiovascular imaging: best practices for safety and effectiveness: A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:2829–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.018.CrossRefPubMed

Angelidis G, Tsougos I, Valotassiou V, Georgoulias P. Low radiation dose cancer risk hypothesis may lead to ‘radiophobia’-driven imaging avoidance? J Nucl Cardiol. 2018;28:1.

Sacks B, Meyerson G, Siegel JA. Epidemiology Without Biology: False Paradigms, Unfounded Assumptions, and Specious Statistics in Radiation Science (with Commentaries by Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake and Christopher Busby and a Reply by the Authors). Biol Theory. 2016;11:69–101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Patricia K, Wu JC. Radiation exposure from imaging tests: is there an increased cancer risk? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2011;9(2):177–83. https://doi.org/10.1586/erc.10.184.CrossRef

Siegel JA, Greenspan BS, Maurer AH, et al. The BEIR VII estimates of low-dose radiation health risks are based on faulty assumptions and data analyses: a call for reassessment. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:1017–9.CrossRefPubMed

Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2005.

Duncan JR, Lieber MR, Adachi N, Wahl RL. Radiation dose does matter: mechanistic insights into dna damage and repair support the linear no-threshold model of low-dose radiation health risks. J. Nucl. Med. 2018;59:1014–6.CrossRefPubMed

Thompson RC, O’Keefe JH, McGhie AI, Bybee KA, Thompson EC, Bateman TM. Reduction of SPECT MPI radiation dose using contemporary protocols and technology: results in 18,000 patients over 8 years. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:282–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.03.008.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Duvall WL, Sweeny JM, Croft LB, Ginsberg E, Guma KA, Henzlova MJ. Reduced stress dose with rapid acquisition CZT SPECT MPI in a non-obese clinical population: comparison to coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-011-9480-y.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Oddstig J, Hedeer F, Jögi J, Carlsson M, Hindorf C, Engblom H. Reduced administered activity, reduced acquisition time, and preserved image quality for the new CZT camera. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013;20(1):38–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-012-9634-6.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Amundson SA, Lee RA, Koch-Paiz CA, et al. Differential response of stress genes to low dose-rate gamma irradiation. Mol Cancer Res. 2003;1:445–52.PubMed

13.

Lee WH, Nguyen PK, Fleischmann D, Wu JC. DNA damage-associated biomarkers in studying individual sensitivity to low-dose radiation from cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:3075–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Nguyen PK, Lee WH, Li YF, et al. Assessment of the radiation effects of cardiac CT angiography using protein and genetic biomarkers. JACC. 2015;8:873–84.PubMed

Title: Striking a balance in the discussion of the benefits of imaging tests and risks of radiation exposure
Authors: Randall C. Thompson, MD, FASNC
Prem Soman, MD, PhD, FASNC
Publication date: 01-02-2019
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1372-y

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Striking a balance in the discussion of the benefits of imaging tests and risks of radiation exposure

Excerpt

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Excerpt

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Social media activities at the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in octogenarians: Safety, tolerability, and long-term prognostic implications of hemodynamic response and SPECT-related variables

Cardiovascular disease in the literature: A selection of recent original research papers

Diagnostic implications of CZT SPECT and impact of CT attenuation correction

Multimodality imaging: Bird’s eye view from The European Society of Cardiology Congress 2018 Munich, August 25–29, 2018

Stress-induced alteration of left ventricular eccentricity: An additional marker of multivessel CAD

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page