Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3/2018

Open Access 01-09-2018 | Symposium: Collective Representation in Healthcare Policy

Patient Representation and Advocacy for Alzheimer Disease in Germany and Israel

Authors: Silke Schicktanz, Nitzan Rimon-Zarfaty, Aviad Raz, Karin Jongsma

Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

This paper analyses self-declared aims and representation of dementia patient organizations and advocacy groups (POs) in relation to two recent upheavals: the critique of social stigmatization and biomedical research focusing on prediction. Based on twenty-six semi-structured interviews conducted in 2016–2017 with members, service recipients, and board representatives of POs in Germany and Israel, a comparative analysis was conducted, based on a grounded theory approach, to detect emerging topics within and across the POs and across national contexts. We identified a heterogeneous landscape, with the only Israeli PO focusing strongly on caretakers, whereas in Germany several POs claim to represent this patient collective. Shared aims of all POs were fighting social stigma, balancing the loss of patients’ individual autonomy, and the well-being of caretakers. By highlighting the emergence of new groups of dementia self-advocacy against the more traditional advocacy by others, this study highlights how advocacy and representation in the context of AD are embedded in the discursive context of stigmatization and revised disease conception. Future developments in early diagnosis and prediction of dementia, with more affected people likely to conduct dementia self-advocacy, might challenge existing representation structures even more.
Literature
go back to reference Beard, R.L. 2004. Advocating voice: Organisational, historical and social milieux of the Alzheimer’s disease movement. Sociology of Health and Illness 26(6): 797–819. Beard, R.L. 2004. Advocating voice: Organisational, historical and social milieux of the Alzheimer’s disease movement. Sociology of Health and Illness 26(6): 797–819.
go back to reference Chamak, B. 2008. Autism and social movements: French parents’ associations and international autistic individuals’ organisations. Sociology of Health & Illness 30(1): 76–96. Chamak, B. 2008. Autism and social movements: French parents’ associations and international autistic individuals’ organisations. Sociology of Health & Illness 30(1): 76–96.
go back to reference Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology 13(1): 1–21. Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology 13(1): 1–21.
go back to reference Dent, M. 2006. Patient choice and medicine in health care: Responsibilisation, governance and proto-professionalisation. Public Management Review 8(3): 449–462. Dent, M. 2006. Patient choice and medicine in health care: Responsibilisation, governance and proto-professionalisation. Public Management Review 8(3): 449–462.
go back to reference Denzin, N.K., and Y.S. Lincoln. 1994. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Denzin, N.K., and Y.S. Lincoln. 1994. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Dubois, B., H. Hampel, H.H. Feldman, et al. 2016. Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: Definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria. Alzheimers Dementia 12(3): 292–323. Dubois, B., H. Hampel, H.H. Feldman, et al. 2016. Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: Definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria. Alzheimers Dementia 12(3): 292–323.
go back to reference Elster, J. 1998. Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Elster, J. 1998. Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Epstein, S. 1998. Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press. Epstein, S. 1998. Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
go back to reference Gilad, D., and A. Rimmerman. 2014. The mission and development processes of the disability movement in Israel and the United States: A comparison. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 24(4): 227–237. Gilad, D., and A. Rimmerman. 2014. The mission and development processes of the disability movement in Israel and the United States: A comparison. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 24(4): 227–237.
go back to reference Gilmour, J.A., and T. Brannelly. 2010. Representation of people with dementia—subaltern, person, citizen. Nursing Inquiry 17(3): 240–247. Gilmour, J.A., and T. Brannelly. 2010. Representation of people with dementia—subaltern, person, citizen. Nursing Inquiry 17(3): 240–247.
go back to reference Golander, H., and A.E. Raz. 2000. The mask of dementia: Images of ‘demented residents’ in a nursing ward. In Aging and everyday life, edited by J. Gubrium and J. Holstein, 357–369. Oxford: Blackwell. Golander, H., and A.E. Raz. 2000. The mask of dementia: Images of ‘demented residents’ in a nursing ward. In Aging and everyday life, edited by J. Gubrium and J. Holstein, 357–369. Oxford: Blackwell.
go back to reference Hazan, H. 2014. Against hybridity. Social impasses in a globalizing world. Cambridge: Polity Press. Hazan, H. 2014. Against hybridity. Social impasses in a globalizing world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
go back to reference Heyer, K.C. 2002. The ADA on the road: Disability rights in Germany. Law & Social Inquiry 27(2): 723–762. Heyer, K.C. 2002. The ADA on the road: Disability rights in Germany. Law & Social Inquiry 27(2): 723–762.
go back to reference Le Couteur, D.G., J. Doust, H. Creasey, and C. Brayne. 2013. Political drive to screen for pre-dementia: Not evidence based and ignores the harms of diagnosis. British Medical Journal (Online) 347(7925). Le Couteur, D.G., J. Doust, H. Creasey, and C. Brayne. 2013. Political drive to screen for pre-dementia: Not evidence based and ignores the harms of diagnosis. British Medical Journal (Online) 347(7925).
go back to reference Lock, M. 2013. The Alzheimer conundrum: Entanglements of dementia and aging. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Lock, M. 2013. The Alzheimer conundrum: Entanglements of dementia and aging. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Mor, S. 2009. Disability rights in Israel: Between socio-political and legal recognition. In Access to justice and social rights, edited by J. Gal and M. Eisenstadt, 80–130. Jerusalem: Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel. Mor, S. 2009. Disability rights in Israel: Between socio-political and legal recognition. In Access to justice and social rights, edited by J. Gal and M. Eisenstadt, 80–130. Jerusalem: Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel.
go back to reference Moreira, T., O. O’Donavan, and E. Howlett. 2014. Assembling dementia care: Patient organisations and social research. BioSocieties 9(2): 173–193. Moreira, T., O. O’Donavan, and E. Howlett. 2014. Assembling dementia care: Patient organisations and social research. BioSocieties 9(2): 173–193.
go back to reference O’Donovan, O., T. Moreira, and E. Howlett. 2013. Tracking transformations in health movement organisations: Alzheimer’s disease organisations and their changing “cause regimes”. Social Movement Studies 12(3): 316–334. O’Donovan, O., T. Moreira, and E. Howlett. 2013. Tracking transformations in health movement organisations: Alzheimer’s disease organisations and their changing “cause regimes”. Social Movement Studies 12(3): 316–334.
go back to reference Rabeharisoa, V., T. Moreira, and M. Akrich. 2014. Evidence-based activism: Patients’, users’ and activists’ groups in knowledge society. BioSocieties 9(2): 111–128. Rabeharisoa, V., T. Moreira, and M. Akrich. 2014. Evidence-based activism: Patients’, users’ and activists’ groups in knowledge society. BioSocieties 9(2): 111–128.
go back to reference Raz, A., K.R. Jongsma, N. Rimon-Zarfaty, E. Späth, B. Bar-Nadav, E. Vaintropov, and S. Schicktanz. 2018. Representing autism: Challenges of collective representation in German and Israeli associations for and of autistic people. Social Science & Medicine 200: 65–72. Raz, A., K.R. Jongsma, N. Rimon-Zarfaty, E. Späth, B. Bar-Nadav, E. Vaintropov, and S. Schicktanz. 2018. Representing autism: Challenges of collective representation in German and Israeli associations for and of autistic people. Social Science & Medicine 200: 65–72.
go back to reference Raz, A., and S. Schicktanz. 2016. Comparative empirical bioethics: Dilemmas of genetic testing and euthanasia in Israel and Germany. Heidelberg: Springer. Raz, A., and S. Schicktanz. 2016. Comparative empirical bioethics: Dilemmas of genetic testing and euthanasia in Israel and Germany. Heidelberg: Springer.
go back to reference Raz, A., and S. Schicktanz. 2009. Diversity and uniformity in genetic responsibility: Moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people in Germany and Israel. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12(4): 433–442. Raz, A., and S. Schicktanz. 2009. Diversity and uniformity in genetic responsibility: Moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people in Germany and Israel. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12(4): 433–442.
go back to reference Schicktanz, S. 2017: The visionary shaping of dementia research: Imaginations and scenarios. in biopolitical narratives and ethical reflections. In Planning later life—Bioethics and public health in ageing societies, edited by M. Schweda, L. Pfaller, K. Brauer, F. Adloff, and S. Schicktanz, 205–227. Abingdon: Routledge. Schicktanz, S. 2017: The visionary shaping of dementia research: Imaginations and scenarios. in biopolitical narratives and ethical reflections. In Planning later life—Bioethics and public health in ageing societies, edited by M. Schweda, L. Pfaller, K. Brauer, F. Adloff, and S. Schicktanz, 205–227. Abingdon: Routledge.
go back to reference Schicktanz, S., and I. Jordan. 2013. Kollektive patientenautonomie. Theorie und praxis eines neuen bioethischen konzepts. In Patientenautonomie. Theoretische grundlagen—Praktische anwendungen, edited by C. Wiesemann and A. Simon, 287–302. Münster: Mentis. Schicktanz, S., and I. Jordan. 2013. Kollektive patientenautonomie. Theorie und praxis eines neuen bioethischen konzepts. In Patientenautonomie. Theoretische grundlagen—Praktische anwendungen, edited by C. Wiesemann and A. Simon, 287–302. Münster: Mentis.
go back to reference Schicktanz, S., A. Raz, and C. Shalev. 2010. The cultural context of end-of-life ethics: A comparison of Germany and Israel. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19(3): 381–394. Schicktanz, S., A. Raz, and C. Shalev. 2010. The cultural context of end-of-life ethics: A comparison of Germany and Israel. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19(3): 381–394.
go back to reference Shalev, C., and Y. Hashiloni-Dolev. 2011. Bioethics governance in Israel: An expert regime. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 8(3): 157–160. Shalev, C., and Y. Hashiloni-Dolev. 2011. Bioethics governance in Israel: An expert regime. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 8(3): 157–160.
go back to reference Swinnen, A., and M. Schweda, eds. 2015. Popularizing dementia. Public expressions and representations of forgetfulness. Bielefeld: Transcript. Swinnen, A., and M. Schweda, eds. 2015. Popularizing dementia. Public expressions and representations of forgetfulness. Bielefeld: Transcript.
go back to reference Werner, P., S. Mittelman, D. Goldstein, and J. Heinik. 2012. Family stigma and caregiver burden in Alzheimer disease. Gerontologist 52(1): 89–97. Werner, P., S. Mittelman, D. Goldstein, and J. Heinik. 2012. Family stigma and caregiver burden in Alzheimer disease. Gerontologist 52(1): 89–97.
go back to reference Williams, M. 1998. Voice, trust, and memory: Marginalized groups and the failings of liberal representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press Williams, M. 1998. Voice, trust, and memory: Marginalized groups and the failings of liberal representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press
go back to reference Williams M. 2014. Introduction—On the use and abuse of recognition in politics. In Recognition versus self-determination—Dilemmas of emancipatory politics, edited by A. Eisenberg, J. Webber, G. Coulthard, and A. Boisselle, 3–20. Toronto: UBC Press. Williams M. 2014. Introduction—On the use and abuse of recognition in politics. In Recognition versus self-determination—Dilemmas of emancipatory politics, edited by A. Eisenberg, J. Webber, G. Coulthard, and A. Boisselle, 3–20. Toronto: UBC Press.
Metadata
Title
Patient Representation and Advocacy for Alzheimer Disease in Germany and Israel
Authors
Silke Schicktanz
Nitzan Rimon-Zarfaty
Aviad Raz
Karin Jongsma
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Electronic ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9871-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3/2018 Go to the issue

Symposium: Collective Representation in Healthcare Policy

One For All, All For One? Collective Representation in Healthcare Policy