Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 4/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Article

Diagnostic performance of the quantification of myocardium at risk from MPI SPECT/CTA 2G fusion for detecting obstructive coronary disease: A multicenter trial

Authors: Marina Piccinelli, PhD, Cesar Santana, MD, Gopi Kiran R. Sirineni, MD, Russell D. Folks, CNMT, RT(N), C. David Cooke, MSEE, Chesnal D. Arepalli, MD, Santiago Aguade-Bruix, MD, Zohar Keidar, MD, Alex Frenkel, MD, Ora Israel, MD, Jaume Candell-Riera, MD, Ernest V. Garcia, PhD

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The effective non-invasive identification of coronary artery disease (CAD) and its proper referral for invasive treatment are still unresolved issues. We evaluated our quantification of myocardium at risk (MAR) from our second generation 3D MPI/CTA fusion framework for the detection and localization of obstructive coronary disease.

Methods

Studies from 48 patients who had rest/stress MPI, CTA, and ICA were analyzed from 3 different institutions. From the CTA, a 3D biventricular surface of the myocardium with superimposed coronaries was extracted and fused to the perfusion distribution. Significant lesions were identified from CTA readings and positioned on the fused display. Three estimates of MAR were computed on the 3D LV surface on the basis of the MPI alone (MARp), the CTA alone (MARa), and the fused information (MARf). The extents of areas at risk were used to generate ROC curves using ICA anatomical findings as reference standard.

Results

Areas under the ROC curve (AUC) for CAD detection using MARf was 0.88 (CI = 0.75-0.95) and for MARp and MARa were, respectively 0.82 (CI = 0.69-0.92) and 0.75 (CI = 0.60-0.86) using the ≥70% stenosis criterion. AUCs for CAD localization (all vessels) using MARf showed significantly higher performance than either MARa or MARp or both.

Conclusions

Using ICA as the reference standard, MAR as the quantitative parameter, and AUC to measure diagnostic performance, MPI-CTA fusion imaging provided incremental diagnostic information compared to MPI or CTA alone for the diagnosis and localization of CAD.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Blankstein R, Di Carli M. Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging. Nat Rev Cardiol 2010;7:226-36.CrossRefPubMed Blankstein R, Di Carli M. Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging. Nat Rev Cardiol 2010;7:226-36.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bax JJ, Beanlands RS, Klocke FJ, Knuuti J, Lammertsma AA, Schaefers MA, et al. Diagnostic and clinical perspective of fusion imaging in cardiology: Is the total greater than the sum of its parts? Heart 2007;93:16-22.CrossRefPubMed Bax JJ, Beanlands RS, Klocke FJ, Knuuti J, Lammertsma AA, Schaefers MA, et al. Diagnostic and clinical perspective of fusion imaging in cardiology: Is the total greater than the sum of its parts? Heart 2007;93:16-22.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Piccinelli M, Garcia EV. Multimodality image fusion for diagnosing coronary artery disease. J Biomech Res 2013;27:439-551. Piccinelli M, Garcia EV. Multimodality image fusion for diagnosing coronary artery disease. J Biomech Res 2013;27:439-551.
4.
go back to reference Santana C, Garcia EV, Faber TL, Sirineni GKR, Esteves FP, Sanyal R, et al. Diagnostic performance of fusion of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and computed tomography coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:201-11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Santana C, Garcia EV, Faber TL, Sirineni GKR, Esteves FP, Sanyal R, et al. Diagnostic performance of fusion of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and computed tomography coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:201-11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Peifer JW, Ezquerra NF, Cooke CD, Mullick R, Klein L, Hyche ME, et al. Visualization of multimodality cardiac imagery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1990;37:744-56.CrossRefPubMed Peifer JW, Ezquerra NF, Cooke CD, Mullick R, Klein L, Hyche ME, et al. Visualization of multimodality cardiac imagery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1990;37:744-56.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Faber TL, Cooke CD, Peifer JW, Pettigrew RI, Vansant JP, Leyendecker JR, et al. Three-Dimensional displays of left ventricular epicardial surface from standard cardiac SPECT perfusion quantification techniques. J Nucl Med 1995;36:697-703.PubMed Faber TL, Cooke CD, Peifer JW, Pettigrew RI, Vansant JP, Leyendecker JR, et al. Three-Dimensional displays of left ventricular epicardial surface from standard cardiac SPECT perfusion quantification techniques. J Nucl Med 1995;36:697-703.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Faber TL, Santana CA, Garcia EV, Candell-Riera J, Folks RD, Peifer JW, et al. Three-dimensional fusion of coronary arteries with myocardial perfusion distributions: Clinical validation. J Nucl Med 2004;45:745-53.PubMed Faber TL, Santana CA, Garcia EV, Candell-Riera J, Folks RD, Peifer JW, et al. Three-dimensional fusion of coronary arteries with myocardial perfusion distributions: Clinical validation. J Nucl Med 2004;45:745-53.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Faber TL, Santana CA, Piccinelli M, Nye J, Votaw JR, Garcia EV, et al. Automatic alignment of myocardial perfusion images with contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2011;58:2296-302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Faber TL, Santana CA, Piccinelli M, Nye J, Votaw JR, Garcia EV, et al. Automatic alignment of myocardial perfusion images with contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2011;58:2296-302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Lowe JE, Reimer KA, Jennings RB. Experimental infarct size as a function of the amount of myocardium at risk. Am J Pathol 1978;90:363-80.PubMedPubMedCentral Lowe JE, Reimer KA, Jennings RB. Experimental infarct size as a function of the amount of myocardium at risk. Am J Pathol 1978;90:363-80.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Lee JT, Ideker RE, Reimer KA. Myocardial infarct size and location in relation to the coronary vascular bed at risk in man. Circulation 1981;64:526-34.CrossRefPubMed Lee JT, Ideker RE, Reimer KA. Myocardial infarct size and location in relation to the coronary vascular bed at risk in man. Circulation 1981;64:526-34.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Garcia EV, Faber TL, Cooke CD, Folks RD, Chen J, Santana C. The increasing role of quantification in nuclear cardiology: The Emory approach. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:420-32.CrossRefPubMed Garcia EV, Faber TL, Cooke CD, Folks RD, Chen J, Santana C. The increasing role of quantification in nuclear cardiology: The Emory approach. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:420-32.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Seiler C, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Measurement from arteriograms of regional myocardial bed size distal to any point in the coronary vascular tree for the assessing anatomic area at risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:783-97.CrossRefPubMed Seiler C, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Measurement from arteriograms of regional myocardial bed size distal to any point in the coronary vascular tree for the assessing anatomic area at risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:783-97.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Patterson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A non-parametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-45.CrossRefPubMed DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Patterson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A non-parametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-45.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rispler S, Keidar Z, Ghersin E, et al. Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1059-67.CrossRefPubMed Rispler S, Keidar Z, Ghersin E, et al. Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1059-67.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I, et al. Cardiac image fusion from stand-alone SPECT and CT: Clinical experience. J Nucl Med 2007;48:696-703.CrossRefPubMed Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I, et al. Cardiac image fusion from stand-alone SPECT and CT: Clinical experience. J Nucl Med 2007;48:696-703.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Slomka PJ, Cheng VY, Dey D, et al. Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion SPECT anatomically guided by co-registered 64-slice coronary CT angiography. J Nucl Med 2009;50:1621-30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Slomka PJ, Cheng VY, Dey D, et al. Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion SPECT anatomically guided by co-registered 64-slice coronary CT angiography. J Nucl Med 2009;50:1621-30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1974;33:87-94.CrossRefPubMed Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1974;33:87-94.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tonino PA, Fearon WF, DeBruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2816-21.CrossRefPubMed Tonino PA, Fearon WF, DeBruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2816-21.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012;367:991-1001.CrossRefPubMed De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012;367:991-1001.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bateman TM, Gould KL, Di Carli MF. Quantitation of myocardial blood flow. J Nucl Cardiol 2015;22:571-8.CrossRefPubMed Bateman TM, Gould KL, Di Carli MF. Quantitation of myocardial blood flow. J Nucl Cardiol 2015;22:571-8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Piccinelli M, Faber TL, Arepalli CD, Appia V, Vinten-Johansen J, Schmarkey SL, et al. Automatic detection of left and right ventricles from CTA enables efficient alignment of anatomy with perfusion data. J Nucl Cardiol 2014;21:96-108.CrossRefPubMed Piccinelli M, Faber TL, Arepalli CD, Appia V, Vinten-Johansen J, Schmarkey SL, et al. Automatic detection of left and right ventricles from CTA enables efficient alignment of anatomy with perfusion data. J Nucl Cardiol 2014;21:96-108.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Einstein AJ, Berman DS, Min JK, et al. Patient-centered imaging: shared decision making for cardiac imaging procedures with exposure to ionizing radiation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:1480-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Einstein AJ, Berman DS, Min JK, et al. Patient-centered imaging: shared decision making for cardiac imaging procedures with exposure to ionizing radiation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:1480-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic performance of the quantification of myocardium at risk from MPI SPECT/CTA 2G fusion for detecting obstructive coronary disease: A multicenter trial
Authors
Marina Piccinelli, PhD
Cesar Santana, MD
Gopi Kiran R. Sirineni, MD
Russell D. Folks, CNMT, RT(N)
C. David Cooke, MSEE
Chesnal D. Arepalli, MD
Santiago Aguade-Bruix, MD
Zohar Keidar, MD
Alex Frenkel, MD
Ora Israel, MD
Jaume Candell-Riera, MD
Ernest V. Garcia, PhD
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0819-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 4/2018 Go to the issue