Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Gastroenterology Reports 2/2010

01-04-2010

What Should Be Done with a Dilated Bile Duct?

Authors: Adrian N. Holm, Henning Gerke

Published in: Current Gastroenterology Reports | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Current methods for imaging the biliary tree include ultrasound, CT, MRI, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Bile duct abnormalities may be identified during evaluation of patient symptoms or laboratory abnormalities, or incidentally during imaging for another problem. Biliary dilatation, when identified, may be separated into obstructive or nonobstructive causes. Clinical presentation should guide decisions on which, if any, additional investigations are necessary. Choledocholithiasis is the most common cause of obstructive dilatation and frequently requires decompression. Nonobstructive causes include cystic dilatation, aging, and possibly post-cholecystectomy state. Data are limited regarding the yield of further investigations in patients with incidentally identified modest ductal dilatation without symptoms or laboratory abnormalities. Additional investigations are more likely to identify clinically relevant findings in patients with more pronounced dilatation. EUS is highly accurate, low-invasive, and useful in this setting, whereas ERC should be reserved for cases likely to require therapeutic intervention.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mahour GH, Wakim KG, Ferris DO: The common bile duct in man: its diameter and circumference. Ann Surg 1966, 165:415–419.CrossRef Mahour GH, Wakim KG, Ferris DO: The common bile duct in man: its diameter and circumference. Ann Surg 1966, 165:415–419.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Adler DG, Baron TH, Davila RE, et al.: ASGE guideline: the role of ERCP in diseases of the biliary tract and pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:1–8.CrossRefPubMed Adler DG, Baron TH, Davila RE, et al.: ASGE guideline: the role of ERCP in diseases of the biliary tract and pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:1–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Niederau C, Sonnenberg A, Mueller J: Comparison of the extrahepatic bile duct size measured by ultrasound and by different radiographic methods. Gastroenterology 1984, 87:615–621.PubMed Niederau C, Sonnenberg A, Mueller J: Comparison of the extrahepatic bile duct size measured by ultrasound and by different radiographic methods. Gastroenterology 1984, 87:615–621.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Stockberger SM, Wass JL, Sherman S, et al.: Intravenous cholangiography with helical CT: Comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1994, 192:675–680.PubMed Stockberger SM, Wass JL, Sherman S, et al.: Intravenous cholangiography with helical CT: Comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1994, 192:675–680.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Chung SC, Leung JW, Li AK: Bile duct size after cholecystectomy: an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic study. Br J Surg 1990, 77:534–535.CrossRefPubMed Chung SC, Leung JW, Li AK: Bile duct size after cholecystectomy: an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic study. Br J Surg 1990, 77:534–535.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Kelly KA: Factors affecting the diameters of the common bile duct and pancreatic duct using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Hepatogastroenterology 1991, 38:243–247.PubMed Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Kelly KA: Factors affecting the diameters of the common bile duct and pancreatic duct using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Hepatogastroenterology 1991, 38:243–247.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Cooperberg PL: High-resolution real-time ultrasound in the evaluation of the normal and obstructed biliary tract. Radiology 1978, 129:477–480.PubMed Cooperberg PL: High-resolution real-time ultrasound in the evaluation of the normal and obstructed biliary tract. Radiology 1978, 129:477–480.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Parulekar SG: Ultrasound evaluation of common bile duct size. Radiology 1979, 133:703–707.PubMed Parulekar SG: Ultrasound evaluation of common bile duct size. Radiology 1979, 133:703–707.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Bruneton JN, Roux P, Fenart D, et al.: Ultrasound evaluation of common bile duct size in normal adult patients and following cholecystectomy, a report of 750 cases. Eur J Radiol 1981, 1:171–172.PubMed Bruneton JN, Roux P, Fenart D, et al.: Ultrasound evaluation of common bile duct size in normal adult patients and following cholecystectomy, a report of 750 cases. Eur J Radiol 1981, 1:171–172.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Niederau C, Muller J, Sonnenberg A: Extrahepatic bile ducts in healthy subjects, in patients with cholelithiasis, and in postcholecystectomy patients: a prospective ultrasonic study. J Clin Ultrasound 1983, 11:23–27.CrossRefPubMed Niederau C, Muller J, Sonnenberg A: Extrahepatic bile ducts in healthy subjects, in patients with cholelithiasis, and in postcholecystectomy patients: a prospective ultrasonic study. J Clin Ultrasound 1983, 11:23–27.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kaim A, Steinke K, Frank M, et al.: Diameter of the common bile duct in the elderly patient: measurement by ultrasound. Eur Radiol 1998, 8:1413–1415.CrossRefPubMed Kaim A, Steinke K, Frank M, et al.: Diameter of the common bile duct in the elderly patient: measurement by ultrasound. Eur Radiol 1998, 8:1413–1415.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Perret RS, Sloop GD, Borne JA: Common bile duct measurements in an elderly population. J Ultrasound Med 2000, 19:727–730.PubMed Perret RS, Sloop GD, Borne JA: Common bile duct measurements in an elderly population. J Ultrasound Med 2000, 19:727–730.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Bachar GN, Cohen M, Belenky A, et al.: Effect of aging on the adult extrahepatic bile duct. J Ultrasound Med 2003, 22:879–882.PubMed Bachar GN, Cohen M, Belenky A, et al.: Effect of aging on the adult extrahepatic bile duct. J Ultrasound Med 2003, 22:879–882.PubMed
15.
go back to reference ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Gan SI, Rajan E, et al.: Role of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 66:425–434. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Gan SI, Rajan E, et al.: Role of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 66:425–434.
16.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Hall EJ: Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:2277–2284.CrossRefPubMed Brenner DJ, Hall EJ: Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:2277–2284.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Anderson SW, Zajick D, Lucey BC, et al.: 64-Detector row computed tomography: An improved tool for evaluating the biliary and pancreatic ducts? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2007, 36:258–271.CrossRefPubMed Anderson SW, Zajick D, Lucey BC, et al.: 64-Detector row computed tomography: An improved tool for evaluating the biliary and pancreatic ducts? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2007, 36:258–271.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Chopra S, Chintapalli KN, Ramakrisna K, et al.: Helical CT cholangiography with oral cholecystographic contrast material. Radiology 2000, 21:596–601. Chopra S, Chintapalli KN, Ramakrisna K, et al.: Helical CT cholangiography with oral cholecystographic contrast material. Radiology 2000, 21:596–601.
19.
go back to reference Prpic GL, Babie N, Marjan D, et al.: MR assessment of bile duct size in healthy individuals: comparison with US measurements. Coll Antropol 2007, 2:567–571. Prpic GL, Babie N, Marjan D, et al.: MR assessment of bile duct size in healthy individuals: comparison with US measurements. Coll Antropol 2007, 2:567–571.
20.
go back to reference Graham MG, Cooperberg PL, Cohen MM, et al.: The size of the normal common hepatic duct following cholecystectomy: an ultrasonographic study. Radiology 1980, 135:137–139.PubMed Graham MG, Cooperberg PL, Cohen MM, et al.: The size of the normal common hepatic duct following cholecystectomy: an ultrasonographic study. Radiology 1980, 135:137–139.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT, Simeone JF, et al.: Postcholecystectomy bile duct dilatation: myth or reality? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981, 136:355–358.PubMed Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT, Simeone JF, et al.: Postcholecystectomy bile duct dilatation: myth or reality? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981, 136:355–358.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Feng B, Song Q: Does the common bile duct dilate after cholecystectomy? Sonographic evaluation in 234 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995, 165:895–861. Feng B, Song Q: Does the common bile duct dilate after cholecystectomy? Sonographic evaluation in 234 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995, 165:895–861.
23.
go back to reference Cohen SM, Kurtz AB: Biliary sonography. Radiol Clin North Am 1991, 29:1171–1198.PubMed Cohen SM, Kurtz AB: Biliary sonography. Radiol Clin North Am 1991, 29:1171–1198.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Yamaguchi M: Congenital choledochal cyst. Analysis of 1433 patients in the Japanese literature. Am J Surg 1980, 14:653–657.CrossRef Yamaguchi M: Congenital choledochal cyst. Analysis of 1433 patients in the Japanese literature. Am J Surg 1980, 14:653–657.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gigot J, Nagorney D, Farnell M, et al.: Bile duct cysts: a changing spectrum of presentation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1996, 3:405–411.CrossRef Gigot J, Nagorney D, Farnell M, et al.: Bile duct cysts: a changing spectrum of presentation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1996, 3:405–411.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Babbitt D: Congenital choledochal cysts: new etiological concept based on anomalous relationships of common bile duct and pancreatic bulb. Ann Radiol (Paris) 1969, 12:231–240. Babbitt D: Congenital choledochal cysts: new etiological concept based on anomalous relationships of common bile duct and pancreatic bulb. Ann Radiol (Paris) 1969, 12:231–240.
27.
go back to reference Todani T, Watanabe Y, Narusue M, et al.: Congenital choledochal cysts. Classification, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases including cancer arising from a choledochal cyst. Am J Surg 1977, 13:263–269.CrossRef Todani T, Watanabe Y, Narusue M, et al.: Congenital choledochal cysts. Classification, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases including cancer arising from a choledochal cyst. Am J Surg 1977, 13:263–269.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Todani T, Watanabe Y, Toki A, et al.: Classification of congenital biliary cystic disease: special reference to type Ic and IVA cysts with primary ductal stricture. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2003, 10:340–344.CrossRefPubMed Todani T, Watanabe Y, Toki A, et al.: Classification of congenital biliary cystic disease: special reference to type Ic and IVA cysts with primary ductal stricture. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2003, 10:340–344.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Irwin ST, Morison JE: Congenital cyst of the common bile duct containing stones and undergoing cancerous change. Br J Surg 1944, 32:319–321.CrossRef Irwin ST, Morison JE: Congenital cyst of the common bile duct containing stones and undergoing cancerous change. Br J Surg 1944, 32:319–321.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference • Soreide K, Soreide JA: Bile duct cyst as precursor to biliary tract cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14:1200–1211. This article reviews the classification, etiology, surgical management, and theories for malignant transformation in bile duct cysts. • Soreide K, Soreide JA: Bile duct cyst as precursor to biliary tract cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14:1200–1211. This article reviews the classification, etiology, surgical management, and theories for malignant transformation in bile duct cysts.
31.
go back to reference Kobayashi S, Asano T, Yamasaki M, et al.: Risk of bile duct carcinogenesis after excision of extrahepatic bile ducts in pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Surgery 1999, 12:939–944.CrossRef Kobayashi S, Asano T, Yamasaki M, et al.: Risk of bile duct carcinogenesis after excision of extrahepatic bile ducts in pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Surgery 1999, 12:939–944.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Voyles CR, Smadja C, Shands C, et al.: Carcinoma in choledochal cysts: age related incidence. Arch Surg 1983, 118:986–988.PubMed Voyles CR, Smadja C, Shands C, et al.: Carcinoma in choledochal cysts: age related incidence. Arch Surg 1983, 118:986–988.PubMed
33.
go back to reference • Garrow D, Miller S, Sinha D, et al.: Endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007, 5:616–623. This article is a meta-analysis of the accuracy of EUS in identifying the etiology of biliary obstruction, with inclusion of 36 relevant publications. • Garrow D, Miller S, Sinha D, et al.: Endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007, 5:616–623. This article is a meta-analysis of the accuracy of EUS in identifying the etiology of biliary obstruction, with inclusion of 36 relevant publications.
34.
go back to reference Tse F, Liu L, Barkun AN, et al.: EUS: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2008, 67:235–244.CrossRefPubMed Tse F, Liu L, Barkun AN, et al.: EUS: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2008, 67:235–244.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference •• Kondo S, Isayama H, Akahane M, et al.: Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography. Eur J Radiol 2005, 54:271–275. A prospective, blinded study where each patient with high probability of choledocholithiasis underwent evaluation with EUS, MRCP, CT, and ERCP. All modalities achieved high sensitivity and accuracy when compared with the ERCP gold standard. The study is remarkable for the prospective approach, and ability to directly compare all four evaluation modalities in the same patients. •• Kondo S, Isayama H, Akahane M, et al.: Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography. Eur J Radiol 2005, 54:271–275. A prospective, blinded study where each patient with high probability of choledocholithiasis underwent evaluation with EUS, MRCP, CT, and ERCP. All modalities achieved high sensitivity and accuracy when compared with the ERCP gold standard. The study is remarkable for the prospective approach, and ability to directly compare all four evaluation modalities in the same patients.
36.
go back to reference • Fernandez-Esparrach G, Gines A, Sanchez M, et al.: Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary diseases: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007, 102:1632–1639. This prospective study evaluated patients with either unexplained biliary dilatation or normal bile duct diameter but high suspicion for choledocholithiasis. Both EUS and MRCP were highly accurate in diagnosing pathology in both groups of patients. • Fernandez-Esparrach G, Gines A, Sanchez M, et al.: Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary diseases: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007, 102:1632–1639. This prospective study evaluated patients with either unexplained biliary dilatation or normal bile duct diameter but high suspicion for choledocholithiasis. Both EUS and MRCP were highly accurate in diagnosing pathology in both groups of patients.
37.
go back to reference Karakan T, Cindoruk M, Alagozlu H, et al.: EUS versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 69:244–252.CrossRefPubMed Karakan T, Cindoruk M, Alagozlu H, et al.: EUS versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 69:244–252.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, et al.: Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001, 96:2900–2904.CrossRefPubMed Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, et al.: Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001, 96:2900–2904.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Hekimoglu K, Ustundag Y, Abdurrahim D, et al.: MRCP vs ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of the current literature. J Dig Dis 2008, 9:162–169.CrossRefPubMed Hekimoglu K, Ustundag Y, Abdurrahim D, et al.: MRCP vs ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of the current literature. J Dig Dis 2008, 9:162–169.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Shanmugam V, Beattie GC, Yule SR, et al.: Is magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography the new gold standard in biliary imaging? Br J Radiol 2005, 78:888–893.CrossRefPubMed Shanmugam V, Beattie GC, Yule SR, et al.: Is magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography the new gold standard in biliary imaging? Br J Radiol 2005, 78:888–893.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Kaltenthaler EC, Walters SJ, Chilcott J, et al.: MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review. BMC Med Imaging 2006, 6:1–15.CrossRef Kaltenthaler EC, Walters SJ, Chilcott J, et al.: MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review. BMC Med Imaging 2006, 6:1–15.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Kim JE, Lee JK, Lee KT, et al.: The clinical significance of common bile-duct dilatation in patients without biliary symptoms or causative lesions on ultrasonography. Endoscopy 2001, 33:495–500.CrossRefPubMed Kim JE, Lee JK, Lee KT, et al.: The clinical significance of common bile-duct dilatation in patients without biliary symptoms or causative lesions on ultrasonography. Endoscopy 2001, 33:495–500.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference •• Malik S, Kaushik N, Khalid A, et al.: EUS yield in evaluating biliary dilatation in patients with normal serum liver enzymes. Dig Dis Sci 2007, 52:508–512. This study addresses a key issue in modern medicine: What to make of the incidentally identified marginally dilated bile duct in patients asymptomatic from a biliary standpoint? In this retrospectively evaluated patient population, the yield of EUS was very low (6%), as opposed to an expected higher yield in patients with abnormal hepatic biochemistries (53%). •• Malik S, Kaushik N, Khalid A, et al.: EUS yield in evaluating biliary dilatation in patients with normal serum liver enzymes. Dig Dis Sci 2007, 52:508–512. This study addresses a key issue in modern medicine: What to make of the incidentally identified marginally dilated bile duct in patients asymptomatic from a biliary standpoint? In this retrospectively evaluated patient population, the yield of EUS was very low (6%), as opposed to an expected higher yield in patients with abnormal hepatic biochemistries (53%).
44.
go back to reference Hammarström L-E: Is there significant increase in bile duct width after cholecystectomy? Scand J Gastroenterol 1997, 32:961–964.CrossRefPubMed Hammarström L-E: Is there significant increase in bile duct width after cholecystectomy? Scand J Gastroenterol 1997, 32:961–964.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
What Should Be Done with a Dilated Bile Duct?
Authors
Adrian N. Holm
Henning Gerke
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Gastroenterology Reports / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 1522-8037
Electronic ISSN: 1534-312X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-010-0094-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Current Gastroenterology Reports 2/2010 Go to the issue

ReviewPaper

Hemobilia