Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Cardiology Reports 4/2022

01-04-2022 | Pacemaker | Invasive Electrophysiology and Pacing (E. Kevin Heist, Section Editor)

Interference by Modern Smartphones and Accessories with Cardiac Pacemakers and Defibrillators

Published in: Current Cardiology Reports | Issue 4/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The risk of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) interference from cell phones was previously thought to be low based on older studies. Current generation of smartphones have incorporated more magnets for optimization of wireless charging, attachment of accessories, and convenience functionalities. These magnets have the potential to cause CIEDs to inadvertently revert into magnet mode. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent findings on smartphones and their accessories causing interference on CIEDs.

Recent Findings

Recent reports have demonstrated that the iPhone 12 series and accessories have the capability to cause CIED magnetic interference.

Summary

Current generation of smartphones, smartwatches, wireless headphones, and accessories have the potential to cause CIEDs to revert into magnet mode in both in vivo and ex vivo experiments. The risk of a clinically significant event is unlikely as long as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations are followed; keeping smartphones and accessories at least six inches away from CIEDs.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Mond HG, Proclemer A. The 11th world survey of cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2009—a World Society of Arrhythmia’s project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34(8):1013–27.CrossRef Mond HG, Proclemer A. The 11th world survey of cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2009—a World Society of Arrhythmia’s project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34(8):1013–27.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hayes DL, Wang PJ, Reynolds DW, Estes M, Griffith JL, Steffens RA, et al. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by cellular telephones. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(21):1473–9.CrossRef Hayes DL, Wang PJ, Reynolds DW, Estes M, Griffith JL, Steffens RA, et al. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by cellular telephones. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(21):1473–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Barbaro V, Bartolini P, Donato A, Militello C, Altamura G, Ammirati F, et al. Do European GSM mobile cellular phones pose a potential risk to pacemaker patients? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995;18(6):1218–24.CrossRef Barbaro V, Bartolini P, Donato A, Militello C, Altamura G, Ammirati F, et al. Do European GSM mobile cellular phones pose a potential risk to pacemaker patients? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995;18(6):1218–24.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Altamura G, Toscano S, Gentilucci G, Ammirati F, Castro A, Pandozi C, et al. Influence of digital and analogue cellular telephones on implanted pacemakers. Eur Heart J. 1997;18(10):1632–41.CrossRef Altamura G, Toscano S, Gentilucci G, Ammirati F, Castro A, Pandozi C, et al. Influence of digital and analogue cellular telephones on implanted pacemakers. Eur Heart J. 1997;18(10):1632–41.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Burri H, Mondouagne Engkolo LP, Dayal N, Etemadi A, Makhlouf A-M, Stettler C, et al. Low risk of electromagnetic interference between smartphones and contemporary implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Europace. 2016;18(5):726–31.CrossRef Burri H, Mondouagne Engkolo LP, Dayal N, Etemadi A, Makhlouf A-M, Stettler C, et al. Low risk of electromagnetic interference between smartphones and contemporary implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Europace. 2016;18(5):726–31.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hekmat K, Salemink B, Lauterbach G, Schwinger RHG, Südkamp M, Weber HJ, et al. Interference by cellular phones with permanent implanted pacemakers: an update. Europace. 2004;6(4):363–9.CrossRef Hekmat K, Salemink B, Lauterbach G, Schwinger RHG, Südkamp M, Weber HJ, et al. Interference by cellular phones with permanent implanted pacemakers: an update. Europace. 2004;6(4):363–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lennerz C, Pavaci H, Grebmer C, Semmler V, Bourier F, Haller B, et al. Electromagnetic interference in cardiac implantable electronic devices: is the use of smartphones safe? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(1):108–10.CrossRef Lennerz C, Pavaci H, Grebmer C, Semmler V, Bourier F, Haller B, et al. Electromagnetic interference in cardiac implantable electronic devices: is the use of smartphones safe? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(1):108–10.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lacour P, Parwani AS, Schuessler F, Hohendanner F, Heinzel FR, Trippel TD, et al. Are contemporary smartwatches and mobile phones safe for patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices? JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(9):1158–66.CrossRef Lacour P, Parwani AS, Schuessler F, Hohendanner F, Heinzel FR, Trippel TD, et al. Are contemporary smartwatches and mobile phones safe for patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices? JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(9):1158–66.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ismail MM, Badreldin AMA, Heldwein M, Hekmat K. Third-generation mobile phones (UMTS) do not interfere with permanent implanted pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010;33(7):860–4.CrossRef Ismail MM, Badreldin AMA, Heldwein M, Hekmat K. Third-generation mobile phones (UMTS) do not interfere with permanent implanted pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010;33(7):860–4.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Francis J, Niehaus M. Interference between cellular telephones and implantable rhythm devices: a review on recent papers. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2006;6(4):226–33.PubMedPubMedCentral Francis J, Niehaus M. Interference between cellular telephones and implantable rhythm devices: a review on recent papers. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2006;6(4):226–33.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Misiri J, Kusumoto F, Goldschlager N. Electromagnetic interference and implanted cardiac devices: the nonmedical environment (part I). Clin Cardiol. 2012;35(5):276–80.CrossRef Misiri J, Kusumoto F, Goldschlager N. Electromagnetic interference and implanted cardiac devices: the nonmedical environment (part I). Clin Cardiol. 2012;35(5):276–80.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yazaki K, Watarai M, Kahata M, Kumagai A, Inoue K, Koganei H, et al. Cause of the “power-on reset” phenomenon other than electric magnetic interference in a patient with a pacemaker. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2018;18(4):150–1.CrossRef Yazaki K, Watarai M, Kahata M, Kumagai A, Inoue K, Koganei H, et al. Cause of the “power-on reset” phenomenon other than electric magnetic interference in a patient with a pacemaker. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2018;18(4):150–1.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jacob S, Panaich SS, Maheshwari R, Haddad JW, Padanilam BJ, John SK. Clinical applications of magnets on cardiac rhythm management devices. Europace. 2011;13(9):1222–30.CrossRef Jacob S, Panaich SS, Maheshwari R, Haddad JW, Padanilam BJ, John SK. Clinical applications of magnets on cardiac rhythm management devices. Europace. 2011;13(9):1222–30.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Poh PG, Liew C, Yeo C, Chong LR, Tan A, Poh A. Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: a review of the dangers and difficulties in MR scanning and attempts to improve safety. Insights Imaging. 2017;8(4):405–18.CrossRef Poh PG, Liew C, Yeo C, Chong LR, Tan A, Poh A. Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: a review of the dangers and difficulties in MR scanning and attempts to improve safety. Insights Imaging. 2017;8(4):405–18.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jongnarangsin K, Thaker JP, Thakur RK. Pacemakers and magnets: an arranged marriage. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(10):1437–8.CrossRef Jongnarangsin K, Thaker JP, Thakur RK. Pacemakers and magnets: an arranged marriage. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(10):1437–8.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sagawa M, Fujimura S, Togawa N, Yamamoto H, Matsuura Y. New material for permanent magnets on a base of Nd and Fe (invited). J Appl Phys. 1984;55(6):2083–7.CrossRef Sagawa M, Fujimura S, Togawa N, Yamamoto H, Matsuura Y. New material for permanent magnets on a base of Nd and Fe (invited). J Appl Phys. 1984;55(6):2083–7.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wolber T, Ryf S, Binggeli C, Holzmeister J, Brunckhorst C, Luechinger R, et al. Potential interference of small neodymium magnets with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4(1):1–4.CrossRef Wolber T, Ryf S, Binggeli C, Holzmeister J, Brunckhorst C, Luechinger R, et al. Potential interference of small neodymium magnets with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4(1):1–4.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ryf S, Wolber T, Duru F, Luechinger R. Interference of neodymium magnets with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: an in vitro study. Technol Health Care. 2008;16(1):13–8.CrossRef Ryf S, Wolber T, Duru F, Luechinger R. Interference of neodymium magnets with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: an in vitro study. Technol Health Care. 2008;16(1):13–8.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Patterson Z, Straw S, Drozd M, Paton MF, Cole C, Witte KK, et al. To the editor-new phones, old problem? Interference with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by phones containing magnets. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(6):1041.CrossRef Patterson Z, Straw S, Drozd M, Paton MF, Cole C, Witte KK, et al. To the editor-new phones, old problem? Interference with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by phones containing magnets. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(6):1041.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Greenberg JC, Altawil MR, Singh G. Letter to the editor-lifesaving therapy inhibition by phones containing magnets. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(6):1040–1.CrossRef Greenberg JC, Altawil MR, Singh G. Letter to the editor-lifesaving therapy inhibition by phones containing magnets. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(6):1040–1.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Nadeem F, Nunez Garcia A, Thach Tran C, Wu M. Magnetic interference on cardiac implantable electronic devices from Apple iPhone MagSafe technology. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(12):e020818.CrossRef Nadeem F, Nunez Garcia A, Thach Tran C, Wu M. Magnetic interference on cardiac implantable electronic devices from Apple iPhone MagSafe technology. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(12):e020818.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference •• Lacour P, Dang PL, Heinzel FR, Parwani AS, Bahr F, Kucher, A. Magnetic field–induced interactions between phones containing magnets and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: flip it to be safe? Heart Rhythm. S1547–5271(21):02334–1. This is the largest and most complete study demonstrating that the incidence of iPhone 12 causing magnet mode when placed directly over the CIED is 18.3%. •• Lacour P, Dang PL, Heinzel FR, Parwani AS, Bahr F, Kucher, A. Magnetic field–induced interactions between phones containing magnets and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: flip it to be safe? Heart Rhythm. S1547–5271(21):02334–1. This is the largest and most complete study demonstrating that the incidence of iPhone 12 causing magnet mode when placed directly over the CIED is 18.3%.
30.
go back to reference • Seidman SJ, Guag J, Beard B, Arp Z. Static magnetic field measurements of smart phones and watches and applicability to triggering magnet modes in implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(10):1741–4. Findings from this study demonstrate that both the iPhone 12 and Apple Watch Series 6 have enough static magnetic field strength to induce magnet mode on CIEDs. • Seidman SJ, Guag J, Beard B, Arp Z. Static magnetic field measurements of smart phones and watches and applicability to triggering magnet modes in implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(10):1741–4. Findings from this study demonstrate that both the iPhone 12 and Apple Watch Series 6 have enough static magnetic field strength to induce magnet mode on CIEDs.
32.
go back to reference Lee S, Fu K, Kohno T, Ransford B, Maisel WH. Clinically significant magnetic interference of implanted cardiac devices by portable headphones. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(10):1432–6.CrossRef Lee S, Fu K, Kohno T, Ransford B, Maisel WH. Clinically significant magnetic interference of implanted cardiac devices by portable headphones. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(10):1432–6.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Tzeis S, Asvestas D, Moraitis N, Vardas EP, Mililis P, Letsas K, et al. Safety of smartwatches and their chargers in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Europace. 2021;23(1):99–103.CrossRef Tzeis S, Asvestas D, Moraitis N, Vardas EP, Mililis P, Letsas K, et al. Safety of smartwatches and their chargers in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Europace. 2021;23(1):99–103.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Asher EB, Panda N, Tran CT, Wu M. Smart wearable device accessories may interfere with implantable cardiac devices. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2021;7(3):167–9.CrossRef Asher EB, Panda N, Tran CT, Wu M. Smart wearable device accessories may interfere with implantable cardiac devices. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2021;7(3):167–9.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Nowak B. Is asynchronous ventricular pacemaker stimulation dangerous? Results of an international survey. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2005;130(16):997–1001.CrossRef Nowak B. Is asynchronous ventricular pacemaker stimulation dangerous? Results of an international survey. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2005;130(16):997–1001.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Tommaso C, Belic N, Brandfonbrener M. Asynchronous ventricular pacing: a rare cause of ventricular tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1982;5(4):561–3.CrossRef Tommaso C, Belic N, Brandfonbrener M. Asynchronous ventricular pacing: a rare cause of ventricular tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1982;5(4):561–3.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Preisman S, Cheng DC. Life-threatening ventricular dysrhythmias with inadvertent asynchronous temporary pacing after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 1999;91(3):880–3.CrossRef Preisman S, Cheng DC. Life-threatening ventricular dysrhythmias with inadvertent asynchronous temporary pacing after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 1999;91(3):880–3.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference von Olshausen G, Schorr J, Grebmer C, Weigand S, Blažek P, Brkic A, et al. Incidence of magnet mode in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019;56(3):335–9.CrossRef von Olshausen G, Schorr J, Grebmer C, Weigand S, Blažek P, Brkic A, et al. Incidence of magnet mode in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019;56(3):335–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Interference by Modern Smartphones and Accessories with Cardiac Pacemakers and Defibrillators
Publication date
01-04-2022
Published in
Current Cardiology Reports / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Electronic ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-022-01653-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

Current Cardiology Reports 4/2022 Go to the issue

Invasive Electrophysiology and Pacing (E. Kevin Heist, Section Editor)

Use of Prolonged Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring to Identify Atrial Fibrillation After Cryptogenic Stroke

Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes (H Jneid, Section Editor)

Radial Artery Access for Acute Coronary Syndromes: a Review of Current Evidence

Congenital Heart Disease (RA Krasuski and G Fleming, Section Editors)

MRI-Guided Cardiac Catheterization in Congenital Heart Disease: How to Get Started

Peripheral Vascular Disease (WS Jones, Section Editor)

Contemporary Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms