Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2005

01-06-2005 | Clinical Investigations

Radiation Dose to the Radiologist’s Hand During Continuous CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventions

Authors: Beate M. Stoeckelhuber, Thorsten Leibecke, Edda Schulz, Uwe H. Melchert, Claudia U. Bergmann-Koester, Thomas Helmberger, Joerg Gellissen

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 5/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Computed tomography fluoroscopy (CT fluoroscopy) enables real-time image control over the entire body with high geometric accuracy and, for the most part, without significant interfering artifacts, resulting in increased target accuracy, reduced intervention times, and improved biopsy specimens [14]. Depending on the procedure being used, higher radiation doses than in conventional CT-supported interventions might occur. Because the radiologist is present in the CT room during the intervention, he is exposed to additional radiation, which is an important aspect. Initial experience with CT fluoroscopically guided interventions is from the work of Katada et al. in 1994 [5] and only relatively few reports on radiation aspects in CT fluoroscopy are found in the literature [1, 2, 611]. To date, there are no reported injuries to patients and radiologists occurring with CT fluoroscopy. The time interval since the wide use of CT fluoroscopy is too short to have data on late effects to the operator using CT fluoroscopy on a daily basis. In addition, the spectrum of CT fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures will expand and more sophisticated procedures requiring longer fluoroscopy times will be performed. Thus, effective exposure reduction is very important. The purpose of our study was to assess the radiation dose to the operator’s hand by using data from phantom measurements. In addition, we investigated the effect of a lead drape on the phantom surface adjacent to the scanning plane, the use of thin radiation protective gloves, and the use of different needle holders.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Paulson, EK, Sheafor, DH, Enterline, DS, et al. 2001CT-fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologistsRadiology220161167CrossRefPubMed Paulson, EK, Sheafor, DH, Enterline, DS,  et al. 2001CT-fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologistsRadiology220161167CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Silverman, SG, Tuncali, K, Adams, DF, et al. 1999CT-fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposureRadiology212673681CrossRefPubMed Silverman, SG, Tuncali, K, Adams, DF,  et al. 1999CT-fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposureRadiology212673681CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Irie T, Kajitani M, Yoshioka H, et al. (2000) CT fluoroscopy for lung needle biopsy: a new device or needle placement and a phantom study. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 11:359–364CrossRef Irie T, Kajitani M, Yoshioka H, et al. (2000) CT fluoroscopy for lung needle biopsy: a new device or needle placement and a phantom study. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 11:359–364CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mey, J, Op Beeck, B, Meysman, M, et al. 2000Real-time CT fluoroscopy: diagnostic and therapeutic applicationsEur J Radiol323240CrossRef Mey, J, Op Beeck, B, Meysman, M,  et al. 2000Real-time CT fluoroscopy: diagnostic and therapeutic applicationsEur J Radiol323240CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Katada K, Anno H, Takeshita G, et al. (1994) Development of CT fluoroscopy using fast CT. Nippon Act Radiol 54:1172–1174 Katada K, Anno H, Takeshita G, et al. (1994) Development of CT fluoroscopy using fast CT. Nippon Act Radiol 54:1172–1174
6.
go back to reference Kato, R, Katada, K, Anno, H, et al. 1996Radiation dosimetry at CT fluoroscopy: physician’s hand dose and development of needle holdersRadiology201576578CrossRefPubMed Kato, R, Katada, K, Anno, H,  et al. 1996Radiation dosimetry at CT fluoroscopy: physician’s hand dose and development of needle holdersRadiology201576578CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Katada, K, Kato, R, Anno, A, et al. 1996Guidance with real-time CT fluoroscopy: early clinical experienceRadiology200851856CrossRefPubMed Katada, K, Kato, R, Anno, A,  et al. 1996Guidance with real-time CT fluoroscopy: early clinical experienceRadiology200851856CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Irie T, Kajitani M, Yuji I (2001) CT fluoroscopy-guided intervention: marked reduction of scatter radiation dose to the physician’s hand by use of a lead plate and improved I-I device. SCVIR 12:1417–1421 Irie T, Kajitani M, Yuji I (2001) CT fluoroscopy-guided intervention: marked reduction of scatter radiation dose to the physician’s hand by use of a lead plate and improved I-I device. SCVIR 12:1417–1421
9.
go back to reference Teeuwisse WM, Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, et al. (2001) Patient and staff dose during CT guided biopsy, drainage and coagulation. Br J Radiol 74:720–726CrossRefPubMed Teeuwisse WM, Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, et al. (2001) Patient and staff dose during CT guided biopsy, drainage and coagulation. Br J Radiol 74:720–726CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nawfel, RD, Judy, PF, Silverman, SG, et al. 2000Personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional proceduresRadiology216180184CrossRefPubMed Nawfel, RD, Judy, PF, Silverman, SG,  et al. 2000Personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional proceduresRadiology216180184CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gianfelice D, Lepanto L, Perreault P, et al. (2000) Effect of the learning on procedure times and radiation exposure for fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous biopsy procedures. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 11:1217–1221CrossRef Gianfelice D, Lepanto L, Perreault P, et al. (2000) Effect of the learning on procedure times and radiation exposure for fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous biopsy procedures. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 11:1217–1221CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kleinschmidt, C 2001EGS-Ray, ein Programm zur Visualisierung von Monte-Carlo-Rechnungen in der StrahlenphysikZ Med Phys11119123CrossRefPubMed Kleinschmidt, C 2001EGS-Ray, ein Programm zur Visualisierung von Monte-Carlo-Rechnungen in der StrahlenphysikZ Med Phys11119123CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Morin, RL, Gerber, TC, McCollough, CH 2003Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heartCirculation107917922CrossRefPubMed Morin, RL, Gerber, TC, McCollough, CH 2003Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heartCirculation107917922CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Froelich JJ, Saar B, Hoppe M, et al. (1998) Real-time CT fluoroscopy for guidance of percutaneous drainage procedures. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 9:735–740CrossRef Froelich JJ, Saar B, Hoppe M, et al. (1998) Real-time CT fluoroscopy for guidance of percutaneous drainage procedures. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 9:735–740CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Daly B, Krebs TL, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, et al. (1999) Percutaneous abdominal and pelvic interventional procedures using CT-fluoroscopic guidance. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 173:637–644 Daly B, Krebs TL, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, et al. (1999) Percutaneous abdominal and pelvic interventional procedures using CT-fluoroscopic guidance. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 173:637–644
16.
go back to reference Mack, MG, Straub, R, Eichler, K, et al. 2001Nadelhalter zur Reduktion der Strahlenbelastung für den Untersucher bei einer CT-gesteuerten PunktionRadiologe41927929CrossRefPubMed Mack, MG, Straub, R, Eichler, K,  et al. 2001Nadelhalter zur Reduktion der Strahlenbelastung für den Untersucher bei einer CT-gesteuerten PunktionRadiologe41927929CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Radiation Dose to the Radiologist’s Hand During Continuous CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventions
Authors
Beate M. Stoeckelhuber
Thorsten Leibecke
Edda Schulz
Uwe H. Melchert
Claudia U. Bergmann-Koester
Thomas Helmberger
Joerg Gellissen
Publication date
01-06-2005
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-005-0104-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2005

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2005 Go to the issue