Published in:
01-08-2020 | Original Research
Supply and Demand: Association Between Non-English Language–Speaking First Year Resident Physicians and Areas of Need in the USA
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 8/2020
Login to get accessAbstract
Background
Over 25 million US inhabitants are limited English proficient (LEP). It is unknown whether physicians fluent in non-English languages are training in geographic areas with the highest proportion of LEP people. Diversity of language ability in the physician workforce is an important complement to language assistance services for providing quality care to LEP patients.
Objective
To determine whether non-English language–speaking resident physicians matched in the geographic areas where language skills are needed.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Participants
Postgraduate medical training applicants to the Association of American Medical College’s Electronic Residency Application Service in 2013–2014 (n = 50,766). We included data from the Graduate Medical Education Track database, mapped against American Community Survey data.
Interventions
N/A.
Main Measures
We assessed the geographic alignment of non-English language–speaking resident physicians relative to the distribution of the LEP-speaking population.
Key Results
While 37% of resident physicians spoke at least one non-English language, in most cases the languages they spoke were not those in greatest need by the US LEP population. LEP speakers’ potential exposure to non-English language–speaking residents varied. For Spanish, the language with the lowest national resident physician to Spanish LEP patient ratio, the ratio was most favorable in New York at 23.7/100,000 LEP population versus 5.1 in Los Angeles. For Tagalog, the group with the highest geographic mismatch, the ratio was 70.4 in New York but 0 in San Diego, San Jose, and Seattle. Among the top five LEP languages in the USA, Chinese-speaking resident physicians were the most geographically matched.
Conclusions
We found considerable misalignment of the geographic distribution of non-English language–speaking resident physicians relative to the distribution of the LEP-speaking population. Residency programs in areas of high need could consider better matching the non-English language needs of their community with the language abilities of the resident physicians they are recruiting.