Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3/2018

01-09-2018 | Symposium: Collective Representation in Healthcare Policy

Representing Whom? U.K. Health Consumer and Patients’ Organizations in the Policy Process

Authors: Rob Baggott, Kathryn L. Jones

Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

This paper draws on nearly two decades of research on health consumer and patients’ organizations (HCPOs) in the United Kingdom. In particular, it addresses questions of representation and legitimacy in the health policy process. HCPOs claim to represent the collective interests of patients and others such as relatives and carers. At times they also make claims to represent the wider public interest. Employing Pitkin’s classic typology of formalistic, descriptive, symbolic, and substantive representation, the paper explores how and in what sense HCPOs represent their constituencies. We found that policymakers themselves are less concerned with formal mechanisms adopted by groups and are more concerned with credibility, in particular whether HCPOs carry the confidence of their constituents. While some concerns about legitimacy remain, particularly in relation to funding from commercial interests, we argue that HCPOs bring a unique perspective to the policy process and to focus purely on formalistic representation provides only a partial understanding of their representative role and a constrained view of their collective moral claims.
Literature
go back to reference Allsop, J., K. Jones, and R. Baggott. 2004. Health consumer groups in the UK: A new social movement? Sociology of Health & Illness 26(6): 737–756.CrossRef Allsop, J., K. Jones, and R. Baggott. 2004. Health consumer groups in the UK: A new social movement? Sociology of Health & Illness 26(6): 737–756.CrossRef
go back to reference Baggott, R., J. Allsop, and K. Jones. 2005. Speaking for patients and carers: Health consumer groups and the policy process. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRef Baggott, R., J. Allsop, and K. Jones. 2005. Speaking for patients and carers: Health consumer groups and the policy process. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRef
go back to reference Baggott, R., and R. Forster. 2008. Health consumer and patients' organizations in Europe: towards a comparative analysis. Health Expectations 11(1): 85–94.CrossRef Baggott, R., and R. Forster. 2008. Health consumer and patients' organizations in Europe: towards a comparative analysis. Health Expectations 11(1): 85–94.CrossRef
go back to reference Baggott, R., and K. Jones. 2011. Prevention better than cure? Health consumer and patients’ organisations and public health. Social Science & Medicine 73(4): 530–534.CrossRef Baggott, R., and K. Jones. 2011. Prevention better than cure? Health consumer and patients’ organisations and public health. Social Science & Medicine 73(4): 530–534.CrossRef
go back to reference ____. 2014. The voluntary sector and health policy: The role of national level health consumer and patients’ organisations in the UK. Social Science & Medicine 123: 202–209.CrossRef ____. 2014. The voluntary sector and health policy: The role of national level health consumer and patients’ organisations in the UK. Social Science & Medicine 123: 202–209.CrossRef
go back to reference ____. 2015. The Big Society in an age of austerity: threats and opportunities for health consumer and patients’ organisations in England. Health Expectations 18(6): 2164–2173. ____. 2015. The Big Society in an age of austerity: threats and opportunities for health consumer and patients’ organisations in England. Health Expectations 18(6): 2164–2173.
go back to reference Batt, S. 2014. Who will support independent patient groups? British Medical Journal 349: g6306.CrossRef Batt, S. 2014. Who will support independent patient groups? British Medical Journal 349: g6306.CrossRef
go back to reference Beier, K., I. Jordan, C. Wiesemann, and S. Schicktanz. 2016. Understanding collective agency in bioethics. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 11(3): 411–422.CrossRef Beier, K., I. Jordan, C. Wiesemann, and S. Schicktanz. 2016. Understanding collective agency in bioethics. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 11(3): 411–422.CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, P., and S. Zavestoski. 2004. Social movements in health: An introduction. Sociology of Health and Illness 26(6): 679–694.CrossRef Brown, P., and S. Zavestoski. 2004. Social movements in health: An introduction. Sociology of Health and Illness 26(6): 679–694.CrossRef
go back to reference Caron-Flinterman, J.F., E.W. Broerse, and J.F.G. Bunders. 2005. The experiential knowledge of patients: A new resource for biomedical research? Social Science & Medicine 60(11): 2575–2584.CrossRef Caron-Flinterman, J.F., E.W. Broerse, and J.F.G. Bunders. 2005. The experiential knowledge of patients: A new resource for biomedical research? Social Science & Medicine 60(11): 2575–2584.CrossRef
go back to reference Chamak, B. 2008. Autism and social movements: French parents’ associations and international autistic individuals’ organizations. Sociology of Health and Illness 30(1): 76–96.CrossRef Chamak, B. 2008. Autism and social movements: French parents’ associations and international autistic individuals’ organizations. Sociology of Health and Illness 30(1): 76–96.CrossRef
go back to reference Cigler, A., and B. Loomis. 1995. Contemporary interest group politics: More than more of the same. In Interest Group Politics, 4th ed. edited by A. Cigler and B. Loomis, 394–398. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press. Cigler, A., and B. Loomis. 1995. Contemporary interest group politics: More than more of the same. In Interest Group Politics, 4th ed. edited by A. Cigler and B. Loomis, 394–398. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
go back to reference Clarke, J., J. Newman, N. Smith, E. Vidler and L. Westermarland. 2007. Creating citizen-consumers: Changing publics and changing public services. London: Sage. Clarke, J., J. Newman, N. Smith, E. Vidler and L. Westermarland. 2007. Creating citizen-consumers: Changing publics and changing public services. London: Sage.
go back to reference Deakin, N., and A. Wright. 1990. Consuming public services. London: Routledge. Deakin, N., and A. Wright. 1990. Consuming public services. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Disch, L. 2012. The impurity of representation and the vitality of democracy Cultural Studies 26(2–3): 207–222.CrossRef Disch, L. 2012. The impurity of representation and the vitality of democracy Cultural Studies 26(2–3): 207–222.CrossRef
go back to reference Epstein, S. 1996. Impure science: AIDS, activism and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Epstein, S. 1996. Impure science: AIDS, activism and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
go back to reference ____. 2016. The politics of health mobilisation in the United States: The promise and pitfalls of “disease constituencies.” Social Science & Medicine 165: 246–254.CrossRef ____. 2016. The politics of health mobilisation in the United States: The promise and pitfalls of “disease constituencies.” Social Science & Medicine 165: 246–254.CrossRef
go back to reference Forster, R., G. Braunegger-Kallinger, and K. Krajic. 2011. Austrian health consumer groups: Voices gaining strength. In Democratising health, edited by H. Lofgren, M. Leahy, and E. de Leeuw, 143–160. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Forster, R., G. Braunegger-Kallinger, and K. Krajic. 2011. Austrian health consumer groups: Voices gaining strength. In Democratising health, edited by H. Lofgren, M. Leahy, and E. de Leeuw, 143–160. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
go back to reference Fung, A., 2003. Associations and democracy: Between theories, hopes, and realities. Annual Review of Sociology 29(1): 515–539.CrossRef Fung, A., 2003. Associations and democracy: Between theories, hopes, and realities. Annual Review of Sociology 29(1): 515–539.CrossRef
go back to reference Halpin, D. 2006. The participatory and democratic potential and practice of interest groups: between solidarity and representation. Public Administration 84(4): 919–940.CrossRef Halpin, D. 2006. The participatory and democratic potential and practice of interest groups: between solidarity and representation. Public Administration 84(4): 919–940.CrossRef
go back to reference Hirst, P. 1994. Associative democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press. Hirst, P. 1994. Associative democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
go back to reference Jones, K., and R. Baggott. 2011. Health consumer groups in the UK: Progress or stagnation? In Democratising Health, edited by H. Lofgren and E. de Leeuw, 30–46. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Jones, K., and R. Baggott. 2011. Health consumer groups in the UK: Progress or stagnation? In Democratising Health, edited by H. Lofgren and E. de Leeuw, 30–46. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
go back to reference Jones, K. 2008. In whose interest? Relationships between health consumer groups and the pharmaceutical industry in the UK. Sociology of Health and Illness 30(6): 929–944.CrossRef Jones, K. 2008. In whose interest? Relationships between health consumer groups and the pharmaceutical industry in the UK. Sociology of Health and Illness 30(6): 929–944.CrossRef
go back to reference Keller, A.C., and L. Packel. 2014. Going for the cure: Patient interest groups and health advocacy in the United States. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 39(2): 331–367.CrossRef Keller, A.C., and L. Packel. 2014. Going for the cure: Patient interest groups and health advocacy in the United States. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 39(2): 331–367.CrossRef
go back to reference Long, S. 1999. The tyranny of the customer and the cost of consumerism. Human Relations 52(6): 723–743. Long, S. 1999. The tyranny of the customer and the cost of consumerism. Human Relations 52(6): 723–743.
go back to reference McCurry, P. 2009. People power: Voluntary sector: User voices: “I’m talking from personal experience.” The Guardian, March 4, Society Supplement, 7. McCurry, P. 2009. People power: Voluntary sector: User voices: “I’m talking from personal experience.” The Guardian, March 4, Society Supplement, 7.
go back to reference Mold, A. 2014. Making the patient-consumer: Patient organisations and health consumerism in Britain. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Mold, A. 2014. Making the patient-consumer: Patient organisations and health consumerism in Britain. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
go back to reference Nicholas, L., and S. Broadbent. 2015. Collective intelligence in patient organisations. London: NESTA. Nicholas, L., and S. Broadbent. 2015. Collective intelligence in patient organisations. London: NESTA.
go back to reference O’Neill, J. 2001. Representing people, representing nature, representing the world. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19(4): 483–500.CrossRef O’Neill, J. 2001. Representing people, representing nature, representing the world. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19(4): 483–500.CrossRef
go back to reference Opedal, S., H. Rommetvedt, and K. Vrangbæk. 2012. Organised interests, authority structures and political influence: Danish and Norwegian patient groups compared. Scandinavian Political Studies 35(1): 1–21.CrossRef Opedal, S., H. Rommetvedt, and K. Vrangbæk. 2012. Organised interests, authority structures and political influence: Danish and Norwegian patient groups compared. Scandinavian Political Studies 35(1): 1–21.CrossRef
go back to reference Phillips, A.1995. The politics of presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Phillips, A.1995. The politics of presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
go back to reference Pinto, D., D. Martin, and R. Chenhall. 2016. The involvement of patient organisations in rare disease research: A mixed methods study in Australia. Orphanet Journal of Rare Disease 11:2.CrossRef Pinto, D., D. Martin, and R. Chenhall. 2016. The involvement of patient organisations in rare disease research: A mixed methods study in Australia. Orphanet Journal of Rare Disease 11:2.CrossRef
go back to reference Pitkin, H.F. 1967. The concept of representation. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Pitkin, H.F. 1967. The concept of representation. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
go back to reference Rabeharisoa, V. 2006. From representation to mediation: The shaping of collective mobilisation on muscular dystrophy in France. Social Science & Medicine 62(3): 564–576.CrossRef Rabeharisoa, V. 2006. From representation to mediation: The shaping of collective mobilisation on muscular dystrophy in France. Social Science & Medicine 62(3): 564–576.CrossRef
go back to reference Rabeharisoa, V., T. Moreira, and M. Akrich. 2014. Evidence-based activism: Patients’, users’ and activists’ groups in knowledge society. BioSocieties 9(2): 111–128.CrossRef Rabeharisoa, V., T. Moreira, and M. Akrich. 2014. Evidence-based activism: Patients’, users’ and activists’ groups in knowledge society. BioSocieties 9(2): 111–128.CrossRef
go back to reference Roberts, C., I. Tyler., C. Satchwell, and J. Armstrong. 2016. Health social movements and the hybridisation of ‘cause regimes’: An ethnography of a British childbirth organization. Social Movement Studies 15(4): 417–430.CrossRef Roberts, C., I. Tyler., C. Satchwell, and J. Armstrong. 2016. Health social movements and the hybridisation of ‘cause regimes’: An ethnography of a British childbirth organization. Social Movement Studies 15(4): 417–430.CrossRef
go back to reference Rogers, A., and D. Pilgrim. 2001. Mental health policy in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRef Rogers, A., and D. Pilgrim. 2001. Mental health policy in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRef
go back to reference Saward, M. 2010. The representative claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Saward, M. 2010. The representative claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Scambler, G., and D. Kelleher. 2006. New social and health movements: Issues of representation and change. Critical Public Health 16(3): 219–231.CrossRef Scambler, G., and D. Kelleher. 2006. New social and health movements: Issues of representation and change. Critical Public Health 16(3): 219–231.CrossRef
go back to reference Schmitter, P. 2002. Participation in governance arrangements: Is there any reason to expect it will achieve “sustainable and innovative policies in a multi-level context?” In Participatory governance, political and societal implications, edited by J.R. Grote and B. Gbikpi, 51–70. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.CrossRef Schmitter, P. 2002. Participation in governance arrangements: Is there any reason to expect it will achieve “sustainable and innovative policies in a multi-level context?” In Participatory governance, political and societal implications, edited by J.R. Grote and B. Gbikpi, 51–70. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.CrossRef
go back to reference Small, N., and P. Rhodes. 2000. Too ill to talk? User involvement and palliative care. London: Routledge. Small, N., and P. Rhodes. 2000. Too ill to talk? User involvement and palliative care. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Stokke, K., and E. Selboe. 2009. Symbolic representation as political practice. In Rethinking popular representation, edited by O. Tornquist, N. Webster, and K. Stokke, 59–78. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Stokke, K., and E. Selboe. 2009. Symbolic representation as political practice. In Rethinking popular representation, edited by O. Tornquist, N. Webster, and K. Stokke, 59–78. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Taylor, V., and N. Whittier. 1992. Collective identity in social movement communities: Lesbian feminist mobilization. In Social perspectives in lesbian and gay studies: A reader, edited by P.M. Nardi and B.E. Schneider, 349–365. New York: Routledge. Taylor, V., and N. Whittier. 1992. Collective identity in social movement communities: Lesbian feminist mobilization. In Social perspectives in lesbian and gay studies: A reader, edited by P.M. Nardi and B.E. Schneider, 349–365. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Toiviainen, H., L. Vuorenkoski, and E. Hemminki. 2010. Patients organisations in Finland. Health Expectations 13(3): 221–233.PubMedPubMedCentral Toiviainen, H., L. Vuorenkoski, and E. Hemminki. 2010. Patients organisations in Finland. Health Expectations 13(3): 221–233.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference van de Bovenkamp, H.M., M.J. Trappenburg, and K.J. Grit. 2010. Patient participation in collective healthcare decision making: The Dutch model. Health Expectations 13(1): 73–85.CrossRef van de Bovenkamp, H.M., M.J. Trappenburg, and K.J. Grit. 2010. Patient participation in collective healthcare decision making: The Dutch model. Health Expectations 13(1): 73–85.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Rooy, A. 2004. The global legitimacy game: Civil society, globalization, and protest Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Van Rooy, A. 2004. The global legitimacy game: Civil society, globalization, and protest Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Williamson, C. 1992. Whose standards? Consumer and professional standards in health care. Buckingham: Open University Press. Williamson, C. 1992. Whose standards? Consumer and professional standards in health care. Buckingham: Open University Press.
go back to reference Williamson, C. 2008. The patient movement as an emancipation movement. Health Expectations 11(2): 102–112.CrossRef Williamson, C. 2008. The patient movement as an emancipation movement. Health Expectations 11(2): 102–112.CrossRef
go back to reference Wood, B. 2000. Patient power? The politics of patients’ associations in Britain and America. Buckingham: Open University Press. Wood, B. 2000. Patient power? The politics of patients’ associations in Britain and America. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Metadata
Title
Representing Whom? U.K. Health Consumer and Patients’ Organizations in the Policy Process
Authors
Rob Baggott
Kathryn L. Jones
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Electronic ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9859-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3/2018 Go to the issue

Symposium: Collective Representation in Healthcare Policy

Patient Representation and Advocacy for Alzheimer Disease in Germany and Israel