Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Original Research

Predicting Mortality and Adverse Outcomes: Comparing the Frailty Index to General Prognostic Indices

Authors: Sandra M. Shi, MD, Ellen P. McCarthy, PhD, Susan L. Mitchell, MD, Dae Hyun Kim, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mortality prediction models are useful to guide clinical decision-making based on prognosis. The frailty index, which allows prognostication and personalized care planning, has not been directly compared with validated prognostic models.

Objective

To compare the discrimination of mortality, disability, falls, and hospitalization between a frailty index and validated prognostic indices.

Design

Secondary Analysis of the National Health and Aging Trends Study.

Participants

Seven thousand thirty-three Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older.

Measurements

We measured a deficit-accumulation frailty index, Schonberg index, and Lee index at the 2011 baseline assessment. Primary outcome was mortality at 5 years. Secondary outcomes were decline in activities of daily living (ADL), decline in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), fall, and hospitalization at 1 year. We used C-statistics to compare discrimination between indices, adjusting for age and sex.

Results

The study population included 4146 (44.8%) with age ≥ 75 years, with a median frailty index of 0.15 (interquartile range 0.09–0.25). A total of 1385 participants died (14.7%) and 2386 (35.2%) were lost to follow-up. Frailty, Schonberg, and Lee indices predicted mortality similarly: C-statistics (95% confidence interval) were 0.78 (0.77–0.80) for frailty index; 0.79 (0.78–0.81) for Schonberg index; and 0.78 (0.77–0.80) for Lee index. The frailty index had higher C-statistics for decline in ADL function (frailty index, 0.80 [0.78–0.83]; Schonberg, 0.74 [0.72–0.76]; Lee, 0.74 [0.71–0.77]) and falls (frailty index, 0.66 [0.65–0.68]; Schonberg, 0.61 [0.58–0.63]; Lee, 0.61 [0.59–0.63]). C-statistics were similar for decline in IADL function (frailty index, 0.61 [0.59–0.63]; Schonberg, 0.60 [0.59–0.62]; Lee, 0.60 [0.58–0.62]) and hospitalizations (frailty index, 0.68 [0.66–0.70]; Schonberg, 0.68 [0.66–0.69]; Lee, 0.65 [0.63–0.67]).

Conclusions

A deficit-accumulation frailty index performs as well as prognostic indices for mortality prediction, and better predicts ADL disability and falls in community-dwelling older adults. Frailty assessment offers a unifying approach to risk stratification for key health outcomes relevant to older adults.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
9.
go back to reference Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits . J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci . 2007;62(7):722–727CrossRef Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits . J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci . 2007;62(7):722–727CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kasper JD, Freedman VA. National Health and Aging Trends Study ( NHATS ) User Guide: Rounds 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 Beta Release. 2016. www.NHATS.org. Kasper JD, Freedman VA. National Health and Aging Trends Study ( NHATS ) User Guide: Rounds 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 Beta Release. 2016. www.​NHATS.​org.
17.
go back to reference Montaquila J, Freedman V, Edwards B, Kasper J. National Health and Aging Trends Study Round 1 Sample Design and Selection. NHATS Technical Paper #1. 2012:1–8. Available at www.NHATS.org. Montaquila J, Freedman V, Edwards B, Kasper J. National Health and Aging Trends Study Round 1 Sample Design and Selection. NHATS Technical Paper #1. 2012:1–8. Available at www.​NHATS.​org.
21.
go back to reference Newson RB. Comparing the predictive powers of survival models using Harrell’s C or Somers’ D. Stata J 2010;10(3):339–358.CrossRef Newson RB. Comparing the predictive powers of survival models using Harrell’s C or Somers’ D. Stata J 2010;10(3):339–358.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Yourman L, Lee SJ, Schonberg MA, Widera E, Smith AK. Prognostic Indices for Older Adults A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2012;307(2):182–192.CrossRef Yourman L, Lee SJ, Schonberg MA, Widera E, Smith AK. Prognostic Indices for Older Adults A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2012;307(2):182–192.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predicting Mortality and Adverse Outcomes: Comparing the Frailty Index to General Prognostic Indices
Authors
Sandra M. Shi, MD
Ellen P. McCarthy, PhD
Susan L. Mitchell, MD
Dae Hyun Kim, MD
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05700-w

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2020 Go to the issue