Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 9/2018

Open Access 01-09-2018 | Original Research

A New Automatically Fixating Stone Basket (2.5 F) Prototype with a Nitinol Spring for Accurate Ureteroscopic Stone Size Measurement

Authors: Jens Cordes, Felix Nguyen, Wolfhard Pinkowski, Axel S. Merseburger, Tomasz Ozimek

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Intraoperative assessment of stone size is crucial for the successful and safe extraction of stones. The first automatically fixating measuring stone basket prototype showed a mismatch between the steel spring and the nitinol basket; therefore, to improve this prototype, the steel spring was replaced with a nitinol spring and a modified scale was implemented on the basket handle for accurate intraoperative stone size measurement.

Methods

The proposed tipped basket was composed of nitinol. A standard handle with a spring-supported self-closing mechanism (2.5 F, Urotech®) was used, and a modified nonlinear millimeter scale was established on the handle. The grasping force was provided by the new nitinol spring mechanism in the handgrip. Various colors associated with the stone size were applied on the scale.

Results

The material difference between the basket and the spring was eliminated. The measuring scale ranged from 2 mm (green) through 5 mm (yellow) to 8 mm (red), and the scale was nonlinear because of the nonlinear relationship between the diameter of the stone and the distance marked on the scale.

Conclusion

The proposed automatically fixating stone basket with a nitinol spring has the potential to improve the safety and effectiveness of endourological stone retrieval. Further validation of this new scale and basket should follow.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475–82.CrossRef Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475–82.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1817–23.CrossRef Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1817–23.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ordon M, Urbach D, Mamdani M, Saskin R, Honey RJ, Pace KT. A population based study of the changing demographics of patients undergoing definitive treatment for kidney stone disease. J Urol. 2015;193:869–74.CrossRef Ordon M, Urbach D, Mamdani M, Saskin R, Honey RJ, Pace KT. A population based study of the changing demographics of patients undergoing definitive treatment for kidney stone disease. J Urol. 2015;193:869–74.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Worster A, Preyra I, Weaver B, Haines T. The accuracy of noncontrast helical computed tomography versus intravenous pyelography in the diagnosis of suspected acute urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40(3):280–6.CrossRef Worster A, Preyra I, Weaver B, Haines T. The accuracy of noncontrast helical computed tomography versus intravenous pyelography in the diagnosis of suspected acute urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40(3):280–6.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kishore TA, Pedro RN, Hinck B, Monga M. Estimation of size of distal ureteral stones: noncontrast CT scan versus actual size. Urology. 2008;72:761–4.CrossRef Kishore TA, Pedro RN, Hinck B, Monga M. Estimation of size of distal ureteral stones: noncontrast CT scan versus actual size. Urology. 2008;72:761–4.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Patel N, Chew B, Knudsen B, Lipkin M, Wenzler D, Sur RL. Accuracy of endoscopic intraoperative assessment of urologic stone size. J Endourol. 2014;28:582–6.CrossRef Patel N, Chew B, Knudsen B, Lipkin M, Wenzler D, Sur RL. Accuracy of endoscopic intraoperative assessment of urologic stone size. J Endourol. 2014;28:582–6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cordes J, Nguyen F, Pinkowski W, Jocham D. Measurement of stone diameter with three sizes of automatically fixating stone baskets. Open J Urol. 2013;3:58–61.CrossRef Cordes J, Nguyen F, Pinkowski W, Jocham D. Measurement of stone diameter with three sizes of automatically fixating stone baskets. Open J Urol. 2013;3:58–61.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cordes J, Teske L, Nguyen F, Pinkowski W, Sievert KD, Vonthain R. A comparison between an in vitro ureteroscopic stone size estimation and the stone size measurement with the help of a scale on stone baskets. World J Urol. 2016;34(9):1303–9.CrossRef Cordes J, Teske L, Nguyen F, Pinkowski W, Sievert KD, Vonthain R. A comparison between an in vitro ureteroscopic stone size estimation and the stone size measurement with the help of a scale on stone baskets. World J Urol. 2016;34(9):1303–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Henderson E, Nash DH, Dempster WM. On the experimental testing of fine nitinol wires for medical devices. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4(3):261–8.CrossRef Henderson E, Nash DH, Dempster WM. On the experimental testing of fine nitinol wires for medical devices. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4(3):261–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Abdelrahim AF, Abdelmaguid A, Abuzeid H, Amin M, Mousa S, Abdelrahim F. Rigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: factors associated with intraoperative adverse events. J Endourol. 2008;22:277–80.CrossRef Abdelrahim AF, Abdelmaguid A, Abuzeid H, Amin M, Mousa S, Abdelrahim F. Rigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: factors associated with intraoperative adverse events. J Endourol. 2008;22:277–80.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Karakan T, Kilinc MF, Demirbas A, Hascicek AM, Doluoglu OG, Yucel MO, Resorlu B. Evaluating ureteral wall injuries with endoscopic grading system and analysis of the predisposing factors. J Endourol. 2016;30(4):375–8.CrossRef Karakan T, Kilinc MF, Demirbas A, Hascicek AM, Doluoglu OG, Yucel MO, Resorlu B. Evaluating ureteral wall injuries with endoscopic grading system and analysis of the predisposing factors. J Endourol. 2016;30(4):375–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sternberg KM, Eisner B, Larson T, Hernandez N, Han J, Pais VM. Ultrasonography significantly overestimates stone size when compared to low-dose, noncontrast computed tomography. J Urol. 2016;95:67–71.CrossRef Sternberg KM, Eisner B, Larson T, Hernandez N, Han J, Pais VM. Ultrasonography significantly overestimates stone size when compared to low-dose, noncontrast computed tomography. J Urol. 2016;95:67–71.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kadihasanogli M, Marien T, Miller NL. Ureteral stone diameter on computerized tomography coronal reconstruction is clinically important and underreported. J Urol. 2017;102:54–60.CrossRef Kadihasanogli M, Marien T, Miller NL. Ureteral stone diameter on computerized tomography coronal reconstruction is clinically important and underreported. J Urol. 2017;102:54–60.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dai JC, Dunmire B, Sternberg KM, et al. Retrospective comparison of measured stone size and posterior acoustic shadow width in clinical ultrasound images. World J Urol. 2018;36(5):727–32.CrossRef Dai JC, Dunmire B, Sternberg KM, et al. Retrospective comparison of measured stone size and posterior acoustic shadow width in clinical ultrasound images. World J Urol. 2018;36(5):727–32.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Li Q, Chen L, Halpern EF, Samir AE. Detection and measurement of stones with ultrasound strain elastography: a phantom study. Ultrasound Quart. 2015;31(4):272–8.CrossRef Li Q, Chen L, Halpern EF, Samir AE. Detection and measurement of stones with ultrasound strain elastography: a phantom study. Ultrasound Quart. 2015;31(4):272–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ludwig WW, Lim S, Stoianovici D, Matlaga BR. Endoscopic stone measurement during ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2017;32:34–9.CrossRef Ludwig WW, Lim S, Stoianovici D, Matlaga BR. Endoscopic stone measurement during ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2017;32:34–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A New Automatically Fixating Stone Basket (2.5 F) Prototype with a Nitinol Spring for Accurate Ureteroscopic Stone Size Measurement
Authors
Jens Cordes
Felix Nguyen
Wolfhard Pinkowski
Axel S. Merseburger
Tomasz Ozimek
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Healthcare Communications
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0761-6

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

Advances in Therapy 9/2018 Go to the issue