Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medical Oncology 4/2007

01-12-2007 | Original Paper

Phase II studies on docetaxel alone every third week, or weekly in combination with gemcitabine in patients with primary locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent esophageal cancer

Authors: M. Albertsson, B. Johansson, S. Friesland, L. Kadar, H. Letocha, G. Frykholm, G. Wagenius

Published in: Medical Oncology | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of these studies was to compare efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel alone with the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel for treatment of metastatic esophageal carcinoma.

Patients and methods

These studies enrolled patients with histopathologically verified squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or cardia. Between March 1997 and June 1999, 52 patients were enrolled in the initial Phase II study (Study 1). They were scheduled for treatment with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every third week as a 1-h infusion. The second Phase II study between September 2000 and March 2003 included 65 patients (Study II). They were given docetaxel 30 mg/m2, administered as a 30-min i.v. infusion weekly for four times, followed by 2 weeks of rest, and gemcitabine starting with a dose of 750 mg/m2 (if well-tolerated 1,000 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15, followed by 3 weeks of rest. A new cycle began on day 36. Patients were premedicated with betamethasone 8 mg p.o. on the evening before, and 8 mg i.v. 30–60 min before the docetaxel infusion. Response was confirmed by computed tomography and assessed at 12 and 24 weeks. Toxicity was assessed according to WHO scales.

Results

In study I, 38 out of the 52 enrolled patients were valuable. Two patients experienced complete remission (CR) (5%), 10 patients partial remission (PR) (26%), nine patients stable disease (SD) (24%), and 17 patients showed progressive disease (PD) (45%). Toxicity mainly involved leukopenia, which in some cases required hospitalization and treatment with antibiotics. In Study II, 46 out of the 65 enrolled patients (70%) were assessable. Out of these, three patients (7%) had CR, eight patients (17%) had PR, 10 patients (22%) had SD, and 25 (54%) PD. Overall response was 24% while an additional 22% showed stable disease. Toxicity mainly consisted of leucopenia and pain.

Conclusion

Docetaxel as a single agent is active in esophageal cancer, both in treatment naive and in previously treated patients with recurrent disease. The overall response rate was 31%, with a good-safety profile. The addition of gemcitabine is well tolerated, but adds no efficacy. Weekly administration of docetaxel may be less effective. It demonstrates moderate efficacy and the doses used provide an acceptable safety profile.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mantravadi R, Lad T, Briele H, Liebner EJ. Carcinoma of the esophagus: sites of failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1982;8(11):1897–1901.PubMed Mantravadi R, Lad T, Briele H, Liebner EJ. Carcinoma of the esophagus: sites of failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1982;8(11):1897–1901.PubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Anderson L, Lad T. Autopsy findings in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Cancer 1982;50:1587–90.PubMedCrossRef Anderson L, Lad T. Autopsy findings in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Cancer 1982;50:1587–90.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Attah E, Hadju S. Benign and malignant tumors of the esophagus at autopsy. J Thoracic Cardiovasc surg 1968;55(3):396–404. Attah E, Hadju S. Benign and malignant tumors of the esophagus at autopsy. J Thoracic Cardiovasc surg 1968;55(3):396–404.
5.
go back to reference Bosch A, Frias Z, Caldwell W, Jaeschke WH. Autopsy findings in carcinoma of the esophagus. Acta Radiol Oncol 1979;18:103–12. Bosch A, Frias Z, Caldwell W, Jaeschke WH. Autopsy findings in carcinoma of the esophagus. Acta Radiol Oncol 1979;18:103–12.
6.
go back to reference Roth JA, Putman SB, Rich TA, Forastiere AA. In: De Vita V Jr. Hellman S, Rosenber S, editors. Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1997;980–1021. Roth JA, Putman SB, Rich TA, Forastiere AA. In: De Vita V Jr. Hellman S, Rosenber S, editors. Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1997;980–1021.
7.
go back to reference Bleiberg H, Conroy T, Paillot B et al. Randomized phase II study of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus cisplatin alone in advanced squamous cell oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer 1997;33:1216–20.PubMedCrossRef Bleiberg H, Conroy T, Paillot B et al. Randomized phase II study of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus cisplatin alone in advanced squamous cell oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer 1997;33:1216–20.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Salts L, Kelson D. Combined modality therapy in the treatment of locoregional oesophageal cancer. Ann Oncol 1992;3:793–9. Salts L, Kelson D. Combined modality therapy in the treatment of locoregional oesophageal cancer. Ann Oncol 1992;3:793–9.
9.
go back to reference Iizuka T et al. Phase II study of CDDP + 5-FU for squamous esophageal carcinoma. JEOG cooperative study results. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1991;10:157. Iizuka T et al. Phase II study of CDDP + 5-FU for squamous esophageal carcinoma. JEOG cooperative study results. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1991;10:157.
10.
go back to reference Rigas JR, Dragnev KH, Bubis JA. Docetaxel in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Semin Oncol 2005;32(2 Suppl 4):S39–51.PubMedCrossRef Rigas JR, Dragnev KH, Bubis JA. Docetaxel in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Semin Oncol 2005;32(2 Suppl 4):S39–51.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Safran H et al. Trastuzumab, paclitaxel, cisplatin, and radiation for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: a phase I study. Cancer Invest 2004;22(5):670–7.PubMedCrossRef Safran H et al. Trastuzumab, paclitaxel, cisplatin, and radiation for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: a phase I study. Cancer Invest 2004;22(5):670–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1989;10:1–10.PubMedCrossRef Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1989;10:1–10.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ajani JA et al. Activity of taxol in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Nat Cancer Inst 1994;86:1086–91.PubMedCrossRef Ajani JA et al. Activity of taxol in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Nat Cancer Inst 1994;86:1086–91.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Muro K et al. A phase II study of single-agent docetaxel in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol 2004;15(6):955–9.PubMedCrossRef Muro K et al. A phase II study of single-agent docetaxel in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol 2004;15(6):955–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Constantinou M, Tsai JY, Safran H. Paclitaxel and concurrent radiation in upper gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer Invest 2003;21(6):887–96.PubMedCrossRef Constantinou M, Tsai JY, Safran H. Paclitaxel and concurrent radiation in upper gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer Invest 2003;21(6):887–96.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kulke MH et al. A phase II trial of vinorelbine in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Invest 2006;24(4):346–50.PubMedCrossRef Kulke MH et al. A phase II trial of vinorelbine in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Invest 2006;24(4):346–50.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ajani J. Review of capecitabine as oral treatment of gastric, gastroesophageal and esophageal cancers. Cancer 2006;107(2):221–31.PubMedCrossRef Ajani J. Review of capecitabine as oral treatment of gastric, gastroesophageal and esophageal cancers. Cancer 2006;107(2):221–31.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Enzinger PC et al. A phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with previously untreated advanced esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma. Dig Dis Sci 2005;50(12):2218–23.PubMedCrossRef Enzinger PC et al. A phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with previously untreated advanced esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma. Dig Dis Sci 2005;50(12):2218–23.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ilson DH. Phase II trial of weekly irinotecan/cisplatin in advanced esophageal cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 2004;16(14 suppl 14):22–5. Ilson DH. Phase II trial of weekly irinotecan/cisplatin in advanced esophageal cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 2004;16(14 suppl 14):22–5.
20.
go back to reference Pozzo C et al. Irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid or with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric or esophageal-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: results of a randomized phase II study. Ann Oncol 2004;15(12):177–81.CrossRef Pozzo C et al. Irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid or with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric or esophageal-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: results of a randomized phase II study. Ann Oncol 2004;15(12):177–81.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Airoldi M et al. Docetaxel and vinorelbine: an effective regimen in recurrent squamous cell esophageal carcinoma. Med Oncol 2003;20(1):19–24.PubMedCrossRef Airoldi M et al. Docetaxel and vinorelbine: an effective regimen in recurrent squamous cell esophageal carcinoma. Med Oncol 2003;20(1):19–24.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wittes RE, Adrianza ME, Parsons R et al. Compilation of phase II results with single antineoplastic agents. Cancer Treat Symp 1985;4:91–130. Wittes RE, Adrianza ME, Parsons R et al. Compilation of phase II results with single antineoplastic agents. Cancer Treat Symp 1985;4:91–130.
23.
go back to reference Eskilsson J, Albertsson M, Mercke C. Adverse cardiac effects during induction chemotherapy treatment with Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Radiother Oncol 1988;13(1):41–6.PubMedCrossRef Eskilsson J, Albertsson M, Mercke C. Adverse cardiac effects during induction chemotherapy treatment with Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Radiother Oncol 1988;13(1):41–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Phase II studies on docetaxel alone every third week, or weekly in combination with gemcitabine in patients with primary locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent esophageal cancer
Authors
M. Albertsson
B. Johansson
S. Friesland
L. Kadar
H. Letocha
G. Frykholm
G. Wagenius
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
Humana Press Inc
Published in
Medical Oncology / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Electronic ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-007-0028-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

Medical Oncology 4/2007 Go to the issue