Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2010

01-09-2010

Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients Older Than 70 Years: A Comparative Study

Authors: Nicolas C. Buchs, Pietro Addeo, Francesco M. Bianco, Antonio Gangemi, Subhashini M. Ayloo, Pier C. Giulianotti

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 9/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains one of the most challenging abdominal procedures and its application in the elderly population is poorly reported in the literature so far. The goal of this study was to demonstrate that robot-assisted PD can be safely performed in patients aged 70 years and older.

Methods

Forty-one consecutive robot-assisted PD performed between April 2007 and January 2010 were prospectively entered in a dedicated database. Patients were stratified into two groups: group 1, aged ≥70 years (n = 15, 36.6%); and group 2, aged <70 years (n = 26, 63.4%). The data were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

Indications for surgery and patient characteristics were the same in both groups, with the exception of age. There was no statistical difference in terms of operative time (P = 0.376), blood loss (P = 0.989), conversion rate (P = 0.52), mortality (P = 0.36), or overall morbidity rate (P = 0.74). The mean hospital stay was 14.3 days in group 1 and 11.2 days in group 2. This was not statistically significant (P = 0.136).

Conclusions

Robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely in elderly patients with comparable mortality, morbidity, and outcomes compared with a younger population. Age alone should not be a contraindication for robotic pancreatic resection.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gagner M, Palermo M (2009) Laparoscopic Whipple procedure: review of the literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:726–730CrossRefPubMed Gagner M, Palermo M (2009) Laparoscopic Whipple procedure: review of the literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:726–730CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145:19–23CrossRefPubMed Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145:19–23CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRefPubMed Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Milone L, Turner P, Gagner M (2004) Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic tumors, an uptake. Minerva Chir 59:165–173PubMed Milone L, Turner P, Gagner M (2004) Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic tumors, an uptake. Minerva Chir 59:165–173PubMed
5.
go back to reference Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P et al (2007) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 205:222–230CrossRefPubMed Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P et al (2007) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 205:222–230CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M et al (2009) Evolution in techniques of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a decade long experience from a tertiary center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:731–740CrossRefPubMed Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M et al (2009) Evolution in techniques of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a decade long experience from a tertiary center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:731–740CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A (2006) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases. Surg Endosc 20:1045–1050CrossRefPubMed Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A (2006) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases. Surg Endosc 20:1045–1050CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pugliese R, Scandroglio I, Sansonna F et al (2008) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective review of 19 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:13–18CrossRefPubMed Pugliese R, Scandroglio I, Sansonna F et al (2008) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective review of 19 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:13–18CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gagner M, Pomp A (1997) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: is it worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg 1:20–25CrossRefPubMed Gagner M, Pomp A (1997) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: is it worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg 1:20–25CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Brozzetti S, Mazzoni G, Miccini M et al (2006) Surgical treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma in elderly patients. Arch Surg 141:137–142CrossRefPubMed Brozzetti S, Mazzoni G, Miccini M et al (2006) Surgical treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma in elderly patients. Arch Surg 141:137–142CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Fortner JG et al (1995) Pancreatic or liver resection for malignancy is safe and effective for the elderly. Ann Surg 222:426–434PubMed Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Fortner JG et al (1995) Pancreatic or liver resection for malignancy is safe and effective for the elderly. Ann Surg 222:426–434PubMed
12.
go back to reference Hodul P, Tansey J, Golts E et al (2001) Age is not a contraindication to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am Surg 67:270–275PubMed Hodul P, Tansey J, Golts E et al (2001) Age is not a contraindication to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am Surg 67:270–275PubMed
13.
go back to reference Makary MA, Winter JM, Cameron JL et al (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly. J Gastrointest Surg 10:347–356CrossRefPubMed Makary MA, Winter JM, Cameron JL et al (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly. J Gastrointest Surg 10:347–356CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Scurtu R, Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E et al (2006) Outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer in elderly patients. J Gastrointest Surg 10:813–822CrossRefPubMed Scurtu R, Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E et al (2006) Outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer in elderly patients. J Gastrointest Surg 10:813–822CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM et al (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc Jan 9 [Epub ahead of print] Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM et al (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc Jan 9 [Epub ahead of print]
17.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Darwin P, Goldberg E, Uradomo L (2010) Jackson Pratt drain fluid-to-serum bilirubin concentration ratio for the diagnosis of bile leaks. Gastrointest Endosc 71:99–104CrossRefPubMed Darwin P, Goldberg E, Uradomo L (2010) Jackson Pratt drain fluid-to-serum bilirubin concentration ratio for the diagnosis of bile leaks. Gastrointest Endosc 71:99–104CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Gulik TM, DeWit LT et al (1997) Delayed gastric emptying after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy versus pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of 200 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 185:373–379PubMed van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Gulik TM, DeWit LT et al (1997) Delayed gastric emptying after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy versus pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of 200 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 185:373–379PubMed
21.
go back to reference Young J (2009) Understanding statistical analysis in the surgical literature: some key concepts. ANZ J Surg 79:398–403CrossRefPubMed Young J (2009) Understanding statistical analysis in the surgical literature: some key concepts. ANZ J Surg 79:398–403CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Tran K, Van Eijck C, Di Carlo V et al (2002) Occlusion of the pancreatic duct versus pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 236:422–428CrossRefPubMed Tran K, Van Eijck C, Di Carlo V et al (2002) Occlusion of the pancreatic duct versus pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 236:422–428CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients Older Than 70 Years: A Comparative Study
Authors
Nicolas C. Buchs
Pietro Addeo
Francesco M. Bianco
Antonio Gangemi
Subhashini M. Ayloo
Pier C. Giulianotti
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0650-x

Other articles of this Issue 9/2010

World Journal of Surgery 9/2010 Go to the issue