Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2/2019

01-04-2019 | Editorial

The need for standardization of nuclear cardiology reporting and data system (NCAD-RADS): Learning from coronary artery disease (CAD), breast imaging (BI), liver imaging (LI), and prostate imaging (PI) RADS

Authors: Majid Assadi, MD, FASNC, Erik Velez, MD, Mohammad Hosein Najafi, MD, Ali Gholamrezanezhad, MD, FEBNM, DABR

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Newer structured reporting manners, the reporting and data system (RADS), have made vast steps in improving standardized and structured reporting, allowing better communication between radiologists and referring providers. This has been implemented in several fields: breast (BI-RADS), lung (Lung-RADS), liver (LI-RADS), thyroid (TI-RADS), prostate (PI-RADS), and in cardiovascular radiology (CAD-RADS). The field of nuclear cardiology began its efforts of standardization years ago; however, a widespread standardized reporting structure has not yet been adopted. Such an approach in nuclear cardiology, the nuclear cardiology reporting and data system (NCAD-RADS), will assist radiologists and treating clinicians in conveying and understanding reports and determining the appropriate next steps in management. By linking explicit findings to defined recommendations, patients will receive more consistent and appropriate care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Li KC, Marcovici P, Phelps A, et al. Digitization of medicine: How radiology can take advantage of the digital revolution. Acad Radiol. 2013;20:1479–94.CrossRefPubMed Li KC, Marcovici P, Phelps A, et al. Digitization of medicine: How radiology can take advantage of the digital revolution. Acad Radiol. 2013;20:1479–94.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference An C, Rakhmonova G, Choi JY, Kim MJ. Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2014: Understanding and application of the diagnostic algorithm. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2016;22:296–307.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral An C, Rakhmonova G, Choi JY, Kim MJ. Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2014: Understanding and application of the diagnostic algorithm. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2016;22:296–307.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Davenport MS, Khalatbari S, Liu PS, et al. Repeatability of diagnostic features and scoring systems for hepatocellular carcinoma by using MR imaging. Radiology. 2014;272:132–42.CrossRefPubMed Davenport MS, Khalatbari S, Liu PS, et al. Repeatability of diagnostic features and scoring systems for hepatocellular carcinoma by using MR imaging. Radiology. 2014;272:132–42.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gholamrezanezhad A, Kessler M, Hayeri SM. The need for standardization of musculoskeletal practice reporting: Learning from ACR BI-RADS, liver imaging-reporting and data system, and prostate imaging-reporting and data system. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:1585–7.CrossRefPubMed Gholamrezanezhad A, Kessler M, Hayeri SM. The need for standardization of musculoskeletal practice reporting: Learning from ACR BI-RADS, liver imaging-reporting and data system, and prostate imaging-reporting and data system. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:1585–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Buntin MB, Jain SH, Blumenthal D. Health information technology: Laying the infrastructure for national health reform. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:1214–9.CrossRefPubMed Buntin MB, Jain SH, Blumenthal D. Health information technology: Laying the infrastructure for national health reform. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:1214–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tragardh E, Hesse B, Knuuti J, et al. Reporting nuclear cardiology: A joint position paper by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:272–9.CrossRefPubMed Tragardh E, Hesse B, Knuuti J, et al. Reporting nuclear cardiology: A joint position paper by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:272–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tilkemeier PL, Cooke CD, Grossman GB, McCallister BD, Ward RP. Standardized reporting of radionuclide myocardial perfusion and function. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:650.CrossRef Tilkemeier PL, Cooke CD, Grossman GB, McCallister BD, Ward RP. Standardized reporting of radionuclide myocardial perfusion and function. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:650.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bosmans JM, Van Goethem JW, De Schepper AM. Structure and content of the radiological report: An audit of 94 reports from a university education center. JBR-BTR. 2004;87:260–4.PubMed Bosmans JM, Van Goethem JW, De Schepper AM. Structure and content of the radiological report: An audit of 94 reports from a university education center. JBR-BTR. 2004;87:260–4.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Cramer JA, Eisenmenger LB, Pierson NS, Dhatt HS, Heilbrun ME. Structured and templated reporting: An overview. Appl Radiol. 2014;43:18–21. Cramer JA, Eisenmenger LB, Pierson NS, Dhatt HS, Heilbrun ME. Structured and templated reporting: An overview. Appl Radiol. 2014;43:18–21.
10.
go back to reference Lee R, Cohen MD, Jennings GS. A new method of evaluating the quality of radiology reports. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:241–8.CrossRefPubMed Lee R, Cohen MD, Jennings GS. A new method of evaluating the quality of radiology reports. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:241–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, Parizel PM. Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72:354–8.CrossRefPubMed Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, Parizel PM. Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72:354–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Khorasani R, Bates DW, Teeger S, Rothschild JM, Adams DF, Seltzer SE. Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports? Acad Radiol. 2003;10:685–8.CrossRefPubMed Khorasani R, Bates DW, Teeger S, Rothschild JM, Adams DF, Seltzer SE. Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports? Acad Radiol. 2003;10:685–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Weiss DL, Langlotz CP. Structured reporting: Patient care enhancement or productivity nightmare? Radiology. 2008;249:739–47.CrossRefPubMed Weiss DL, Langlotz CP. Structured reporting: Patient care enhancement or productivity nightmare? Radiology. 2008;249:739–47.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8:342–58.CrossRefPubMed Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8:342–58.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Muller NL, Remy J. Fleischner society: Glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology. 2008;246:697–722.CrossRefPubMed Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Muller NL, Remy J. Fleischner society: Glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology. 2008;246:697–722.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rao AA, Feneis J, Lalonde C, Ojeda-Fournier H. A pictorial review of changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition. Radiographics. 2016;36:623–39.CrossRefPubMed Rao AA, Feneis J, Lalonde C, Ojeda-Fournier H. A pictorial review of changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition. Radiographics. 2016;36:623–39.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Conners AL, Hruska CB, Tortorelli CL, et al. Lexicon for standardized interpretation of gamma camera molecular breast imaging: observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:971–82.CrossRefPubMed Conners AL, Hruska CB, Tortorelli CL, et al. Lexicon for standardized interpretation of gamma camera molecular breast imaging: observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:971–82.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Conners AL, Maxwell RW, Tortorelli CL, et al. Gamma camera breast imaging lexicon. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:W767–74.CrossRefPubMed Conners AL, Maxwell RW, Tortorelli CL, et al. Gamma camera breast imaging lexicon. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:W767–74.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Flotats A, Knuuti J, Gutberlet M, et al. Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:201–12.CrossRefPubMed Flotats A, Knuuti J, Gutberlet M, et al. Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:201–12.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tilkemeier PL, Cooke CD, Ficaro EP, et al. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology information statement: Standardized reporting matrix for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:e157–71.CrossRefPubMed Tilkemeier PL, Cooke CD, Ficaro EP, et al. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology information statement: Standardized reporting matrix for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:e157–71.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Mitchell DG, Bruix J, Sherman M, Sirlin CB. LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System): Summary, discussion, and consensus of the LI-RADS Management Working Group and future directions. Hepatology. 2015;61:1056–65.CrossRefPubMed Mitchell DG, Bruix J, Sherman M, Sirlin CB. LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System): Summary, discussion, and consensus of the LI-RADS Management Working Group and future directions. Hepatology. 2015;61:1056–65.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kazerooni EA, Armstrong MR, Amorosa JK, et al. ACR CT accreditation program and the lung cancer screening program designation. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:R30–4.CrossRefPubMed Kazerooni EA, Armstrong MR, Amorosa JK, et al. ACR CT accreditation program and the lung cancer screening program designation. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:R30–4.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:587–95.CrossRefPubMed Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:587–95.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Lim RP, et al. Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. Radiology. 2013;269:482–92.CrossRefPubMed Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Lim RP, et al. Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. Radiology. 2013;269:482–92.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Cury RC, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al. CAD-RADS(TM) Coronary Artery Disease—Reporting and Data System. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:269–81.CrossRefPubMed Cury RC, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al. CAD-RADS(TM) Coronary Artery Disease—Reporting and Data System. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:269–81.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Liu D, Zucherman M, Tulloss WB Jr. Six characteristics of effective structured reporting and the inevitable integration with speech recognition. J Digit Imaging. 2006;19:98–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu D, Zucherman M, Tulloss WB Jr. Six characteristics of effective structured reporting and the inevitable integration with speech recognition. J Digit Imaging. 2006;19:98–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Srinivasa Babu A, Brooks ML. The malpractice liability of radiology reports: Minimizing the risk. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2015;35:547-554. Srinivasa Babu A, Brooks ML. The malpractice liability of radiology reports: Minimizing the risk. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2015;35:547-554.
29.
go back to reference D’Orsi CJ, Kopans DB. The American College of Radiology’s mammography lexicon: Barking up the only tree. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:595.CrossRefPubMed D’Orsi CJ, Kopans DB. The American College of Radiology’s mammography lexicon: Barking up the only tree. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:595.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Ghasemi M, Nabipour I, Omrani A, Alipour Z, Assadi M. Precision medicine and molecular imaging: New targeted approaches toward cancer therapeutic and diagnosis. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;6:310–27.PubMedPubMedCentral Ghasemi M, Nabipour I, Omrani A, Alipour Z, Assadi M. Precision medicine and molecular imaging: New targeted approaches toward cancer therapeutic and diagnosis. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;6:310–27.PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Brindis RG, Douglas PS, Hendel RC, et al. ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1587–605.CrossRefPubMed Brindis RG, Douglas PS, Hendel RC, et al. ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1587–605.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Chandrashekhar Y, Min JK, Hecht H, Narula J. CAD-RADS: A giant first step toward a common lexicon? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:1125–9.CrossRefPubMed Chandrashekhar Y, Min JK, Hecht H, Narula J. CAD-RADS: A giant first step toward a common lexicon? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:1125–9.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Xie JX, Cury RC, Leipsic J, et al. The Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS): Prognostic and clinical implications associated with standardized coronary computed tomography angiography reporting. JACC Cardiovascular imaging. 2018;11:78–89.CrossRefPubMed Xie JX, Cury RC, Leipsic J, et al. The Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS): Prognostic and clinical implications associated with standardized coronary computed tomography angiography reporting. JACC Cardiovascular imaging. 2018;11:78–89.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Douglas P, Iskandrian AE, Krumholz HM, et al. Achieving quality in cardiovascular imaging: Proceedings from the American College of Cardiology-Duke University Medical Center Think Tank on Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2141–51.CrossRefPubMed Douglas P, Iskandrian AE, Krumholz HM, et al. Achieving quality in cardiovascular imaging: Proceedings from the American College of Cardiology-Duke University Medical Center Think Tank on Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2141–51.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Gardin JM, Adams DB, Douglas PS, et al. Recommendations for a standardized report for adult transthoracic echocardiography: A report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Nomenclature and Standards Committee and Task Force for a Standardized Echocardiography Report. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15:275–90.CrossRefPubMed Gardin JM, Adams DB, Douglas PS, et al. Recommendations for a standardized report for adult transthoracic echocardiography: A report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Nomenclature and Standards Committee and Task Force for a Standardized Echocardiography Report. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15:275–90.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, et al. Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, et al. Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, et al. ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:380–406.CrossRefPubMed Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, et al. ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:380–406.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The need for standardization of nuclear cardiology reporting and data system (NCAD-RADS): Learning from coronary artery disease (CAD), breast imaging (BI), liver imaging (LI), and prostate imaging (PI) RADS
Authors
Majid Assadi, MD, FASNC
Erik Velez, MD
Mohammad Hosein Najafi, MD
Ali Gholamrezanezhad, MD, FEBNM, DABR
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-01473-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2/2019 Go to the issue