Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 2/2017

01-02-2017 | Brief Communication

One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Why Biliary Reflux Remains Controversial?

Authors: Matthieu Bruzzi, Jean-Marc Chevallier, Sébastien Czernichow

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

One-anastomosis gastric bypass is an alternative to the “gold-standard” Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. This technique appears to be safe and efficient, but controversy remains regarding the long-term theoretical risk of subsequent biliary reflux and its possible complications, such as cancer. The aim of the present narrative review was to summarize some of the current thoughts on biliary reflux. Research has established that exposure to chronic bile reflux in humans and rats (outside the “bariatric surgery” box) induce esophageal intestinal metaplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Although one-anastomosis gastric bypass can theoretically induce chronic biliary reflux, the incidence of biliary reflux and risk of cancer have not been prospectively evaluated. Clarification of this controversial issue is urgently needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Czernichow S, Paita M, Nocca D, et al. Current challenges in providing bariatric surgery in France: a nationwide study. Medicine 2016. In press. Czernichow S, Paita M, Nocca D, et al. Current challenges in providing bariatric surgery in France: a nationwide study. Medicine 2016. In press.
2.
go back to reference Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001;11:276–80.CrossRefPubMed Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001;11:276–80.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, et al. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:321–6.CrossRefPubMed Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, et al. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:321–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242:20–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242:20–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Chevallier JM, Arman GA, Guenzi M, et al. One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg. 2015;25:951–8.CrossRefPubMed Chevallier JM, Arman GA, Guenzi M, et al. One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg. 2015;25:951–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Champion G, Richter JE, Vaezi MF, et al. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux: relationship to pH and importance in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterol. 1994;107:747–54.CrossRef Champion G, Richter JE, Vaezi MF, et al. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux: relationship to pH and importance in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterol. 1994;107:747–54.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sifrim D, Castell D, Dent J, et al. Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux. Gut. 2004;53:1024–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sifrim D, Castell D, Dent J, et al. Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux. Gut. 2004;53:1024–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Tolone S, Cristiano S, Savarino E, et al. Effects of omega-loop bypass on esophagogastric junction function. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:62–9.CrossRefPubMed Tolone S, Cristiano S, Savarino E, et al. Effects of omega-loop bypass on esophagogastric junction function. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:62–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Scozzari G, Trapani R, Toppino M, et al. Esophagogastric cancer after bariatric surgery : systematic review of the literature. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:133–42.CrossRefPubMed Scozzari G, Trapani R, Toppino M, et al. Esophagogastric cancer after bariatric surgery : systematic review of the literature. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:133–42.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Greene CL, Worrell SG, DeMeester TR. Rat reflux model of esophageal cancer and its implication in human disease. Ann Surg. 2015;262:910–24.CrossRefPubMed Greene CL, Worrell SG, DeMeester TR. Rat reflux model of esophageal cancer and its implication in human disease. Ann Surg. 2015;262:910–24.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bassily R, Smallwood RA, Crotty B. Risk of gastric cancer is not increased after partial gastrectomy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15:762–5.CrossRefPubMed Bassily R, Smallwood RA, Crotty B. Risk of gastric cancer is not increased after partial gastrectomy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15:762–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Csendes A, Burgos AM, Smok G, et al. Latest results (12-21 years) of a prospective randomized study comparing Billroth II and Roux-en-Y anastomosis after a partial gastrectomy plus vagotomy in patients with duodenal ulcers. Ann Surg. 2009;249:189–94.CrossRefPubMed Csendes A, Burgos AM, Smok G, et al. Latest results (12-21 years) of a prospective randomized study comparing Billroth II and Roux-en-Y anastomosis after a partial gastrectomy plus vagotomy in patients with duodenal ulcers. Ann Surg. 2009;249:189–94.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Why Biliary Reflux Remains Controversial?
Authors
Matthieu Bruzzi
Jean-Marc Chevallier
Sébastien Czernichow
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2480-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Obesity Surgery 2/2017 Go to the issue