Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology 2/2018

01-06-2018

Evaluation of surface dose and image quality using the half-scan mode in chest computed tomography-guided interventional radiology: a phantom study

Authors: Hiroaki Hasegawa, Jiro Sato, Ikuo Kobayashi

Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The authors aimed to evaluate the effects of the half-scan mode on image quality and physician exposure to radiation in computed tomography (CT)-guided interventional radiology (IVR) to the right lung using an intermittent CT fluoroscopy technique for measuring phantom surface dose distribution and image noise. For the half-scan mode, settings at 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° were used as the central axis of the X-ray exposure range on the chest phantom. With the center of the ventral side in the chest phantom defined as 0°, optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters were attached at five positions at 30° intervals on the right side of the phantom surface. Securing a space for device operation during the procedure is necessary. The couch was shifted downward by 50 mm to reproduce the conditions used for measurement in clinical settings. Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio were measured to assess image quality; subjective evaluation was performed using simulated lung nodules placed in the phantom. The phantom surface dose distribution in the measured half-scan mode depended on the angle setting. Additionally, the phantom surface dose in the half-scan mode at the 90° setting was reduced by approximately 50%; however, image quality was clearly decreased. In CT-guided IVR to the right lung, using a lead drape and half-scan mode according to the procedural situation is important.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Haaga JR, Alfidi RJ. Precise biopsy localization by computer tomography. Radiology. 1976;118:603–7.CrossRefPubMed Haaga JR, Alfidi RJ. Precise biopsy localization by computer tomography. Radiology. 1976;118:603–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Katada K, Anno H, Takeshita G, Ogura Y, Koga S, Ida Y, Nonomura K, Kanno T, Shibata Y. Development of real-time CT fluoroscopy. Nippon Acta Radiol. 1994;54:1172–4.PubMed Katada K, Anno H, Takeshita G, Ogura Y, Koga S, Ida Y, Nonomura K, Kanno T, Shibata Y. Development of real-time CT fluoroscopy. Nippon Acta Radiol. 1994;54:1172–4.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Katada K, Kato R, Anno H, Ogura Y, Koga S, Ida Y, Sato M, Nonomura K. Guidance with real-time CT fluoroscopy: early clinical experience. Radiology. 1996;200:851–6.CrossRefPubMed Katada K, Kato R, Anno H, Ogura Y, Koga S, Ida Y, Sato M, Nonomura K. Guidance with real-time CT fluoroscopy: early clinical experience. Radiology. 1996;200:851–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Meyer CA, White CS, Wu J, Futterer SF, Templeton PA. Real-time CT fluoroscopy: usefulness in thoracic drainage. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:1097–101.CrossRef Meyer CA, White CS, Wu J, Futterer SF, Templeton PA. Real-time CT fluoroscopy: usefulness in thoracic drainage. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:1097–101.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Daly B, Krebs TL, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, Wang SS. Percutaneous abdominal and pelvic interventional procedures using CT fluoroscopy guidance. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:637–44.CrossRef Daly B, Krebs TL, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, Wang SS. Percutaneous abdominal and pelvic interventional procedures using CT fluoroscopy guidance. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:637–44.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Silverman SG, Tuncali K, Adams DF, Nawfel RD, Zou KH, Judy PF. CT fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposure. Radiology. 1999;212:673–81.CrossRefPubMed Silverman SG, Tuncali K, Adams DF, Nawfel RD, Zou KH, Judy PF. CT fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposure. Radiology. 1999;212:673–81.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Froelich JJ, Saar B, Hoppe M, Ishaque N, Walthers EM, Regn J, Klose KJ. Real-time CT-fluoroscopy for guidance of percutaneous drainage procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998;9:735–40.CrossRefPubMed Froelich JJ, Saar B, Hoppe M, Ishaque N, Walthers EM, Regn J, Klose KJ. Real-time CT-fluoroscopy for guidance of percutaneous drainage procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998;9:735–40.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Carlson SK, Bender CE, Classic KL, Zink FE, Quam JP, Ward EM, Oberg AL. Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures. Radiology. 2001;219:515–20.CrossRefPubMed Carlson SK, Bender CE, Classic KL, Zink FE, Quam JP, Ward EM, Oberg AL. Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures. Radiology. 2001;219:515–20.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Paulson EK, Sheafor DH, Enterline DS, McAdams HP, Yoshizumi TT. CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologists. Radiology. 2001;220:161–7.CrossRefPubMed Paulson EK, Sheafor DH, Enterline DS, McAdams HP, Yoshizumi TT. CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologists. Radiology. 2001;220:161–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hohl C, Suess C, Wildberger JE, Honnef D, Das M, Mühlenbruch G, Schaller A, Günther RW, Mahnken AH. Dose reduction during CT fluoroscopy: phantom study of angular beam modulation. Radiology. 2008;246:519–25.CrossRefPubMed Hohl C, Suess C, Wildberger JE, Honnef D, Das M, Mühlenbruch G, Schaller A, Günther RW, Mahnken AH. Dose reduction during CT fluoroscopy: phantom study of angular beam modulation. Radiology. 2008;246:519–25.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Silverman SG, Hooton S, Tuncali K, Adams DF. Patient and personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures. Radiology. 2000;216:180–4.CrossRefPubMed Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Silverman SG, Hooton S, Tuncali K, Adams DF. Patient and personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures. Radiology. 2000;216:180–4.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Irie T, Kajitani M, Itai Y. CT fluoroscopy-guided intervention: marked reduction of scattered radiation dose to the physician’s hand by use of a lead plate and an improved I-I device. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:1417–21.CrossRefPubMed Irie T, Kajitani M, Itai Y. CT fluoroscopy-guided intervention: marked reduction of scattered radiation dose to the physician’s hand by use of a lead plate and an improved I-I device. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:1417–21.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Stoeckelhuber BM, Leibecke T, Schulz E, Melchert UH, Bergmann-Koester CU, Helmberger T, Gellissen J. Radiation dose to the radiologist’s hand during continuous CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;28:589–94.CrossRefPubMed Stoeckelhuber BM, Leibecke T, Schulz E, Melchert UH, Bergmann-Koester CU, Helmberger T, Gellissen J. Radiation dose to the radiologist’s hand during continuous CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;28:589–94.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Takegami K, Hayashi H, Yamada K, Mihara Y, Kimoto N, Kanazawa Y, Higashino K, Yamashita K, Hayashi F, Okazaki T, Hashizume T, Kobayashi I. Entrance surface dose measurements using a small OSL dosimeter with a computed tomography scanner having 320 rows of detectors. Radiol Phys Technol. 2017;10:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-016-0366-1.CrossRefPubMed Takegami K, Hayashi H, Yamada K, Mihara Y, Kimoto N, Kanazawa Y, Higashino K, Yamashita K, Hayashi F, Okazaki T, Hashizume T, Kobayashi I. Entrance surface dose measurements using a small OSL dosimeter with a computed tomography scanner having 320 rows of detectors. Radiol Phys Technol. 2017;10:49–59. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s12194-016-0366-1.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gupta AK, Nelson RC, Johnson GA, Paulson EK, Delong DM, Yoshizumi TT. Optimization of eight-element multi-detector row helical CT technology for evaluation of the abdomen. Radiology. 2003;227:739–45.CrossRefPubMed Gupta AK, Nelson RC, Johnson GA, Paulson EK, Delong DM, Yoshizumi TT. Optimization of eight-element multi-detector row helical CT technology for evaluation of the abdomen. Radiology. 2003;227:739–45.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton Int. 2004;11:36–42. Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton Int. 2004;11:36–42.
20.
go back to reference Kato R, Katada K, Anno H, Suzuki S, Ida Y, Koga S. Radiation dosimetry at CT fluoroscopy: physician’s hand dose and development of needle holders. Radiology. 1996;201:576–8.CrossRefPubMed Kato R, Katada K, Anno H, Suzuki S, Ida Y, Koga S. Radiation dosimetry at CT fluoroscopy: physician’s hand dose and development of needle holders. Radiology. 1996;201:576–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gianfelice D, Lepanto L, Perreault P, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Milette PC. Effect of the learning process on procedure times and radiation exposure for CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous biopsy procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11:1217–21.CrossRefPubMed Gianfelice D, Lepanto L, Perreault P, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Milette PC. Effect of the learning process on procedure times and radiation exposure for CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous biopsy procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11:1217–21.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Nickoloff EL, Khandji A, Dutta A. Radiation doses during CT fluoroscopy. Health Phys. 2000;79:675–81.CrossRefPubMed Nickoloff EL, Khandji A, Dutta A. Radiation doses during CT fluoroscopy. Health Phys. 2000;79:675–81.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Teeuwisse WM, Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, Obermann WR, Van Persijn Van Meerten EL. Patient and staff dose during CT guided biopsy, drainage and coagulation. Br J Radiol. 2001;74:720–6.CrossRefPubMed Teeuwisse WM, Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, Obermann WR, Van Persijn Van Meerten EL. Patient and staff dose during CT guided biopsy, drainage and coagulation. Br J Radiol. 2001;74:720–6.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Buls N, Pages J, de Mey J, Osteaux M. Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions. Health Phys. 2003;85:165–73.CrossRefPubMed Buls N, Pages J, de Mey J, Osteaux M. Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions. Health Phys. 2003;85:165–73.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Roberts CC, Morrison WB, Deely DM, Zoga AC, Koulouris G, Winalski CS. Use of a novel percutaneous biopsy localization device: initial musculoskeletal experience. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36:53–7.CrossRefPubMed Roberts CC, Morrison WB, Deely DM, Zoga AC, Koulouris G, Winalski CS. Use of a novel percutaneous biopsy localization device: initial musculoskeletal experience. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36:53–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of surface dose and image quality using the half-scan mode in chest computed tomography-guided interventional radiology: a phantom study
Authors
Hiroaki Hasegawa
Jiro Sato
Ikuo Kobayashi
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Radiological Physics and Technology / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1865-0333
Electronic ISSN: 1865-0341
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-018-0445-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Radiological Physics and Technology 2/2018 Go to the issue