Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 4/2019

01-08-2019 | Care

A comparison of two models of follow-up care for adult survivors of childhood cancer

Authors: K. Reynolds, M. Spavor, Y. Brandelli, C. Kwok, Y. Li, M. Disciglio, L. E. Carlson, F. Schulte, R. Anderson, P. Grundy, J. Giese-Davis

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Few studies have compared follow-up-care models for adult survivors of childhood cancer (ASCCs), though choice of model could impact medical test adherence, and health-related quality of life (QOL). This study compared two follow-up-care models, cancer-center-based versus community-based, for ASCCs in Alberta, Canada, to determine which model would demonstrate greater ASCC adherence to guideline-recommended medical screening tests for late effects, QOL, physical symptoms, and adherence to yearly follow-up.

Methods

ASCC discharged to a community model (over 15 years) and those with comparable birth years (1973–1993) currently followed in a cancer center model were recruited via direct contact or multimedia campaign. Chart review identified chemotherapeutic and radiation exposures, and required medical late effect screening tests. ASCCs also completed questionnaires assessing QOL, physical symptoms, and follow-up behavior.

Results

One hundred fifty-six survivors participated (community (n = 86); cancer center (n = 70)). Primary analysis indicated that cancer center ASCCs guideline-recommended total test adherence percentage (Mdn = 85.4%) was significantly higher than the community model (Mdn = 29.2%, U = 3996.50, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in QOL for cancer center ASCCs (M = 83.85, SD = 20.55 versus M = 77.50, SD = 23.94; t (154) = 1.77, p = 0.078) compared to community-based ASCCs. Cancer center–based ASCCs endorsed from 0.4–7.1% fewer physical symptom clusters, and higher adherence to follow-up behavior in comparisons using effect sizes without p values.

Conclusion

This study highlights the cancer center model’s superiority for adherence to exposure-based medical late effect screening guidelines, cancer-specific follow-up behaviors, and the reporting of fewer physical complaints in ASCCs.

Implications for cancer survivors

ASCCs followed in a cancer center model likely benefit from earlier late-effects detection and opportunities for early intervention.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
5.
go back to reference National Research Council. Childhood cancer survivorship: improving care and quality of life. Washington, D.C.: Natl Acad Press; 2003. National Research Council. Childhood cancer survivorship: improving care and quality of life. Washington, D.C.: Natl Acad Press; 2003.
6.
go back to reference Landier W, Constine LS, Freeman CR, Friedman DL, Green DM, Marina N, et al. Development of risk-based guidelines for pediatric cancer survivors: the children’s oncology group long-term follow-up guidelines from the children’s oncology group late effects committee and nursing discipline. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(24):4979–90. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.11.032.CrossRefPubMed Landier W, Constine LS, Freeman CR, Friedman DL, Green DM, Marina N, et al. Development of risk-based guidelines for pediatric cancer survivors: the children’s oncology group long-term follow-up guidelines from the children’s oncology group late effects committee and nursing discipline. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(24):4979–90. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2004.​11.​032.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Neville KA, Cohn RJ, Steinbeck KS, Johnston K, Walker JL. Hyperinsulinemia, impaired glucose tolerance, and diabetes mellitus in survivors of childhood cancer: prevalence and risk factors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(11):4401–7.CrossRefPubMed Neville KA, Cohn RJ, Steinbeck KS, Johnston K, Walker JL. Hyperinsulinemia, impaired glucose tolerance, and diabetes mellitus in survivors of childhood cancer: prevalence and risk factors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(11):4401–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mulrooney DA, Yeazel M, Mitby P, Kawashima T, Leinsenring WM, Stovall M. Survivors of childhood cancer may have higher risk for heart disease. ONS Connect. 2008;7. Mulrooney DA, Yeazel M, Mitby P, Kawashima T, Leinsenring WM, Stovall M. Survivors of childhood cancer may have higher risk for heart disease. ONS Connect. 2008;7.
19.
go back to reference Winqvist S, Vainionpaa L, Kokkonen J, Lanning M. Cognitive functions of young adults who survived childhood cancer. Appl Neuropsychol. 2001;8(4):224–33.CrossRefPubMed Winqvist S, Vainionpaa L, Kokkonen J, Lanning M. Cognitive functions of young adults who survived childhood cancer. Appl Neuropsychol. 2001;8(4):224–33.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Meadows AT, Gallagher JA, Bunin GR. Late effects of early childhood cancer therapy. Br J Cancer Suppl. 1992;18:S92–5.PubMedPubMedCentral Meadows AT, Gallagher JA, Bunin GR. Late effects of early childhood cancer therapy. Br J Cancer Suppl. 1992;18:S92–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Friedman DL, Freyer DR, Levitt GA. Models of care for survivors of childhood cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;46(2):159–68.CrossRefPubMed Friedman DL, Freyer DR, Levitt GA. Models of care for survivors of childhood cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;46(2):159–68.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.CrossRefPubMed Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Oeffinger KC, Hudson MM. Long-term complications following childhood and adolescent cancer: foundations for providing risk-based health care for survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54:208–36.CrossRefPubMed Oeffinger KC, Hudson MM. Long-term complications following childhood and adolescent cancer: foundations for providing risk-based health care for survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54:208–36.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Welch JJG, Kenney LB, Hirway P, Usmani GN, Kadan-Lottick N, Grewal SS, et al. Understanding predictors of continued long-term pediatric cancer care across the region: a report from the Consortium for New England Childhood Cancer Survivors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017;64(10). https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26564.CrossRef Welch JJG, Kenney LB, Hirway P, Usmani GN, Kadan-Lottick N, Grewal SS, et al. Understanding predictors of continued long-term pediatric cancer care across the region: a report from the Consortium for New England Childhood Cancer Survivors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017;64(10). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​pbc.​26564.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Russell B, Reynolds K, Spavor M, Giese-Davis J, editors. Barriers to care in two differing models of follow-up for long-term childhood cancer survivors. Alexandria: American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2017. Russell B, Reynolds K, Spavor M, Giese-Davis J, editors. Barriers to care in two differing models of follow-up for long-term childhood cancer survivors. Alexandria: American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2017.
56.
go back to reference Ristovski-Slijepcevic S, Barr R, Bernstein M, Nathan PC. A cross-Canada survey of clinical programs for the care of survivors of cancer in childhood and adolescence. Paediatr Child Health. 2009;14(6):375–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Ristovski-Slijepcevic S, Barr R, Bernstein M, Nathan PC. A cross-Canada survey of clinical programs for the care of survivors of cancer in childhood and adolescence. Paediatr Child Health. 2009;14(6):375–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
57.
go back to reference Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, D.C.: Natl Acad Press; 2006. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, D.C.: Natl Acad Press; 2006.
63.
go back to reference Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, Pond GR, Maunsell E, Folkes A, et al. Results of a multicenter randomized trial to evaluate a survivorship care plan for breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(suppl):abstr 9005.CrossRef Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, Pond GR, Maunsell E, Folkes A, et al. Results of a multicenter randomized trial to evaluate a survivorship care plan for breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(suppl):abstr 9005.CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Sussman J, Souter LH, Grunfeld E, Howell D, Gage C, Keller-Olaman S, et al. Models of care for cancer survivorship. Toronto: Cancer Care Ontario; 2012. Report No.: 26–1 Sussman J, Souter LH, Grunfeld E, Howell D, Gage C, Keller-Olaman S, et al. Models of care for cancer survivorship. Toronto: Cancer Care Ontario; 2012. Report No.: 26–1
Metadata
Title
A comparison of two models of follow-up care for adult survivors of childhood cancer
Authors
K. Reynolds
M. Spavor
Y. Brandelli
C. Kwok
Y. Li
M. Disciglio
L. E. Carlson
F. Schulte
R. Anderson
P. Grundy
J. Giese-Davis
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Care
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00774-w

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 4/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine