Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medical Oncology 1/2011

01-12-2011

Salvage S-1 monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients who failed irinotecan-based or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy

Authors: Duk Joo Lee, Jeeyun Lee, Ha Yeon Lee, Taekyu Lim, Su Jin Lee, Seong Yoon Yi, Se Hoon Park, Joon Oh Park, Ho Yeong Lim, Won Ki Kang, Young Suk Park

Published in: Medical Oncology | Special Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of S-1 monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who have failed the standard oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based chemotherapy. From 2007 to 2010, metastatic CRC patients who received S-1 monotherapy as salvage treatment were identified from tumor registry at Samsung Medical Center. All patients received ≥ second-line treatment for CRC. S-1 was administered orally from day 1 to day 14, every 3 weeks. The dose of S-1 for each patient was determined according to body surface area (BSA) as follows: for BSA < 1.25 m2, 80 mg/day; for 1.25 m2 < BSA < 1.5 m2, 100 mg/day; and for BSA > 1.5 m2, 120 mg/day divided by 2 doses. The median age of the 19 patients was 59 years (range: 33–77). Fourteen (73.7%) of 19 patients received S-1 monotherapy as third-line treatment after failing oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Previous regimens prior to S-1 therapy were as follows: FOLFOX, XELOX, FOLFIRI, XELOX + avastin, and cetuximab + irinotecan. The median number of administered S-1 courses given in the entire studied population was 3 cycles (1–10 cycles). Three patients had confirmed partial response (PR) after 3 cycles of S-1 treatment. After a follow-up duration of 22.3 months (range: 6.7–32.6 months), median time to progression (TTP) was 2.1 (95% CI, 1.8–4.2) months. Median overall survival was 11.3 months (95% CI, 8.8–16.8) from the time of S-1 chemotherapy administration. Two patients had grade 1 hand-foot syndrome (HFS) after first and 2nd cycles of treatments, respectively, but treatments were continued without developing further adverse events. The salvage S-1 monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients who failed irinotecan-based or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was moderately effective and well tolerated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Machover D. A comprehensive review of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 1997;80:1179–87.PubMedCrossRef Machover D. A comprehensive review of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 1997;80:1179–87.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Scheithauer W, Rosen H, Kornek GV, Sebesta C, Depisch D. Randomised comparison of combination chemotherapy plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. BMJ. 1993;306:752–5.PubMedCrossRef Scheithauer W, Rosen H, Kornek GV, Sebesta C, Depisch D. Randomised comparison of combination chemotherapy plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. BMJ. 1993;306:752–5.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Thirion P, et al. Modulation of fluorouracil by leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: an updated meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3766–75.PubMedCrossRef Thirion P, et al. Modulation of fluorouracil by leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: an updated meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3766–75.PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Shirasaka T. Development history and concept of an oral anticancer agent S-1 (TS-1): its clinical usefulness and future vistas. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009;39:2–15.PubMedCrossRef Shirasaka T. Development history and concept of an oral anticancer agent S-1 (TS-1): its clinical usefulness and future vistas. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009;39:2–15.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Koizumi W, Kurihara M, Nakano S, Hasegawa K. Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral derivative of 5-fluorouracil, in advanced gastric cancer. For the S-1 cooperative gastric cancer study group. Oncology. 2000;58:191–7.PubMedCrossRef Koizumi W, Kurihara M, Nakano S, Hasegawa K. Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral derivative of 5-fluorouracil, in advanced gastric cancer. For the S-1 cooperative gastric cancer study group. Oncology. 2000;58:191–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ohtsu A, et al. Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral fluorophyrimidine derivative, in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. S-1 cooperative colorectal carcinoma study group. Br J Cancer. 2000;83:141–5.PubMedCrossRef Ohtsu A, et al. Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral fluorophyrimidine derivative, in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. S-1 cooperative colorectal carcinoma study group. Br J Cancer. 2000;83:141–5.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shirao K, et al. Phase II study of oral S-1 for treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;100:2355–61.PubMedCrossRef Shirao K, et al. Phase II study of oral S-1 for treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;100:2355–61.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Okusaka T, et al. A late phase II study of S-1 for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;61:615–21.PubMedCrossRef Okusaka T, et al. A late phase II study of S-1 for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;61:615–21.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Therasse P, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European organization for research and treatment of cancer, National cancer institute of the United States, National cancer institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European organization for research and treatment of cancer, National cancer institute of the United States, National cancer institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
go back to reference Shirasaka T, et al. Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs. 1996;7:548–57.PubMedCrossRef Shirasaka T, et al. Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs. 1996;7:548–57.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gubanski M, Naucler G, Almerud A, Lidestahl A, Lind PA. Capecitabine as third line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Acta Oncol. 2005;44:236–9.PubMedCrossRef Gubanski M, Naucler G, Almerud A, Lidestahl A, Lind PA. Capecitabine as third line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Acta Oncol. 2005;44:236–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Salvage S-1 monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients who failed irinotecan-based or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy
Authors
Duk Joo Lee
Jeeyun Lee
Ha Yeon Lee
Taekyu Lim
Su Jin Lee
Seong Yoon Yi
Se Hoon Park
Joon Oh Park
Ho Yeong Lim
Won Ki Kang
Young Suk Park
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Medical Oncology / Issue Special Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Electronic ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9755-1

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2011

Medical Oncology 1/2011 Go to the issue