Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2021

01-07-2021 | Proton Pump Inhibitors | Review Paper

Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies

Authors: Claudia C. Orelio, PhD MSc, Pauline Heus, PhD MSc, Judith J Kroese-van Dieren, MSc, René Spijker, MSc, Barbara C. van Munster, PhD MD, Lotty Hooft, PhD MSc

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 7/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A large proportion of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions, including those for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP), are inappropriate. Our study purpose was to systematically review the effectiveness of de-implementation strategies aimed at reducing inappropriate PPI use for SUP in hospitalized, non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) patients.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases (from inception to January 2020). Two authors independently screened references, performed data extraction, and critical appraisal. Randomized trials and comparative observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Criteria developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group were used for critical appraisal. Besides the primary outcome (inappropriate PPI prescription or use), secondary outcomes included (adverse) pharmaceutical effects and healthcare use.

Results

We included ten studies in this review. Most de-implementation strategies contained an educational component (meetings and/or materials), combined with either clinical guideline implementation (n = 5), audit feedback (n = 3), organizational culture (n = 4), or reminders (n = 1). One study evaluating the de-implementation strategy effectiveness showed a significant reduction (RR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03–0.55) of new inappropriate PPI prescriptions. Out of five studies evaluating the effectiveness of de-implementing inappropriate PPI use, four found a significant reduction (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.18–0.26 to RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.68–0.86). No significant differences in the occurrence of pharmaceutical effects (n = 1) and in length of stay (n = 3) were observed. Adverse pharmaceutical effects were reported in two studies and five studies reported on PPI or total drug costs. No pooled effect estimates were calculated because of large statistical heterogeneity between studies.

Discussion

All identified studies reported mainly educational interventions in combination with one or multiple other intervention strategies and all interventions were targeted at providers. Most studies found a small to moderate reduction of (inappropriate) PPI prescriptions or use.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
14.
go back to reference Farrell B, Pottie K, Thompson W, Boghossian T, Pizzola L, Rashid FJ, et al. Deprescribing proton pump inhibitors: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Can Fam Physician. 2017;63(5):354-64.PubMedPubMedCentral Farrell B, Pottie K, Thompson W, Boghossian T, Pizzola L, Rashid FJ, et al. Deprescribing proton pump inhibitors: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Can Fam Physician. 2017;63(5):354-64.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
26.
go back to reference Oxman A, Thomson M, Davis D, Haynes R. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;153(10):1423-31. Oxman A, Thomson M, Davis D, Haynes R. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;153(10):1423-31.
28.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, group tP. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med. 2009;3(2):123-30. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, group tP. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med. 2009;3(2):123-30.
29.
go back to reference Higgins J. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. version 6.0. 6 ed. Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, et al., editors: Cochrane 2019. Higgins J. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. version 6.0. 6 ed. Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, et al., editors: Cochrane 2019.
32.
go back to reference Jain G, Jabeen S, Vallurupalli S. Efforts to Reduce Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Use in Non-Critically Ill Hospitalized Patients by Internal Medicine Residents: A Single-Institution Experience. JCOM. 2013;20(1):13-9. Jain G, Jabeen S, Vallurupalli S. Efforts to Reduce Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Use in Non-Critically Ill Hospitalized Patients by Internal Medicine Residents: A Single-Institution Experience. JCOM. 2013;20(1):13-9.
38.
go back to reference Kehr H, CL G, Haynes R, S E, BH M. Evaluation of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in a Family Medicine Residency Inpatient Service. JCOM. 2011;18(3):102-6. Kehr H, CL G, Haynes R, S E, BH M. Evaluation of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in a Family Medicine Residency Inpatient Service. JCOM. 2011;18(3):102-6.
41.
go back to reference Krag M, Marker S, Perner A, Wetterslev J, Wise MP, Schefold JC, et al. Pantoprazole in Patients at Risk for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the ICU. New Eng J Med. 2018;379:2199-208.CrossRef Krag M, Marker S, Perner A, Wetterslev J, Wise MP, Schefold JC, et al. Pantoprazole in Patients at Risk for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the ICU. New Eng J Med. 2018;379:2199-208.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies
Authors
Claudia C. Orelio, PhD MSc
Pauline Heus, PhD MSc
Judith J Kroese-van Dieren, MSc
René Spijker, MSc
Barbara C. van Munster, PhD MD
Lotty Hooft, PhD MSc
Publication date
01-07-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06425-6

Other articles of this Issue 7/2021

Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2021 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.