Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 3/2021

01-03-2021 | Bariatric Surgery | Original Contributions

The Effect of Family Member Attendance at Bariatric Surgery Appointments on Patient and Family Weight-Related Outcomes

Authors: Megan Ferriby Ferber, Sabrena Noria, Brian Focht, Lorraine Wallace, Bradley Needleman, Keeley J. Pratt

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the effect of family member attendance at routine pre- and postoperative appointments on early postoperative patients’ weight loss and physical activity levels and family members’ weight control practices.

Materials and Methods

As part of a RCT, patients were randomized to (1) invite a romantic partner or cohabitating family member to attend routine appointments (FA arm) or (2) proceed with treatment as usual (TAU arm). Patients in FA arm were asked to invite their family member to attend four routine appointments (T1 = pre-surgery class, T2 = 1 month pre-surgery, T3 = 2 weeks post-surgery, T4 = 2 months post-surgery). Assessments of patients’ percent excess weight loss (%EWL), change in body mass index (ΔBMI), and levels of physical activity and family members’ weight control practices (dietary control, self-monitoring, physical activity, and psychological coping) were conducted at T1–T4 with all dyads, and attendance was documented. Of the 213 dyads approached, 63 dyads consented to participate.

Results

There were no significant differences in patient outcomes between FA and TAU arms or based on consistent attendance of family members. There were no significant differences in weight control practices between FA and TAU dyads. At T3 and T4, family members with consistent attendance reported higher self-monitoring, physical activity, and psychological control practices. Family members with consistent attendance reported significant increases in physical activity and psychological control practices from T1 to T4.

Conclusions

Family member attendance at routine appointments had greater positive effects on family members rather than on patient outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hales CM, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, et al. Trends in obesity and severe obesity prevalence in US youth and adults by sex and age, 2007-2008 to 2015-2016. JAMA. 2018;319(16):1723–5.CrossRef Hales CM, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, et al. Trends in obesity and severe obesity prevalence in US youth and adults by sex and age, 2007-2008 to 2015-2016. JAMA. 2018;319(16):1723–5.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37.CrossRef Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Maciejewski ML, Arterburn DE, Van Scoyoc L, et al. Bariatric surgery and long-term durability of weight loss. Jama Surg. 2016;151(11):1046–55.CrossRef Maciejewski ML, Arterburn DE, Van Scoyoc L, et al. Bariatric surgery and long-term durability of weight loss. Jama Surg. 2016;151(11):1046–55.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cooper TC, Simmons EB, Webb K, et al. Trends in weight regain following roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(8):1474–81.CrossRef Cooper TC, Simmons EB, Webb K, et al. Trends in weight regain following roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(8):1474–81.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ferchak CV, Meneghini LF. Obesity, bariatric surgery and type 2 diabetes—a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004;20(6):438–45.CrossRef Ferchak CV, Meneghini LF. Obesity, bariatric surgery and type 2 diabetes—a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004;20(6):438–45.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt J, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, Engl). 2009;13(41):1–190. Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt J, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, Engl). 2009;13(41):1–190.
7.
go back to reference Karmali S, Brar B, Shi X, et al. Weight recidivism post-bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1922–33.CrossRef Karmali S, Brar B, Shi X, et al. Weight recidivism post-bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1922–33.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wakayama L, Nameth K, Adler S, et al. Replication and extension of dietary adherence as a predictor of suboptimal weight-loss outcomes in postbariatric patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(1):91–6.CrossRef Wakayama L, Nameth K, Adler S, et al. Replication and extension of dietary adherence as a predictor of suboptimal weight-loss outcomes in postbariatric patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(1):91–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Woodard GA, Encarnacion B, Peraza J, et al. Halo effect for bariatric surgery: collateral weight loss in patients’ family members (vol 146, pg 1185, 2011). Arch Surg. 2011;146(12):1410–0. Woodard GA, Encarnacion B, Peraza J, et al. Halo effect for bariatric surgery: collateral weight loss in patients’ family members (vol 146, pg 1185, 2011). Arch Surg. 2011;146(12):1410–0.
10.
go back to reference Ferriby M, Pratt K, Wallace L, et al. Rationale and design of a feasibility and acceptability RCT of romantic partner and support figure attendance during bariatric surgery visits. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019;100422 Ferriby M, Pratt K, Wallace L, et al. Rationale and design of a feasibility and acceptability RCT of romantic partner and support figure attendance during bariatric surgery visits. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019;100422
12.
go back to reference Stommel M, Schoenborn CA. Accuracy and usefulness of BMI measures based on self-reported weight and height: findings from the NHANES & NHIS 2001-2006. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):421.CrossRef Stommel M, Schoenborn CA. Accuracy and usefulness of BMI measures based on self-reported weight and height: findings from the NHANES & NHIS 2001-2006. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):421.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Brethauer SA, Kim J, El Chaar M, et al. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(4):587–606.CrossRef Brethauer SA, Kim J, El Chaar M, et al. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(4):587–606.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Leblanc C, et al. A method to assess energy expenditure in children and adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983;37(3):461–7.CrossRef Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Leblanc C, et al. A method to assess energy expenditure in children and adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983;37(3):461–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pinto AM, Fava JL, Raynor HA, et al. Development and validation of the weight control strategies scale. Obesity. 2013;21(12):2429–36.CrossRef Pinto AM, Fava JL, Raynor HA, et al. Development and validation of the weight control strategies scale. Obesity. 2013;21(12):2429–36.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Corp I. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. In. Armonk, NY, 2017. Corp I. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. In. Armonk, NY, 2017.
17.
go back to reference Weaver B, Maxwell H. Exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis with missing data: a simple method for SPSS users. Quant Methods Psychol. 2014;10(2):143–52.CrossRef Weaver B, Maxwell H. Exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis with missing data: a simple method for SPSS users. Quant Methods Psychol. 2014;10(2):143–52.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic; 1988. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic; 1988.
19.
go back to reference Kluever Romo L, Dailey RM. Weighty dynamics: exploring couples’ perceptions of post-weight-loss interaction. Health Commun. 2014;29(2):193–204.CrossRef Kluever Romo L, Dailey RM. Weighty dynamics: exploring couples’ perceptions of post-weight-loss interaction. Health Commun. 2014;29(2):193–204.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wallwork A, Tremblay L, Chi M, et al. Exploring partners’ experiences in living with patients who undergo bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):1973–81.CrossRef Wallwork A, Tremblay L, Chi M, et al. Exploring partners’ experiences in living with patients who undergo bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):1973–81.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pories ML, Hodgson J, Rose MA, et al. Following bariatric surgery: an exploration of the couples’ experience. Obes Surg. 2016;26(1):54–60.CrossRef Pories ML, Hodgson J, Rose MA, et al. Following bariatric surgery: an exploration of the couples’ experience. Obes Surg. 2016;26(1):54–60.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lent MR, Bailey-Davis L, Irving BA, et al. Bariatric surgery patients and their families: health, physical activity, and social support. Obes Surg. 2016;26(12):2981–8.CrossRef Lent MR, Bailey-Davis L, Irving BA, et al. Bariatric surgery patients and their families: health, physical activity, and social support. Obes Surg. 2016;26(12):2981–8.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mehta A, Hutfless S, Blair AB, et al. Outcomes of partnered individuals undergoing bariatric surgery together: a single institution case series. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):2207–10.CrossRef Mehta A, Hutfless S, Blair AB, et al. Outcomes of partnered individuals undergoing bariatric surgery together: a single institution case series. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):2207–10.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Woodard GA, Encarnacion B, Peraza J, et al. Halo effect for bariatric surgery: collateral weight loss in patients' family members. Arch Surg. 2011;146(10):1185–90.CrossRef Woodard GA, Encarnacion B, Peraza J, et al. Halo effect for bariatric surgery: collateral weight loss in patients' family members. Arch Surg. 2011;146(10):1185–90.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gorber SC, Tremblay M, Moher D, et al. A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2007;8(4):307–26.CrossRef Gorber SC, Tremblay M, Moher D, et al. A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2007;8(4):307–26.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient—2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Obesity. 2013;21(S1):S1–S27.CrossRef Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient—2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Obesity. 2013;21(S1):S1–S27.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Effect of Family Member Attendance at Bariatric Surgery Appointments on Patient and Family Weight-Related Outcomes
Authors
Megan Ferriby Ferber
Sabrena Noria
Brian Focht
Lorraine Wallace
Bradley Needleman
Keeley J. Pratt
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05041-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Obesity Surgery 3/2021 Go to the issue