Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 6/2016

Open Access 01-06-2016 | Original Research

Breaking Barriers to Effective Type 2 Diabetes Management: Findings from the use of the OPTIMA© Questionnaire in Clinical Practice

Authors: André Grimaldi, Alfred Penfornis, Silla Consoli, Bruno Falissard, Elisabeth Eymard, Paul Williams, Sylvie Dejager

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The OPTIMA© (MSD, Courbevoie, France) questionnaire was developed to promote shared decisions and the set-up of specific micro-objectives in clinical practice by optimizing communication between type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients and their physicians. The present study aimed to assess OPTIMA in clinical practice.

Methods

A cross-sectional multicenter observational study was conducted in France from 2012 to 2014. During routine consultation, patients completed one of the five modules of the OPTIMA questionnaire (Physical activity, Diet, Treatment, Knowledge of the disease or Self-monitoring of blood glucose). The rate of SMART (specific, measurable, acceptable, realistic, timely) micro-objective set-up following the use of the questionnaire was assessed. Data on how patients felt about their diabetes management (beliefs concerning actions, how easy they were to do and how often they were done in practice) were gathered. Finally, patients’ and physicians’ opinions on OPTIMA were assessed using the PRAgmatic Content and face validity Test (PRAC-Test© (Mapi, Lyon, France) evaluation questionnaire.

Results

Overall, 807 patients were included by 186 physicians. While 92.7 % of consultations led to the set-up of a micro-objective, only 22.3 % were SMART micro-objectives: Physical activity module (34.3 %), Diet module (9.6 %), Treatment module (16.4 %), Knowledge of the disease module (25.2 %), and self-monitoring of blood glucose module (29.5 %). Among patients completing the Physical activity module, 79.0 % reported that they believed physical activity was useful, 35.0 % that it was easy, and 25.8 % that they regularly practised it. PRAC-Test results showed that OPTIMA was a useful and easy-to-use questionnaire that promotes communication between physicians and their patients according to 92.8 % of patients and 69.4 % of physicians.

Conclusion

The OPTIMA questionnaire facilitates communication between patients and their physicians and promotes the set-up of micro-objectives concerning T2DM management. The Physical activity module was the most likely of the five modules in the questionnaire to lead to the set-up of SMART micro-objectives.

Funding

MSD France.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report: estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States, 2014. Atlanta, GA2014. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report: estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States, 2014. Atlanta, GA2014.
2.
go back to reference Cramer JA. A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1218–24.CrossRefPubMed Cramer JA. A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1218–24.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Reach G, Consoli SM, Halimi S, Colas C, Duclos M, Fontaine P, et al. The multinational second diabetes, attitudes, wishes and needs study: results of the French survey. Patient Preference Adher. 2015;9:289–97. doi:10.2147/PPA.S68941.CrossRef Reach G, Consoli SM, Halimi S, Colas C, Duclos M, Fontaine P, et al. The multinational second diabetes, attitudes, wishes and needs study: results of the French survey. Patient Preference Adher. 2015;9:289–97. doi:10.​2147/​PPA.​S68941.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wermeling M, Thiele-Manjali U, Koschack J, Lucius-Hoene G, Himmel W. Type 2 diabetes patients’ perspectives on lifestyle counselling and weight management in general practice: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15(1):1–7. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-15-97.CrossRef Wermeling M, Thiele-Manjali U, Koschack J, Lucius-Hoene G, Himmel W. Type 2 diabetes patients’ perspectives on lifestyle counselling and weight management in general practice: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15(1):1–7. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2296-15-97.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Revello K, Fields W. An educational intervention to increase nurse adherence in eliciting patient daily goals. Rehabil Nursing. 2015;. doi:10.1002/rnj.201. Revello K, Fields W. An educational intervention to increase nurse adherence in eliciting patient daily goals. Rehabil Nursing. 2015;. doi:10.​1002/​rnj.​201.
11.
go back to reference Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):1364–79. doi:10.2337/dc12-0413.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):1364–79. doi:10.​2337/​dc12-0413.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Arnould B. Patient-reported outcomes and clinical practice. From measurement instruments to decision tools: much more than a simple change in format. PRO Newsl. 2006;36:21–4. Arnould B. Patient-reported outcomes and clinical practice. From measurement instruments to decision tools: much more than a simple change in format. PRO Newsl. 2006;36:21–4.
16.
go back to reference Arnould B, Vigneux M, Seignobos E, Penfornis A, Varroud-Vial M, Consoli S, et al. Conceptual development of a patient self-assessment tool to improve patient-clinician communication on the daily management of type 2 diabetes. Athens: ISPOR; 2008. Arnould B, Vigneux M, Seignobos E, Penfornis A, Varroud-Vial M, Consoli S, et al. Conceptual development of a patient self-assessment tool to improve patient-clinician communication on the daily management of type 2 diabetes. Athens: ISPOR; 2008.
17.
go back to reference Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Tishelman C. A conceptual framework for patient-professional communication: an application to the cancer context. Psycho-oncology. 2005;14(10):801–9. doi:10.1002/pon.950 (discussion 10-1).CrossRefPubMed Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Tishelman C. A conceptual framework for patient-professional communication: an application to the cancer context. Psycho-oncology. 2005;14(10):801–9. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​950 (discussion 10-1).CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bagneux V, Barnes N, Arnould B. Development of a standardized face and content validity test to evaluate patient questionnaires for clinical practice. PRO Newsl. 2007;39:1–3. Bagneux V, Barnes N, Arnould B. Development of a standardized face and content validity test to evaluate patient questionnaires for clinical practice. PRO Newsl. 2007;39:1–3.
19.
go back to reference Hoffmann TC, Legare F, Simmons MB, McNamara K, McCaffery K, Trevena LJ, et al. Shared decision making: what do clinicians need to know and why should they bother? Med J Aust. 2014;201(1):35–9.CrossRefPubMed Hoffmann TC, Legare F, Simmons MB, McNamara K, McCaffery K, Trevena LJ, et al. Shared decision making: what do clinicians need to know and why should they bother? Med J Aust. 2014;201(1):35–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47(9):1102–14.CrossRefPubMed Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47(9):1102–14.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Duclos M, Dejager S, Postel-Vinay N, di Nicola S, Quéré S, Fiquet B. Physical activity in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension—insights into motivations and barriers from the MOBILE study. Vasc Health Risk Manage. 2015;11:361–71. doi:10.2147/vhrm.s84832. Duclos M, Dejager S, Postel-Vinay N, di Nicola S, Quéré S, Fiquet B. Physical activity in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension—insights into motivations and barriers from the MOBILE study. Vasc Health Risk Manage. 2015;11:361–71. doi:10.​2147/​vhrm.​s84832.
23.
24.
go back to reference Auerbach SM, Clore JN, Kiesler DJ, Orr T, Pegg PO, Quick BG, et al. Relation of diabetic patients’ health-related control appraisals and physician-patient interpersonal impacts to patients’ metabolic control and satisfaction with treatment. J Behav Med. 2002;25(1):17–31.CrossRefPubMed Auerbach SM, Clore JN, Kiesler DJ, Orr T, Pegg PO, Quick BG, et al. Relation of diabetic patients’ health-related control appraisals and physician-patient interpersonal impacts to patients’ metabolic control and satisfaction with treatment. J Behav Med. 2002;25(1):17–31.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Breaking Barriers to Effective Type 2 Diabetes Management: Findings from the use of the OPTIMA© Questionnaire in Clinical Practice
Authors
André Grimaldi
Alfred Penfornis
Silla Consoli
Bruno Falissard
Elisabeth Eymard
Paul Williams
Sylvie Dejager
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0341-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Advances in Therapy 6/2016 Go to the issue