Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Research

Clinical Benefit and Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment in Patients Treated with Cisplatin/S-1 Versus Cisplatin/5-FU: Secondary End Point Results From the First-Line Advanced Gastric Cancer Study (FLAGS)

Authors: György Bodoky, Max E. Scheulen, Fernando Rivera, Jacek Jassem, Alfredo Carrato, Vladimir Moiseyenko, Ihor Vynnychenko, Jana Prausová, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Stefano Cascinu, Jaffer A. Ajani

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and time to worsening of clinical benefit parameters were evaluated as secondary end points in the phase 3 first-line advanced gastric cancer study (FLAGS) trial of cisplatin/S-1 versus cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

The primary PRO end point was the Trial Outcome Index of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gastric (FACT-Ga). FACT-Ga was completed at the beginning of the first 4 cycles, cycle 6, and then every 3 cycles thereafter. The Chemotherapy Convenience and Satisfaction Questionnaire (CCSQ) was administered before the first 4 cycles; clinical benefit parameters (performance status, weight loss, and anorexia) were assessed at baseline, prior to study drug administration on day 1 of each cycle after cycle 1, and at the end of study treatment.

Results

Compliance to questionnaire fulfillment was more than 80 % through cycle 9. Significantly, fewer patients treated with cisplatin/S-1 reported worsened physical well-being (PWB) scores (45.1 versus 51.7 %, p = 0.044) and experienced significantly longer time to worsening in PWB scores, with a median of 4.5 months (95 % confidence interval (CI), 3.1–5.1) compared to 3.0 months (2.8–4.6) with cisplatin/5-FU (CF) (p = 0.01). Patients receiving cisplatin/S-1 also reported significantly higher best and worst score of PWB as well as CCSQ scores and a longer median time to worsening in clinical benefit parameters.

Conclusions

Differences in secondary end points of PWB, CCSQ scores, and clinical benefit parameters favoring the cisplatin/S-1 arm provide further evidence for considering this combination a standard therapeutic option for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wagner AD, Grothe W, Haerting J, et al. Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2903–9.CrossRefPubMed Wagner AD, Grothe W, Haerting J, et al. Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2903–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, et al. Upper Gastrointestinal Clinical Studies Group of the National Cancer Research Institute of the United Kingdom. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:36–46.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, et al. Upper Gastrointestinal Clinical Studies Group of the National Cancer Research Institute of the United Kingdom. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:36–46.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, et al. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4991–7.CrossRefPubMed Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, et al. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4991–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lordick F, Lorenzen S, Yamada Y, Ilson D. Optimal chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: is there a global consensus? Gastr Cancer. 2013;19 Lordick F, Lorenzen S, Yamada Y, Ilson D. Optimal chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: is there a global consensus? Gastr Cancer. 2013;19
5.
go back to reference Shirasaka T, Shimamato Y, Ohshimo H, et al. Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs. 1996;7:548–57.CrossRefPubMed Shirasaka T, Shimamato Y, Ohshimo H, et al. Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs. 1996;7:548–57.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Fukushima M. Inhibition by oxonic acid of gastrointestinal toxicity of 5-fluorouracil without loss of its antitumor activity in rats. Cancer Res. 1993;53:4004–9.PubMed Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Fukushima M. Inhibition by oxonic acid of gastrointestinal toxicity of 5-fluorouracil without loss of its antitumor activity in rats. Cancer Res. 1993;53:4004–9.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Kato T, Fukushima M. Invention of a tumor-selective 5-fluorouracil derivative named S-1 by biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1998;25:371–84.PubMed Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Kato T, Fukushima M. Invention of a tumor-selective 5-fluorouracil derivative named S-1 by biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1998;25:371–84.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Blum MA, Suzuki A, Taketa T, Ajani J. The role of S-1 in the treatment of gastric cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Targets Ther. 2011;1:59–67. Blum MA, Suzuki A, Taketa T, Ajani J. The role of S-1 in the treatment of gastric cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Targets Ther. 2011;1:59–67.
9.
go back to reference Chollet P, Schöffski P, Weigang-Köhler K, et al. Phase II trial with S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with gastric cancer. A trial performed by the EORTC Early Clinical Studies Group (ECSG). Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:1264–70.CrossRefPubMed Chollet P, Schöffski P, Weigang-Köhler K, et al. Phase II trial with S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with gastric cancer. A trial performed by the EORTC Early Clinical Studies Group (ECSG). Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:1264–70.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sakata Y, Ohtsu A, Horikoshi N, Sugimachi K, Mitachi Y, Taguchi T. Late phase II study of novel oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug S-1 (1 M tegafur-0.4 M gimestat-1 M otastat potassium) in advanced gastric cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:1715–20.CrossRefPubMed Sakata Y, Ohtsu A, Horikoshi N, Sugimachi K, Mitachi Y, Taguchi T. Late phase II study of novel oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug S-1 (1 M tegafur-0.4 M gimestat-1 M otastat potassium) in advanced gastric cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:1715–20.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Koizumi W, Kurihara M, Nakano S, Hasegawa K. Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral derivative of 5-fluorouracil, in advanced gastric cancer. For the S-1 Cooperative Gastric Cancer Study Group. Oncology. 2000;58:191–7.CrossRefPubMed Koizumi W, Kurihara M, Nakano S, Hasegawa K. Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral derivative of 5-fluorouracil, in advanced gastric cancer. For the S-1 Cooperative Gastric Cancer Study Group. Oncology. 2000;58:191–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215–21.CrossRefPubMed Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215–21.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H, et al. Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1063–9.CrossRefPubMed Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H, et al. Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1063–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ajani JA, Lee F-C, Singh DA, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:663–7.CrossRefPubMed Ajani JA, Lee F-C, Singh DA, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:663–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ajani JA, Rodriguez W, Bodoky G. Multicenter phase III comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study: the FLAGS trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(9):1547–53.CrossRefPubMed Ajani JA, Rodriguez W, Bodoky G. Multicenter phase III comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study: the FLAGS trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(9):1547–53.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ajani JA, Buyse M, Lichinitser M, et al. Combination of cisplatin/S-1 in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: results of noninferiority and safety analyses compared with cisplatin/5-fluorouracil in the First-Line Advanced Gastric Cancer Study. Eur J Cancer. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.07.003.PubMed Ajani JA, Buyse M, Lichinitser M, et al. Combination of cisplatin/S-1 in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: results of noninferiority and safety analyses compared with cisplatin/5-fluorouracil in the First-Line Advanced Gastric Cancer Study. Eur J Cancer. 2013. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2013.​07.​003.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Cella D (1997) Manual of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT Scales); Evanston, IL: Center on Outcomes, Research and Education (CORE), Evanston Northwestern Healthcare and Northwestern University, Version 4 Cella D (1997) Manual of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT Scales); Evanston, IL: Center on Outcomes, Research and Education (CORE), Evanston Northwestern Healthcare and Northwestern University, Version 4
18.
go back to reference Cella D, Tulsky DS, Gray G, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:570–9.PubMed Cella D, Tulsky DS, Gray G, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:570–9.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Webster K, Cella D, Yost K. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system: properties, applications, and interpretation. Health Qual Life Outcome. 2003;1:79.CrossRef Webster K, Cella D, Yost K. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system: properties, applications, and interpretation. Health Qual Life Outcome. 2003;1:79.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yost K, Hahn E, Cella D. A new measure of chemotherapy convenience and satisfaction. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(16S):6043. Yost K, Hahn E, Cella D. A new measure of chemotherapy convenience and satisfaction. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(16S):6043.
21.
go back to reference Roderick J, Little R, Rubin D. Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2002. Roderick J, Little R, Rubin D. Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
22.
go back to reference Troxel AB, Fairclough DL, Curran D, et al. Statistical analysis of quality of life with missing data in clinical data in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1998;17:653–66.CrossRefPubMed Troxel AB, Fairclough DL, Curran D, et al. Statistical analysis of quality of life with missing data in clinical data in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1998;17:653–66.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Guimbaud R, Louvet C, Ries P, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter, phase III study of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a French intergroup (Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, and Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie) study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(31):3520–6.CrossRefPubMed Guimbaud R, Louvet C, Ries P, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter, phase III study of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a French intergroup (Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, and Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie) study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(31):3520–6.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB, et al. Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomized phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:666–73.CrossRefPubMed Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB, et al. Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomized phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:666–73.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Yang J, Min K, Yao Q, Xu CN. S-1–based vs non-S-1-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;7;20(33):11886–11893. Yang J, Min K, Yao Q, Xu CN. S-1–based vs non-S-1-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;7;20(33):11886–11893.
26.
go back to reference Lipscomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder CF. Patient-reported outcomes in cancer: a review of recent research and policy initiatives. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(5):278–300.CrossRef Lipscomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder CF. Patient-reported outcomes in cancer: a review of recent research and policy initiatives. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(5):278–300.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bezjak A, Ng P, Skeet R, et al. Oncologists’ use of quality of life information; results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians. Qual Life Res. 2001;10(1):1–13.CrossRefPubMed Bezjak A, Ng P, Skeet R, et al. Oncologists’ use of quality of life information; results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians. Qual Life Res. 2001;10(1):1–13.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Garland SN, Pelletier G, Lawe A, et al. Prospective evaluation of the reliability, validity, and minimally important difference of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-gastric (FACT-Ga) quality-of-life instrument. Cancer. 2011;117(6):1302–12.CrossRefPubMed Garland SN, Pelletier G, Lawe A, et al. Prospective evaluation of the reliability, validity, and minimally important difference of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-gastric (FACT-Ga) quality-of-life instrument. Cancer. 2011;117(6):1302–12.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical Benefit and Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment in Patients Treated with Cisplatin/S-1 Versus Cisplatin/5-FU: Secondary End Point Results From the First-Line Advanced Gastric Cancer Study (FLAGS)
Authors
György Bodoky
Max E. Scheulen
Fernando Rivera
Jacek Jassem
Alfredo Carrato
Vladimir Moiseyenko
Ihor Vynnychenko
Jana Prausová
Jean-Luc Van Laethem
Stefano Cascinu
Jaffer A. Ajani
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1941-6628
Electronic ISSN: 1941-6636
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-014-9680-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer 2/2015 Go to the issue