Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2011

01-02-2011 | Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2010

Hip Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Quantitative Measurement with Navigation

Authors: Manish Dastane, MD, Lawrence D. Dorr, MD, Rupesh Tarwala, MD, Zhinian Wan, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Offset in THA correlates to abductor muscle function, wear, and impingement. Femoral offset after THA is not independent of the cup center of rotation (COR) so hip offset, a combination of femoral offset and change in hip COR, becomes the important measurement.

Questions/purposes

We therefore asked whether hip offset in arthritic hips would correlate with cup COR; whether offset could always be balanced within 6 mm of contralateral normal hips; and whether hip length could also be kept within 6 mm.

Methods

We compared hip offset of arthritic and contralateral normal hips on radiographs in 82 patients (82 hips) who had THA. We used computer navigation in all patients with the aim of reconstructing the hip offset and to compare hip offset change to the quantitative change of the hip COR.

Results

The preoperative radiographic change to equalize the offset ranged from −12 to +21 mm (mean, 1.5); postoperatively the change was 1.4 ± 6.4 mm and was within ± 6 mm in 78 of 82 hips. As COR displaced superiorly from 3 to 6+ mm the offset had to be substantially increased. Only with COR 0–3 mm superior and 0–5 mm medial was offset always within 5 mm.

Conclusions

Hip offset reconstruction was directly related to the position of the hip COR, and navigation allowed quantitative control of offset and hip length.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson KJ, Kinsey TL, Mahoney OM. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:414–420.CrossRefPubMed Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson KJ, Kinsey TL, Mahoney OM. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:414–420.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Charles MN, Bourne RB, Davey JR, Greenwald AS, Morrey BF, Rorabeck CH. Soft-tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1078–1088. Charles MN, Bourne RB, Davey JR, Greenwald AS, Morrey BF, Rorabeck CH. Soft-tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1078–1088.
4.
go back to reference Dolhain P, Tsigaras H, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Mac Donald S, Mc Calden R. The effectiveness of dual offset stems in restoring offset during total hip replacement. Acta Orthop Belg, 2002;68:490–499.PubMed Dolhain P, Tsigaras H, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Mac Donald S, Mc Calden R. The effectiveness of dual offset stems in restoring offset during total hip replacement. Acta Orthop Belg, 2002;68:490–499.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Dorr LD. Hip Arthroplasty: Minimally Invasive Techniques and Computer Navigation. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2005. Dorr LD. Hip Arthroplasty: Minimally Invasive Techniques and Computer Navigation. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2005.
6.
go back to reference Flecher X, Parratte S, Brassart N, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN. Evaluation of the hip center in total hip arthroplasty for old development dysplasia. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:1189–1196.CrossRefPubMed Flecher X, Parratte S, Brassart N, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN. Evaluation of the hip center in total hip arthroplasty for old development dysplasia. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:1189–1196.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737–755.PubMed Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737–755.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Heaton K, Dorr LD. Surgical release of iliopsoas tendon for groin pain after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:779–781.CrossRefPubMed Heaton K, Dorr LD. Surgical release of iliopsoas tendon for groin pain after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:779–781.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Johnston RC, Brand RA, Crownenshield RD. Reconstruction of the hip. A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:639–652.PubMed Johnston RC, Brand RA, Crownenshield RD. Reconstruction of the hip. A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:639–652.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Karachalios T, Hartofilakidis G, Zacharakis N, Tsekoura M. A 12- to 18-year radiographic follow-up study of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. The role of the center of rotation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;296:140–147.PubMed Karachalios T, Hartofilakidis G, Zacharakis N, Tsekoura M. A 12- to 18-year radiographic follow-up study of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. The role of the center of rotation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;296:140–147.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Krishnan SP, Carrington RW, Mohiyaddin S, Garlick N. Common misconceptions of normal hip joint relations on pelvic radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:409–412.CrossRefPubMed Krishnan SP, Carrington RW, Mohiyaddin S, Garlick N. Common misconceptions of normal hip joint relations on pelvic radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:409–412.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kurtz WB, Ecker TM, Reichmann WM, Murphy SB. Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:624–634.CrossRefPubMed Kurtz WB, Ecker TM, Reichmann WM, Murphy SB. Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:624–634.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Little NJ, Busch CA, Gallagher JA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2895–2900.CrossRefPubMed Little NJ, Busch CA, Gallagher JA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2895–2900.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Long WT, Dastane M, Harris MJ, Wan Z, Dorr LD. Failure of the Durom Metasul acetabular component. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:400–405.CrossRefPubMed Long WT, Dastane M, Harris MJ, Wan Z, Dorr LD. Failure of the Durom Metasul acetabular component. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:400–405.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, McCaskie AW. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:163–166.CrossRefPubMed Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, McCaskie AW. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:163–166.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD. Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1832–1842.CrossRefPubMed Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD. Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1832–1842.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference McGrory BJ, Morrey BJ, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:865–869.PubMed McGrory BJ, Morrey BJ, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:865–869.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Shaughnessy WJ. Effect of superior placement of the acetabular component on the rate of loosening after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1004–1014.PubMed Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Shaughnessy WJ. Effect of superior placement of the acetabular component on the rate of loosening after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1004–1014.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Ranawat CS, Dorr LD, Inglis AE. Total hip arthroplasty in protusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:1059–1065.PubMed Ranawat CS, Dorr LD, Inglis AE. Total hip arthroplasty in protusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:1059–1065.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Ranawat CS, Rao RR, Rodriguez JA, Bhende HS. Correction of limb-length inequality during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:715–720.CrossRefPubMed Ranawat CS, Rao RR, Rodriguez JA, Bhende HS. Correction of limb-length inequality during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:715–720.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ranawat CS, Rodriguez JA. Functional leg-length inequality following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:359–364.CrossRefPubMed Ranawat CS, Rodriguez JA. Functional leg-length inequality following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:359–364.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Renkawitz T, Schuster T, Herold T, Goessmann H, Sendtner E, Grifka J, Kalteis T. Measuring leg length and offset with an imageless navigation system during total hip arthroplasty: is it really accurate? Int J Med Robot. 2009;5:192–197.PubMed Renkawitz T, Schuster T, Herold T, Goessmann H, Sendtner E, Grifka J, Kalteis T. Measuring leg length and offset with an imageless navigation system during total hip arthroplasty: is it really accurate? Int J Med Robot. 2009;5:192–197.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Resnick D. Bone and Joint Imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. Resnick D. Bone and Joint Imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.
24.
go back to reference Sakalkale DP, Sharkey PF, Eng K, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:125–134.CrossRefPubMed Sakalkale DP, Sharkey PF, Eng K, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:125–134.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Silva, M, Lee KH, Heisel C, Dela Rosa MS, Schmalzried TP. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:40–60. Silva, M, Lee KH, Heisel C, Dela Rosa MS, Schmalzried TP. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:40–60.
26.
go back to reference Stans AA, Pagnano MW, Shaughnessy WJ, Hanssen AD. Results of total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type III developmental hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;348:149–157.CrossRefPubMed Stans AA, Pagnano MW, Shaughnessy WJ, Hanssen AD. Results of total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type III developmental hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;348:149–157.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E. Predicting the position of the femoral head center. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:102–107.CrossRefPubMed Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E. Predicting the position of the femoral head center. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:102–107.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Yoder SA, Brand RA, Pedersen DR, O’Gorman TW. Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;228:79–87.PubMed Yoder SA, Brand RA, Pedersen DR, O’Gorman TW. Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;228:79–87.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Hip Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Quantitative Measurement with Navigation
Authors
Manish Dastane, MD
Lawrence D. Dorr, MD
Rupesh Tarwala, MD
Zhinian Wan, MD
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1554-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2011 Go to the issue

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2010

What Factors Influence Long-term Survivorship After Hip Arthroscopy?

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2010

Tranexamic Acid Reduces Allogenic Transfusion in Revision Hip Arthroplasty