Published in:
Open Access
01-04-2016 | Original Article
The effects of 18-h fasting with low-carbohydrate diet preparation on suppressed physiological myocardial 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake and possible minimal effects of unfractionated heparin use in patients with suspected cardiac involvement sarcoidosis
Authors:
Osamu Manabe, MD, PhD, Keiichiro Yoshinaga, MD, PhD, FACC, Hiroshi Ohira, MD, PhD, Atsuro Masuda, MD, Takahiro Sato, MD, PhD, Ichizo Tsujino, MD, PhD, Asuka Yamada, MD, Noriko Oyama-Manabe, MD, PhD, Kenji Hirata, MD, PhD, Masaharu Nishimura, MD, PhD, Nagara Tamaki, MD, PhD
Published in:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
|
Issue 2/2016
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET plays an important role in the detection of cardiac involvement sarcoidosis (CS). However, diffuse left ventricle (LV) wall uptake sometimes makes it difficult to distinguish between positive uptake and physiological uptake. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of 18-h fasting with low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) vs a minimum of 6-h fasting preparations on diffuse LV FDG uptake and free fatty acid (FFA) levels in patients with suspected CS.
Methods
Eighty-two patients with suspected CS were divided into 2 preparation protocols: one with a minimum 6-h fast without LCD preparation (group A, n = 58) and the other with a minimum 18-h fast with LCD preparation (group B, n = 24). All patients also received intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH; 50 IU/kg) before the injection of
FDG.
Results
Group A showed a higher percentage of diffuse LV uptake than did group B (27.6 vs 0.0%, P = .0041). Group B showed higher FFA levels (1159.1 ± 393.0, 650.5 ± 310.9 μEq/L, P < .0001) than did group A. Patients with diffuse LV uptake (n = 16) showed lower FFA levels than did other patients (n = 66) (432.1 ± 296.1, 888.4 ± 381.4 μEq/L, P < .0001). UFH administration significantly increased FFAs in both groups, even in the patients with diffuse LV FDG uptake.
Conclusions
The 18-h fast with LCD preparation significantly reduced diffuse LV uptake and increased FFA levels. In particular, the FFA level was significantly lower in patients with LV diffuse uptake than in patients without LV diffuse uptake. Acutely increasing plasma FFA through the use of UFH may not have a significant role in reducing physiological LV FDG uptake.