Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Article

Laparoscopic robotic liver surgery: the Henri Mondor initial experience of 20 cases

Authors: Chady Salloum, Daren Subar, Riccardo Memeo, Claude Tayar, Alexis Laurent, Alexandre Malek, Daniel Azoulay

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Laparoscopic liver surgery is now an established practice in many institutions. It is a safe and feasible approach in the hands of trained surgeons. The introduction of robotics into surgery represents progression in the field of minimally invasive surgery but has seen a slow uptake in the hepatopancreaticobiliary subspeciality. We report our initial experience in 20 cases of laparoscopic robotic liver resection (LRLR). From March 2011 to April 2013 patients with lesions within the liver were assessed and consented for laparoscopic robotic liver surgery. This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively kept database on preoperative details and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. During the time period there were 20 LRLRs. The median age was 62 years (range 39–80 years) with a male to female ratio of 14:6. Ten patients had left lateral sectionectomies, 10 patients had atypical segmental resections; 14 patients had resections for malignancies, 6 patients had resections for benign disease. One case was converted to open resection. The mean operating time was 176.4 ± 74.6 min (range 60–300 min), the mean blood loss was 107 ± 106 ml (range 50–700 ml) and the mean hospital stay was 6.5 ± 3.7 days (range 2–16 days). Two patients required blood transfusions. The incidence of postoperative complications was 10 % (n = 2). LRLR overcomes some of the disadvantages of conventional laparoscopic surgery. It is a technically feasible and safe approach for wedge resections and left lateral sectionectomy of the liver without oncological compromise. However, this surgical technique requires advanced laparoscopic skills and there is an associated steep learning curve. Further studies are needed to determine the potential advantages of this technique for the patient compared to the traditional laparoscopic approach.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830PubMedCrossRef Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250(5):831–841PubMedCrossRef Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250(5):831–841PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 16(10):1389–1402PubMedCrossRef Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 16(10):1389–1402PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O et al (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25(11):1467–1477PubMed Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O et al (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25(11):1467–1477PubMed
6.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784PubMedCrossRef Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hyung WJ (2007) Robotic surgery in gastrointestinal surgery. Korean J Gastroenterol 50(4):256–259PubMed Hyung WJ (2007) Robotic surgery in gastrointestinal surgery. Korean J Gastroenterol 50(4):256–259PubMed
9.
go back to reference Pang YY (2000) The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2:333–39 (HPB (Oxford) 2002; 4(2):99; author reply 99-100) Pang YY (2000) The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2:333–39 (HPB (Oxford) 2002; 4(2):99; author reply 99-100)
10.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Haverkamp L, Weijs TJ, van der Sluis PC et al (2013) Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27(5):1509–1520 Haverkamp L, Weijs TJ, van der Sluis PC et al (2013) Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27(5):1509–1520
12.
go back to reference Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L et al (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236(6):759–766 (discussion 767)PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L et al (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236(6):759–766 (discussion 767)PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pokala N, Sadhasivam S, Kiran RP, Parithivel V (2007) Am Surg 73(8):737–741 (discussion 741–2)PubMed Pokala N, Sadhasivam S, Kiran RP, Parithivel V (2007) Am Surg 73(8):737–741 (discussion 741–2)PubMed
14.
go back to reference Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Ditto A et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multi-institutional cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 20(6):2007–2015 Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Ditto A et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multi-institutional cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 20(6):2007–2015
15.
go back to reference Abood GJ, Tsung A (2013) Robot-assisted surgery: improved tool for major liver resections? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20(5):151–156 Abood GJ, Tsung A (2013) Robot-assisted surgery: improved tool for major liver resections? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20(5):151–156
16.
go back to reference Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB (1998) Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12(8):1091PubMedCrossRef Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB (1998) Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12(8):1091PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Elsamra SE, Leone AR, Lasser MS et al (2013) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes and cost. J Endourol 27(2):182–188 Elsamra SE, Leone AR, Lasser MS et al (2013) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes and cost. J Endourol 27(2):182–188
19.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM et al (2010) Outcomes of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients older than 70 years: a comparative study. World J Surg 34(9):2109–2114PubMedCrossRef Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM et al (2010) Outcomes of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients older than 70 years: a comparative study. World J Surg 34(9):2109–2114PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Bucher P, Pugin F et al (2010) Robot-assisted oncologic resection for large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a preliminary case series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(5):411–415PubMedCrossRef Buchs NC, Bucher P, Pugin F et al (2010) Robot-assisted oncologic resection for large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a preliminary case series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(5):411–415PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F et al (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford) 12(8):583–586CrossRef Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F et al (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford) 12(8):583–586CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Choi GH, Choi SH, Kim SH et al (2012) Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures. Surg Endosc 26(8):2247–2258PubMedCrossRef Choi GH, Choi SH, Kim SH et al (2012) Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures. Surg Endosc 26(8):2247–2258PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM et al (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253(2):342–348PubMedCrossRef Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM et al (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253(2):342–348PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Chan OC, Tang CN, Lai EC et al (2011) Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18(4):471–480PubMedCrossRef Chan OC, Tang CN, Lai EC et al (2011) Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18(4):471–480PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wakabayashi G, Sasaki A, Nishizuka S et al (2011) Our initial experience with robotic hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18(4):481–487PubMedCrossRef Wakabayashi G, Sasaki A, Nishizuka S et al (2011) Our initial experience with robotic hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18(4):481–487PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Casciola L, Patriti A, Ceccarelli G et al (2011) Robot-assisted parenchymal-sparing liver surgery including lesions located in the posterosuperior segments. Surg Endosc 25(12):3815–3824PubMedCrossRef Casciola L, Patriti A, Ceccarelli G et al (2011) Robot-assisted parenchymal-sparing liver surgery including lesions located in the posterosuperior segments. Surg Endosc 25(12):3815–3824PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F et al (2011) Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery 149(1):29–39PubMedCrossRef Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F et al (2011) Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery 149(1):29–39PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lai EC, Tang CN, Li MK (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy: technique and surgical outcomes. Int J Surg 10(1):11–15PubMedCrossRef Lai EC, Tang CN, Li MK (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy: technique and surgical outcomes. Int J Surg 10(1):11–15PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic robotic liver surgery: the Henri Mondor initial experience of 20 cases
Authors
Chady Salloum
Daren Subar
Riccardo Memeo
Claude Tayar
Alexis Laurent
Alexandre Malek
Daniel Azoulay
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-013-0437-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2014 Go to the issue