Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 2/2013

01-02-2013 | New Concept

Initial Experience of Single-Port Surgery Assisted by Percutaneous Instruments for Gastric Bypass: a Combination of Safety and Minimally Invasive Surgery

Authors: Nikos Kotzampassakis, Nikolaos Machairas, Mathieu Clanet, Pierre Cornet, Anne-Catherine Dandrifosse

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We present here the first reported cases of patients undergoing gastric bypass with a hybrid technique that involves a new concept of percutaneous instruments and provides the advantages of minimally invasive single-port surgery while maintaining the triangulation, safety, and timing of operative procedures.

Methods

This was a prospective pilot study of eight patients selected for gastric bypass between December 2011 and January 2012 and treated by a technique that combined single SSL port and percutaneous surgical set PPS. We performed hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy in all cases. We analyzed preliminary results at 1 month and focused on the feasibility of the technique, duration of surgery, perioperative complications, and cosmetic results. The Ethics Committee of our institution approved this study and we obtained the informed consent of each patient.

Results

We completed the procedure successfully in all patients. No conversions to laparotomy or classic laparoscopy were required. The average time of surgery was 112 min (85–155). Length of hospital stay was 4 days (3–5). One patient was re-admitted on the seventh postoperative day for gastrointestinal bleeding from the gastrojejunostomy suture and treated by endoscopic clipping. Residual scars were less than 2 cm for the single midline port and 2 mm for the percutaneous instruments.

Conclusions

This new technique combines the advantages of single-port surgery with the safety of conventional laparoscopy by using percutaneous instruments and leaves minimal scarring. It is likely that the use of percutaneous instrumentation will become widespread in all areas of laparoscopic surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Reoch J, Mottillo S, Shimony A, et al. Safety of laparoscopic vs open bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2011;11:1314–22.CrossRef Reoch J, Mottillo S, Shimony A, et al. Safety of laparoscopic vs open bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2011;11:1314–22.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Puzziferri N, Austrheim-Smith IT, Wolfe BM, et al. Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006;2:181–8.CrossRef Puzziferri N, Austrheim-Smith IT, Wolfe BM, et al. Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006;2:181–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tacchino RM, Greco F, Matera D, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2010;8:1154–60.CrossRef Tacchino RM, Greco F, Matera D, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2010;8:1154–60.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, et al. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84:695.PubMedCrossRef Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, et al. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84:695.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Auyang ED, Santos BF, Enter DH, et al. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (Notes(®)): a technical review. Surg Endosc. 2011;10:3135–48.CrossRef Auyang ED, Santos BF, Enter DH, et al. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (Notes(®)): a technical review. Surg Endosc. 2011;10:3135–48.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors. JAMA. 2003;289:76–9.PubMedCrossRef Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors. JAMA. 2003;289:76–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dietel M. Overweight and obesity worldwide now estimated to involve 1.7 billion people. Obes Surg. 2003;13:329–30.CrossRef Dietel M. Overweight and obesity worldwide now estimated to involve 1.7 billion people. Obes Surg. 2003;13:329–30.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sjöström L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Swedish Obese Subjects Study Scientific Group. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2683–93.PubMedCrossRef Sjöström L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Swedish Obese Subjects Study Scientific Group. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2683–93.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2008. Obes Surg. 2009;12:1605–11.CrossRef Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2008. Obes Surg. 2009;12:1605–11.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Misawa T, Sakamoto T, Ito R, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy using the “tug-exposure technique” in adults: results of ten initial cases. Surg Endosc. 2011;10:3222–7.CrossRef Misawa T, Sakamoto T, Ito R, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy using the “tug-exposure technique” in adults: results of ten initial cases. Surg Endosc. 2011;10:3222–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Makino T, Milsom JW, Lee SW. Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;255:667–76.PubMedCrossRef Makino T, Milsom JW, Lee SW. Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;255:667–76.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Flora ED, Wilson TG, Martin IJ, et al. A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting. Ann Surg. 2008;4:583–602.CrossRef Flora ED, Wilson TG, Martin IJ, et al. A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting. Ann Surg. 2008;4:583–602.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Juang D, et al. Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2011;4:586–90.CrossRef St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Juang D, et al. Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2011;4:586–90.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bulut O, Nielsen CB, Jespersen N. Single-port access laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: initial experience with 10 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;7:803–9.CrossRef Bulut O, Nielsen CB, Jespersen N. Single-port access laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: initial experience with 10 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;7:803–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Brinkmann L, Lorenz D. Minilaparoscopic surgery: alternative or supplement to single-port surgery. Chirurg. 2011;5:419–24.CrossRef Brinkmann L, Lorenz D. Minilaparoscopic surgery: alternative or supplement to single-port surgery. Chirurg. 2011;5:419–24.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Paek J, Nam EJ, Kim YT, et al. Overcoming technical difficulties with single-port access laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: using conventional laparoscopic instruments. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;2:137–41.CrossRef Paek J, Nam EJ, Kim YT, et al. Overcoming technical difficulties with single-port access laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: using conventional laparoscopic instruments. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;2:137–41.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN, et al. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2011;3:254–8.CrossRef Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN, et al. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2011;3:254–8.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Huang CK, Yao SF, Lo CH, et al. A novel surgical technique: single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2010;10:1429–35.CrossRef Huang CK, Yao SF, Lo CH, et al. A novel surgical technique: single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2010;10:1429–35.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH, Minnick DB. Single port access transumbilical laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using the SILS port: first reported case. Surg Innov. 2009;4:343–7.CrossRef Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH, Minnick DB. Single port access transumbilical laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using the SILS port: first reported case. Surg Innov. 2009;4:343–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bruner TW, Salazar-Reyes H, Friedman JD, et al. Umbilical hernia repair in conjunction with abdominoplasty: a surgical technique to maintain umbilical blood supply. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;4:333–4.CrossRef Bruner TW, Salazar-Reyes H, Friedman JD, et al. Umbilical hernia repair in conjunction with abdominoplasty: a surgical technique to maintain umbilical blood supply. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;4:333–4.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Initial Experience of Single-Port Surgery Assisted by Percutaneous Instruments for Gastric Bypass: a Combination of Safety and Minimally Invasive Surgery
Authors
Nikos Kotzampassakis
Nikolaos Machairas
Mathieu Clanet
Pierre Cornet
Anne-Catherine Dandrifosse
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0793-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Obesity Surgery 2/2013 Go to the issue